Modification of the Standard 7-Day Ovsynch Protocol to Increase the Luteolytic and Synchronization Risks in Dairy Cows

Efficiency of Two Protocols of Resynchronization of Estrus and Ovulation in High-Producing Dairy Cows at Peak Lactation

The reproductive efficiency of the cows was monitored after two resynchronization protocols: Ovsynch (OVS) and Double Ovsynch (DOS). The research initially included 70 HF cows who entered the first synchronization protocol – Presynch. Cows that did not conceive after the first synchronization were divided into two groups and introduced to two resynchronization protocols. In the first group of cows (n=35), the DOS protocol began with the application of GnRH on day 22 after the Presynch TAI (Timed Artificial Insemination), and seven days later pregnancy check-up was done and PGF2α was applied only to non-pregnant cows (n=23), which remained in the study. In the second group of cows, the OVS protocol started on day 32 after Presynch TAI only in non-pregnant animals (n=20). Progesterone (P4) concentration was determined at the time of application of GnRH1, PGF2α and GnRH2 in both groups of cows, and then 30 days after Resynch TAI, ultrasound pregnancy diagnosis was done. A higher percentage of pregnant cows were recorded in the OVS group compared to the DOS group (45% and 35%, respectively). The concentration of P4 in the serum of cows in the DOS group during the first measurement (GnRH1) was significantly higher than the value in cows that did not conceive (p<0.05), while in the third measurement (GnRH2) the average concentration of P4 in conceiving cows was significantly lower (p<0.001) compared to cows that did not coincive. The open days period was significantly longer in pregnant cows that were resynchronized using the DOS protocol compared to cows from the OVS protocol. In conclusion, the OVS protocol of estrus resynchronization in dairy cows proved to be more successful than the DOS protocol. However, considering the advantages the OVS, it is needed to determine which day of the sexual cycle is the best to start resynchronization.

Luteolysis, progesterone, and pregnancy per insemination after modifying the standard 7-day Ovsynch program in Holstein-Friesian and Holstein cows

Two experiments were conducted with Holstein-Friesian cows in the Republic of North Macedonia and with Holstein cows in Kansas. We hypothesized that 1 dose of PGF_2α administered on d 8 (Ov-8×1) instead of d 7 (Ov-7×1) in an Ovsynch program [GnRH-1 (d 0)-7 d-PGF_2α-56 h-GnRH-2-16 h-timed artificial insemination (AI)] would increase the proportion of cows with complete luteolysis compared with controls receiving a single dose on d 7. Cows were treated with Ov-7×1 or with Ov-8×1 in experiment 1 (n = 347), using only a single dose of PGF_2α. In experiment 2 (n = 452), a third treatment was added (Ov-7×2), in which a second dose of PGF_2α was administered on d 8. Progesterone was measured in blood samples collected before the first or only PGF_2α administration and 72 h later before insemination. Complete luteolysis was defined as having occurred when progesterone was ≥1 ng/mL before PGF_2α and ≤0.3 ng/mL 72 h later (time of AI). Follicles and luteal structures were mapped before GnRH-1 and PGF_2α administrations. The results of experiment 1 demonstrated a greater percentage of multiparous cows in OV-8×1 having complete luteal regression compared with multiparous Ov-7×1 cows, whereas treatments were equally effective in primiparous cows, as reflected in the concentrations of progesterone before AI. Furthermore, pregnancy per AI did not differ between treatments. Results in experiment 2 revealed that 99.3% of cows in the Ov-7×2 treatment receiving the second dose of PGF_2α had complete luteolysis, regardless of parity, compared with significantly fewer cows in the Ov-7×1 and Ov-8×1 treatments (91.2 and 90.6%, respectively). Neither concentrations of progesterone, which averaged <0.4 ng/mL at AI, nor pregnancy per AI differed among the 3 treatments. In both experiments, when status of luteal function before PGF_2α treatment was examined [cows with no corpus luteum (CL) before GnRH-1 but which had formed a new CL in response to ovulation after GnRH-1; cows with an older CL (the same CL that was detected before GnRH-1); or cows with both a new and an older CL], treatments did not differ in causing complete luteolysis. Furthermore, complete luteolysis in experiment 2 did not differ regardless of whether cows had 1, 2, or 3 or more CL before PGF_2α administration. Pregnancy per AI did not differ among treatments, indicating that any of the 3 treatments might produce similar pregnancy outcomes with the flexibility of applying either of the 7- or the 8-d treatments.