Insidious onset of shoulder girdle weakness

Coupled effect of load weights and belt use on male shoulder pressure redistribution

Shoulder pressure redistribution is jointly affected by backpack loads and belt support. However, the combined effect of both factors has rarely been fully evaluated. Here, we studied the coupled effect of backpack loads and belt support on shoulder pressure redistribution. All twenty-eight healthy male subjects underwent eight loading conditions with both chest and hip belts fastened (CH) and unfastened (CON) in four conditions where the backpack weighed 7.5, 15, 22.5, and 30% of body weight (BW). Shoulder pressure distribution was quantified through a pressure-sensing vest mat. The results showed that using the hip belt and chest belt was effective in relieving the high pressure in the lateral clavicle and medial trapezius region and strengthening the load-bearing capacity of shoulder. However, the assistance in pressure relief of using belt was weakened when load increased to 30% BW. This study also showed that the belt use can be effective in improving pressure asymmetry on both sides.

The effects of shoulder morphology on the distribution of shoulder pressure during load carriage

To enhance the prevention of shoulder pressure injuries in various load-bearing populations, the effects of shoulder morphology on pressure distribution were investigated. In this study, 69 participants underwent three-dimensional scanning, and based on shoulder morphological characteristic indicators, they were classified into four shoulder types. From these, 28 participants were selected to have the pressure within shoulder regions measured using a pressure-sensing vest while carrying a backpack load equivalent to 15% of their body weight. The results indicated that variations in shoulder morphology significantly impact pressure distribution. The greater bumpiness of the shoulder surface contributed to pressure concentration at specific points, resulting in uneven pressure distribution. The enhanced fullness of the shoulder surface promoted even pressure dispersal across the area. This study provided a theoretical basis for developing more effective shoulder injury prevention and management strategies tailored to load-bearing populations with different shoulder types.

Physical therapists referring patients to physicians: a review of case reports and series

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive.

BACKGROUND

An important role for physical therapists in the healthcare delivery system is to recognize when patient referral to a physician or other healthcare provider is indicated. Few studies exist describing physical therapists' evaluative and diagnostic processes leading to patient referral to a physician.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize published patient case reports that described physical therapist/patient episodes of care that resulted in the referral of the patient to a physician and a subsequent diagnosis of medical disease.

METHODS

A literature search identified 78 case reports describing physical therapist referral of patients to physicians with subsequent diagnosis of a medical condition. Two evaluators reviewed the cases and summarized (1) how and when patients accessed physical therapy services, (2) timing of patient referral to a physician, (3) resultant medical diagnoses, (4) physical therapists' role in referral of patients for diagnostic testing, and (5) relevant patient symptom description, health history, review of systems, and physical examination findings.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight (74.4%) of 78 patients had been referred to a physical therapist by their physician, while the remaining 20 patients accessed physical therapy services via direct access. The patients' primary presenting symptoms included pain (n = 60), weakness (n = 4), tingling/numbness (n = 2), or a combination (n = 12). Patient referrals to a physician occurred at the initial physical therapy session in 58 (74.4%) of 78 cases. A majority of patient referrals to a physician (n = 65) were related to primary presenting symptoms, including manifestations inconsistent with physician diagnosis, recent worsening without cause, unusual accompanying symptoms such as fatigue and/or weakness, and inadequate response to treatment. Resultant diagnoses included neuromusculoskeletal disorders (n = 53; fractures and tumors most common), visceral disorders (n = 14; cardiovascular involvement most common), and medication-related disorders (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

This review of published patient case reports provides numerous examples of physical therapists using effective multifactorial screening strategies for referred and direct-access patients, leading to timely patient referrals to physicians. The therapist-initiated patient referral to a physician led to subsequent diagnosis of a wide range of conditions and pathological processes.

Screening for medical problems in patients with upper extremity signs and symptoms

NARRATIVE REVIEW: Hand therapists must be able to identify signs and symptoms of systemic disease that can mimic integumentary, neuromuscular, or musculoskeletal dysfunction evaluated and treated within their scope of practice. Pneumonia, complications of pacemakers, liver disease, kidney stones, ectopic pregnancy, and myocardial ischemia are only a few examples of problems and systemic diseases that can cause shoulder or upper extremity signs or symptoms. A screening model is presented for use by therapists in all practice settings. Information gathered is combined with results from the objective evaluation in making a treatment-versus-referral decision. Knowing the risk factors for various illnesses, diseases, and conditions will help guide the therapist in knowing when to screen for specific problems. Recognizing red flag histories, signs, and symptoms will also alert the therapist to the need for additional questions. Clues to screening and tips for physician referral are offered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

Medical screening and evacuation: cauda equina syndrome in a combat zone

STUDY DESIGN

Resident's case problem.

BACKGROUND

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare, potentially devastating, disorder and is considered a true neurologic emergency. CES often has a rapid clinical progression, making timely recognition and immediate surgical referral essential.

DIAGNOSIS

A 32-year-old male presented to a medical aid station in Iraq with a history of 4 weeks of insidious onset and recent worsening of low back, left buttock, and posterior left thigh pain. He denied symptoms distal to the knee, paresthesias, saddle anesthesia, or bowel and bladder function changes. At the initial examination, the patient was neurologically intact throughout all lumbosacral levels with negative straight-leg raises. He also presented with severely limited lumbar flexion active range of motion, and reduction of symptoms occurred with repeated lumbar extension. At the follow-up visit, 10 days later, he reported a new, sudden onset of saddle anesthesia, constipation, and urinary hesitancy, with physical exam findings of right plantar flexion weakness, absent right ankle reflex, and decreased anal sphincter tone. No advanced medical imaging capabilities were available locally. Due to suspected CES, the patient was medically evacuated to a neurosurgeon and within 48 hours underwent an emergent L4-5 laminectomy/decompression. He returned to full military duty 18 weeks after surgery without back or lower extremity symptoms or neurological deficit.

DISCUSSION

This case demonstrates the importance of continual medical screening for physical therapists throughout the patient management cycle. It further demonstrates the importance of immediate referral to surgical specialists when CES is suspected, as rapid intervention offers the best prognosis for recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Differential diagnosis, level 4. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(7):541-549, Epub 24 February 2009. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2999.