Current management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: from resection to palliative treatments

A nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators for differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma

Objective

This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators to differentiate mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-ICC) from hepatic metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Materials and methods

A total of 343 patients with pathologically confirmed MF-ICC or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled between October 2018 and July 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to training and validation sets at a ratio of 7:3. Preoperative ultrasound features and clinical indicators were retrieved. Univariate logistic regression analysis was employed to select relevant features. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to establish a predictive model, which was presented as a nomogram in training sets. The model's performance was assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.

Results

The study included 169 patients with MF-ICC and 174 with liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, assigned to training (n=238) and validation (n=105) cohorts. The nomogram incorporated ultrasound features (tumor size, lesion number, echogenicity, tumor necrosis, and rim arterial phase hyperenhancement) and clinical information (serum levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA125). The nomogram demonstrated promising performance in differentiating these two entities in both training and validation sets, with an AUC value of 0.937 (95%CI: 0.907,0.969) and 0.916 (95%CI: 0.863,0.968), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curves confirmed good consistency between predictions and observations. Additionally, decision curve analysis confirmed the nomogram's high clinical practicability.

Conclusion

The nomogram based on ultrasound features and clinical indicators demonstrated good discrimination performance in differentiating MF-ICC from metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, which may enhance clinical decision-making process in managing these challenging diagnostic scenarios.

Comparison analysis of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus lenvatinib or gemcitabine/cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly aggressive primary liver cancer, with increasing incidence worldwide. Effective first-line treatments for advanced ICC patients are currently limited. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in combination with gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) and lenvatinib as first-line treatment in advanced ICC patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 51 advanced ICC patients, among whom 25 patients were administered with PD-1/PD-L1 plus lenvatinib and 26 patients were administered with PD-1/PD-L1 plus GC. Baseline characteristics including demographic information, medical history, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and imaging examination were collected. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and sixth- and ninth-month overall survival (OS) rate. Survival curve was plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportion risk model was performed to investigate independent risk factors of PFS and OS. The secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events.

Results

The median age of advanced ICC patients in our study was 58.0 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 48.0-72.4) years, with 33 male and 18 female patients. Patients in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus lenvatinib group were more likely to be in ECOG grade above 1, develop ascites, and have an elevated level of ALT. The ORR was 16.0% in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus lenvatinib group and 23.1% in the GC group (p = 0.777). The DCR was 52.0% in the lenvatinib group and 46.2% in the GC group (p = 0.676). The combination treatment of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus lenvatinib was associated with longer PFS than the GC group; however, it was not statistically significant (lenvatinib: 9.5 months, GC: 5.1 months, p = 0.454). The sixth-month and ninth-month OS rates were 82.0% and 76.9% in the lenvatinib group and 87.4% and 71.5% in the GC group. After adjusting for confounders, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that ECOG grade above 1 was an independent risk factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.388, 95% CI = 1.312-8.746, p = 0.012) and OS (HR = 4.220, 95% CI = 1.131-15.742, p = 0.032).

Conclusion

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with lenvatinib or GC all demonstrated significant efficacy and safety as first-line treatment in patients with advanced ICC. As for patients who refuse or are intolerant to chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 plus lenvatinib would be recommended.

Locoregional Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has a poor prognosis, and surgical resection (SR) offers the only potential for cure. Unfortunately, only a small proportion of patients are eligible for resection due to locally advanced or metastatic disease. Locoregional therapies (LRT) are often used in unresectable liver-only or liver-dominant ICC. This review explores the role of these therapies in the treatment of ICC, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy, irreversible electroporation (IE), and brachytherapy. A search of the current literature was performed to examine types of LRT currently used in the treatment of ICC. We examined patient selection, technique, and outcomes of each type. Overall, LRTs are well-tolerated in the treatment of ICC and are effective in improving overall survival (OS) in this patient population. Further studies are needed to reduce bias from heterogenous patient populations and small sample sizes, as well as to determine whether certain LRTs are superior to others and to examine optimal treatment selection.

Update on the Applications of Radiomics in Diagnosis, Staging, and Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

This paper offers an assessment of radiomics tools in the evaluation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for papers published in the English language no earlier than October 2022.

RESULTS

We found 236 studies, and 37 satisfied our research criteria. Several studies addressed multidisciplinary topics, especially diagnosis, prognosis, response to therapy, and prediction of staging (TNM) or pathomorphological patterns. In this review, we have covered diagnostic tools developed through machine learning, deep learning, and neural network for the recurrence and prediction of biological characteristics. The majority of the studies were retrospective.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to conclude that many performing models have been developed to make differential diagnosis easier for radiologists to predict recurrence and genomic patterns. However, all the studies were retrospective, lacking further external validation in prospective and multicentric cohorts. Furthermore, the radiomics models and the expression of results should be standardized and automatized to be applicable in clinical practice.

Long-term efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy-guided photodynamic therapy for postoperative recurrent extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma recurs frequently following excision surgery and is usually inoperable, while radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy are of limited benefit. As palliative care, percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) can relieve biliary obstruction, prevent jaundice, and maintain quality of life (QOL), but does not improve overall survival. In contrast, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been demonstrated to prolong the survival of inoperable cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTCS)-guided PDT following PTCD versus PTCD alone for recurrent inoperable cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

The case files of 39 patients with postoperative recurrence were retrospectively analyzed, including 18 receiving PTCS-guided PDT (PTCS-PDT group) and 21 receiving PTCD only as a control (PTCD group). Survival time was compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test, and QOL by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-HEP) questionnaire. Clinicodemographic factors, including serum bilirubin and adverse reaction rates, were compared by Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test. The maximum follow-up period was 71 months.

RESULTS

Median survival time was significantly longer in the PTCS-PDT group than the PTCD group (23 months vs. 10 months, P = 0.00001). At 6 and 12 months post-treatment, total FACT-HEP score was lower in the PTCS-PDT group (P < 0.05), indicating improved QOL. There was no significant difference in total adverse events incidence between groups (19 [51.4%] vs. 15 [71.4%]; P = 0.131).

CONCLUSION

PTCS-guided PDT can prolong survival and improve the QOL of patients with postoperative cholangiocarcinoma recurrence without increasing complications.

SIGNIFICANT AND/OR NEW FINDINGS

Compared to PTCD alone, PTCS-guided PDT significantly prolonged the survival time of patients with postoperative recurrent extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Photodynamic therapy also improved patient quality of life by facilitating timely removal of the PTCD drainage tube. PTCS-guided PDT did not increase surgery-related complications except for skin phototoxicity, which can be easy avoided and treated.

Diagnostic and prognostic nomograms for newly diagnosed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with brain metastasis: A population-based analysis

Brain metastasis (BM) is one of the rare metastatic sites of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). ICC with BM can seriously affect the quality of life of patients and lead to a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to establish two nomograms to estimate the risk of BM in ICC patients and the prognosis of ICC patients with BM. Data on 19,166 individuals diagnosed with ICC were retrospectively collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Independent risk factors and prognostic factors were identified by the logistic and the Cox regression, respectively. Next, two nomograms were developed, and their discrimination was estimated by concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots, while the clinical benefits of the prognostic nomogram were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the decision curve analysis (DCA), and the Kaplan-Meier analyses. The independent risk factors for BM were T stage, N stage, surgery, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, and tumor size. T stage, surgery, radiotherapy, and bone metastasis were prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). For the prognostic nomogram, the C-index was 0.759 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.745-0.773) and 0.764 (95% CI = 0.747-0.781) in the training and the validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curves revealed a robust agreement between predictions and actual observations probability. The area under curves (AUCs) for the 3-, 6-, and 9-month OS were 0.721, 0.727, and 0.790 in the training cohort and 0.702, 0.777, and 0.853 in the validation cohort, respectively. The DCA curves yielded remarkable positive net benefits over a wide range of threshold probabilities. The Kaplan-Meier analysis illustrated that the nomogram could significantly distinguish the population with different survival risks. We successfully established the two nomograms for predicting the incidence of BM and the prognosis of ICC patients with BM, which may assist clinicians in choosing more effective treatment strategies.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors for Early Recurrence in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Curative-Intent Resection

BACKGROUND

Recurrence rates of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) after curative hepatectomy are as high as 50% to 70%, and about half of these recurrences occur within 2 years. This systematic review aims to define prognostic factors (PFs) for early recurrence (ER, within 24 months) and 24-month disease-free survival (DFS) after curative-intent iCCA resections.

METHODS

Systematic searching was performed from database inception to 14 January 2021. Duplicate independent review and data extraction were performed. Data on 13 predefined PFs were collected. Meta-analysis was performed on PFs for ER and summarized using forest plots. The Quality in Prognostic Factor Studies tool was used for risk-of-bias assessment.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 10 studies comprising 4158 patients during an accrual period ranging from 1990 to 2016. In the risk-of-bias assessment of patients who experienced ER after curative-intent iCCA resection, six studies were rated as low risk and four as moderate risk (49.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 49.2-50.0). Nine studies were pooled for meta-analysis. Of the postoperative PFs, multiple tumors, microvascular invasion, macrovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and R1 resection were associated with an increased hazard for ER or a reduced 24-month DFS, and the opposite was observed for receipt of adjuvant chemo/radiation therapy. Of the preoperative factors, cirrhosis, sex, HBV status were not associated with ER or 24-month DFS.

CONCLUSION

The findings from this systematic review could allow for improved surveillance, prognostication, and treatment decision-making for patients with resectable iCCAs. Further well-designed prospective studies are needed to explore prognostic factors for iCCA ER with a focus on preoperative variables.

Results of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Resections: a Single-Center Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary neoplasm of the liver after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although an underlying cause is not usually found, liver flukes, cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and viral hepatitis have been found to increase the risk in recent years. In this study, we aimed to present our experience on ICC and compare the outcomes of patients with a concomitant liver pathology and with incidentally detected ICC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients who underwent surgical resection for ICC were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups, group one (with concomitant liver disease, n = 13) and group two (incidentally detected ICC, n = 18). Demographics, perioperative findings, pathological properties, recurrence rates, and survival rates were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 59.77 ± 9.81 years, of whom sixteen (51.6%) were males. Thirteen patients (41.9%) had concomitant liver disease, the most common being chronic hepatitis B infection. Eighteen patients (58.1%) had incidentally detected ICC. There were no significant differences between the groups except for follow-up time and recurrence rate. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in the incidentally detected ICC group (61.1% versus 7.7%, p = 0.003). Follow-up time was significantly higher in patients with concomitant liver disease (42 versus 17.5 months, p = 0.007). The mortality rate was higher in the incidentally detected ICC group (55.6 to 23.1%, p = 0.071) but the difference did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection in ICC patients with underlying liver disease is associated with better prognosis than in incidentally detected ICC patients. Incidental ICC may be a different tumor with different biology, hence the high recurrence rates.

Aggressive local treatment for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma—Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation as a valuable addition to hepatic resection

Background

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and overall clinical outcome of local treatment for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection.

Methods

Between 2007 and 2019 72 consecutive patients underwent hepatic resection for primary intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. If amenable, recurrent tumors were aggressively treated by HR or stereotactic radiofrequency ablation with local curative intent. Endpoints consisted of morbidity and mortality, locoregional and de novo recurrence, disease free survival, and overall survival.

Results

After a median follow-up of 28 months, recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma was observed in 43 of 72 patients undergoing hepatic resection (60.3%). 16 patients were subsequently treated by hepatic resection (n = 5) and stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (n = 11) with local curative intention. The remaining 27 patients underwent palliative treatment for first recurrence. Overall survival of patients who underwent repeated aggressive liver-directed therapy was comparable to patients without recurrence (p = 0.938) and was better as compared to patients receiving palliative treatment (p = 0.018). The 5-year overall survival rates for patients without recurrence, the repeated liver-directed treatment group and the palliative treatment group were 54.3%, 47.7% and 12.3%, respectively. By adding stereotactic radiofrequency ablation as an alternative treatment option, the rate of curative re-treatment increased from 11.9% to 37.2%.

Conclusion

Repeated hepatic resection is often precluded due to patient morbidity or anatomical and functional limitations. Due to the application of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation in case of recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma, the number of patients treated with curative intent can be increased. This leads to favorable clinical outcome as compared to palliative treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma recurrence.

Radioembolization of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Patient Selection, Outcomes, and Competing Therapies

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary hepatic malignancy and poses a therapeutic challenge owing to its late-stage presentation and treatment-resistant outcomes. Most patients are diagnosed with locally advanced, unresectable disease and are treated with a combination of systemic and local regional therapies. Transarterial radioembolization offers a survival benefit and a favorable side effect profile, with a growing body of evidence to support its use. Herein, we review patient selection and detail outcomes of radioembolization for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, together with mention of competing treatments.

Approach to Resectable Biliary Cancers

OPINION STATEMENT

Biliary malignancies, although rare, can be some of the most challenging to manage surgically. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas are resectable if there is no evidence of metastatic disease. These tumors are managed with anatomic resection and portal lymphadenectomy when centrally located or multiple in a single lobe. Non-anatomic resection can be performed for solitary peripheral tumors with minimally invasive techniques. It is not our practice to routinely employ neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection of these tumors. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is utilized at our institution in highly selected patients in the context of an ongoing clinical trial for unresectable tumors. Hilar cholangiocarcinomas, when resectable (i.e., ipsilateral arterial involvement or lack of vascular involvement), are managed with right or left (extended) hepatectomy, caudate resection, and portal lymphadenectomy. Distal cholangiocarcinomas are managed with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not routinely used in our treatment algorithm of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Nodal involvement and positive margin (R1) resection necessitates adjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, gallbladder carcinoma is managed with radical cholecystectomy, anatomic segment IVb/V resection, and portal lymphadenectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy is employed routinely amongst patients with T2 or higher tumors and those with positive lymph nodes.