Pulsed low dose-rate irradiation response in isogenic HNSCC cell lines with different radiosensitivity

Evaluation of the effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) techniques on survival response in cell lines with a new radiobiological modeling

BACKGROUND

The optimal radiobiological model, which assesses the biological effects of novel radiotherapy techniques that concurrently modify multiple physical factors, has not yet been defined. This study aimed to investigate the impact of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) on cellular response in head and neck cancer and melanoma models.

METHODS

Clonogenic analysis, DNA double-strand break analysis, apoptosis, and cell cycle analysis were performed on cancer stem cell models, cancer models, and normal tissue cell models to assess radiation sensitivity.

RESULTS

The segmented radiation approach used in IMRT applications enhanced radiosensitivity and cytotoxicity in the cancer models, while changes in dose rate had varying effects on cytotoxicity depending on the tumor cell type. VMAT increased cellular resistance, favoring treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The biological processes were influenced differently by dose rate, IMRT, and VMAT depending on the tumor cell type. The selection of the most appropriate technique is crucial in representing new radiotherapy approaches. The obtained data can serve as a model to address clinical questions in daily practice. The integration of non-standard outcomes with standard applications should be considered in clinical settings.

Efficacy and safety of PLDR-IMRT for the re-irradiation of recurrent NPC: A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial

Salvage treatment of locoregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) requires weighing the benefits of re-irradiation against increased risks of toxicity. Here, we evaluated the outcomes of patients treated with intensity-modulated-based pulsed low-dose-rate radiotherapy (PLDR-IMRT) to enhance the curative effect of salvage treatment and reduce RT-related SAEs. A prospective clinical trial was conducted from March 2018 to March 2020 at multiple institutions. NPC patients who experienced relapse after radical therapy were re-irradiated with a median dose of 60 Gy (50.4-70 Gy)/30 f (28-35 f) using PLDR-IMRT. Thirty-six NPC patients who underwent PLDR-IMRT for locoregional recurrence were identified. With a median follow-up of 26.2 months, the objective response rate (ORR) of the entire cohort was 91.6%. The estimated mPFS duration was 28 months (95% CI: 24.9-31.1), and the estimated mLRFS duration was 30.4 months (95% CI: 25.2-35.5). The overall survival (OS) rate for all patients was 80.6%, the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 75% and the cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate was 88.9% at 1 year. The LRFS and DMFS rates were 88.9% and 91.7%, respectively, at 1 year. A combination of systematic therapies could provide survival benefits to patients who experience NPC relapse (p < 0.05), and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score of ≥90 was a favorable factor for local control (p < 0.05). The incidence of acute SAEs (grade 3+) from PLDR was 22.2%, and the incidence of chronic SAEs was 19.4% among all patients. PLDR-IMRT combined with systematic therapy can effectively treat patients with locoregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma and causes fewer adverse events than the rates expected with IMRT.

Pulsed low dose-rate radiotherapy: radiobiology and dosimetry

Pulsed low dose-rate radiotherapy (PLDR) relies on two radiobiological findings, the hyper-radiosensitivity of tumor cells at small doses and the reduced normal tissue toxicity at low dose rates. This is achieved by delivering the daily radiation dose of 2 Gy in 10 sub-fractions (pulses) with a 3 min time interval, resulting in an effective low dose rate of 0.067 Gy min−1. In vitro cell studies and in vivo animal experiments demonstrated the therapeutic potential of PLDR treatments and provided useful preclinical data. Various treatment optimization strategies and delivery techniques have been developed for PLDR on existing linear accelerators. Preliminary results from early clinical studies have shown favorable outcomes for various treatment sites especially for recurrent cancers. This paper reviews the experimental findings of PLDR and dosimetric requirements for PLDR treatment planning and delivery, and summarizes major clinical studies on PLDR cancer treatments.

Advances in the Current Understanding of How Low-Dose Radiation Affects the Cell Cycle

Cells exposed to ionizing radiation undergo a series of complex responses, including DNA damage, reproductive cell death, and altered proliferation states, which are all linked to cell cycle dynamics. For many years, a great deal of research has been conducted on cell cycle checkpoints and their regulators in mammalian cells in response to high-dose exposures to ionizing radiation. However, it is unclear how low-dose ionizing radiation (LDIR) regulates the cell cycle progression. A growing body of evidence demonstrates that LDIR may have profound effects on cellular functions. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of how LDIR (of up to 200 mGy) regulates the cell cycle and cell-cycle-associated proteins in various cellular settings. In light of current findings, we also illustrate the conceptual function and possible dichotomous role of p21^Waf1, a transcriptional target of p53, in response to LDIR.

The Effect of High-Dose-Rate Pulsed Radiation on the Survival of Clinically Relevant Radioresistant Cells

We demonstrated that low dose pulsed radiation (0.25 Gy) at a high-dose-rate, even for very short intervals (10 s), decreases cell survival to a greater extent than single exposure to a similar total dose and dose rate. The objective of this study was to clarify whether high-dose-rate pulsed radiation is effective against SAS-R, a clinically relevant radioresistant cell line. Cell survival following high-dose-rate pulsed radiation was evaluated via a colony assay. Flow cytometry was utilized to evaluate γH2AX, a molecular marker of DNA double-strand breaks and delayed reactive oxygen species (ROS) associated with radiation-induced apoptosis. Increased cytotoxicity was observed in SAS-R and parent SAS cells in response to high dose rate pulsed radiation compared to single dose, as determined by colony assays. Residual γH2AX in both cells subjected to high-dose-rate pulsed radiation showed a tendency to increase, with a significant increase observed in SAS cells at 72 h. In addition, high-dose-rate pulsed radiation increased delayed ROS more than the single exposure did. These results indicate that high-dose-rate pulsed radiation was associated with residual γH2AX and delayed ROS, and high-dose-rate pulsed radiation may be used as an effective radiotherapy procedure against radioresistant cells.

Pulsed low-dose rate radiotherapy has an improved therapeutic effect on abdominal and pelvic malignancies

Until now, there has been a lack of standard and effective treatments for patients with recurrent malignant tumors or abdominal and pelvic malignancies with extensive invasion (Morris, 2000). Generally, these patients face problems such as inability to undergo surgery or chemotherapy resistance (Combs et al., 2016). Re-radiotherapy has achieved a prominent place in the treatment of patients who have received radiotherapy previously and developed in-field recurrences (Straube et al., 2018). However, re-radiotherapy is very complicated, requiring comprehensive consideration of appropriate radiation dose, interval from first radiotherapy, boundary of the radiotherapy target area, and damage to surrounding normal tissues (Straube et al., 2019). In other words, it is necessary to focus on the protection of surrounding normal tissues while maximizing the efficacy of re-radiotherapy in such patients.

Biological factors of the tumour response to electrochemotherapy: Review of the evidence and a research roadmap

The beneficial effects of electrochemotherapy (ECT) for superficial tumours and, more recently, deep-seated malignancies in terms of local control and quality of life are widely accepted. However, the variability in responses across histotypes needs to be explored. Currently, patient selection for ECT is based on clinical factors (tumour size, histotype, and exposure to previous oncological treatments), whereas there are no biomarkers to predict the response to treatment. In this field, two major areas of investigation can be identified, i.e., tumour cell characteristics and the tumour microenvironment (vasculature, extracellular matrix, and immune infiltrate). For each of these areas, we describe the current knowledge and discuss how to foster further investigation. This review aims to provide a summary of the currently used guiding clinical factors and delineates a research roadmap for future studies to identify putative biomarkers of response to ECT. These biomarkers may allow researchers to improve ECT practice by customising treatment parameters, manipulating the tumour and its microenvironment, and exploring novel therapeutic combinations.