Adherence and systemic reaction rates to allergy immunotherapy among veterans

Causes of Non-Adherence to Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy: A Foundation towards a Patient-Personalized Approach

BACKGROUND

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying therapy for allergic conditions, resulting in a long-lasting tolerance beyond the duration of the treatment. Due to the strong relationship between the effectiveness, its optimal duration (at least three years) and the observation of the correct administration protocol, appropriate adherence to the plan of treatment represents a critical factor for the therapeutical success of AIT.

METHODS

Analysis of studies about the rate of adherence in subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy, which are the main routes of administration of AIT.

RESULTS

There are different causes leading to a premature interruption of the therapy or to it being incorrectly carried out; the most reported include erroneous expectations of the effectiveness and the adverse effects, economic issues, inconvenience and unrelated clinical conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

An attentive analysis of the main causes of dropouts may be useful to improve the management of these patients and to develop new strategies for a personalized approach. These strategies should be dynamic, involving attentive communication between the physician and the patient about all the possible criticalities, especially in the initial phase of the therapy, and facilitating, as much as possible, access to healthcare providers over the course of the maintenance phase, including by exploiting technological tools.

Compliance With Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Appointments in an Urban Tertiary Care Setting

INTRODUCTION

Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is an effective treatment for allergic disease such as allergic rhinitis and asthma. Reported adherence rates to SCIT have been low, ranging between 50% and 89%. This study sought to evaluate compliance to SCIT in an urban "safety net," tertiary care center, and to evaluate for disparities in compliance based upon insurance and socioeconomic status.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of SCIT patients between 2003 and 2016 was performed. Demographic data, insurance carriers, and comorbidities were collected. Compliance was evaluated on treatment adherence (percentage of injections administered/scheduled appointments). Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software. Linear regression analysis was performed to compare compliance to the variables, asthma, duration of therapy, payor, and age. Analysis of variance was used to compare mean compliance between payor groups.

RESULTS

Two hundred five patients met our inclusion criteria and 28 were excluded. Insurance composition was Medicaid (67, 33%), Medicare (18, 9%), Health Safety Net (HSN) in Massachusetts (33, 16%), and commercial payors (82, 42%). Linear regression demonstrated that age, duration of therapy, and asthma status were not related to the percentage of missed doses ( P > .05). Payor status was statistically predictive of missed doses ( P = .02). When comparing average percentage of missed immunotherapy shots, Medicaid patients missed the most 34.2%, followed by Medicare 24.4%, commercial insurance 19.9%, and HSN in Massachusetts 18.5% ( P ≤ .02).

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of patients at a tertiary care "safety-net" center serving a low-income population, compliance to SCIT was found to be overall high but lower in the Medicaid population.