Factors associated with early catheter-related complications in peritoneal dialysis

Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) in the Treatment of Neurological Disorders

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a well-established renal replacement therapy commonly employed in clinical practice. While its primary application is in the treatment of kidney disease, its potential in addressing other systemic disorders, including neurological diseases, has garnered increasing interest. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the related technologies, unique advantages, and clinical applications of PD in the context of neurological disorders. By exploring the mechanism underlying PD, its application in neurological diseases, and associated complications, we addressed the feasibility and benefits of PD as an adjunct therapy for various neurological conditions. Our study aims to highlight its role in detoxification and symptom management, as well as its advantages over other universally accepted methods of renal replacement therapy. Our goal is to bring to the spotlight the therapeutic potential of PD in neurological diseases, such as stroke, stimulate further research, and broaden the scope of its application in the clinical setting.

Diabetes Is the Most Critical Risk Factor of Adverse Complications After Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement

Introduction: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a kind of renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). While PD has many advantages, various complications may arise.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the complications of ESRD patients who received PD catheter implantation in a single medical center within 15 years.

Results: This study collected 707 patients. In the first 14 days after PD implantation, 54 patients experienced bleeding complications, while 47 patients experienced wound infection. Among all complications, catheter-related infections were the most common complication 14 days after PD implantation (incidence: 38.8%). A total of 323 patients experienced PD catheter removal, of which 162 patients were due to infection, while 96 were intentional due to kidney transplantation. Excluding those whose catheters were removed due to transplantation, the median survival of the PD catheter was 4.1 years; among them, patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) were 7.4 years and patients with DM were 2.5 years (p < 0.001). Further, 50% probability of surviving was beyond 3.5 years in DM patients with HbA1CC < 7 and 1.6 years in DM patients with HbA1C <7 (p ≥ 0.001).

Conclusions: Catheter-related infections were the most common complications following PD catheter implantation. DM, especially with HbA1C ≥7, significantly impacted on the catheter-related infection and the survival probability of the PD catheter.

Establishment of a prediction model for early and mid-term complications for patients undergoing catheter insertion for peritoneal dialysis

Objective

To investigate the factors involved in early and mid-term complications after catheter insertion for peritoneal dialysis and to establish prediction models.

Methods

A total of 158 patients with peritoneal dialysis in the Department of Nephrology of our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. General information, laboratory indices, early complications (within 1 month after the operation), mid-term complications (1–6 months after the operation), and other relevant data were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to establish a prediction model of complications and generate a nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of the model.

Results

Among the patients, 48 (30.8%) had early complications, which were mainly catheter-related complications, and 29 (18.4%) had mid-term complications, which were mainly abdominal infection and catheter migration. We constructed a prediction model for early complications (area under the curve = 0.697, 95% confidence interval: 0.609–0.785) and mid-term complications (area under the curve = 0.730, 95% confidence interval: 0.622–0.839). The sensitivity was 0.750 and 0.607, and the specificity was 0.589 and 0.765, respectively.

Conclusions

Our prediction model has clinical significance for risk assessment of early and mid-term complications and prevention of complications after catheterization for peritoneal dialysis.

Reducing the occurrence rate of catheter dysfunction in peritoneal dialysis: a single-center experience about CQI

To reduce the occurrence rate of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter dysfunction caused by catheter displacement or plugging, this study screened all patients with peritoneal dialysis catheterization from 2002 to 2015 from the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. There were 256 patients before continuous quality improvement (CQI) (from 2002 to 2007) and 813 patients after CQI (from 2008 to 2015). The occurrence rate of catheter dysfunction was 5.9% in the preCQI group: seven cases were associated with peritonitis, six cases were involved in omentum wrapping, one case was blocked by oviduct, and one case was blocked by blood clot. Through PDCA (plan-do-check-act) four-step of CQI, the following measures were adopted: (1) Preoperative: treat complications, enema and urine catheterization (2) Intraoperative: strengthen analgesia, Lower the insert position of catheter to 7.5 ∼ 8.5 cm above the pubic symphysis, extending the straight distance of catheter in rectus abdominis and decrease the times of peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation. (3) Postoperative: strengthen the training of nurses, patients and their families. (4) strengthen anticoagulation therapy during peritonitis treatment. (5) use laparoscopic technology for refractory patients, and so on. The occurrence of catheter dysfunction was 1.5% in the postCQI group (p < 0.05): two cases were associated with peritonitis, ten cases were involved in omentum wrapping. The measures we adopted in CQI reduce the occurrence rate of catheter displacement or plugging in peritoneal dialysis.