1
|
Bonazzi N, Fortunati E, Zanoni L, Argalia G, Calabrò D, Tabacchi E, Allegri V, Campana D, Andrini E, Lamberti G, Di Franco M, Casadei R, Ricci C, Mosconi C, Fanti S, Ambrosini V. Real-Life Use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in Confirmed and Suspected NETs from a Prospective 5-Year Electronic Archive at an ENETS Center of Excellence: More Than 2000 Scans in More Than 1500 Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:701. [PMID: 38398092 PMCID: PMC10886517 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The recent introduction of novel treatments for advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and the well-established impact of clinical case discussion within dedicated multidisciplinary teams indicates the need to promote the centralization of rare diseases, such as NENs (neuroendocrine neoplasms). Data on the real-life use of and indications for [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT were collected from a prospective monocentric 5-year electronic archive including consecutive patients with confirmed and suspected NETs (September 2017 to May 2022). Overall, 2082 [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT scans (1685 confirmed NETs, 397 suspected NETs) were performed in 1537 patients. A high positivity rate was observed across different clinical settings (approximately 70%). Approximately 910/2082 scans were requested by the local oncology ward (851 confirmed NETs, 59 suspected NETs). The following observations were found: (i) the detection rate across all indications was 73.2% (higher for staging, peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRRT) selection, and treatment response assessment); (ii) in suspected NETs, PET was more often positive when based on radiological findings. This systematic data collection in a high-volume diagnostic center represents a reliable cohort reflecting the global trends in the use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for different clinical indications and primary tumor sites, but prompts the need for further multicenter data sharing in such a rare and slowly progressive disease setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norma Bonazzi
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (G.A.); (D.C.); (M.D.F.); (S.F.); (V.A.)
| | - Emilia Fortunati
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.F.); (L.Z.); (E.T.); (V.A.)
| | - Lucia Zanoni
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.F.); (L.Z.); (E.T.); (V.A.)
| | - Giulia Argalia
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (G.A.); (D.C.); (M.D.F.); (S.F.); (V.A.)
| | - Diletta Calabrò
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (G.A.); (D.C.); (M.D.F.); (S.F.); (V.A.)
| | - Elena Tabacchi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.F.); (L.Z.); (E.T.); (V.A.)
| | - Vincenzo Allegri
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.F.); (L.Z.); (E.T.); (V.A.)
| | - Davide Campana
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (D.C.); (E.A.); (G.L.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Elisa Andrini
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (D.C.); (E.A.); (G.L.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Lamberti
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (D.C.); (E.A.); (G.L.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Martina Di Franco
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (G.A.); (D.C.); (M.D.F.); (S.F.); (V.A.)
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (R.C.); (C.R.)
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Claudio Ricci
- Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (R.C.); (C.R.)
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Cristina Mosconi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (G.A.); (D.C.); (M.D.F.); (S.F.); (V.A.)
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.F.); (L.Z.); (E.T.); (V.A.)
| | - Valentina Ambrosini
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (G.A.); (D.C.); (M.D.F.); (S.F.); (V.A.)
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (E.F.); (L.Z.); (E.T.); (V.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Trovato P, Simonetti I, Morrone A, Fusco R, Setola SV, Giacobbe G, Brunese MC, Pecchi A, Triggiani S, Pellegrino G, Petralia G, Sica G, Petrillo A, Granata V. Scientific Status Quo of Small Renal Lesions: Diagnostic Assessment and Radiomics. J Clin Med 2024; 13:547. [PMID: 38256682 PMCID: PMC10816509 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Small renal masses (SRMs) are defined as contrast-enhanced renal lesions less than or equal to 4 cm in maximal diameter, which can be compatible with stage T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Currently, 50-61% of all renal tumors are found incidentally. Methods: The characteristics of the lesion influence the choice of the type of management, which include several methods SRM of management, including nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, ablation, observation, and also stereotactic body radiotherapy. Typical imaging methods available for differentiating benign from malignant renal lesions include ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: Although ultrasound is the first imaging technique used to detect small renal lesions, it has several limitations. CT is the main and most widely used imaging technique for SRM characterization. The main advantages of MRI compared to CT are the better contrast resolution and tissue characterization, the use of functional imaging sequences, the possibility of performing the examination in patients allergic to iodine-containing contrast medium, and the absence of exposure to ionizing radiation. For a correct evaluation during imaging follow-up, it is necessary to use a reliable method for the assessment of renal lesions, represented by the Bosniak classification system. This classification was initially developed based on contrast-enhanced CT imaging findings, and the 2019 revision proposed the inclusion of MRI features; however, the latest classification has not yet received widespread validation. Conclusions: The use of radiomics in the evaluation of renal masses is an emerging and increasingly central field with several applications such as characterizing renal masses, distinguishing RCC subtypes, monitoring response to targeted therapeutic agents, and prognosis in a metastatic context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Trovato
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| | - Alessio Morrone
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| | - Giuliana Giacobbe
- General and Emergency Radiology Department, “Antonio Cardarelli” Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Annarita Pecchi
- Department of Radiology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy;
| | - Sonia Triggiani
- Postgraduate School of Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (S.T.); (G.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Pellegrino
- Postgraduate School of Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (S.T.); (G.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giacomo Sica
- Radiology Unit, Monaldi Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Granata V, Fusco R, De Muzio F, Brunese MC, Setola SV, Ottaiano A, Cardone C, Avallone A, Patrone R, Pradella S, Miele V, Tatangelo F, Cutolo C, Maggialetti N, Caruso D, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Radiomics and machine learning analysis by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in colorectal liver metastases prognostic assessment. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023; 128:1310-1332. [PMID: 37697033 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01710-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was the evaluation radiomics analysis efficacy performed using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of colorectal liver metastases patterns linked to patient prognosis: tumor growth front; grade; tumor budding; mucinous type. Moreover, the prediction of liver recurrence was also evaluated. METHODS The retrospective study included an internal and validation dataset; the first was composed by 119 liver metastases from 49 patients while the second consisted to 28 patients with single lesion. Radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics. Univariate and multivariate approaches including machine learning algorithms were employed. RESULTS The best predictor to identify tumor growth was the Wavelet_HLH_glcm_MaximumProbability with an accuracy of 84% and to detect recurrence the best predictor was wavelet_HLH_ngtdm_Complexity with an accuracy of 90%, both extracted by T1-weigthed arterial phase sequence. The best predictor to detect tumor budding was the wavelet_LLH_glcm_Imc1 with an accuracy of 88% and to identify mucinous type was wavelet_LLH_glcm_JointEntropy with an accuracy of 92%, both calculated on T2-weigthed sequence. An increase statistically significant of accuracy (90%) was obtained using a linear weighted combination of 15 predictors extracted by T2-weigthed images to detect tumor front growth. An increase statistically significant of accuracy at 93% was obtained using a linear weighted combination of 11 predictors by the T1-weigthed arterial phase sequence to classify tumor budding. An increase statistically significant of accuracy at 97% was obtained using a linear weighted combination of 16 predictors extracted on CT to detect recurrence. An increase statistically significant of accuracy was obtained in the tumor budding identification considering a K-nearest neighbors and the 11 significant features extracted T1-weigthed arterial phase sequence. CONCLUSIONS The results confirmed the Radiomics capacity to recognize clinical and histopathological prognostic features that should influence the choice of treatments in colorectal liver metastases patients to obtain a more personalized therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
| | | | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ottaiano
- Clinical Experimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Claudia Cardone
- Clinical Experimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Clinical Experimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Renato Patrone
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Silvia Pradella
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
- SIRM Foundation, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
- SIRM Foundation, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabiana Tatangelo
- Division of Pathological Anatomy and Cytopathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084, Salerno, Italy
| | - Nicola Maggialetti
- Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs (DSMBNOS), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Damiano Caruso
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Radiology Unit-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza-University of Rome, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Petrillo A, Fusco R, Barretta ML, Granata V, Mattace Raso M, Porto A, Sorgente E, Fanizzi A, Massafra R, Lafranceschina M, La Forgia D, Trombadori CML, Belli P, Trecate G, Tenconi C, De Santis MC, Greco L, Ferranti FR, De Soccio V, Vidiri A, Botta F, Dominelli V, Cassano E, Boldrini L. Radiomics and artificial intelligence analysis by T2-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to predict Breast Cancer Histological Outcome. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023; 128:1347-1371. [PMID: 37801198 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01718-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of radiomics features obtained by MR images to predict Breast Cancer Histological Outcome. METHODS A total of 217 patients with malignant lesions were analysed underwent MRI examinations. Considering histological findings as the ground truth, four different types of findings were used in both univariate and multivariate analyses: (1) G1 + G2 vs G3 classification; (2) presence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 + vs HER2 -); (3) presence of the hormone receptor (HR + vs HR -); and (4) presence of luminal subtypes of breast cancer. RESULTS The best accuracy for discriminating HER2 + versus HER2 - breast cancers was obtained considering nine predictors by early phase T1-weighted subtraction images and a decision tree (accuracy of 88% on validation set). The best accuracy for discriminating HR + versus HR - breast cancers was obtained considering nine predictors by T2-weighted subtraction images and a decision tree (accuracy of 90% on validation set). The best accuracy for discriminating G1 + G2 versus G3 breast cancers was obtained considering 16 predictors by early phase T1-weighted subtraction images in a linear regression model with an accuracy of 75%. The best accuracy for discriminating luminal versus non-luminal breast cancers was obtained considering 27 predictors by early phase T1-weighted subtraction images and a decision tree (accuracy of 94% on validation set). CONCLUSIONS The combination of radiomics analysis and artificial intelligence techniques could be used to support physician decision-making in prediction of Breast Cancer Histological Outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Barretta
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Mauro Mattace Raso
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Annamaria Porto
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Eugenio Sorgente
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Annarita Fanizzi
- Direzione Scientifica-IRCCS, Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II-Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Raffaella Massafra
- SSD Fisica Sanitaria-IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II-Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Miria Lafranceschina
- Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale di Radiodiagnostica Senologica-IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II-Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Daniele La Forgia
- Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale di Radiodiagnostica Senologica-IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II-Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Belli
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanna Trecate
- Department of Radiodiagnostic and Magnetic Resonance, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Tenconi
- Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Carmen De Santis
- De Santis Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Greco
- Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Istituto di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Romana Ferranti
- Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Istituto di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria De Soccio
- Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Istituto di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonello Vidiri
- Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Istituto di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Botta
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Dominelli
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pavel M, Dromain C, Ronot M, Schaefer N, Mandair D, Gueguen D, Elvira D, Jégou S, Balazard F, Dehaene O, Schutte K. The use of deep learning models to predict progression-free survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Future Oncol 2023; 19:2185-2199. [PMID: 37497644 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-1136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: The RAISE project assessed whether deep learning could improve early progression-free survival (PFS) prediction in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Patients & methods: Deep learning models extracted features from CT scans from patients in CLARINET (NCT00353496) (n = 138/204). A Cox model assessed PFS prediction when combining deep learning with the sum of longest diameter ratio (SLDr) and logarithmically transformed CgA concentration (logCgA), versus SLDr and logCgA alone. Results: Deep learning models extracted features other than lesion shape to predict PFS at week 72. No increase in performance was achieved with deep learning versus SLDr and logCgA models alone. Conclusion: Deep learning models extracted relevant features to predict PFS, but did not improve early prediction based on SLDr and logCgA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Pavel
- Department of Medicine 1, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
De Muzio F, Pellegrino F, Fusco R, Tafuto S, Scaglione M, Ottaiano A, Petrillo A, Izzo F, Granata V. Prognostic Assessment of Gastropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm: Prospects and Limits of Radiomics. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2877. [PMID: 37761243 PMCID: PMC10529975 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13182877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of lesions originating from cells of the diffuse neuroendocrine system. NENs may involve different sites, including the gastrointestinal tract (GEP-NENs). The incidence and prevalence of GEP-NENs has been constantly rising thanks to the increased diagnostic power of imaging and immuno-histochemistry. Despite the plethora of biochemical markers and imaging techniques, the prognosis and therapeutic choice in GEP-NENs still represents a challenge, mainly due to the great heterogeneity in terms of tumor lesions and clinical behavior. The concept that biomedical images contain information about tissue heterogeneity and pathological processes invisible to the human eye is now well established. From this substrate comes the idea of radiomics. Computational analysis has achieved promising results in several oncological settings, and the use of radiomics in different types of GEP-NENs is growing in the field of research, yet with conflicting results. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive update on the role of radiomics on GEP-NEN management, focusing on the main clinical aspects analyzed by most existing reports: predicting tumor grade, distinguishing NET from other tumors, and prognosis assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | | | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Napoli, Italy;
| | - Salvatore Tafuto
- Unit of Sarcomi e Tumori Rari, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Mariano Scaglione
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ottaiano
- Unit for Innovative Therapies of Abdominal Metastastes, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maio F, Pasqualino V, Bertana L, Venturini S, Cantoni V, Fusaro M, Morana G. Pancreatic cancer detection with a non-contrast MR protocol: is it reliable? LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023; 128:1035-1046. [PMID: 37515631 PMCID: PMC10474201 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01680-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The pancreatic cancer (PC) is the 4th leading cancer-related death, becoming the second one by 2030, with a 5 year survival rate of 8%. Considering its increased incidence in high-risk categories compared to the general population, we aimed to validate a non-contrast MR protocol, to detect PC in its earliest phase, which could be suitable as a screening tool in high-risk patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, we selected 200 patients (> 40 years) from our radiological database, which performed upper abdominal MRI between 2012 and 2017. 100 were negative for pancreatic lesions and 100 positive for pancreatic lesion (< 30 mm). The latter group included: 40 PDAC (pancreatic adenocarcinoma), 42 BD-IPMN (Branch Duct- Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm), 10 PNET(pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor), 4 SCN(serous cystic neoplasm), 3 IPS(intrapancreatic spleen), 1 MCN(mucinous cystic neoplasm). Three readers (R1, R2 and R3) with a high, medium and low experience, respectively, analysed, first, the non-contrast MR sequences (single-shot T2w breath-hold, GE T1w FS, DWI and 2D/3D MRCP), and then the standard MR protocol, independently, randomly and anonymously. Readers identified or excluded the presence of pancreatic lesion, in both reading sessions. These results were compared with the histopathological diagnosis, and then divided into 3 different classes of lesions: all lesions, pancreatic adenocarcinoma and solid lesion. Mcnemar's test was used to compare the results. The inter-observer agreement was determined according to the kappa statistic in both protocols, and then the inter-protocol agreement was calculated. RESULTS The non-contrast MR protocol has reached statistical parameters values ranging between 83% in SE (sensitivity) by R3 and 99% in NPV (negative predictive value) by R1. The standard MR protocol has reported slight increasing statistical parameters compared to those of the proposed one. However, there are not significant statistical differences between the both protocols. The proposed non-contrast MR protocol has reported the highest NPVs in the PDAC group detection (R1: 99%, R2: 99%, R3: 98%). In all groups of lesions, the agreement between the two protocols was excellent for each Reader ranging from 96 to 98%. CONCLUSION The proposed non-contrast MR protocol showed high PC detection values and a time execution ≤ 20 min. Therefore, it can be proposed as a screening tool in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Maio
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
- National Cancer Institute IRCCS “Fondazione G. Pascale” Radiology Department, Via Semmola 52, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Pasqualino
- Department of Radiology, Padua University, Via 8 Febbraio 1848, 2, 35122 Padua, Italy
| | - Luca Bertana
- Department of Radiology, General Hospital Ca’ Foncello, Piazzale dell’ Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| | - Silvia Venturini
- Department of Radiology, General Hospital Ca’ Foncello, Piazzale dell’ Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| | - Valeria Cantoni
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Fusaro
- Department of Radiology, General Hospital Ca’ Foncello, Piazzale dell’ Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| | - Giovanni Morana
- Department of Radiology, General Hospital Ca’ Foncello, Piazzale dell’ Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Setola SV, Galdiero R, Maggialetti N, Patrone R, Ottaiano A, Nasti G, Silvestro L, Cassata A, Grassi F, Avallone A, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Colorectal liver metastases patients prognostic assessment: prospects and limits of radiomics and radiogenomics. Infect Agent Cancer 2023; 18:18. [PMID: 36927442 PMCID: PMC10018963 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-023-00495-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
In this narrative review, we reported un up-to-date on the role of radiomics to assess prognostic features, which can impact on the liver metastases patient treatment choice. In the liver metastases patients, the possibility to assess mutational status (RAS or MSI), the tumor growth pattern and the histological subtype (NOS or mucinous) allows a better treatment selection to avoid unnecessary therapies. However, today, the detection of these features require an invasive approach. Recently, radiomics analysis application has improved rapidly, with a consequent growing interest in the oncological field. Radiomics analysis allows the textural characteristics assessment, which are correlated to biological data. This approach is captivating since it should allow to extract biological data from the radiological images, without invasive approach, so that to reduce costs and time, avoiding any risk for the patients. Several studies showed the ability of Radiomics to identify mutational status, tumor growth pattern and histological type in colorectal liver metastases. Although, radiomics analysis in a non-invasive and repeatable way, however features as the poor standardization and generalization of clinical studies results limit the translation of this analysis into clinical practice. Clear limits are data-quality control, reproducibility, repeatability, generalizability of results, and issues related to model overfitting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy.
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, Napoli, Italy.,Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Galdiero
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Maggialetti
- Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs (DSMBNOS), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, 70124, Italy
| | - Renato Patrone
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ottaiano
- Clinical Sperimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, 80131, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Nasti
- Clinical Sperimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, 80131, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Silvestro
- Clinical Sperimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, 80131, Italy
| | - Antonio Cassata
- Clinical Sperimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, 80131, Italy
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Division of Radiology, "Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, 80138, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Clinical Sperimental Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, 80131, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Picone C, Fusco R, Tonerini M, Fanni SC, Neri E, Brunese MC, Grassi R, Danti G, Petrillo A, Scaglione M, Gandolfo N, Giovagnoni A, Barile A, Miele V, Granata C, Granata V. Dose Reduction Strategies for Pregnant Women in Emergency Settings. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12051847. [PMID: 36902633 PMCID: PMC10003653 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12051847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In modern clinical practice, there is an increasing dependence on imaging techniques in several settings, and especially during emergencies. Consequently, there has been an increase in the frequency of imaging examinations and thus also an increased risk of radiation exposure. In this context, a critical phase is a woman's pregnancy management that requires a proper diagnostic assessment to reduce radiation risk to the fetus and mother. The risk is greatest during the first phases of pregnancy at the time of organogenesis. Therefore, the principles of radiation protection should guide the multidisciplinary team. Although diagnostic tools that do not employ ionizing radiation, such as ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be preferred, in several settings as polytrauma, computed tomography (CT) nonetheless remains the examination to perform, beyond the fetus risk. In addition, protocol optimization, using dose-limiting protocols and avoiding multiple acquisitions, is a critical point that makes it possible to reduce risks. The purpose of this review is to provide a critical evaluation of emergency conditions, e.g., abdominal pain and trauma, considering the different diagnostic tools that should be used as study protocols in order to control the dose to the pregnant woman and fetus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmine Picone
- Division of Radiology, “Instituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Michele Tonerini
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Salvatore Claudio Fanni
- Department of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Emanuele Neri
- Department of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Naples, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Division of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, “Instituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Mariano Scaglione
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Gandolfo
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, Corso Scassi 1, 16121 Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Division of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Granata
- Department of Radiology, G. Gaslini Institute, IRCCS, 16147 Genova, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, “Instituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grassi F, Granata V, Fusco R, De Muzio F, Cutolo C, Gabelloni M, Borgheresi A, Danti G, Picone C, Giovagnoni A, Miele V, Gandolfo N, Barile A, Nardone V, Grassi R. Radiation Recall Pneumonitis: The Open Challenge in Differential Diagnosis of Pneumonia Induced by Oncological Treatments. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041442. [PMID: 36835977 PMCID: PMC9964719 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of primary and secondary lung neoplasms now sees the fundamental role of radiotherapy, associated with surgery and systemic therapies. The improvement in survival outcomes has also increased attention to the quality of life, treatment compliance and the management of side effects. The role of imaging is not only limited to recognizing the efficacy of treatment but also to identifying, as soon as possible, the uncommon effects, especially when more treatments, such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy and radiotherapy, are associated. Radiation recall pneumonitis is an uncommon treatment complication that should be correctly characterized, and it is essential to recognize the mechanisms of radiation recall pneumonitis pathogenesis and diagnostic features in order to promptly identify them and adopt the best therapeutic strategy, with the shortest possible withdrawal of the current oncological drug. In this setting, artificial intelligence could have a critical role, although a larger patient data set is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Grassi
- Division of Radiology, Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80015 Naples, Italy
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy
| | - Michela Gabelloni
- Department of Translational Research, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Carmine Picone
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Gandolfo
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, Corso Scassi 1, 16149 Genoa, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Division of Radiology, Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Division of Radiology, Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Granata V, Fusco R, De Muzio F, Cutolo C, Grassi F, Brunese MC, Simonetti I, Catalano O, Gabelloni M, Pradella S, Danti G, Flammia F, Borgheresi A, Agostini A, Bruno F, Palumbo P, Ottaiano A, Izzo F, Giovagnoni A, Barile A, Gandolfo N, Miele V. Risk Assessment and Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence. BIOLOGY 2023; 12:biology12020213. [PMID: 36829492 PMCID: PMC9952965 DOI: 10.3390/biology12020213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver tumor, with a median survival of only 13 months. Surgical resection remains the only curative therapy; however, at first detection, only one-third of patients are at an early enough stage for this approach to be effective, thus rendering early diagnosis as an efficient approach to improving survival. Therefore, the identification of higher-risk patients, whose risk is correlated with genetic and pre-cancerous conditions, and the employment of non-invasive-screening modalities would be appropriate. For several at-risk patients, such as those suffering from primary sclerosing cholangitis or fibropolycystic liver disease, the use of periodic (6-12 months) imaging of the liver by ultrasound (US), magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), or computed tomography (CT) in association with serum CA19-9 measurement has been proposed. For liver cirrhosis patients, it has been proposed that at-risk iCCA patients are monitored in a similar fashion to at-risk HCC patients. The possibility of using Artificial Intelligence models to evaluate higher-risk patients could favor the diagnosis of these entities, although more data are needed to support the practical utility of these applications in the field of screening. For these reasons, it would be appropriate to develop screening programs in the research protocols setting. In fact, the success of these programs reauires patient compliance and multidisciplinary cooperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Orlando Catalano
- Radiology Unit, Istituto Diagnostico Varelli, Via Cornelia dei Gracchi 65, 80126 Naples, Italy
| | - Michela Gabelloni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56216 Pisa, Italy
| | - Silvia Pradella
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Federica Flammia
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ottaiano
- SSD Innovative Therapies for Abdominal Metastases, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80130 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Gandolfo
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, Corso Scassi 1, 16149 Genoa, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Diagnostic Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Technique Optimization and Tips and Tricks for Radiologists. Tomography 2023; 9:217-246. [PMID: 36828370 PMCID: PMC9958666 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9010018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, which derive from cells of the diffuse neuroendocrine system that specializes in producing hormones and neuropeptides and arise in most cases sporadically and, to a lesser extent, in the context of complex genetic syndromes. Furthermore, they are primarily nonfunctioning, while, in the case of insulinomas, gastrinomas, glucagonomas, vipomas, and somatostatinomas, they produce hormones responsible for clinical syndromes. The GEP-NEN tumor grade and cell differentiation may result in different clinical behaviors and prognoses, with grade one (G1) and grade two (G2) neuroendocrine tumors showing a more favorable outcome than grade three (G3) NET and neuroendocrine carcinoma. Two critical issues should be considered in the NEN diagnostic workup: first, the need to identify the presence of the tumor, and, second, to define the primary site and evaluate regional and distant metastases. Indeed, the primary site, stage, grade, and function are prognostic factors that the radiologist should evaluate to guide prognosis and management. The correct diagnostic management of the patient includes a combination of morphological and functional evaluations. Concerning morphological evaluations, according to the consensus guidelines of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS), computed tomography (CT) with a contrast medium is recommended. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), is usually indicated for use to evaluate the liver, pancreas, brain, and bones. Ultrasonography (US) is often helpful in the initial diagnosis of liver metastases, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can solve problems in characterizing the liver, as this tool can guide the biopsy of liver lesions. In addition, intraoperative ultrasound is an effective tool during surgical procedures. Positron emission tomography (PET-CT) with FDG for nonfunctioning lesions and somatostatin analogs for functional lesions are very useful for identifying and evaluating metabolic receptors. The detection of heterogeneity in somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression is also crucial for treatment decision making. In this narrative review, we have described the role of morphological and functional imaging tools in the assessment of GEP-NENs according to current major guidelines.
Collapse
|
13
|
Cutolo C, Fusco R, Simonetti I, De Muzio F, Grassi F, Trovato P, Palumbo P, Bruno F, Maggialetti N, Borgheresi A, Bruno A, Chiti G, Bicci E, Brunese MC, Giovagnoni A, Miele V, Barile A, Izzo F, Granata V. Imaging Features of Main Hepatic Resections: The Radiologist Challenging. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13010134. [PMID: 36675795 PMCID: PMC9862253 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13010134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver resection is still the most effective treatment of primary liver malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and of metastatic disease, such as colorectal liver metastases. The type of liver resection (anatomic versus non anatomic resection) depends on different features, mainly on the type of malignancy (primary liver neoplasm versus metastatic lesion), size of tumor, its relation with blood and biliary vessels, and the volume of future liver remnant (FLT). Imaging plays a critical role in postoperative assessment, offering the possibility to recognize normal postoperative findings and potential complications. Ultrasonography (US) is the first-line diagnostic tool to use in post-surgical phase. However, computed tomography (CT), due to its comprehensive assessment, allows for a more accurate evaluation and more normal findings than the possible postoperative complications. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and/or hepatospecific contrast agents remains the best tool for bile duct injuries diagnosis and for ischemic cholangitis evaluation. Consequently, radiologists should be familiar with the surgical approaches for a better comprehension of normal postoperative findings and of postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Napoli, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy
| | - Piero Trovato
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Maggialetti
- Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs (DSMBNOS), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bruno
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuditta Chiti
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Eleonora Bicci
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Risk Assessment and Pancreatic Cancer: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020351. [PMID: 36672301 PMCID: PMC9857317 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the deadliest cancers, and it is responsible for a number of deaths almost equal to its incidence. The high mortality rate is correlated with several explanations; the main one is the late disease stage at which the majority of patients are diagnosed. Since surgical resection has been recognised as the only curative treatment, a PC diagnosis at the initial stage is believed the main tool to improve survival. Therefore, patient stratification according to familial and genetic risk and the creation of screening protocol by using minimally invasive diagnostic tools would be appropriate. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) are subsets of lesions which deserve special management to avoid overtreatment. The current PC screening programs are based on the annual employment of magnetic resonance imaging with cholangiopancreatography sequences (MR/MRCP) and/or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). For patients unfit for MRI, computed tomography (CT) could be proposed, although CT results in lower detection rates, compared to MRI, for small lesions. The actual major limit is the incapacity to detect and characterize the pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) by EUS and MR/MRCP. The possibility of utilizing artificial intelligence models to evaluate higher-risk patients could favour the diagnosis of these entities, although more data are needed to support the real utility of these applications in the field of screening. For these motives, it would be appropriate to realize screening programs in research settings.
Collapse
|
15
|
Concors SJ, Maxwell JE. Neuroendocrine hepatic metastatic disease: the surgeon's perspective. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (NEW YORK) 2022; 47:4073-4080. [PMID: 35476146 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03515-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors are a rare subset of tumors that are increasing in incidence over the last 4 decades. These tumors occur along the gastrointestinal tract and bronchopulmonary tree and frequently metastasize. Up to 90% of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors develop liver metastases (NeLM) during their clinical course. The development of NeLM and their appropriate management has a profound impact on patient morbidity and mortality. Workup of NeLM involves biopsy to define tumor grade, cross-sectional imaging to delineate the distribution and number of metastases, and hormonal studies to determine tumor functionality. Depending on these three factors, a combination of cytoreductive surgery, liver-directed therapies, and medical management-with cytostatic and cytotoxic chemotherapies, is utilized. The multidisciplinary management of patients with NeLM should carefully consider all these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth J Concors
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jessica E Maxwell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
El Bakouri A, El wassi A, Eddaoudi Y, Bouali M, EL Hattabi K, Bensardi F, Fadil A. Fortuitous discovery of an early neuroendocrine tumor during appendicular peritonitis. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 82:104735. [PMID: 36268349 PMCID: PMC9577830 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Materials and methods Results Conclusion Neuroendocrine tumors of the small bowel are rare but represent the most frequent histological type at this level. Their incidence is increasing thanks to the evolution of diagnostic means. These tumors are most often diagnosed incidentally during the workup of aspecific digestive disorders or during hormonal hypersecretion syndrome or rarely by a complication.
Collapse
|
17
|
Multimodality Imaging Assessment of Desmoid Tumors: The Great Mime in the Era of Multidisciplinary Teams. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12071153. [PMID: 35887650 PMCID: PMC9319486 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Desmoid tumors (DTs), also known as desmoid fibromatosis or aggressive fibromatosis, are rare, locally invasive, non-metastatic soft tissue tumors. Although histological results represent the gold standard diagnosis, imaging represents the fundamental tool for the diagnosis of these tumors. Although histological analysis represents the gold standard for diagnosis, imaging represents the fundamental tool for the diagnosis of these tumors. DTs represent a challenge for the radiologist, being able to mimic different pathological conditions. A proper diagnosis is required to establish an adequate therapeutic approach. Multimodality imaging, including ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), should be preferred. Different imaging techniques can also guide minimally invasive treatments and monitor their effectiveness. The purpose of this review is to describe the state-of-the-art multidisciplinary imaging of DTs; and its role in patient management.
Collapse
|
18
|
Imaging Features of Main Posthepatectomy Complications: A Radiologist’s Challenge. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12061323. [PMID: 35741133 PMCID: PMC9221607 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
In the recent years, the number of liver resections has seen an impressive growth. Usually, hepatic resections remain the treatment of various liver diseases, such as malignant tumors, benign tumors, hydatid disease, and abscesses. Despite technical advancements and tremendous experience in the field of liver resection of specialized centers, there are moderately high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality, especially in high-risk and older patient populations. Although ultrasonography is usually the first-line imaging examination for postoperative complications, Computed Tomography (CT) is the imaging tool of choice in emergency settings due to its capability to assess the whole body in a few seconds and detect all possible complications. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the imaging modality of choice for delineating early postoperative bile duct injuries and ischemic cholangitis that may arise in the late postoperative phase. Moreover, both MDCT and MRCP can precisely detect tumor recurrence. Consequently, radiologists should have knowledge of these surgical procedures for better comprehension of postoperative changes and recognition of the radiological features of various postoperative complications.
Collapse
|
19
|
Granata V, Fusco R, De Muzio F, Cutolo C, Setola SV, Simonetti I, Dell’Aversana F, Grassi F, Bruno F, Belli A, Patrone R, Pilone V, Petrillo A, Izzo F. Complications Risk Assessment and Imaging Findings of Thermal Ablation Treatment in Liver Cancers: What the Radiologist Should Expect. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11102766. [PMID: 35628893 PMCID: PMC9147303 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the major fields of application of ablation treatment is liver tumors. With respect to HCC, ablation treatments are considered as upfront treatments in patients with early-stage disease, while in colorectal liver metastases (CLM), they can be employed as an upfront treatment or in association with surgical resection. The main prognostic feature of ablation is the tumor size, since the goal of the treatment is the necrosis of all viable tumor tissue with an adequate tumor-free margin. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are the most employed ablation techniques. Ablation therapies in HCC and liver metastases have presented a challenge to radiologists, who need to assess response to determine complication-related treatment. Complications, defined as any unexpected variation from a procedural course, and adverse events, defined as any actual or potential injury related to the treatment, could occur either during the procedure or afterwards. To date, RFA and MWA have shown no statistically significant differences in mortality rates or major or minor complications. To reduce the rate of major complications, patient selection and risk assessment are essential. To determine the right cost-benefit ratio for the ablation method to be used, it is necessary to identify patients at high risk of infections, coagulation disorders and previous abdominal surgery interventions. Based on risk assessment, during the procedure as part of surveillance, the radiologists should pay attention to several complications, such as vascular, biliary, mechanical and infectious. Multiphase CT is an imaging tool chosen in emergency settings. The radiologist should report technical success, treatment efficacy, and complications. The complications should be assessed according to well-defined classification systems, and these complications should be categorized consistently according to severity and time of occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.S.); (I.S.); (A.P.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy;
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.C.); (V.P.)
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.S.); (I.S.); (A.P.)
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.S.); (I.S.); (A.P.)
| | - Federica Dell’Aversana
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy; (F.D.); (F.G.)
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy; (F.D.); (F.G.)
| | - Federico Bruno
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Andrea Belli
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.B.); (R.P.); (F.I.)
| | - Renato Patrone
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.B.); (R.P.); (F.I.)
| | - Vincenzo Pilone
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.C.); (V.P.)
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.V.S.); (I.S.); (A.P.)
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.B.); (R.P.); (F.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Belli A, Borzillo V, Palumbo P, Bruno F, Grassi R, Ottaiano A, Nasti G, Pilone V, Petrillo A, Izzo F. Conventional, functional and radiomics assessment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Infect Agent Cancer 2022; 17:13. [PMID: 35346300 PMCID: PMC8961950 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-022-00429-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This paper offers an assessment of diagnostic tools in the evaluation of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods Several electronic datasets were analysed to search papers on morphological and functional evaluation in ICC patients. Papers published in English language has been scheduled from January 2010 to December 2021.
Results We found that 88 clinical studies satisfied our research criteria. Several functional parameters and morphological elements allow a truthful ICC diagnosis. The contrast medium evaluation, during the different phases of contrast studies, support the recognition of several distinctive features of ICC. The imaging tool to employed and the type of contrast medium in magnetic resonance imaging, extracellular or hepatobiliary, should change considering patient, departement, and regional features. Also, Radiomics is an emerging area in the evaluation of ICCs. Post treatment studies are required to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of therapies so as the patient surveillance. Conclusions Several morphological and functional data obtained during Imaging studies allow a truthful ICC diagnosis.
Collapse
|
21
|
Granata V, Grassi R, Fusco R, Belli A, Cutolo C, Pradella S, Grazzini G, La Porta M, Brunese MC, De Muzio F, Ottaiano A, Avallone A, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Diagnostic evaluation and ablation treatments assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma. Infect Agent Cancer 2021; 16:53. [PMID: 34281580 PMCID: PMC8287696 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-021-00393-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This article provides an overview of diagnostic evaluation and ablation treatment assessment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Only studies, in the English language from January 2010 to January 202, evaluating the diagnostic tools and assessment of ablative therapies in HCC patients were included. We found 173 clinical studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria.HCC may be noninvasively diagnosed by imaging findings. Multiphase contrast-enhanced imaging is necessary to assess HCC. Intravenous extracellular contrast agents are used for CT, while the agents used for MRI may be extracellular or hepatobiliary. Both gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine may be used in hepatobiliary phase imaging. For treatment-naive patients undergoing CT, unenhanced imaging is optional; however, it is required in the post treatment setting for CT and all MRI studies. Late arterial phase is strongly preferred over early arterial phase. The choice of modality (CT, US/CEUS or MRI) and MRI contrast agent (extracelllar or hepatobiliary) depends on patient, institutional, and regional factors. MRI allows to link morfological and functional data in the HCC evaluation. Also, Radiomics is an emerging field in the assessment of HCC patients.Postablation imaging is necessary to assess the treatment results, to monitor evolution of the ablated tissue over time, and to evaluate for complications. Post- thermal treatments, imaging should be performed at regularly scheduled intervals to assess treatment response and to evaluate for new lesions and potential complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology SIRM, SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Belli
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Silvia Pradella
- Radiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Grazzini
- Radiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ottaiano
- Abdominal Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Abdominal Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ramos MFKP, Pereira MA, Arabi AYM, Mazepa MM, Dias AR, Ribeiro U, Zilberstein B, Nahas SC. Gastric Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Western Center Case Series. Med Sci (Basel) 2021; 9:47. [PMID: 34201925 PMCID: PMC8293352 DOI: 10.3390/medsci9030047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) represent a rare tumor composed of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma components. This study reports a case series of gastric MiNEN and discusses issues related to its diagnosis, management, and outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with gastric MiNEN who underwent surgical resection at our service from 2009 to 2020. Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma served as a comparison group. Clinical, pathologic, and surgical characteristics were compared. RESULTS During the selected period, 5 gastric MiNEN patients and 597 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were included. Among the clinical variables, age, sex, BMI, and laboratory exams were similar between the two groups. Only ASA classification was different (p = 0.015). Pathological variables such as tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and pTNM staging were also similar between both groups. Lastly, early surgical outcomes and long-term survival did not differ between gastric MiNEN and adenocarcinoma patients. CONCLUSION A MiNEN is a rare tumor that represents less than 1% of GC patients undergoing curative treatment, and demonstrated clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes similar to gastric adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille Ramos
- Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Cancer, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 01246-000, Brazil; (M.A.P.); (A.Y.M.A.); (M.M.M.); (A.R.D.); (U.R.J.); (B.Z.); (S.C.N.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Półtorak-Szymczak G, Budlewski T, Furmanek MI, Wierzba W, Sklinda K, Walecki J, Mruk B. Radiological Imaging of Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. The Review of Current Literature Emphasizing the Diagnostic Value of Chosen Imaging Methods. Front Oncol 2021; 11:670233. [PMID: 34211845 PMCID: PMC8239281 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.670233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite development of radiologic imaging, detection and follow-up of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) still pose a diagnostic challenge, due to the heterogeneity of NEN, their relatively long-term growth, and small size of primary tumor. A set of information obtained by using different radiological imaging tools simplifies a choice of the most appropriate treatment method. Moreover, radiological imaging plays an important role in the assessment of metastatic lesions, especially in the liver, as well as, tumor response to treatment. This article reviews the current, broadly in use imaging modalities which are applied to the diagnosis of GEP-NETs, (the most common type of NENs) and put emphasis on the strengths and limitations of each modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Półtorak-Szymczak
- Department of Radiology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.,Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Budlewski
- Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mariusz Ireneusz Furmanek
- Department of Radiology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.,Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Waldemar Wierzba
- Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.,University of Humanities and Economics, Lodz, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Sklinda
- Department of Radiology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.,Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jerzy Walecki
- Department of Radiology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.,Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Bartosz Mruk
- Department of Radiology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.,Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fernandez CJ, Agarwal M, Pottakkat B, Haroon NN, George AS, Pappachan JM. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A clinical snapshot. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13. [PMID: 33796213 PMCID: PMC7993001 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i3.231&set/a 886074439+803088391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Our understanding about the epidemiological aspects, pathogenesis, molecular diagnosis, and targeted therapies of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have drastically advanced in the past decade. Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NENs originate from the enteroendocrine cells of the embryonic gut which share common endocrine and neural differentiation factors. Most NENs are well-differentiated, and slow growing. Specific neuroendocrine biomarkers that are used in the diagnosis of functional NENs include insulin, glucagon, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, gastrin, somatostatin, adrenocorticotropin, growth hormone releasing hormone, parathyroid hormone-related peptide, serotonin, histamine, and 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid (5-HIAA). Biomarkers such as pancreatic polypeptide, human chorionic gonadotrophin subunits, neurotensin, ghrelin, and calcitonin are used in the diagnosis of non-functional NENs. 5-HIAA levels correlate with tumour burden, prognosis and development of carcinoid heart disease and mesenteric fibrosis, however several diseases, medications and edible products can falsely elevate the 5-HIAA levels. Organ-specific transcription factors are useful in the differential diagnosis of metastasis from an unknown primary of well-differentiated NENs. Emerging novel biomarkers include circulating tumour cells, circulating tumour DNA, circulating micro-RNAs, and neuroendocrine neoplasms test (NETest) (simultaneous measurement of 51 neuroendocrine-specific marker genes in the peripheral blood). NETest has high sensitivity (85%-98%) and specificity (93%-97%) for the detection of gastrointestinal NENs, and is useful for monitoring treatment response, recurrence, and prognosis. In terms of management, surgery, radiofrequency ablation, symptom control with medications, chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapies are all considered as options. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment, but depends on factors including age of the individual, location, stage, grade, functional status, and the heredity of the tumour (sporadic vs inherited). Medical management is helpful to alleviate the symptoms, manage inoperable lesions, suppress postoperative tumour growth, and manage recurrences. Several molecular-targeted therapies are considered second line to somatostatin analogues. This review is a clinical update on the pathophysiological aspects, diagnostic algorithm, and management of GEP NENs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelius J Fernandez
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pilgrim Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Boston PE21 9QS, United Kingdom
| | - Mayuri Agarwal
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pilgrim Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Boston PE21 9QS, United Kingdom
| | - Biju Pottakkat
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry 605006, India
| | - Nisha Nigil Haroon
- Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury P3E 2C6, Ontario, Canada
| | - Annu Susan George
- Department of Medical Oncology, VPS Lakeshore Hospital, Cochin 682040, Kerala, India
| | - Joseph M Pappachan
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, PR2 9HT, Preston, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road M13 9PL, Manchester Metropolitan University, All Saints Building M15 6BH, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fernandez CJ, Agarwal M, Pottakkat B, Haroon NN, George AS, Pappachan JM. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A clinical snapshot. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:231-255. [PMID: 33796213 PMCID: PMC7993001 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i3.231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Our understanding about the epidemiological aspects, pathogenesis, molecular diagnosis, and targeted therapies of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have drastically advanced in the past decade. Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NENs originate from the enteroendocrine cells of the embryonic gut which share common endocrine and neural differentiation factors. Most NENs are well-differentiated, and slow growing. Specific neuroendocrine biomarkers that are used in the diagnosis of functional NENs include insulin, glucagon, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, gastrin, somatostatin, adrenocorticotropin, growth hormone releasing hormone, parathyroid hormone-related peptide, serotonin, histamine, and 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid (5-HIAA). Biomarkers such as pancreatic polypeptide, human chorionic gonadotrophin subunits, neurotensin, ghrelin, and calcitonin are used in the diagnosis of non-functional NENs. 5-HIAA levels correlate with tumour burden, prognosis and development of carcinoid heart disease and mesenteric fibrosis, however several diseases, medications and edible products can falsely elevate the 5-HIAA levels. Organ-specific transcription factors are useful in the differential diagnosis of metastasis from an unknown primary of well-differentiated NENs. Emerging novel biomarkers include circulating tumour cells, circulating tumour DNA, circulating micro-RNAs, and neuroendocrine neoplasms test (NETest) (simultaneous measurement of 51 neuroendocrine-specific marker genes in the peripheral blood). NETest has high sensitivity (85%-98%) and specificity (93%-97%) for the detection of gastrointestinal NENs, and is useful for monitoring treatment response, recurrence, and prognosis. In terms of management, surgery, radiofrequency ablation, symptom control with medications, chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapies are all considered as options. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment, but depends on factors including age of the individual, location, stage, grade, functional status, and the heredity of the tumour (sporadic vs inherited). Medical management is helpful to alleviate the symptoms, manage inoperable lesions, suppress postoperative tumour growth, and manage recurrences. Several molecular-targeted therapies are considered second line to somatostatin analogues. This review is a clinical update on the pathophysiological aspects, diagnostic algorithm, and management of GEP NENs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelius J Fernandez
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pilgrim Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Boston PE21 9QS, United Kingdom
| | - Mayuri Agarwal
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pilgrim Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Boston PE21 9QS, United Kingdom
| | - Biju Pottakkat
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry 605006, India
| | - Nisha Nigil Haroon
- Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury P3E 2C6, Ontario, Canada
| | - Annu Susan George
- Department of Medical Oncology, VPS Lakeshore Hospital, Cochin 682040, Kerala, India
| | - Joseph M Pappachan
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, PR2 9HT, Preston, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road M13 9PL, Manchester Metropolitan University, All Saints Building M15 6BH, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Verde F, Galatola R, Romeo V, Perillo T, Liuzzi R, Camera L, Klain M, Modica R, Faggiano A, Napolitano V, Colao A, Brunetti A, Maurea S. Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: Diagnostic Value of Different MRI Sequences. Neuroendocrinology 2021; 111:696-704. [PMID: 32580192 DOI: 10.1159/000509647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND MRI is a useful imaging modality to assess the presence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), allowing repeat monitoring examinations in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) patients. OBJECTIVES We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI sequences to identify which sequence better depicts the presence of PNETs in MEN-1 patients. METHOD We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive MEN-1 patients who underwent a conventional MRI protocol to monitor previously proven PNETs. MRI sequences T1-w chemical shift (CS), T2-w HASTE, fat-suppressed (FS) T2-w HASTE, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and pre- and post-contrast FS T1-w sequences were independently analyzed by 2 experienced radiologists using a 3-grade score (no lesion, uncertain lesion, and certain lesion); lesion size and signal intensity were recorded. A Friedman ANOVA and a Wilcoxon pairwise test for the post hoc analysis were used. The sensitivity of each sequence was measured, and the results were analyzed with the χ2 test. RESULTS We included 21 patients with a total of 45 PNETs proven by histology, endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration, CT, and nuclear medicine studies. A statistically significant (p < 0.01) difference was observed in the detection performance of each MRI sequence, particularly between DWI (91%) and T2-w FS (85%) sequences in comparison to the others (T1-w CS, T2-w, and pre- and post-contrast FS T1-w, ≤56% for all); no significant (p = 0.5) difference was found between the detection performance of DWI and T2-w FS sequences. No correlation was observed between the qualitative score of each sequence and lesion tumor size. CONCLUSIONS DWI and T2-w FS sequences proved to be the most accurate in the detection of PNETs, thus suggesting a role for an abbreviated MRI protocol without contrast medium administration for monitoring MEN-1 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Verde
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Galatola
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
| | - Valeria Romeo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy,
| | - Teresa Perillo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Liuzzi
- Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging of the National Council of Research (CNR), Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Camera
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Klain
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Modica
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
| | - Antongiulio Faggiano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Napolitano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli,", Naples, Italy
| | - Annamaria Colao
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
| | - Arturo Brunetti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
| | - Simone Maurea
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Granata V, Coppola F, Grassi R, Fusco R, Tafuto S, Izzo F, Reginelli A, Maggialetti N, Buccicardi D, Frittoli B, Rengo M, Bortolotto C, Prost R, Lacasella GV, Montella M, Ciaghi E, Bellifemine F, De Muzio F, Danti G, Grazzini G, De Filippo M, Cappabianca S, Barresi C, Iafrate F, Stoppino LP, Laghi A, Grassi R, Brunese L, Neri E, Miele V, Faggioni L. Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:748944. [PMID: 34917023 PMCID: PMC8670531 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.748944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Structured reporting (SR) in radiology is becoming increasingly necessary and has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured CT-based reports in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms during the staging phase in order to improve communication between the radiologist and members of multidisciplinary teams. MATERIALS AND METHODS A panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. A Modified Delphi process was used to develop the SR and to assess a level of agreement for all report sections. Cronbach's alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. RESULTS The final SR version was built by including n=16 items in the "Patient Clinical Data" section, n=13 items in the "Clinical Evaluation" section, n=8 items in the "Imaging Protocol" section, and n=17 items in the "Report" section. Overall, 54 items were included in the final version of the SR. Both in the first and second round, all sections received more than a good rating: a mean value of 4.7 and range of 4.2-5.0 in the first round and a mean value 4.9 and range of 4.9-5 in the second round. In the first round, the Cα correlation coefficient was a poor 0.57: the overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for the structured report were 4.7 (range 1-5) and 728 (mean value 52.00 and standard deviation 2.83), respectively. In the second round, the Cα correlation coefficient was a good 0.82: the overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for the structured report were 4.9 (range 4-5) and 760 (mean value 54.29 and standard deviation 1.64), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The present SR, based on a multi-round consensus-building Delphi exercise following in-depth discussion between expert radiologists in gastro-enteric and oncological imaging, derived from a multidisciplinary agreement between a radiologist, medical oncologist and surgeon in order to obtain the most appropriate communication tool for referring physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale – IRCCS di Napoli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Coppola
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Tafuto
- Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS ‘Fondazione G. Pascale’, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Department of Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Alfonso Reginelli
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Barbara Frittoli
- Department of Radiology, Ospedali Civili, Hospital of Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Rengo
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome - I.C.O.T. Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Chandra Bortolotto
- Department of Radiology, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto Prost
- Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Giorgia Viola Lacasella
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Montella
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Division of Radiology, “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi”, Florence, Italy
- *Correspondence: Ginevra Danti,
| | - Giulia Grazzini
- Division of Radiology, “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi”, Florence, Italy
| | - Massimo De Filippo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Radiology, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Carmelo Barresi
- Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy
| | - Franco Iafrate
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Laghi
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome-Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Grassi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Emanuele Neri
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiology, “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi”, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Faggioni
- Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Calabrò D, Argalia G, Ambrosini V. Role of PET/CT and Therapy Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:E1059. [PMID: 33297381 PMCID: PMC7762240 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10121059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are heterogeneous neoplasms with neuroendocrine differentiation that show peculiar clinical and histomorphological features, with variable prognosis. In recent years, advances in knowledge regarding the pathophysiology and heterogeneous clinical presentation, as well as the availability of different diagnostic procedures for panNEN diagnosis and novel therapeutic options for patient clinical management, has led to the recognition of the need for an active multidisciplinary discussion for optimal patient care. Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become indispensable for the management of panNENs. Several PET radiopharmaceuticals can be used to characterize either panNEN receptor expression or metabolism. The aim of this review is to offer an overview of all the currently used radiopharmaceuticals and of the new upcoming tracers for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), and their clinical impact on therapy management. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET/CT (SSA-PET/CT) has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy and is recommended for the staging and restaging of any non-insulinoma well-differentiated panNEN cases to carry out detection of unknown primary tumor sites or early relapse and for evaluation of in vivo somatostatin receptors expression (SRE) to select patient candidates for peptide receptor radiometabolic treatment (PRRT) with 90Y or 177Lu and/or cold analogs. SSA-PET/CT also has a strong impact on clinical management, leading to a change in treatment in approximately a third of the cases. Its role for treatment response assessment is still under debate due to the lack of standardized criteria, even though some semiquantitative parameters seem to be able to predict response. [18F]FDG PET/CT generally shows low sensitivity in small growing and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET; G1 and G2), while it is of utmost importance in the evaluation and management of high-grade NENs and also provides important prognostic information. When positive, [18F]FDG PET/CT impacts therapeutical management, indicating the need for a more aggressive treatment regime. Although FDG positivity does not exclude the patient from PRRT, several studies have demonstrated that it is certainly useful to predict response, even in this setting. The role of [18F]FDOPA for the study of panNET is limited by physiological uptake in the pancreas and is therefore not recommended. Moreover, it provides no information on SRE that has crucial clinical management relevance. Early acquisition of the abdomen and premedication with carbidopa may be useful to increase the accuracy, but further studies are needed to clarify its utility. GLP-1R agonists, such as exendin-4, are particularly useful for benign insulinoma detection, but their accuracy decreases in the case of malignant insulinomas. Being a whole-body imaging technique, exendin-PET/CT gives important preoperative information on tumor size and localization, which is fundamental for surgical planning as resection (enucleation of the lesion or partial pancreatic resection) is the only curative treatment. New upcoming tracers are under study, such as promising SSTR antagonists, which show a favorable biodistribution and higher tumor-to-background ratio that increases tumor detection, especially in the liver. [68Ga]pentixafor, an in vivo marker of CXCR4 expression associated with the behavior of more aggressive tumors, seems to only play a limited role in detecting well-differentiated NET since there is an inverse expression of SSTR2 and CXCR4 in G1 to G3 NETs with an elevation in CXCR4 and a decrease in SSTR2 expression with increasing grade. Other tracers, such as [68Ga]Ga-PSMA, [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC, [18F]SiTATE, and [18F]AlF-OC, are also under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diletta Calabrò
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.A.); (V.A.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, DIMES University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Argalia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.A.); (V.A.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, DIMES University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Valentina Ambrosini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.A.); (V.A.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, DIMES University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Avallone A, Cassata A, Palaia R, Delrio P, Grassi R, Tatangelo F, Grazzini G, Izzo F, Petrillo A. Abbreviated MRI protocol for colorectal liver metastases: How the radiologist could work in pre surgical setting. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0241431. [PMID: 33211702 PMCID: PMC7676687 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background MRI is the most reliable imaging modality that allows to assess liver metastases. Our purpose is to compare the per-lesion and per-patient detection rate of gadoxetic acid-(Gd-EOB) enhanced liver MRI and fast MR protocol including Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) and T2-W Fat Suppression sequence in the detection of liver metastasis in pre surgical setting. Methods One hundred and eight patients with pathologically proven liver metastases (756 liver metastases) underwent Gd-EOBMRI were enrolled in this study. Three radiologist independently graded the presence of liver lesions on a five-point confidence scale assessed only abbreviated protocol (DWI and sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) fat suppressed sequence) and after an interval of more than 2 weeks the conventional study (all acquired sequences). Per-lesion and per-patient detection rate of metastases were calculated. Weighted к values were used to evaluate inter-reader agreement of the confidence scale regarding the presence of the lesion. Results MRI detected 732 liver metastases. All lesions were identified both by conventional study as by abbreviated protocol. In terms of per-lesion detection rate of liver metastasis, all three readers had higher detection rate both with abbreviated protocol and with standard protocol with Gd-EOB (96.8% [732 of 756] vs. 96.5% [730 of 756] for reader 1; 95.8% [725 of 756] vs. 95.2% [720 of 756] for reader 2; 96.5% [730 of 756] vs. 96.5% [730 of 756] for reader 3). Inter-reader agreement of lesions detection rate between the three radiologists was excellent (k range, 0.86–0.98) both for Gd-EOB MRI and for Fast protocol (k range, 0.89–0.99). Conclusion Abbreviated protocol showed the same detection rate than conventional study in detection of liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale – IRCCS di Napoli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Radiology Division, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale – IRCCS di Napoli”, Naples, Italy
- * E-mail:
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Division, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale – IRCCS di Napoli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonino Cassata
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Division, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale – IRCCS di Napoli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Palaia
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale – IRCCS di Napoli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale – IRCCS di Napoli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Division of Radiology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Fabiana Tatangelo
- Division of Pathology, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale – IRCCS di Napoli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Giulia Grazzini
- Division of Radiology, “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi”, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale – IRCCS di Napoli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Division, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale – IRCCS di Napoli”, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Artale S, Barzaghi S, Grillo N, Maggi C, Lepori S, Butti C, Bovio A, Barbarini L, Colombo A, Zanlorenzi L, Castiglioni E, Trojani A. Role of Diet in the Management of Carcinoid Syndrome: Clinical Recommendations for Nutrition in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors. Nutr Cancer 2020; 74:2-11. [PMID: 33148022 DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2020.1838572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Nutrition and metabolism are altered in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, which is related to excessive production of gastrointestinal hormones, peptides, and amines that can cause maldigestion, diarrhea, steatorrhea, and altered gastrointestinal motility. Patients with carcinoid syndrome are at risk of malnutrition due to tryptophan depletion, reduced intake of food, and loss of appetite because of diarrhea and/or flushing. To date, there is limited information on the nutritional issues faced by patients with neuroendocrine tumors, and on what specific recommendations should be made to patients concerning nutrition at various stages of the disease process. Dietary planning should therefore be an integral part of multidisciplinary management for patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Herein, we review current guidance for nutrition in patients with neuroendocrine tumors, focusing on intake of amines and foods to avoid, as well as concurrent medications. We also propose a new and practical food pyramid based on the principles of Mediterranean diet 4.0 that can be easily adapted according to the unmet needs of patients with neuroendocrine tumors at all stages of disease. The overarching goal of the present review is to create greater awareness of nutritional care and considerations that should be given to patients with neuroendocrine tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Artale
- Department of Medical Oncology, Busto Arsizio-Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Sabrina Barzaghi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Busto Arsizio-Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Nunziata Grillo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Busto Arsizio-Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Claudia Maggi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Busto Arsizio-Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Stefano Lepori
- Department of Medical Oncology, Busto Arsizio-Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Chiara Butti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Busto Arsizio-Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Antonella Bovio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Busto Arsizio-Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Lucia Barbarini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Busto Arsizio-Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Andrea Colombo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Busto Arsizio-Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Laura Zanlorenzi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Busto Arsizio-Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Elena Castiglioni
- Department of Medical Oncology, Busto Arsizio-Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Alessandra Trojani
- Divisione di Ematologia, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Morse B, Al-Toubah T, Montilla-Soler J. Anatomic and Functional Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2020; 21:75. [PMID: 32728967 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-020-00770-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can occur in a wide variety of organs and display a spectrum of pathologic behavior. Accurate and effective imaging is paramount to the diagnosis, staging, therapy, and surveillance of patients with NET. There have been continuous advancements in the imaging of NET which includes anatomic and functional techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Morse
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, WCB-RAD, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| | - Taymeyah Al-Toubah
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jaime Montilla-Soler
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, WCB-RAD, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|