Endoscopic skull base/sinonasal adenocarcinoma surgery: what evidence exists?

Psychometric testing of the Skull Base Inventory health-related quality of life questionnaire in a multi-institutional study of patients undergoing open and endoscopic surgery

PURPOSE

The skull base inventory (SBI) was developed to better assess health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in patients with anterior and central skull base neoplasms treated by endoscopic and open approaches. The primary objective of this study was to prospectively assess the psychometric properties of the SBI.

METHODS

This study is part of a multi-center study of patients undergoing endoscopic and open procedures completed between 2012 and 2018. Participants were eligible if they were over 18 years of age; had benign or malignant anterior, antero-lateral, or central skull base tumors; and required either an open or endoscopic skull base surgical approach. In order to assess the psychometric properties of the SBI, patients completed the instrument at six time points (preoperative, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months postoperative). Patients also completed the Anterior Skull Base (ASB) questionnaire and the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) to allow comparison to the SBI.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-seven patients were included across five centers, with 121 having an endoscopic procedure. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95) and test-retest at 12 months and 12 months plus 2 weeks (intraclass correlation > 0.90) were excellent. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by very strong correlation between total SBI scores and ASB scores (r = 0.810 to 0.869, p < 0.001) and moderate correlation between nasal domain SBI scores and SNOT-22 scores (r = - 0.616 to - 0.738, p < 0.001). Convergent validity was demonstrated by moderate correlation between change in SBI scores and global QOL change (r_s = 0.4942, p < 0.001). The minimally important clinical difference (global HR-QOL change of "a little better" or "a little worse") was 6.0.

CONCLUSION

The SBI questionnaire is reliable and valid for patients treated by both endoscopic and open approaches and can be used for assessment of HR-QOL in these settings.

Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery

Endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery is the standard procedure for surgery of most paranasal sinus diseases. Appropriate frame conditions provided, the respective procedures are safe and successful. These prerequisites encompass appropriate technical equipment, anatomical oriented surgical technique, proper patient selection, and individually adapted extent of surgery. The range of endonasal sinus operations has dramatically increased during the last 20 years and reaches from partial uncinectomy to pansinus surgery with extended surgery of the frontal (Draf type III), maxillary (grade 3-4, medial maxillectomy, prelacrimal approach) and sphenoid sinus. In addition there are operations outside and beyond the paranasal sinuses. The development of surgical technique is still constantly evolving. This article gives a comprehensive review on the most recent state of the art in endoscopic sinus surgery according to the literature with the following aspects: principles and fundamentals, surgical techniques, indications, outcome, postoperative care, nasal packing and stents, technical equipment.

Evidence-based practice: endoscopic skull base resection for malignancy

Successful outcomes of endoscopic approaches to benign sinonasal tumors have launched interest in expanding its use for sinonasal malignancy. Because of the heterogeneity and rarity of sinonasal malignancy, evidence for clinical outcomes of endoscopic approaches versus traditional craniofacial resection is low. Using the Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine guidelines, we present the existing evidence comparing both techniques for a variety of sinonasal malignancies.

Global and disease-specific health-related quality of life after complete endoscopic resection of anterior skull base neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery for neoplasms of the anterior skull base has revolutionized the treatment of these diseases. The relative effect of endoscopic procedures, however, has not been described in terms of disease-specific and global health-related quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

A single-center longitudinal study was performed of patients undergoing complete endoscopic resection of anterior skull base neoplasms. Patients presenting between October 2009 and September 2010 were enrolled. QoL assessments were based on the 22-question Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22), Health Utilities Index Mark II (HUI-2), and Short-Form 12 (SF-12) and were completed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Comparisons over time were made within subjects.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were enrolled; 11 completed preoperative and postoperative assessments (79%). Our cohort consisted of five men and six women; mean age was 55 years. Six patients had malignant tumors; four required adjuvant therapy. SNOT-22 scores were stable or improved in 10 cases (91%), with a significant difference for the cohort (mean, -33 points; p < 0.01). Ten (91%) patients had stable or improved HUI-2 scores (mean utility change, +0.13). SF-12 scores were stable for both mental (p = 0.17) and physical (p = 0.26) components. Mean quality-adjusted life year gain over the study period was 0.07.

CONCLUSION

Complete endoscopic resection of anterior skull base neoplasms is oncologically sound with anecdotal QoL improvements relative to open craniofacial resection. We show positive, quantifiable QoL results with validated global and disease-specific instruments. Additional work will help to improve outcomes in this population and will be used in formal cost-effectiveness analysis.

Endoscopic vs Transfacial Resection of Sinonasal Adenocarcinomas

Objectives. Compare the survival and the complication rates of 2 comparable groups of patients who underwent either endoscopic or transfacial resection of a sinonasal adenocarcinoma.

Study Design. Historical cohort study.

Setting. Tertiary referral center.

Subjects and Methods. Twenty-four patients with sinonasal adenocarcinomas who recently underwent an endoscopy (the ENDO group, 1999-2009) were compared with 24 patients who underwent a lateral rhinotomy procedure (the LR group, 1993-2007). The present retrospective study included patients who would have had an endoscopic resection in 2011.

Results. The groups were comparable in terms of age and sex ( P = .49), as well as tumor stages; 43 of the 48 patients had undergone postoperative radiotherapy. There were 13 T1-T2 and 11 T3-T4 tumors in the ENDO group compared with 12 T1-T2 and 12 T3-T4 tumors in the LR group ( P = .77). The mean length of follow-up was 38 months for the ENDO group and 89 for the LR group. The overall survival and recurrence-free rates were not significantly different ( P = .3 and P = .87, respectively). The median duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the ENDO group than in the LR group (4 vs 8 days, P < .0001). The rate of early complications was identical in both groups (12.5%).

Conclusion. The endoscopic approach is a safe and effective treatment in selected sinonasal adenocarcinoma cases. The early oncological outcome and morbidity associated with the endoscopic approach were comparable with a transfacial approach. Hospitalization was significantly reduced by the endoscopic approach. Although the endoscopic approach is less invasive, it requires an optimal preoperative imaging protocol and an experienced surgical team.

Anatomical correlates of endonasal surgery for sinonasal malignancies

In recent years, endoscopic endonasal techniques have been applied to the treatment of sinonasal malignancies. Comprehensive anatomical knowledge is essential to preserve oncological principles and minimize surgical morbidity. The bones that form the anterior cranial base are pneumatized and the sinuses provide surgical corridors for the endoscopic endonasal approach to the skull base. During endoscopic endonasal resection of sinonasal malignancies, usually, the intranasal portion of the tumor is first debulked to provide visualization of the margins and assess the extent of the tumor. Afterwards the tumor is completely removed and the margins of resection are defined. In case of dural resection, the reconstruction is done with vascularized tissue (septal flap or pericranial flap). Sinonasal malignant neoplasms that invade the skull base can be resected accordingly to oncological principles using endoscopic endonasal techniques. Profound knowledge of the endoscopic anatomy of the ventral cranial base is paramount in order to perform a safe resection and reconstruction.