1
|
Song D, Liu D, Yang M, Chen S, Ning W, Li X, Yang J, Li Y, Guo Y, Chen Y, Shang S, Zhang H. Quality of life in elderly patients with Neuro-co-Cardiological Diseases: Rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysis of WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36 instruments. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2024; 116:105172. [PMID: 37716028 DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The quality of life (QOL) in elderly patients with neuro-co-cardiological diseases multimorbidity (NCCD) exhibits distinct features, but there is a scarcity of research in this specialized area. This study seeks to comprehensively assess the QOL of elderly patients with NCCD, employing both the WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36 instruments, while concurrently evaluating the validity and reliability of these two measurement scales. METHODS The study participants were derived from the Elderly Individuals with Neuro-co-Cardiological Diseases Registered Cohort Study (EINCCDRCS). WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36 were used for QOL assessment. Rasch analysis, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were conducted. Internal consistency, ceiling, and floor effects were also analyzed. RESULTS 202 patients from the EINCCDRCS were included in the study. Both scales showed good reliability and validity. SF-36 demonstrated better distribution and targeting compared to WHOQOL-BREF. Some items exhibited potential bias in specific patient groups. However, the 'Role limitations due to emotional problems' component showed suboptimal performance in certain assessments, suggesting its consideration for removal in practical use. Differential item functioning was observed in patients with anxiety, depression, and cognitive impairment, highlighting the impact of these conditions on the QOL of elderly NCCD patients. CONCLUSIONS Both WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36 are effective instruments for assessing QOL in elderly NCCD patients, showing good reliability and validity for both scales. SF-36 generally outperforms WHOQOL-BREF overall. Patients diagnosed with anxiety and depression, as well as cognitive impairment, exhibited differences in QOL assessment. Further attention to these findings can improve QOL assessment and care for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dixiang Song
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Deshan Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Min Yang
- Department of Cardiology, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shengyun Chen
- Department of Cerebralvascular center, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Weihai Ning
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Cerebralvascular center, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Yang
- Department of Cardiology and Institute of Vascular Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Yongle Li
- Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yifan Guo
- Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yushan Chen
- Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shasha Shang
- Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hongwei Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Periosteal Needling to the Cervical Articular Pillars as an Adjunct Intervention for Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain and Headache: A Case Report. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12063122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
(1) Background: Periosteal dry needling (PDN) involves clinicians using a solid filiform needle to stimulate bone for analgesic purposes. This case report presents the use of PDN to the cervical articular pillars (CAPs) in an 85-year-old female with chronic neck pain and headache. (2) Case description: PDN was applied to the right C2–C3 articular pillars, following trigger point dry needling (TrPDN) and manual therapy, in order to provide a direct sensory stimulus to the corresponding sclerotomes. PDN added over two treatments led to improved cervical range of motion and eliminated the patient’s neck pain and headache at 1 week follow-up. (3) Outcomes: At discharge, clinically relevant improvements were demonstrated on the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), which improved from an 8/10 on intake to a 0/10 at rest and with all movements. In addition, the patient exceeded the risk adjusted predicted four-point score improvement and the minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) value of four points on the Focus on Therapeutic Outcomes (FOTO) Neck Functional Status (Neck FS). At one month post-discharge, the patient remained symptom-free. (4) Discussion: In the context of an evidence-informed approach for neck pain and headache, PDN led to marked improvements in pain and function. Patient outcomes exceeded predictive analytic expectations for functional gains and efficient utilization of visits and time in days. Combined with other interventions, PDN to the CAPs could be a viable technique to treat chronic neck pain with headache.
Collapse
|
3
|
Werneke MW, Deutscher D, Grigsby D, Tucker CA, Mioduski JE, Hayes D. Telerehabilitation During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Outpatient Rehabilitation Settings: A Descriptive Study. Phys Ther 2021; 101:6224412. [PMID: 33848335 PMCID: PMC8083284 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE COVID-19 has widely affected delivery of health care. In response, telerehabilitation (TR) has emerged as alternative care model. Aims were: (1) to describe baseline patient characteristics and available unadjusted outcomes for episodes of care administered during COVID-19 using TR versus traditional in-person care, and (2) to describe TR frequency levels by condition and telecommunication modes. METHODS A descriptive retrospective observational design was used to report patient variables and outcomes including physical function, number of visits, and patient satisfaction, by TR frequency (few, most, or all visits) and telecommunication modes. Standardized differences were used to compare baseline characteristics between episodes with and without TR. RESULTS Sample consisted of 222,680 patients (59% female; mean [SD] age = 55 [18] years). Overall TR rate was 6% decreasing from 10% to 5% between second and third quarters of 2020. Outcome measures were available for 90% to 100% of episodes. Thirty-seven percent of clinicians administered care via TR. Patients treated using TR compared with in-person care were more likely to be younger and live in large metropolitan areas. From those with TR, 55%, 20%, and 25% had TR during few, most, or all visits, respectively. TR care was administered equally across orthopedic body parts, with lower use for nonorthopedic conditions such as stroke, edema, and vestibular dysfunction. TR was primarily administered using synchronous (video or audio) modes. The rate of patients reported being very satisfied with their treatment results was 3% higher for no TR compared with TR. CONCLUSIONS These results provide new knowledge about to whom and how TR is being administered during the pandemic in outpatient rehabilitation practices throughout the United States. The database assessed was found to be suitable for conducting studies on associations between TR and diverse outcome measures, controlling for a comprehensive set of patient characteristics, to advance best TR care models, and promote high-quality care. IMPACT This study provided detailed and robust descriptive information using an existing national patient database containing patient health and demographic characteristics, outcome measures, and telerehabilitation (TR) administration data. Findings support the feasibility to conduct future studies on associations between TR care and patient outcomes, adjusting for a wide range of patient characteristics and clinical setting factors that may be associated with the probability of receiving TR. The finding of limited and decreasing use of TR over the study period calls for studies aimed to better understand facilitators and inhibitors of TR use by rehabilitation therapists during everyday practice to promote its use when clinically appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark W Werneke
- Address all correspondence to Mark Werneke PT, MS, E-mail address: , Postal address: 95-1031 Ohiaha St Mililani HI USA
| | - Daniel Deutscher
- Net Health Systems, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, USA,MaccabiTech Institute for Research & Innovation, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - David Grigsby
- MidSouth Orthopaedic Rehabilitation, Cordova, TN, USA
| | - Carole A Tucker
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Valera-Calero JA, Guodemar-Pérez J, Cleland JA, Ojedo-Martín C, Gallego-Sendarrubias GM. Physical therapist attitude and opinion about cervical spine examination: A national Spanish survey. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e13781. [PMID: 33091196 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A correct examination is essential during a differential diagnosis of neck pain patients. Therefore, the objective of this study was to provide an update on the properties considered most important by physical therapists (PTs) when conducting accessory and physiological movement tests during the cervical spine physical examination. METHODS A total of 84 private physiotherapy centres participated in this online cross-sectional survey including 415 active physiotherapists and members of one autonomous Spanish Physiotherapists School. This survey included information about the characteristics of the respondents (eg, weekly patient care, highest qualification and specific training in osteopathy and manual therapy), their opinion about the accuracy and reliability of accessory and physiological movement tests, the frequency and importance of mobility and pain responses, and the most commonly reference used to make a judgement. RESULTS Pain responses are most frequently used by physiotherapists at a rate of 79.8% and also rated as important by 42.65% respondents mobility aspects such as quality of end-feel (17.3%), quantity of translation (16.4%) and quality of resistance (13.3%) during passive accessory intervertebral movement tests. During passive and active physiological movement tests, the most frequent properties assessed were the quality of motion path (80.5% and 84.3%, respectively) and quantity of angle bending (81.7% and 77.6%, respectively). Pain responses are used as reference by 54.7% to make a clinical judgement during passive accessory intervertebral movement tests. CONCLUSION Physical therapists face validity in relation to passive accessory intervertebral movement test for assessing spinal segmental motion aspects has been decreasing with more attention devoted to pain responses. The current scepticism regarding the motion properties assessed with these tests is associated with utility aspects such as validity, sensitivity, accuracy and specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Antonio Valera-Calero
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Camilo Jose Cela University, Madrid, Spain
- Escuela Internacional de Doctorado, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús Guodemar-Pérez
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Camilo Jose Cela University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joshua A Cleland
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cristina Ojedo-Martín
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Camilo Jose Cela University, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Edmond SL, Werneke MW, Young M, Grigsby D, McClenahan B, Harris G, McGill T. Cognitive behavioural interventions, and function and pain outcomes among patients with chronic neck pain managed with the McKenzie approach. Musculoskeletal Care 2019; 18:46-52. [PMID: 31799798 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Graded activity and graded exposure in vivo are recommended cognitive behavioural approaches to improve function and pain outcomes for patients receiving physiotherapy for chronic nonspecific neck pain. The McKenzie method is a common treatment approach for patients with neck pain. The study objectives were to examine associations between interventions with graded activity and/or graded exposure, as determined by the treating physiotherapist, and function and pain outcomes for patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain managed by clinicians with credentials in the McKenzie approach. METHOD A cohort study was carried out, in which subjects (n = 366) with chronic nonspecific neck pain completed intake surveys (i.e., the Neck Functional Status Computerized Adaptive Test and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale), and questions related to their demographic, lifestyle and health status. Treatment with graded activity/graded exposure during the episode of care was recorded. Function and pain measures were repeated at discharge. Multivariable models examining associations between patients receiving versus not receiving graded activity/graded exposure, and pain and function outcomes were constructed, controlling for potential confounding effects. RESULTS Despite statistical significance, there were no clinically relevant differences between treatment versus no treatment with graded activity/graded exposure, and function or pain outcomes. CONCLUSION There is insufficient evidence to suggest that patients being managed with McKenzie methods will attain clinically relevant improvements in function or pain outcomes when augmenting treatment with graded activity and/or graded exposure when the choice to intervene with these cognitive behavioural approaches is determined by the treating physiotherapist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michelle Young
- The Valley Health Wellness & Fitness Center, Winchester Medical Center, Winchester, VA
| | | | | | | | - Troy McGill
- Alaska Regional Hospital Anchorage AK, 2801 Debarr Rd, Anchorage, AK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical interpretation of patient-reported outcome measures is an essential step in patient-centered care. Interpretation of scores derived from the Neck Functional Status Computerized Adaptive Test (NFS-CAT) has not been studied. OBJECTIVES To (1) assess the reliability of point estimates and improvement scores, (2) determine thresholds of minimal clinically important improvement (MCII), and (3) develop a functional staging model to facilitate clinical interpretation of NFS-CAT scores. METHODS A secondary retrospective cohort analysis was performed using data from patients aged 14 to 89 years who started an episode of care for neck impairments during 2016-2017 and completed the NFS-CAT at admission. The reliability of point estimates and of improvement scores was derived from the NFS-CAT standard error of measurement. The MCII was estimated by combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches. A functional staging model was developed to describe clinical meaningfulness of the quantitative scores provided by the NFS-CAT. RESULTS Of 250 741 patients who completed the NFS-CAT at admission (mean ± SD age, 54 ± 16 years; 65% female), 169±039 (67%) also completed the NFS-CAT at discharge. The standard error of measurement was stable across the measurement continuum, ranging from 3.7 to 3.9 NFS-CAT points. Minimal detectable improvement was 6.8 points at the 90% confidence level. The estimate of the MCII was 8.1 points, with more change points needed to achieve the MCII for patients with lower baseline scores. Large rates of functional staging change during treatment were observed, demonstrating responsiveness of the functional staging model. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated how the NFS-CAT can be interpreted to better assist clinicians and patients with neck impairments during outpatient rehabilitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapy, level 2b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(12):875-886. Epub 10 Jul 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8862.
Collapse
|
7
|
Associations between interim patient-reported outcome measures and functional status at discharge from rehabilitation for non-specific lumbar impairments. Qual Life Res 2019; 29:439-451. [PMID: 31571028 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02314-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Identify impact of frequency and timing of interim Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) assessments during episodes of care for rehabilitation services in outpatient clinical settings on functional status (FS) outcomes at discharge for patients with low back pain. METHODS FS outcomes of patients who had no interim PROMs were compared to outcomes of six patient groups defined by interim timing (early, mid, late) and frequency (1, 2 or more). For each comparison, patients were matched using propensity score matching for variables known to be associated with FS outcomes and for episode duration (days) and number of visits. FS was assessed using the lumbar computerized adaptive test (LCAT) where scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better physical function. RESULTS A sample of 140,336 patients was considered for matching (mean age = 58 [SD = 17] range 18-89; 60% females) with 83,101 patients (59%) having no interim PROMs. Patients who had only one interim PROM, administered during early (first 2 weeks), mid (weeks 3-4), or late (week 5 or later) timing, had 4.6, 2.7, and 1.0 additional FS score points at discharge compared to those without an interim PROM, respectively (p < 0.001). Having two or more interim PROMs was associated with an additional 1.2 FS points compared to having only one interim assessment, but only if the first interim was administered early. CONCLUSIONS Optimal utilization of interim PROM assessment during clinical practice to enhance treatment outcomes was related to administering the first interim PROM within the first 2 weeks after the initial evaluation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Wiitavaara B, Heiden M. Content and psychometric evaluations of questionnaires for assessing physical function in people with neck disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil 2017; 40:2227-2235. [DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1334096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Birgitta Wiitavaara
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden
| | - Marina Heiden
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational and Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|