[Level of evidence for therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides]

[Pharmacogenetics of aminoglycoside ototoxicity: State of knowledge and practices - Recommendations of the Francophone Network of Pharmacogenetics (RNPGx)]

The administration of aminoglycosides can induce nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity, which can be monitored through pharmacological therapeutic drug monitoring. However, there are cases of genetic predisposition to ototoxicity related to the MT-RNR1 gene, which may occur from the first administrations. Pharmacogenetic analysis recommendations have recently been proposed by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). The Francophone Pharmacogenetics Network (RNPGx) provides a bibliographic synthesis of this genetic predisposition, as well as professional recommendations. The MT-RNR1 gene codes for mitochondrial 12S rRNA, which constitutes the small subunit of the mitochondrial ribosome. Three variants can be identified: the variants m.1555A>G and m.1494C>T of the MT-RNR1 gene have a 'high' level of evidence regarding the risk of ototoxicity. The variant m.1095T>C has a 'moderate' level of evidence. The search for these variants can be performed in the laboratory if the administration of aminoglycosides can be delayed after obtaining the result. However, if the treatment is urgent, there is currently no rapid test available in France (a 'point-of-care' test is authorized in Great Britain). RNPGx considers: (1) the search for the m.1555A>G, m.1494C>T variants as 'highly recommended' and the m.1095T>C variant as 'moderately recommended' before the administration of an aminoglycoside (if compatible with the medical context). It should be noted that the level of heteroplasmy detected does not modify the recommendation; (2) pharmacogenetic analysis is currently not feasible in situations of short-term aminoglycoside administration, in the absence of an available analytical solution (rapid test to be evaluated in France); (3) the retrospective analysis in case of aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity is 'recommended'; (4) analysis of relatives is 'recommended'. Through this summary, RNPGx proposes an updated review of the MT-RNR1-aminoglycoside gene-drug pair to serve as a basis for adapting practices regarding pharmacogenetic analysis related to aminoglycoside treatment.

An international survey on aminoglycoside practices in critically ill patients: the AMINO III study

BACKGROUND

While aminoglycosides (AG) have been used for decades, debate remains on their optimal dosing strategy. We investigated the international practices of AG usage specifically regarding dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in critically ill patients. We conducted a prospective, multicentre, observational, cohort study in 59 intensive-care units (ICUs) in 5 countries enrolling all ICU patients receiving AG therapy for septic shock.

RESULTS

We enrolled 931 septic ICU patients [mean ± standard deviation, age 63 ± 15 years, female 364 (39%), median (IQR) SAPS II 51 (38-65)] receiving AG as part of empirical (761, 84%) or directed (147, 16%) therapy. The AG used was amikacin in 614 (66%), gentamicin in 303 (33%), and tobramycin in 14 (1%) patients. The median (IQR) duration of therapy was 2 (1-3) days, the number of doses was 2 (1-2), the median dose was 25 ± 6, 6 ± 2, and 6 ± 2 mg/kg for amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin respectively, and the median dosing interval was 26 (23.5-43.5) h. TDM of C_max and C_min was performed in 437 (47%) and 501 (57%) patients, respectively, after the first dose with 295 (68%) patients achieving a C_max/MIC > 8 and 353 (71%) having concentrations above C_min recommended thresholds. The ICU mortality rate was 27% with multivariable analysis showing no correlation between AG dosing or pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Short courses of high AG doses are mainly used in ICU patients with septic shock, although wide variability in AG usage is reported. We could show no correlation between PK/PD target attainment and clinical outcome. Efforts to optimize the first AG dose remain necessary. Trial registration Clinical Trials, NCT02850029, registered on 29th July 2016, retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Evaluation of the clinical practice of aminoglycoside use in paediatric patients in Kenya: findings and implications for lower-middle income countries

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the practice of aminoglycoside use/monitoring in Kenya and explore healthcare worker (HCW) perceptions of aminoglycoside monitoring to identify gaps and opportunities for future improvements, given the low therapeutic index of aminoglycosides.

METHODS

This was a two-phase study whereby we reviewed patients' medical records at Kenyatta National Hospital (October-December 2016) in Phase 1 and interviewed HCWs face to face in Phase 2. Outcome measures included describing and evaluating the practice of aminoglycoside use and monitoring and compliance to guidelines. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, out of the 2318 patients admitted, 192 patients (8.3%) were prescribed an aminoglycoside, of which 102 (53.1%) had aminoglycoside doses that did not conform to national guidelines. Aminoglycoside-related adverse effects were suspected in 65 (33.9%) patients. Monitoring of aminoglycoside therapy was performed in only 17 (8.9%) patients, with no therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), attributed mainly to knowledge and skill gaps and lack of resources. Out of the 28 recruited HCWs, 18 (64.3%) needed training in how to perform and interpret TDM results.

CONCLUSIONS

The practice of using and monitoring aminoglycosides was suboptimal, raising concerns around potential avoidable harm to patients. The identified gaps could form the basis for developing strategies to improve the future use of aminoglycosides, not only in Kenya but also in other countries with similar settings and resources.

Is Computer-Assisted Aminoglycoside Dosing Managed by a Pharmacist a Safety Tool of Pharmacotherapy?

This pilot prospective study verified the hypothesis that use of computer-assisted therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides by pharmacists leads to better safety therapeutic outcomes and cost avoidance than only concentration measurement and dose adjustments based on a physician’s experience. Two groups of patients were enrolled according to the technique of monitoring. Patients (Group 1, n=52) underwent monitoring by a pharmacist using pharmacokinetic software. In a control group (Group 2, n=11), plasma levels were measured but not interpreted by the pharmacist, only by physicians. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in factors influenced by therapy. However, the results are not statistically significant but a comparison of the groups showed a clear trend towards safety and cost avoidance, thus supporting therapeutic drug monitoring. Safety limits were achieved in 76 % and 63 % of cases in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. More patients achieved both concentrations (peak and trough) with falling eGFR in Group 1. In present pilot study, the pharmacist improved the care of patients on aminoglycoside therapy. A larger study is needed to demonstrate statistically significantly improved safety and cost avoidance of aminoglycoside therapy monitoring by the pharmacist using pharmacokinetic software.

Interest of therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides administered by a monodose regimen

BACKGROUND

Although the once-daily regimen of aminoglycosides (AG) is considered as predominantly used by many centers, the level of evidence of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of AG in cases of once-daily has not been clearly defined. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of TDM in achievement or maintaining target serum concentrations in patients receiving once-daily administration of AG.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients having received a once daily amikacin or gentamicin and underwent routine TDM. A longitudinal follow up was performed. Data were analyzed according to the adhesion or not to recommendations. A logistic regression was performed in order to evaluate the effect of covariates (age, gender, weight, creatinine clearance [CLcr], TDM-based dose adjustment, weighted dose of AG) on the achievement of non-toxic Cmin.

RESULTS

A total 437 blood samples issued from 324 patients were analyzed. The cut-off value of Clcr associated with a risk of toxic Cmin was≤41.66mL/min (OR: 11.29; 95%CI: 7.21-17.61; P<0.0001). Eighty-eight patients (27.1%) have at least two sampling points. The univariate analysis showed that the age, weight, CLcr and TDM-based dose adjustment were found to be significant factors in the achievement of non-toxic Cmin. In multivariate analysis, only TDM-based dose adjustment remains a significant factor in the achievement of non-toxic Cmin (OR: 6.66; 95%CI: 2.26-19.63; P=0.0006).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the usefulness of TDM-based dosing adjustment of AG antibiotics in achieving nontoxic trough concentrations, particularly in critically ill patients, as they are prone to a renal impairment.

Determinants of amikacin first peak concentration in critically ill patients

Amikacin antimicrobial effect has been correlated with the ratio of the peak concentration (C_max ) to the minimum inhibitory concentration. A target C_max ≥ 60-80 mg/L has been suggested. It has been shown that such target is not achieved in a large proportion of critically ill patients in intensive care units. A retrospective analysis was performed to examine the determinants of C_max ≥ 80 mg/L on the first peak in 339 critically ill patients treated by amikacin. The influence of available variables on C_max target attainment was analyzed using a classification and regression tree (CART) and logistic regression. Mean C_max in the 339 patients was 73.0 ± 23.9 mg/L, with a target attainment rate (TAR, C_max ≥ 80 mg/L) of 37.5%. In CART analysis, the strongest predictor of amikacin target peak attainment was dose per kilogram of lean body weight (dose/LBW). TAR was 60.1% in patients with dose/LBW ≥ 37.8 vs. 19.9% in patients with lower dose/LBW (OR = 6.0 (95% CI: 3.6-10.2)). Renal function was a secondary predictor of C_max . Logistic regression analysis identified dose per kilogram of ideal body weight (OR = 1.13 (95% CI: 1.09-1.17)) and creatinine clearance (OR = 0.993 (95% CI: 0.988-0.998)) as predictors of target peak achievement. Based on our results, an amikacin dose ≥ 37.8 mg/kg of LBW should be used to optimize the attainment of C_max ≥ 80 mg/L after the first dose in critically ill patients. An even higher dose may be necessary in patients with normal renal function.