Assessing the relationship between serum resistin and nasal obstruction in children with allergic rhinitis

A Randomized Trial of Comparing a Combination of Montelukast and Budesonide With Budesonide in Allergic Rhinitis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

It is not unequivocally proven whether a combination of an intranasal corticosteroids (INSs) and a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist has greater efficacy than INSs in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR).

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center, randomized, open-label study.

METHODS

Study subjects included 46 participants with SAR. Participants were randomized to receive budesonide (BD; 256 μg) plus montelukast (MNT; 10 mg) (BD + MNT) or BD alone (256 μg) for 2 weeks. Visual analog scale scores for five major symptoms of SAR, nasal cavity volume (NCV), nasal airway resistance (NAR), and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) were assessed before and at the end of treatments.

RESULTS

Both treatments significantly improved the five main SAR symptoms from baseline; however, BD + MNT produced significantly greater improvements in nasal blockage and nasal itching compared to BD alone. At baseline, the nasal blockage score was significantly correlated with NCV and NAR (r = -0.473, P = .002 and r = -0.383, P = .013, respectively). After 2 weeks of treatment, BD + MNT significantly improved NCV, but not NAR, to a greater level than BD. The number of patients with FeNO concentration ≥ 30 ppb at baseline was significantly decreased after BD + MNT treatment, but not after BD treatment. Similarly, BD + MNT treatment led to a significantly greater decrease in FeNO concentration than BD treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

BD + MNT treatment may have an overall superior efficacy than BD monotherapy for patients with SAR, especially in improvement of nasal blockage, itching, and subclinical lower airway inflammation. Also, NCV and NAR could be used to assess nasal blockage more accurately.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1b Laryngoscope, 131:E1054-E1061, 2021.

Nasal obstructive disorders induce medical treatment failure in paediatric persistent allergic rhinitis (The NODPAR Study)

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is the most common chronic disease among children. To characterize the disease, a modified classification of severity (m-ARIA) has recently been validated in AR children. When medical treatment fails, surgery for nasal obstructive disorders (NOD) may be a therapeutic option. Our objective was to assess the prevalence of NOD and their influence in medical treatment response among children with persistent AR (PER).

METHODS

In a prospective, real-life study, 130 paediatric PER patients (13.1 ± 2.8 years, females 31.5%, severe rhinitis 49%) referred from Allergy to ENT department were assessed for their response (R, responders; NR, non-responders) to medical treatment (intranasal steroids and antihistamines or antileukotrienes) by direct questioning and nasal symptom visual analogue scale, the presence of NOD (septal deformity, turbinate enlargement and adenoidal hyperplasia), comorbidities, nasal symptoms, rhinitis severity (modified ARIA criterion) and asthma control (International Consensus On Pediatric Asthma criterion).

RESULTS

After 2 months of treatment, the NR group presented a higher prevalence of obstructive septal deformity and severe inferior turbinate enlargement when compared with the R group. Higher septal deformity and turbinate enlargement scores were strongly associated with treatment refractoriness. The prevalence of severe PER was also higher for the NR group. Higher asthma control scores were associated with the probability of treatment-induced improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

In paediatric PER patients, medical therapy refractoriness was associated with NOD, mainly septal deformity and turbinate enlargement. In those patients, ENT examination will facilitate an early NOD diagnosis in order to indicate potential corrective surgery.

Intranasal budesonide in children affected by persistent allergic rhinitis and its effect on nasal patency and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score

BACKGROUND

Intranasal steroids are recognized as an effective treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) although their effect on nasal patency has never been evaluated with an objective instrument such as anterior rhinomanometry in children. Moreover this effect has been widely assessed with total Nasal Symptom Scores (NSS) including all symptoms of allergic rhinitis and not with scores specifically focused on nasal obstruction such as the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation score (NOSE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty children (42 males and 18 female) aged 6-10 years, affected by persistent AR, were randomized and divided in two groups of 30 children to be included in an unblinded trial: one group treated with intranasal budesonide and isotonic nasal saline for 2 weeks and the other group treated only with isotonic nasal saline for 2 weeks. Each child underwent rhinomanometry and completed the NSS and the NOSE scores before and after treatment.

RESULTS

At the baseline nasal patency and NSS total score, NOSE total scores were correlated (r=-0.29, p<0.001; r=-60, p<0.001). After 2 weeks of treatment improvements in nasal patency, NSS and NOSE were seen (Δ NSS 4.13 ± 1.38 vs 1.33 ± 1.93, p<0.001; Δ NOSE 34 ± 17.97 vs 9 ± 18.21, p<0.001; Δ nasal patency -26.13 ± 25.25 vs -11.83 ± 11.31, p<0.001). Correlations were found between rhinitis duration and Δ nasal patency and Δ NOSE (r=-0.84, p<0.001; r=0.43, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Intranasal budesonide is effective in increasing nasal patency in children. Moreover the NOSE score was strongly correlated with nasal flow and, hence, this score should be regarded as a valid and reliable instrument in children.

Nasal expiratory sound analysis for evaluation of nasal patency in perennial allergic rhinitis patients treated with nasal corticosteroids

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of nasal expiratory sound analysis in determining the degree of nasal obstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have analyzed and recorded the expiratory nasal sounds in 18 healthy controls and in 30 patients with inferior turbinate hypertrophy before and after the administration of nasal corticosteroid treatment. Analysis consisted of the time-expanded waveform, spectral analysis with time-averaged fast Fourier transform and waveform analysis of nasal sound.

RESULTS

Before treatment, an increase in sound intensity at high frequency was observed in the sound analyses of the patients, whereas after treatment, a decrease in sound intensity at high frequency was noted in the sound analyses of the patients. The differences between the patients and the control group were statistically significant. Data obtained with the Odiosoft-Rhino method were correlated with symptom scores and endoscopic examination.

CONCLUSION

Expiratory nasal sound is a practical and objective tool, which can be reliably used not only for the assessment of the degree of nasal blockage but also for the comparison of different treatment alternatives.