Preliminary results of the first quality assurance project in rectal cancer in Poland

Colorectal Cancer: Is it Still a Disease of the Elderly?

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Colorectal cancer is becoming an increasingly significant health issue, being one of the more commonly diagnosed malignancies. Colorectal tumors account for 10% of all malignant cancers in women and 12% in men. Incidence is higher in the male population, especially among younger individuals. It is commonly believed that colorectal cancer is predominantly associated with advanced age. However, colorectal surgeons, who specialize in the treatment of this type of cancer, are observing a growing number of cases among middle-aged and younger individuals.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The aim of our study was to investigate whether colorectal cancer still predominantly affects elderly individuals, how frequently it is diagnosed in younger patients, and whether the location of tumors in the intestines of younger patients aligns with data from elderly individuals.</br> <b><br>Materials and methods:</b> The study was conducted retrospectively and included a cohort of 1771 patients who underwent surgical procedures due to colorectal cancer between 2012 and 2015 at the Department of General and Colorectal Surgery at the Medical University of Łódź and between 2014 and 2017 at the Department of General Surgery with a Division of Surgical Oncology at the District Health Center in Brzeziny. Data were analyzed regarding the frequency of colorectal cancer occurrence by age, tumor location in different age groups, and disease stage according to age. Age groups included <40 years, 41-50 years, 51-70 years, and >70 years.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> The study encompassed a total of 1771 patients, with 988 (55.79%) being males and 783 (44.21%) females. The mean age of the patients was 65.27 11.12 years. The highest number of cases was observed in the age range of 60-70 years and 70-80 years. It was found that colorectal tumors in males more frequently occurred on the left side of the colon and rectum, while in females, they were more commonly located on the right side of the colon, which was statistically significant (P = 0.007). Younger age groups of patients (<40 years, 40-50 years) had a similar male-to-female ratio, whereas in age groups above 50 years, males significantly outnumbered females (P = 0.049). The study revealed that in the group of patients below 40 years of age, an advanced stage of colorectal cancer was significantly more common; stage D occurred over twice as often as in the 51-70 age group and over three times as often as in the >70 age group.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> The incidence of colorectal cancer in Poland is steadily increasing, with a growing number of diagnoses in younger individuals. Research findings demonstrate that males, especially those in younger age groups, are at a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer. A higher disease stage is more frequently observed in younger patients, possibly due to delayed diagnosis and symptomatic treatment. Screening programs should be adjusted to the changing age groups at higher risk. Our study underlines the need to raise public awareness regarding colorectal cancer, particularly among the younger population.</br>.

Incidence and mortality of anastomotic dehiscence requiring reoperation after rectal carcinoma resection

Anastomotic dehiscence (AD) requiring reoperation is the most severe complication following anterior rectal resection. We performed a systematic review on studies that describe AD requiring reoperation and its subsequent mortality after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. A systematic search was performed on published literature. Data on the definition and rate of AD, the number of ADs requiring reoperation, the mortality caused by AD, and the overall postoperative mortality were pooled and analyzed. A total of 39 studies with 24,232 patients were analyzed. The studies varied in incidence and definition of AD. Systematic review of the data showed that the overall rate of AD was 8.6%, and the rate of AD requiring reoperation was 5.4%. The postoperative mortality caused by AD was 0.4%, and the overall postoperative mortality was 1.3%. We found considerable risk and mortality for AD requiring reoperation, which largely contributed to the overall postoperative mortality.

Pioneering quality assessment in European cancer centers: a data analysis of the organization for European cancer institutes accreditation and designation program

PURPOSE

In order to improve the quality of care in Cancer Centers (CC) and designate Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs), the Organization for European Cancer Institutes (OECI) launched an Accreditation and Designation (A&D) program. The program facilitates the collection of defined data and the assessment of cancer center quality. This study analyzes the results of the first 10 European centers that entered the program.

METHODS

The assessment included 927 items divided across qualitative and quantitative questionnaires. Data collected during self-assessment and peer-review from the 10 first participating centers were combined in a database for comparative analysis using simple statistics. Quantitative and qualitative results were validated by auditors during the peer review visits.

RESULTS

Volumes of various functions and activities dedicated to care, research, and education varied widely among centers. There were no significant differences in resources for radiology, radiotherapy, pathologic diagnostic, and surgery. Differences were observed in the use of clinical pathways but not for the practices of holding multidisciplinary team meetings and conforming to guidelines. Regarding human resources, main differences were in the composition and number of supportive care and research staff. All 10 centers applied as CCCs; five obtained the label, and five were designated as CCs.

CONCLUSION

The OECI A&D program allows comparisons between centers with regard to management, research, care, education, and designation as CCs or CCCs. Through the peer review system, recommendations for improvements are given. Assessing the added value of the program, as well as research and patient treatment outcomes, is the next step.

Experts reviews of the multidisciplinary consensus conference colon and rectal cancer 2012: science, opinions and experiences from the experts of surgery

The first multidisciplinary consensus conference on colon and rectal cancer was held in December 2012, achieving a majority of consensus for diagnostic and treatment decisions using the Delphi Method. This article will give a critical appraisal of the topics discussed during the meeting and in the consensus document by well-known leaders in surgery that were involved in this multidisciplinary consensus process. Scientific evidence, experience and opinions are collected to support multidisciplinary teams (MDT) with arguments for medical decision-making in diagnosis, staging and treatment strategies for patients with colon or rectal cancer. Surgery is the cornerstone of curative treatment for colon and rectal cancer. Standardizing treatment is an effective instrument to improve outcome of multidisciplinary cancer care for patients with colon and rectal cancer. In this article, a review of the following focuses; Perioperative care, age and colorectal surgery, obstructive colorectal cancer, stenting, surgical anatomical considerations, total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery and training, surgical considerations for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and local recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), surgery in stage IV colorectal cancer, definitions of quality of surgery, transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery, preoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, and how about functional outcome after surgery?

Systematic review of anastomotic leakage rate according to an international grading system following anterior resection for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

A generally acceptable definition and a severity grading system for anastomotic leakages (ALs) following rectal resection were not available until 2010, when the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISGRC) proposed a definition and a grading system for AL.

METHODS

A search for published data was performed using the MEDLINE database (2000 to December 5, 2012) to perform a systematic review of the studies that described AL, grade AL according to the grading system, pool data, and determine the average rate of AL for each grade after anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 930 abstracts were retrieved; 40 articles on AR, 25 articles on low AR (LAR), and 5 articles on ultralow AR (ULAR) were included in the review and analysis. The pooled overall AL rate of AR was 8.58% (2,085/24,288); the rate of the asymptomatic leakage (Grade A) was 2.57%, that of AL that required active intervention without relaparotomy (Grade B) was 2.37%, and that of AL that required relaparotomy (Grade C) was 5.40%. The pooled rate of AL that required relaparotomy was higher in AR (5.40%) than in LAR (4.70%) and in ULAR (1.81%), which could be attributed to the higher rate of protective defunctioning stoma in LAR (40.72%) and ULAR (63.44%) compared with that in AR (30.11%).

CONCLUSIONS

The new grading system is simple that the ALs of each grade can be easily extracted from past publications, therefore likely to be accepted and applied in future studies.

Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: is the pelvic drain externalization site an independent risk factor for perineal wound healing?

Aim. The aim of this paper is to investigate if the insertion of the pelvic drainage tube via the perineal wound could be considered as an independent risk factor for perineal healing disorders, after abdominoperineal resection for rectal malignancy. Patients and Methods. The last two decades, 75 patients underwent elective abdominoperineal resection for malignancy. In 42 patients (56%), the pelvic drain catheter was inserted through the perineal wound (PW group), while in the remaining 33 (44%) through a puncture skin wound of the perineum (SW group). Patients' data with respect to age (P = 0.136), stage (P > 0.05), sex (P = 0.188) and comorbidity (P = 0.128) were similar in both groups. 25 patients (PW versus SW: 8 versus 17, P = 0.0026) underwent neoadjuvant radio/chemotherapy. Results. The overall morbidity rate was 36%, but a significant increase was revealed in PW group (52.4% versus 9%, P = 0.0007). In 33.3% of the patients in the PW group, perineal healing was delayed, while in the SW group, no delay was noted. Perineal healing disorders were revealed as the main source of increased morbidity in this group. Conclusion. The insertion of the pelvic drain tube through the perineal wound should be considered as an independent risk factor predisposing to perineal healing disorders.