Quantification of C1 inhibitor activity using a chromogenic automated assay: analytical and clinical performances

OBJECTIVES

The quantification of functional C1 inhibitor activity (fC1-INH) is an important tool to diagnose bradykinin-mediated angioedema (AE), whether hereditary or acquired. For that an accurate assay is necessary, therefore we evaluated the analytical performances of a fC1-INH chromogenic assay (Berichrom®, Siemens) performed utilizing an Optilite turbidimeter (Binding Site).

METHODS

fC1-INH was quantified by means of the chromogenic assay Berichrom®. Internal quality controls were used to determine the precision of the assay. Stability under various storage and matrix conditions, uncertainty, linearity, interference (of hemolysis, lipemia, and icterus), agreement with the manual Technochrom® assay, and diagnostic performances were further evaluated on samples from patients and healthy donors.

RESULTS

The fC1-INH Berichrom® assay presented good performances regarding intra- and inter-assay precision (CV: 1.3-4.5 % and 3.0-6.0 %, respectively), expanded uncertainty (5.5 % at normal level and 12.5 % at the clinical threshold) and linearity (rho2>0.99: range 7-130 % activity). Addition of interfering substances (hemoglobin <16 g/L, intralipid® <12 g/L, and bilirubin <1 g/L) did not affect fC1-INH quantification. fC1-INH activity from healthy donors remained stable in citrate whole blood until 4 days at room temperature, and 7 days when plasma was collected. Agreement between the automated Berichrom® assay and the manual Technochrom® assay (n=47) was excellent as obtained with both quantitative (Deming regression and Bland-Altman difference plot) and qualitative (Kappa index=1) analyses. Finally, the diagnostic performance of the quantification of fC1-INH for AE evaluated on 81 patients revealed a sensitivity of 100 %, a specificity of 97.2 %, a positive predictive value of 83.3 % and a negative predictive value of 100 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The automated fC1-INH Berichrom® assay showed good performance, both at the analytical and diagnostic/clinical levels that allowed its usage in a clinical laboratory for C1-INH-dependent bradykinin-mediated AE research in combination with quantitative C1-INH and C4 determinations.

Enzymatic assays for the diagnosis of bradykinin-dependent angioedema

Background

The kinins (primarily bradykinin, BK) represent the mediators responsible for local increase of vascular permeability in hereditary angioedema (HAE), HAE I-II associated with alterations of the SERPING1 gene and HAE with normal C1-Inhibitor function (HAE-nC1INH). Besides C1-Inhibitor function and concentration, no biological assay of kinin metabolism is actually available to help physicians for the diagnosis of angioedema (AE). We describe enzymatic tests on the plasma for diagnosis of BK-dependent AE.

Methods

The plasma amidase assays are performed using the Pro-Phe-Arg-p-nitroanilide peptide substrate to evaluate the spontaneous amidase activity and the proenzyme activation. We analyzed data of 872 patients presenting with BK-dependent AE or BK-unrelated diseases, compared to 303 controls. Anti-high MW kininogen (HK) immunoblot was achieved to confirm HK cleavage in exemplary samples. Reproducibility, repeatability, limit of blank, limit of detection, precision, linearity and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used to calculate the diagnostic performance of the assays.

Results

Spontaneous amidase activity was significantly increased in all BK-dependent AE, associated with the acute phase of disease in HAE-nC1INH, but preserved in BK-unrelated disorders. The increase of the amidase activity was associated to HK proteolysis, indicating its relevance to identify kininogenase activity. The oestrogens, known for precipitating AE episodes, were found as triggers of enzymatic activity. Calculations from ROC curves gave the optimum diagnostic cut-off for women (9.3 nmol⋅min⁻¹⋅mL⁻¹, area under curve [AUC] 92.1%, sensitivity 80.0%, and specificity 90.1%) and for men (6.6 nmol·min⁻¹⋅mL⁻¹, AUC 91.0%, sensitivity 87.0% and specificity 81.2%).

Conclusion

The amidase assay represents a diagnostic tool to help physicians in the decision to distinguish between BK-related and –unrelated AE.