Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in bilateral retinoblastoma

Stereotactic Gamma Knife® Radiosurgery of Intraocular Retinoblastoma: Six-Year Experience

Background

External beam radiotherapy for resistant retinoblastoma is now seen as a last resort to saving the eye because of the risk of severe side effects: secondary cancers and cosmetic problems of orbital bone growth retardation. To reduce such complications, treatment modalities have shifted towards new radiation therapy techniques. No information on single fraction Gamma Knife® radiosurgery (GKRS) for intraocular retinoblastoma exists.

Materials and methods

Eighteen children (19 eyes) with retinoblastoma were treated with GKRS. The mean age at the time of treatment was 35 months (from 12 to 114 months). Before GKRS, all routes of chemotherapy delivery were held in all cases. The eligibility criteria for GKRS were retinoblastomas not amenable either to systemic or local chemotherapy and local ophthalmological treatment, retinoblastomas too large for conventional local methods, and inability to perform intraarterial chemotherapy. Conventional external beam radiotherapy was excluded in the presented cases, given the possible complications mentioned above. In every case, eye removal was suggested to the child's parents, but they flatly refused. GKRS was proposed as the last chance to save the eye (in four cases, it was performed on the only eye). The median prescribed dose was 22 Gy (interquartile range [IQR]: 18-35 Gy), and the median prescribed isodose was 50% (IQR: 36-90%).

Results

Local control was achieved in 79% of cases (complete tumor regression in 69%, incomplete regression in 10%). Two eyes (10.5%) could not be preserved and had to be enucleated due to the tumor recurrence. Two eyes (10.5%) developed secondary complications (total vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, and iris neovascularization), making adequate tumor control nearly impossible. Overall, 15 eyes (79%) were preserved, and four eyes (21%) were enucleated after GKRS with no signs of tumor recurrence and metastasis in the mean follow-up of 41 months. No acute radiation side effects occurred in any patient after GKRS. Ten children (10 eyes, 53%) were diagnosed with vitreous hemorrhage from mild to severe. Three eyes presented with optic neuropathy one year after GKRS, and four eyes developed retinopathy. Radiation-induced cataract occurred in two eyes. There were no cases of secondary glaucoma or keratopathy in our study. All patients and eyes treated by GKRS were stable within 41 months (from seven to 74 months).

Conclusions

Single fraction Gamma Knife® radiosurgery may be a reasonable salvage treatment for resistant and recurrent retinoblastoma as an alternative approach to enucleation in selected cases. GKRS should be considered in retinoblastoma management.

Neurological Complications of Childhood Cancer

Though the treatment of pediatric cancers has come a long way, acute and chronic effects of cancer are still affecting the life of many children. These effects may be caused not only by the malignancy itself but also by the interventions used for the purpose of treatment. This article focuses primarily on the indirect effects of pediatric cancers and their treatment on the central and peripheral nervous system. Chemotherapy, radiation, and stem cell transplantation cause an immune-compromised state and place the patient at risk of infection, the leading cause of mortality in pediatric cancer. The underlying cancer and the treatments also cause neurovascular changes that may lead to neurological sequelae immediately or many years in the future. Chemotherapy and radiation have both immediate and long-term neurotoxic effects on the central and peripheral nervous system. Cancers may also trigger an immune response that damages nervous system components, leading to altered mental status, seizures, abnormal movements, and even psychosis. Knowledge of these effects can help the practitioner be more vigilant for the signs and symptoms of potential neurological complications during the management of pediatric cancers.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of unicentric Castlemans disease: a case report and review of the use of radiotherapy in the literature

Background

Surgical resection is considered standard therapy for cases of resectable unicentric Castleman’s disease (UCD). Unresectable cases of UCD do not have a consensus regarding the optimal treatment approach, but have utilized steroids, observation, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Here we discuss a patient presentation of UCD treated with an advanced radiotherapy technique, IMRT.

Case report

A 47 year old female was found to have an intra-thoracic posterior UCD and was determined not to be a good surgical candidate. She was referred for radiotherapy and was treated using IMRT to a total dose of 4320 cGy in 180 cGy fractions including a scheduled 10 day break. Following the break, the patient’s treatment was replanned at which the initial treatment volume was reduced by 50.9% for the duration of the treatment course. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade III pneumonitis developed which was managed medically. Neither disease progression nor late effects have occurred.

Conclusions

The use of IMRT and planned treatment break was successful in the treatment of a case of UCD, and should be considered for other unresectable cases.

A fully electronic intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance (IMRT QA) process implemented in a network comprised of independent treatment planning, record and verify, and delivery systems

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to implement an electronic method to perform and analyze intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance (IMRT QA) using an aSi megavoltage electronic portal imaging device in a network comprised of independent treatment planning, record and verify (R&V), and delivery systems.

METHODS

A verification plan was generated in the treatment planning system using the actual treatment plan of a patient. After exporting the treatment fields to the R&V system, the fields were delivered in QA mode with the aSi imager deployed. The resulting dosimetric images are automatically stored in a DICOM-RT format in the delivery system treatment console computer. The relative dose density images are subsequently pushed to the R&V system. The absolute dose images are then transferred electronically from the treatment console computer to the treatment planning system and imported into the verification plan in the dosimetry work space for further analysis. Screen shots of the gamma evaluation and isodose comparison are imported into the R&V system as an electronic file (e.g. PDF) to be reviewed prior to initiation of patient treatment. A relative dose image predicted by the treatment planning system can also be sent to the R&V system to be compared with the relative dose density image measured with the aSi imager.

RESULTS

Our department does not have integrated planning, R&V, and delivery systems. In spite of this, we are able to fully implement a paperless and filmless IMRT QA process, allowing subsequent analysis and approval to be more efficient, while the QA document is directly attached to its specific patient chart in the R&V system in electronic form. The calculated and measured relative dose images can be compared electronically within the R&V system to analyze the density differences and ensure proper dose delivery to patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of an integrated planning, verifying, and delivery system, we have shown that it is nevertheless possible to develop a completely electronic IMRT QA process.