Comparison of pain catastrophizing and anxiety in patients with dyspareunia and healthy women: a cross-sectional study

Sexual Function of Women with and without Pregnancy-Related Pelvic Girdle Pain and its Relationship with Physical Activity, Kinesiophobia and Body Image: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study

The aim of this study was to compare the sexual function of women with and without pregnancy-related PGP, and to investigate its relationship with physical activity (PA), kinesiophobia, and body image (BI). Demographic characteristics, sexual function (Pregnancy Sexual Response Inventory), PA (Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire), kinesiophobia (Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale), and BI (Body Image in Pregnancy Scale) of 125 pregnant women were recorded. In the PGP group (n = 46), visual analogue scales were used to assess the pain intensity during resting and sexual activity, and Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire was used to evaluate the activity limitation. Although total sexual function and BI scores of the groups were similar (p > 0.05), dyspareunia during pregnancy and level of kinesiophobia were higher, and energy expenditure during moderate-intensity PA was lower in pregnant women with PGP (p < 0.05). The PGP group had moderate activity limitation and reported increased PGP intensity during sexual activities (p < 0.001). PA level was significantly correlated with sexual desire (r = 0.180), and overall sexual function was correlated with kinesiophobia (r = -0.344) and BI (r = -0.199) during pregnancy (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that pregnant women with PGP are more vulnerable to sexual dysfunctions, and there is a need to develop biopsychosocial framework-oriented management strategies which aim to improve PA level and to eliminate psychological factors such as kinesiophobia and negative BI.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05990361.

Pain Sensitivity and Acute Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: The Mediating Roles of Pain Self-Efficacy and Pain Catastrophizing

BACKGROUND

Inadequately managed postoperative pain remains a common issue. Examining factors like pain sensitivity, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy can help improve postoperative pain management. While these factors have been identified as potential predictors of acute postoperative pain, their effects have been inconsistent. Few studies have explored the interactions between these factors.

AIM

To investigate the influence of preoperative pain sensitivity, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy on acute postoperative pain in abdominal surgery patients and to determine the mediating roles of pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy in the relationship between pain sensitivity and acute postoperative pain, as per the gate control theory.

METHODS

A total of 246 patients were enrolled in this study. General information was collected before surgery, and the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) were administered. After surgery, patients' average pain scores over the 24 hours were reported using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Correlation analyses and a structural equation model were used to examine the relationships among these variables.

RESULTS

NRS scores over 3 during the 24 hours post-surgery were reported by 21.54% of patients. Postoperative acute pain was found to be associated with pain sensitivity (rs = 0.463, p < .001), pain catastrophizing (rs = 0.328, p < .001), and pain self-efficacy (rs = -0.558, p < .001). A direct effect on postoperative acute pain was exerted by pain sensitivity (effect = 0.250, p = .001), along with indirect effects through: (A) pain catastrophizing (effect = 0.028, p = .001); (B) pain self-efficacy (effect = 0.132, p = .001); and (C) the chain mediation of pain self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing (effect = 0.021, p = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of postoperative acute pain can be predicted by pain self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing, and the connection between moderate pain sensitivity and postoperative acute pain severity is mediated by them. Therefore, intervention programs aimed at boosting pain self-efficacy and reducing pain catastrophizing can enhance postoperative pain outcomes for abdominal surgery patients.