Chapter 3: Epistaxis

Sinuses and Common Rhinologic Conditions

Some of the most common rhinologic disorders that may present to the primary care provider include disorders of hemostasis, such as epistaxis, or sinonasal inflammatory disorders, such as allergic rhinitis and acute or chronic rhinosinusitis. This article is written with the intent to review these common rhinologic conditions for primary care providers and to summarize symptoms, diagnostic testing, differential diagnosis, and management/treatment approaches.

Early and Late Recurrent Epistaxis Admissions: Patterns of Incidence and Risk Factors

Objective Epistaxis is a common complaint, yet few studies have focused on the incidence and risk factors of recurrent epistaxis. Our objective was to determine the patterns of incidence and risk factors for recurrent epistaxis admission (REA). Study Design Case series with chart review. Settings Single academic center. Subjects and Methods The medical records of patients admitted for epistaxis between 1999 and 2015 were reviewed. The follow-up period was defined as 3 years following initial admission. REAs were categorized as early (30 days) and late (31 days to 3 years) following initial admission. Logistic regression was used to identify potential predictors of REAs. Results A total of 653 patients were included. Eighty-six patients (14%) had REAs: 48 (7.5%) early and 38 (6.5%) late. Nonlinear incidence curve was demonstrated for both early and late REAs. Based on logistic regression, prior nasal surgery and anemia were independent risk factors for early REAs. According to multivariate analysis, thrombocytopenia was significantly associated with late REAs. Conclusion Early and late REAs demonstrate different risk predictors. Knowledge of such risk factors may help in risk stratification for this selected group of patients. All patients at risk should be advised on possible preventive measures. Patients at risk for early REA may benefit from a more proactive approach.

Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor Use: An Under-Reported Cause of Profuse Nasal Bleeding

BACKGROUND

Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors enhance penile erection and have gained popularity not only for erectile dysfunction, but also in recreational settings. Nevertheless, adverse effects have been associated with their use, with nasal bleeding among them. PDE-5 inhibitor action is materialized through the inhibition of the cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) enzyme. cGMP is present at several sites of the human body in addition to the corpus cavernosum, leading to the adverse effects associated with its nonselective inhibition.

CASE REPORTS

Two male patients with severe epistaxis who were taking PDE-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction or recreational purposes are discussed. Surgical intervention was required in both patients to control the nasal hemorrhage. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Nasal bleeding in patients who are taking PDE-5 inhibitors might represent an under-reported cause of epistaxis because of the unwillingness of most male patients to discuss issues pertaining their use without hesitation. Yet such episodes are rather profuse. This is especially true when the venous engorgement caused in the nasal mucosa by the smooth muscle relaxant effect of PDE-5 inhibitors is combined with a second event (e.g., specific drugs or blood dyscrasia). Emergency physicians should be also aware of the possibility that in the coming years the number of such cases might increase because of the increased use of these medications for erectile dysfunction or recreational purposes. It is likely that these patients could not be managed conservatively, but would rather require referral to an Ear, Nose, and Throat Department for surgical intervention.

The utility of FloSeal haemostatic agent in the management of epistaxis

Background:

FloSeal, a locally applied haemostatic agent, has been shown to be effective in a variety of clinical situations. This study investigated its potential benefits in the management of epistaxis.

Methods:

The outcomes of a series of patients with epistaxis presenting to one ENT unit, over a two-month period, were compared. Patients were either treated with FloSeal or traditional epistaxis management techniques. Success of FloSeal was classed as complete haemostasis after its application, without the need for further interventions and no readmission with epistaxis within 7 days.

Results:

Our study comprised 101 adults, with a mean age of 70 years (range, 22–98 years). The overall success rate for FloSeal was 14 per cent (5 out of 36 cases). It was successful in 66 per cent of anterior epistaxis cases (2 out of 3) and in only 9 per cent of posterior epistaxis cases (3 out of 33). There was a significantly higher failure rate of FloSeal compared with nasal packing in posterior epistaxis (p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Our findings suggest that FloSeal has a limited role in the management of epistaxis.

Cytological changes in nasal secretions accompanying delayed nasal response to allergen challenge

BACKGROUND

Patients with allergic rhinitis when challenged with allergen develop various types of nasal response, such as an immediate nasal response (INR), late nasal response (LNR), dual late nasal response (DLNR), or delayed nasal response (DYNR), probably because of different hypersensitivity mechanisms. This study was designed to investigate the cytological changes in the nasal secretions (NSs) during the DYNR, beginning 24-32 hours, reaching maximum at 32-36 hours, and resolving within 56 hours after the nasal provocation tests (NPTs) with allergens.

METHODS

In 45 allergic rhinitis patients developing 45 positive DYNRs (p < 0.01), the NPTs and the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) controls were repeated and supplemented with cytological examination of the NSs and determination of interferon (IFN) γ and IL-4 in nasal lavage fluid (NLF).

RESULTS

The repeated DYNR (p < 0.001) was accompanied by significant changes (p < 0.05) in the counts of neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, epithelial and goblet cells, and, to a limited extent, of plasma cells and platelets in the NSs and increased concentrations of IFN-γ but not of IL-4, in NLF between 24 and 48 hours after the NPT. No significant cytological changes were found in NSs during the PBS controls (p > 0.1).

CONCLUSION

The DYNR is associated with cytological profiles in the NS different from those observed during the INR or LNR. The significant count changes of neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, epithelial and goblet cells in NSs, and increased IFN-γ but not of IL-4 concentrations in the NLF, suggest a possible involvement of the cell-mediated hypersensitivity in the DYNR. These results also emphasize the diagnostic value of NPTs combined with cytological examination of the NSs in patients with nasal allergy.