Expression Analysis of the LFY and TFL1 Homologs in Floral Buds of Japanese Pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) and Quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.)

Indeterminate growth of the umbel inflorescence and bulb is associated with increased expression of the TFL1 homologue, AcTFL1, in onion

TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1) is a key gene for maintenance of vegetative and inflorescence indeterminacy and architecture. In onion, flowering and bulbing are two distinct developmental phases, each under complex environmental regulatory control. We have identified two CEN/TFL1-like genes from onion designated as AcTFL1 and AcCEN1. AcTFL1 is expressed during bulbing and inflorescence development with expression increasing with indeterminate growth of the umbel and the bulb suggesting possible conservation of function. Increase in AcTFL1 expression during umbel growth is associated with a simultaneous reduction in expression of AcLFY. Expression of AcTFL1 within the bulb is lowest in the outermost layers and highest in the innermost (youngest) layers. Bulb storage at room temperature or in cold leads to a gradual reduction in AcTFL1 levels in the meristem-containing tissues, the decrease being faster in the variety not requiring vernalization. Constitutive expression of AcTFL1, but not AcCEN1 complements the Arabidopsis tfl1-14 mutant and delays flowering in wild type suggesting conservation of the AcTFL1 function even in the distantly related Arabidopsis. Taken together, AcTFL1 appears to be the functional counterpart of TFL1 and regulates indeterminate growth of the umbel inflorescence as well as bulb development in onion.

The expression level of Rosa Terminal Flower 1 (RTFL1) is related with recurrent flowering in roses

We examined the relationship between the recurrent flowering character and the expression patterns of TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) homologs in roses, using flower buds of Rosa multiflora, R. rugosa, R. chinensis, and six other rose species and nine rose cultivars. RTFL1 (Rosa TFL1) genes were amplified from rose genomic DNA using a combination of degenerate and gene-specific primers by thermal asymmetric interlaced-PCR and normal PCR, respectively. Their copy numbers in different species were determined by Southern blots. We used real-time PCR to analyze the expression patterns of RTFL1 genes at four developmental stages (pre-sprouting, young, mid-aged, and mature flower buds). Our results show that there are at least three RTFL1 homologs in roses; RTFL1a, RTFL1b, and RTFL1c. The sequences of the homologs were more similar among the same homolog in different species than among the different homologs in the same species. For RTFL1a, we detected two copies in R. multiflora, two copies in R. rugosa, and one copy in R. chinensis. For RTFL1c, we detected one copy in R. multiflora, two copies in R. rugosa, and three copies in R. chinensis. We detected only one copy of RTFL1b in R. chinensis. RTFL1c was expressed at high levels at all four flowering stages in R. multiflora and R. rugosa, which are non-recurrent flowering species, whereas it was barely detected in R. chinensis (a recurrent flowering species) at any stage. These results were further verified in six other non-recurrent flowering species and nine recurrent flowering cultivars. These results suggest that the recurrent flowering habit in roses results from lower expression of RTFL1c, which may be related to recurrent flowering character in roses.

Quantitative trait loci for flowering time and inflorescence architecture in rose

The pattern of development of the inflorescence is an important characteristic in ornamental plants, where the economic value is in the flower. The genetic determinism of inflorescence architecture is poorly understood, especially in woody perennial plants with long life cycles. Our objective was to study the genetic determinism of this characteristic in rose. The genetic architectures of 10 traits associated with the developmental timing and architecture of the inflorescence, and with flower production were investigated in a F(1) diploid garden rose population, based on intensive measurements of phenological and morphological traits in a field. There were substantial genetic variations in inflorescence development traits, with broad-sense heritabilities ranging from 0.82 to 0.93. Genotypic correlations were significant for most (87%) pairs of traits, suggesting either pleiotropy or tight linkage among loci. However, non-significant and low correlations between some pairs of traits revealed two independent developmental pathways controlling inflorescence architecture: (1) the production of inflorescence nodes increased the number of branches and the production of flowers; (2) internode elongation connected with frequent branching increased the number of branches and the production of flowers. QTL mapping identified six common QTL regions (cQTL) for inflorescence developmental traits. A QTL for flowering time and many inflorescence traits were mapped to the same cQTL. Several candidate genes that are known to control inflorescence developmental traits and gibberellin signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana were mapped in rose. Rose orthologues of FLOWERING LOCUS T (RoFT), TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (RoKSN), SPINDLY (RoSPINDLY), DELLA (RoDELLA), and SLEEPY (RoSLEEPY) co-localized with cQTL for relevant traits. This is the first report on the genetic basis of complex inflorescence developmental traits in rose.