|
1
|
Wright L. Comparison of two sociometric devices for measuring personality integration. Psychol Rep 1971; 29:1035-9. [PMID: 4945144 DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1971.29.3f.1035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
A comparison was made of two sociometric measures of personality integration. Contrary to prediction, the more brief, 6-item PIRT scale was significantly more reliable ( r11 = .84) than the lengthier 30-item ESD scale ( r11 = .74). Also contrary to prediction, neither test was more highly correlated than the other (and therefore more valid) with any of 8 construct-validity measures. It was concluded that the PIRT was the more functional measure and therefore recommended for use in future personality integration research. Earlier results concerning the relationship of personality integration to self-concept and environmental contact, as well as locus of control and locus of evaluation in college-age females, were replicated.
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Fracchia J, Sheppard C, Merlis M, Merlis S. Atypical reasoning errors in sociopathic, paranoid, and schizophrenic personality types. THE JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 1970; 76:91-5. [PMID: 4394097 DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1970.9916825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
|
|
3
|
Fracchia JF, Fiorentino D, Sheppard C, Merlis S. A Comparison of Techniques for the Scoring of Avoidable Errors on the Raven Progressive Matrices. THE JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 1969. [DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1969.10543841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|