Honig H, Haron A, Plitman L, Lokshtanov D, Shinder D, Nagar S, Goshen T, Druyan S. Comparative Analysis of Broiler Housing Systems: Implications for Production and Wellbeing.
Animals (Basel) 2024;
14:1665. [PMID:
38891712 PMCID:
PMC11171039 DOI:
10.3390/ani14111665]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Revised: 05/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
This study compares the effects of modern colony cage systems and traditional floor systems on the production and welfare of broiler chickens. Through two trials spanning 35 days each, we evaluated various physiological parameters, including growth performance, bone health, stress responses, and meat quality. Colony cages demonstrated superior thermal regulation and growth performance compared to traditional floor systems, but also exhibited higher frequencies of leg deformity and reduced standing ability. Conversely, the broilers in traditional floor systems experienced heat stress-related challenges, impacting the meat quality. Our findings underscore the need to balance productivity with animal welfare in broiler farming practices. By understanding the distinct impacts of different housing systems, we can work towards improving broiler rearing methods to ensure optimal welfare and production outcomes.
Collapse