Radiation therapy for melanoma brain metastases: a systematic review

Treatment of melanoma brain metastases with radiation and immunotherapy or targeted therapy: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with melanoma brain metastases are now frequently treated with immunotherapy (IMT) or targeted therapy (TT). The aim of this systematic review was to determine relative survival outcomes after combining radiotherapy (RT) with IMT or TT.

METHODS

126 studies were identified by searching Medline, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL (to 7Aug 2023).

RESULTS

Multivariable analyses showed that the risk of death was reduced by 30 % for combined stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)+IMT compared to IMT alone, by 65 % for patients treated with SRS+anti-PD1 and by 59 % for patients treated with SRS+anti-CTLA4 and/or anti-PD1 (HR 0.41, 95 %CI 0.31-0.54) compared to SRS alone. Four studies compared SRS+anti-CTLA4 with SRS+anti-PD1, showing a 42 % reduction in risk of death with SRS+anti-PD1 treatment. Combined treatment with SRS+TT showed a 59 % reduction in risk compared to SRS alone.

CONCLUSION

The systematic review suggests a substantial survival benefit for combining SRS with IMT or TT for patients with melanoma brain metastases.

The incidence and predictive factors of secondary epilepsy in patients with supratentorial brain metastases (st-BMs) after stereotactic radiosurgery: A multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence and the independent risk factors of SRS-related epilepsy in patients with supratentorial brain metastases (st-BMs), providing evidences for prevention or reduction secondary epilepsy after SRS.

METHODS

Patients with st-BMs from four gamma knife centers who developed secondary epilepsy after SRS were retrospectively studied between January 1, 2017 and June 31, 2023. The incidence and clinical characteristics of the patients with secondary epilepsy were analyzed. The predictive role of baseline clinical-demographic variables was evaluated according to univariate and multivariate logistic regression model. The impact of secondary epilepsy on patients' OS was evaluated as well by log-rank test.

RESULTS

11.3 % (126/1120) of the patients with totally 158 st-BMs experienced secondary epilepsy after SRS in median 21 days. 61.9 % (78/126) of the patients experienced simple partial seizures. 91.3 % (115/126) patients achieved good seizure control after received 1-2 kinds of AEDs for median 90 days, while 7.1 % (9/126) of the patients suffered from refractory epilepsy. Patients had higher risk of secondary epilepsy if the tumor located in cortex and/or hippocampus, peri-tumor edema larger than 20.3 cm3 before SRS, had epilepsy history, and failed to receive bevacizumab prior to SRS. There was no difference in the OS of patients who experience secondary epilepsy or not after SRS.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of SRS-related secondary epilepsy is 11.3 % in patients with st-BMs in this retrospective study. The risk of secondary epilepsy is higher in patients with st-BM located in cortex and/or hippocampus area, peri-tumor edema larger than 20.3 cm3 before SRS, and epilepsy history. Bevacizumab is suggested prior to SRS therapy, as it could be used for the control of peri-tumor edema and SRS-related damage, hence reduce the risk of secondary epilepsy. However, whether or not patients suffered from secondary epilepsy after SRS does not affect their OS.

Demographics aspects of brain and spine metastatic melanoma. Retrospective analysis in a single third-level center

Background

Melanoma metastases to the CNS rank third in frequency, just after lung and breast metastases. There is controversy regarding the factors predisposing to developing CNS metastases in patients with cutaneous melanoma and their survival with conventional treatments.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective analysis in a third-level hospital in Mexico to determine epidemiological aspects of melanoma metastases to the central nervous system, factors related to its appearance, clinical presentation, and survival in three treatment groups: surgery, radiotherapy, and conservative management.

Results

We found that the nodular variant has the most significant association with CNS metastases. In addition, the superficial spreading variant has the highest risk of presenting a more substantial number of lesions, up to seven for each case and predominantly in the infratentorial space. On the other hand, we found more remarkable survival in patients treated only with surgery than those treated with radiotherapy or conservatively.

Conclusions

This study lays the foundations for future prospective survival analysis of the different current treatment modalities for metastatic melanoma in the brain and spine. It also highlights the clinical risk factors for metastatic brain and spine tumors of melanoma.

Local and Systemic Management Options for Melanoma Brain Metastases

ABSTRACT

Development of brain metastasis is one of the most serious complications of advanced melanoma, carrying a significant burden of morbidity and mortality. Although advances in local treatment modalities such as stereotactic radiosurgery and breakthrough systemic therapies including immunotherapy and targeted therapies have improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma, management of patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) remains challenging. Notably, patients with MBMs have historically been excluded from clinical trials, limiting insights into their specific treatment responses. Encouragingly, a growing body of evidence shows the potential of systemic therapies to yield durable intracranial responses in these patients, highlighting the need for inclusion of patients with MBMs in future clinical trials. This is pivotal for expediting the advancement of novel therapies tailored to this distinct patient population. In this review, we will highlight the evolving landscape of MBM management, focusing on local and systemic treatment strategies.

Clinical outcomes of melanoma brain metastases treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab alone versus nivolumab and ipilimumab with stereotactic radiosurgery

PURPOSE

Upfront dual checkpoint blockade with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has demonstrated efficacy for treating melanoma brain metastases (MBM) in asymptomatic patients. Whether the combination of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with dual checkpoint blockade improves outcomes over dual-checkpoint blockade alone is unknown. We evaluated clinical outcomes of patients with MBM receiving ICI with nivolumab and ipilimumab, with and without SRS.

METHODS

49 patients with 158 MBM receiving nivolumab and ipilimumab for untreated MBM between 2015 and 2022 were identified at our institution. Patient and tumor characteristics including age, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), presence of symptoms, cancer history, MBM burden, and therapy course were recorded. Outcomes measured from initiation of MBM-directed therapy included overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant intracranial control (DIC). Time-to-event analysis was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

25 patients with 74 MBM received ICI alone, and 24 patients with 84 MBM received concurrent SRS. Median follow-up was 24 months. No differences in age (p = 0.96), KPS (p = 0.85), presence of symptoms (p = 0.79), prior MBM (p = 0.68), prior MBM-directed surgery (p = 0.96) or SRS (p = 0.68), MBM size (p = 0.67), or MBM number (p = 0.94) were seen. There was a higher rate of nivolumab and ipilimumab course completion in the SRS group (54% vs. 24%; p = 0.029). The SRS group received prior immunotherapy more often than the ICI alone group (54% vs. 8.0%; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in 1-year OS (72% vs. 71%, p = 0.20) and DIC (63% v 51%, p = 0.26) between groups. The SRS group had higher 1-year LC (92% vs. 64%; p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, LC was improved with combination therapy (AHR 0.38, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In our analysis, patients who received SRS with nivolumab and ipilimumab had superior LC without increased risk of toxicity or compromised immunotherapy treatment completion despite the SRS cohort having higher rates of prior immunotherapy. Further prospective study of combination nivolumab and ipilimumab with SRS is warranted.

Immunotherapy Combined with Radiation in Malignant Melanoma without BRAF Mutations Brain Metastases-Favorable Response after Immunotherapy Continued beyond Progression

We present the case of a patient who was diagnosed in 2018 with nodular Malignant Melanoma (MM) without BRAF V 600 mutations stage 3 C (pT4b pN1a M0), and who underwent adjuvant citokines treatment with Interferon alpha 2b-48 weeks. Immunotherapy was initiated in January 2021 for lung and lymph node metastases. In June 2021, there was a partial response of the lung and lymph node metastases, but there was also progression to brain metastases. Immunotherapy was continued and Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) was performed. In September 2023, the imaging investigations revealed a favorable response, with no lesions suggestive of secondary determinations. The combination of Radiotherapy (RT) and Immunotherapy (IT) with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) has an abscopal effect. There is a coordinated action in the combination of RT and IT in order to obtain a common result, with the antitumor effect being greater than if RT or IT acted separately.

Radiotherapy with or without immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: efficacy and tolerability

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy (RT) is primarily considered as a palliative treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma. However, observations suggest that when RT is combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), it can induce an immune response leading to an anti-tumoral effect also distant from the irradiated area - a phenomenon called 'abscopal effect'. The frequency and circumstances of abscopal effect among metastatic melanoma patients remains uncertain and further research is necessary.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This retrospective study included all metastatic melanoma patients who received non-stereotactic RT in Stockholm, Sweden in 2015-2020. Patients were grouped depending on if RT was given at start of ICI (RT + ICI(start)), at ICI progression (RT + ICI(salvage)) or without ICI (RT(only)). Response rates in irradiated (RR(irradiated)) and overall response rates in non-irradiated (ORR(non-irradiated)) metastases were evaluated together with survival and toxicity in each cohort.

RESULTS

In the RT + ICI(start) (n = 47), RT + ICI(salvage) (n = 41) and RT(only) (n = 55) cohorts, RR(irradiated) was 70.7%, 67.5% and 43.1% (p = 0.018) while the ORR(non-irradiated) was 36.1%, 14.8% and 0.0% (p = 0.003), and the median overall survival was 18.2, 15.0 and 7.2 months, respectively (p = 0.014). Local response to RT was in all cohorts associated with longer survival (p < 0.001). The frequency of grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events was 17.0% and 19.5% in the RT + ICI(start) and RT + ICI(salvage) cohorts. No increased frequency of RT-related adverse events was seen in the RT + ICI cohorts, compared to the RT(only) cohort.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study showed that melanoma patients receiving RT in combination with ICI had a superior antitumoral response in both irradiated and non-irradiated lesions as compared to patients receiving only RT. Additionally, a subgroup of patients receiving RT when progressing on ICI experienced tumor regression also in non-irradiated areas.