Preliminary investigation of associations of illness schemata and treatment-induced reduction in headaches

Illness perception in patients with migraine: An exploratory study in a tertiary care headache centre

BACKGROUND

Illness perception is significantly related to several outcome measures in different medical conditions. However, little is known about headache-related causal attributions and cognitive and emotional representations in patients with migraine.

OBJECTIVE

To examine perceived causes of headache and demographic, clinical, and psychological correlates and predictors of illness perception in patients with migraine attending a tertiary care headache centre.

METHODS

A sample of 143 patients with migraine (85.3% women, mean age 44.0 ± 12.1 years) completed the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ), the Symptom Questionnaire (SQ), and the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire. A set of demographic and clinical characteristics was also collected.

RESULTS

Stress, heredity, and nervousness were the most frequent perceived causes of headache. Female gender was significantly related to higher Brief IPQ "consequences" and "emotional response" scores. Increased psychological distress and a poorer clinical course were significantly associated with more negative illness representations. In multiple regression analysis, a longer illness duration, increased depressive symptoms, and higher levels of headache-related disability and painfulness of headache attacks independently predicted a worse illness perception.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with migraine, depressive symptoms and a worse disease status, characterized by a longer history of suffering, higher disability and more painful headache attacks, may negatively affect illness perception. It could also be that dysfunctional illness representations lead to depressive symptoms and decrease patients' motivation to adhere to treatments, resulting in a worse outcome. Future studies should examine whether the improvement of illness perception through specific psychological interventions may promote a better adaptation to migraine.

The GRIM2005 study of migraine consultation in France II. Psychological factors associated with treatment response to acute headache therapy and satisfaction in migraine

The objective of this analysis was to identify variables associated with treatment response in subjects with migraine. Data were collected from a sample of 10,000 subjects. A battery of questionnaires assessing clinical and psychological variables was completed. Migraine diagnosis was attributed using an algorithm based on the IHS criteria and treatment response using the ANAES criteria. We identified 1534 subjects, of whom 1443 were treated. For 54.2%, at least one ANAES criterion for treatment response was unfulfilled. Non-response was associated with female gender, high HIT-6 impact scores and high HAD psychological distress scores. The strongest associations with non-response were identified for four psychological variables: elevated scores on the CSQ catastrophization subscale and the 'Consequences' and 'Acceptance' dimensions of the Brief COPE, and low scores on the 'Positive Reinterpretation' Brief COPE dimension. In conclusion, many individuals with migraine respond inadequately to treatment. Behavioural interventions aimed at modifying coping strategies may improve outcome.

Managing physical symptoms: the clinical assessment as treatment

Physical symptoms are a common cause of attendance at general hospital out-patient clinics. There is good evidence that cognitive therapy is effective in the management of such physical symptoms. This narrative review suggests that the assessment itself, without formal psychological therapy, may be used as a treatment, regardless of whether relevant pathology is absent or present. Changing patients' beliefs about their symptoms may improve a broad range of outcomes, including symptoms, disability, distress, and health-care resource use. The evidence for investigations as treatment is reviewed, along with potential for further development and possible pitfalls. A rationale is presented for a brief psychoeducational intervention that can be delivered in the clinic. This would be a logical extension of the kind of simple explanation and reassurance that occurs routinely today, but which is not explicitly used as, or regarded as, treatment. The dearth of relevant evidence is emphasized, and recommendations are made for future research.