The nose as a target organ in the diagnosis of severe aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease

Progress in understanding hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), the medications most commonly used for treating pain and inflammation, are the main triggers of drug hypersensitivity reactions. The latest classification of NSAIDs hypersensitivity by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) differentiates between cross-hypersensitivity reactions (CRs), associated with COX-1 inhibition, and selective reactions, associated with immunological mechanisms. Three phenotypes fill into the first group: NSAIDs-exacerbated respiratory disease, NSAIDs-exacerbated cutaneous disease and NSAIDs-induced urticaria/angioedema. Two phenotypes fill into the second one: single-NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema/anaphylaxis and single-NSAID-induced delayed reactions. Diagnosis of NSAIDs hypersensitivity is hampered by different factors, including the lack of validated in vitro biomarkers and the uselessness of skin tests. The advances achieved over recent years recommend a re-evaluation of the EAACI classification, as it does not consider other phenotypes such as blended reactions (coexistence of cutaneous and respiratory symptoms) or food-dependent NSAID-induced anaphylaxis. In addition, it does not regard the natural evolution of phenotypes and their potential interconversion, the development of tolerance over time or the role of atopy. Here, we address these topics. A state of the art on the underlying mechanisms and on the approaches for biomarkers discovery is also provided, including genetic studies and available information on transcriptomics and metabolomics.

Diagnostic Evaluation in Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a distinct clinical condition characterized by chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps, asthma, and hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Distinguishing AERD from other forms of chronic sinusitis, asthma, and NSAID reactivity has important clinical implications for management. The clinical history is helpful, but not adequate for confirming the diagnosis of AERD, in most cases. Diagnostic provocation challenge remains the only way to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of AERD. This article discusses the utility of the clinical history and the current evidence regarding measures that optimize the safety of performing diagnostic NSAID provocation challenges.

Evaluation of aspirin hypersensitivity in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

Conclusion The recurrence rates of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) were higher in the aspirin nasal provocation test (ANPT)-positive group, regardless of the presence of nasal polyps. Thus, a careful endoscopic examination is required during follow-up in ANPT-positive patients with CRS. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features and prognosis after surgical treatment in patients with CRS and aspirin hypersensitivity. Methods In a prospective study, 100 patients were analyzed with CRS who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery at the hospital from October 2012 to March 2013. This study measured changes in nasal volume and symptoms before and after the ANPT and examined patient's asthma history, allergy, Lund-Mackay score (LMS), total immunoglobulin E, percentage of peripheral eosinophils, and objectively measured relapse at 6 months. Results Patients wwith CRS and nasal polyps (CRSwNP) were more likely to have a positive ANPT test result compared to those without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) (21.4% vs 5.5%). The ANPT-positive group had a higher LMS and required more revision endoscopic sinus surgery than those in the ANPT-negative group. The results were that similar results were observed in CRSwNP and CRSsNP.

Mediator release after nasal aspirin provocation supports different phenotypes in subjects with hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs

BACKGROUND

Multiple NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema (MNSAID-UA) is an entity well differentiated from aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), although no detailed phenotype analysis has yet been performed. The objective was to evaluate the functional characteristics of MNSAID-UA subjects by analyzing the response to nasal lysine-aspirin challenge and measurement of nasal inflammatory mediator release compared with AERD subjects and controls.

METHODS

The study included 85 subjects with confirmed hypersensitivity to NSAIDs (≥3 episodes with >2 different NSAIDs or positive drug provocation) with either cutaneous (MNSAID-UA, n = 25) or respiratory manifestations (AERD, n = 60) and 30 tolerant controls (15 aspirin-tolerant asthmatic patients and 15 healthy controls). Nasal lavages at 0, 15, 60, and 120 min after lysine-aspirin challenge were analyzed for ECP, tryptase, PGE2 , PGD2 , LTD4 , and LTE4 .

RESULTS

Lysine nasal challenge was positive in 80% of the AERD cases but positive only in 12% of the MNSAID-UA group. MNSAID-UA subjects showed no changes in nasal ECP, whereas subjects with AERD had increased levels of ECP, with the highest peak at 15 min after challenge (P < 0.05). Tryptase levels were higher in AERD compared with MNSAID-UA and controls with the highest release of tryptase at 60 min (P < 0.05). Significant increases in PGD2 , LTD4 , and LTE4 were observed in AERD (at 60 min for PGD2 , LTD4 , and LTE4 ) but not in MNSAID-UA or control subjects (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Data support the observation that MNSAID-UA, although sharing a common response with AERD to COX inhibitors, seems to have a distinctive phenotype, based on the response to nasal challenge and the release of inflammatory mediators.

Two patterns of changes in nasal nitric oxide after lysine aspirin nasal challenge in patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease

BACKGROUND

Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) levels after nasal lysine acetylsalicylic acid (lys-ASA) challenge have not been determined. This study was designed to determine a pattern of changes after lys-ASA challenge in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) patients and to evaluate the usefulness of nNO measurements in the assessment of lys-ASA nasal challenge outcome.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with aspirin hypersensitivity, nasal polyps, and asthma were included. Aspirin-tolerant control groups consisted of 10 healthy volunteers without asthma and nasal polyps and 10 patients with nasal polyps without asthma. All subjects underwent nasal challenge with lys-ASA. nNO was measured before and 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours after control solution and lys-ASA administration.

RESULTS

A significant fall in nNO levels was noted in AERD patients with a positive result to challenges at time points 1 hour (p = 0.0033), 2 hours (p = 0.0033), and 3 hours (p = 0.026) after lys-ASA. A trend toward higher nNO concentrations was observed after lys-ASA challenge at the 2-hour (p = 0.018) and 4-hour (p = 0.018) time points compared with baseline in subjects with AERD and a clinically negative result to the challenge. No significant changes in nNO levels after the challenge were observed in control groups. The combined increase and decrease in nNO levels gave the sensitivity as 0.94 and specificity 1.00 at best.

CONCLUSION

nNO levels decrease after lys-ASA nasal challenge in subjects with AERD and a clinically positive result of the challenge. An unexpected trend toward an increase in nNO levels is observed in subjects with AERD and a clinically negative result of the challenge.