The Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale: A New Tool That Quantifies Distress and Has Predictive Validity With Patient-Reported Outcomes

Cortisol as a Marker of Pain and Distress After Acute Musculoskeletal Trauma

OBJECTIVES

The best available predictors of chronic pain development broadly encompass baseline metrics of cognition (ie, beliefs/expectations) about the trauma and resulting symptoms. In the context of musculoskeletal trauma, we have previously shown the Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS) capable of risk-stratifying cohorts for chronic pain development. Here, we explore whether the physiological marker cortisol shows meaningful associations with cognitions predictive of pain outcomes.

METHODS

Data for these cross-sectional analyses were drawn from an observational study that recruited 130 participants presenting to the hospital with pain related to a recent noncatastrophic Musculoskeletal trauma. Cortisol was measured from the participant's hair, saliva, and blood. In addition to pain and distress questionnaires, metadata such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), adverse childhood events, pretrauma stress levels, and pre-existing physical/psychological comorbidities were collected.

RESULTS

We found no significant associations between cortisol levels and pain or distress in isolation. When stratified by person-level variables, associations were revealed with distress (TIDS) in young age and low pretrauma stress subgroups (hair cortisol) and low BMI (blood cortisol). Through hierarchical regression analysis, we found the "cortisol X age" or "cortisol X stress" interaction terms significantly improved TIDS prediction beyond either variable in isolation (Age: ∆ R2 =15.1%; pretrauma stress: ∆ R2 =9.1%).

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that while linear correlations between pain-related distress and cortisol may be overly simplistic, certain person-level variables such as age, pretrauma stress, and BMI are worthy of consideration for experimental design or confounder characterization in future studies of pain and distress following musculoskeletal injuries especially when "trait" (hair) cortisol is the predictor variable.

Biopsychosocial sequelae and recovery trajectories from whiplash injury following a motor vehicle collision

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Five out of 10 injured in a motor vehicle collision (MVC) will develop persistent pain and disability. It is unclear if prolonged symptoms are related to peritraumatic pain/disability, psychological distress, muscle fat, lower extremity weakness.

PURPOSE

To test if widespread muscle fat infiltration (MFI) was (1) unique to those with poor recovery, (2) present in the peritraumatic stage, (3) related to known risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A cohort study, single-center academic hospital.

PATIENT SAMPLES

A total of 97 men and women (age 18-65) presenting to an urban academic emergency medicine department following MVC, but not requiring inpatient hospitalization.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Neck disability at 12-months.

METHODS

Participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantify neck and lower extremity MFI, completed questionnaires on pain/disability and psychological distress (< 1-week, 2-weeks, 3-, and 12-months) and underwent maximum volitional torque testing of their lower extremities (2-weeks, 3-, and 12-months). Percentage score on the Neck Disability Index at 12-months was used for a model of (1) Recovered (0%-8%), (2) Mild (10%-28%), and (3) Moderate/Severe (≥ 30%). This model was adjusted for BMI and age.

RESULTS

Significant differences for neck MFI were revealed, with the Recovered group having significantly lower neck MFI than the Mild and Moderate/Severe groups at all time points. The Mild group had significantly more leg MFI at 12-months (p=.02) than the Recovered group. There were no other significant differences at any other time point. Lower extremity torques revealed no group differences. The Traumatic Injury Distress Scale (TIDS) and MFI of the neck at 1-week postinjury significantly predicted NDI score at 12-months.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher neck MFI and distress may represent a risk factor though it is unclear whether this is a pre-existing phenotype or result of the trauma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02157038.

Sleep quality as a mediator of the relation between depression and chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain and depression represent two global health problems with considerable economic consequences. Although existing literature reports on the relation between depression and pain conditions, meta-analytic evidence backing the mediating role of sleep disturbance as one of the main symptoms of depression is scarce. To examine the extent to which sleep disturbance mediates the depression-chronic pain association, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations of chronic pain, depression, and sleep quality.

METHODS

We systematically searched for literature in MEDLINE and other relevant databases and identified cohort and case-control studies on depression, sleep disturbance, and chronic pain. Forty-nine studies were eligible, with a total population of 120 489 individuals. We obtained direct and indirect path coefficients via two-stage meta-analytic structural equation modelling, examined heterogeneity via subgroup analyses, and evaluated primary studies quality.

RESULTS

We found a significant, partial mediation effect of sleep disturbance on the relation between depression and chronic pain. The pooled path coefficient (coef.) of the indirect effect was 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.05) and accounted for 12.5% of the total effect of depression on chronic pain. This indirect effect also existed for cohort studies (coef. 0.02; 95% CI: 0.002-0.04), European studies (coef. 0.03; 95% CI: 0.004-0.05), and studies that adjusted for confounders (coef. 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01-0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep disturbance partially mediates the association between depression and pain. Although plausible mechanisms could explain this mediation effect, other explanations, including reverse causation, must be further explored.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

PROSPERO CRD42022338201.

Exploring Social Determinants of Posttraumatic Pain, Distress, Depression, and Recovery Through Cross-Sectional, Longitudinal, and Nonlinear Trends

OBJECTIVES

Pain, distress, and depression are predictors of posttrauma pain and recovery. We hypothesized that pretrauma characteristics of the person could predict posttrauma severity and recovery.

METHODS

Sex, age, body mass index, income, education level, employment status, pre-existing chronic pain or psychopathology, and recent life stressors were collected from adults with acute musculoskeletal trauma through self-report. In study 1 (cross-sectional, n=128), pain severity was captured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), distress through the Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS) and depression through the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). In study 2 (longitudinal, n=112) recovery was predicted using scores on the Satisfaction and Recovery Index (SRI) and differences within and between classes were compared with identify pre-existing predictors of posttrauma recovery.

RESULTS

Through bivariate, linear and nonlinear, and regression analyses, 8.4% (BPI) to 42.9% (PHQ-9) of variance in acute-stage predictors of chronicity was explainable through variables knowable before injury. In study 2 (longitudinal), latent growth curve analysis identified 3 meaningful SRI trajectories over 12 months. Trajectory 1 (start satisfied, stay satisfied [51%]) was identifiable by lower TIDS, BPI, and PHQ-9 scores, higher household income and less likely psychiatric comorbidity. The other 2 trajectories (start dissatisfied, stay dissatisfied [29%] versus start dissatisfied, become satisfied [20%]) were similar across most variables at baseline save for the "become satisfied" group being mean 10 years older and entering the study with a worse (lower) SRI score.

DISCUSSION

The results indicate that 3 commonly reported predictors of chronic musculoskeletal pain (BPI, TIDS, PHQ-9) could be predicted by variables not related to the injurious event itself. The 3-trajectory recovery model mirrors other prior research in the field, though 2 trajectories look very similar at baseline despite very different 12-month outcomes. Researchers are encouraged to design studies that integrate, rather than exclude, the pre-existing variables described here.

Features and impact of dysphagia, dysphonia and laryngeal hypersensitivity in whiplash associated disorder - a qualitative study

PURPOSE

Investigation into dysphagia, dysphonia and laryngeal hypersensitivity after whiplash is limited, offering minimal insight into specific features and impact. This study aimed to explore these symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A qualitative interpretive description design was used. Eleven participants with chronic Whiplash Associated Disorder and self-reported swallowing, voice and/or throat-related problems completed baseline symptom questionnaires and were offered a videofluroscopic swallow study to investigate baseline swallowing biomechanics. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore features of swallowing, voice and laryngeal sensory complaints and analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

There were high baseline levels of self-reported neck, pain- and throat-related disability and psychological distress. There was no evidence of baseline deficits in swallow biomechanics. Thematic analysis revealed 5 themes: (1) A range of features of dysphagia and dysphonia exist after whiplash with varied clinical course; (2) Activity and participation in swallow and voice activities have changed; (3) There are psychological and emotional impacts; (4) Features of laryngeal hypersensitivity co-exist and (5) There are barriers to management.

CONCLUSIONS

Swallow, voice and laryngeal sensory problems after whiplash were described, with impacts on quality of life and barriers to management. These insights broaden understanding of post-whiplash sequalae, indicating the need for better detection.Implications for rehabilitationDysphagia, dysphonia and laryngeal hypersensitivity are under-recognised consequences of whiplash.Individuals presenting with dysphagia, dysphonia and laryngeal sensory symptoms after whiplash experience significant implications to wellbeing, activity and participation.Improved understanding of these symptoms may facilitate better detection and subsequent referral to speech-language pathology.Greater understanding into the functional and psychosocial implications of these symptoms may guide more effective post-whiplash assessments and informed rehabilitation.

Cross-cultural translation and validation of the traumatic injuries distress scale - Spanish version

PURPOSE

The Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale is a patient-reported measure capturing experiences of distress following non-catastrophic musculoskeletal injuries. The original English version has shown adequate accuracy for predicting recovery trajectories up to 12 months later. Herein we describe the translation of the English TIDS into the TIDS-Spanish.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prototype version was developed through a two-step forwards-back translation involving four independent bilingual speakers. 73 participants (51% female, mean age 47 years, 32% acute) with musculoskeletal pain responded to the prototype through an online platform or in paper format through a single administration. A series of hypotheses including correlation with an external standard and factor structure were tested for both concurrent and factorial validity compared to those of the English version.

RESULTS

Despite an overall higher mean TIDS score in the Spanish-speaking participants compared to the original English development cohort, all hypotheses for concurrent associations with external pain criteria were satisfied and the three-factor structure of the original was replicated in the new TIDS-Spanish (CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

While prospective data collection is needed to explore the equivalence in prognostic validity, all other analyses indicated psychometric equivalence of the new TIDS-Spanish with the original English version. Implications for RehabilitationThe Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale has previously shown prognostic validity for stratifying people with acute musculoskeletal injury into risk-recovery trajectories.A Spanish-translated version of the TIDS was developed and evaluated for psychometric equivalence with the original English version.Results indicate that we were successful in creating a conceptually and empirically equivalent version of the TIDS for use in Spanish-speaking populations.

How Is the Probability of Reporting Various Levels of Pain 12 Months After Noncatastrophic Injuries Associated with the Level of Peritraumatic Distress?

BACKGROUND

Psychological factors have been shown to be consistent predictors of chronic pain in people with musculoskeletal injuries. However, few prognostic studies have considered multiple risk factors including peritraumatic distress. In addition, previous research has not considered that the associations between peritraumatic distress and pain levels can vary across pain outcomes.

QUESTION/PURPOSE

To determine whether an easily measurable level of baseline distress is associated with pain levels 1 year after noncatastrophic traumatic injuries when the outcome to be assessed is not normally distributed.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. The data were captured from two cohorts in London, Ontario, Canada, and Chicago, IL, USA. Participants were adults with acute noncatastrophic (that is, not treated with surgery or hospitalization) musculoskeletal injuries of any etiology with various injury locations (60% [145 of 241] spinal and 40% [96 of 241] peripheral) that presented to local urgent care centers. Other inclusion criteria included English/French speakers and having no other disorder that would affect their pain levels. In total, between the years 2015 and 2018, 241 participants were recruited based on the inclusion criteria. Ninety-three percent (225 of 241) of participants provided baseline data, and of these, 48% (109 of 225) were lost to follow-up in 1 year. Based on a complete case approach, this study included 116 participants who ranged in age from 18 to 66 years and 69% (80) of whom were women. The Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS) was used to evaluate distress at baseline (within 4 weeks of injury). The TIDS is a validated, reliable 12-item risk prognosis screening tool that takes less than 3 minutes to complete with questions regarding uncontrolled pain, negative affect, and intrusion/hyperarousal. The minimum and maximum possible scores are 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating higher levels of distress. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) was used to assess the pain level at baseline and again 12 months postinjury. To complete the NPRS, participants rate the severity of their pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable. NPRS scores of 1 to 3 indicate mild pain, 4 to 6 indicate moderate pain and 7 or higher indicate severe pain. As a preliminary analysis, to assess whether the participants as a group experienced recovery, a paired samples t-test was used to compare NPRS scores at baseline and 12 months. In all, 52% (60 of 116) of participants reported no pain (NPRS = 0), and mean pain intensity scores improved from 4.8 ± 2.1 at baseline to 1.6 ± 1.6 at 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Quantile regression was used to describe the association between baseline distress and pain levels 1 year after the injury. This technique was used because it reveals the relationships at different quantiles of the pain outcome distribution.

RESULTS

The results indicate some people (52% [60 of 116]) recovered regardless of their baseline level of distress (30th quantile of the NPRS: β = 0). However, in those with persisting pain, higher levels of baseline distress are associated with greater levels of pain 12 months after the injury (50th quantile of the NPRS: β = 0.11; p = 0.01; 70th quantile of the NPRS: β = 0.27; p < 0.001; 90th quantile of the NPRS: β = 0.31; p = 0.01). According to this model, with a baseline TIDS score of 5, there is 10% probability that patients will report moderate or greater levels of pain (4 or higher of 10) 12 months later. This probability then increases as the TIDS score increases. For instance, at a score of 13 on the TIDS, the probability of a patient reporting moderate or higher levels of pain increases to 30%, and the probability of reporting severe pain (higher than 6 of 10) is 10%.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians and surgeons in orthopaedic settings can screen for the presence of peritraumatic distress using the TIDS, which is an easily administered tool that does not require extensive knowledge of psychology, and by using it they can identify those with higher levels of distress who are more likely to have persistent, long-term pain. A score of 4 or less indicates a low risk of persistent pain, a score between 5 and 12 (endpoints included) indicates moderate risk, and a score of 13 or higher indicates high risk. Future studies should investigate whether certain immediate interventions for peritraumatic distress in the aftermath of trauma can decrease the likelihood that a patient will develop chronic pain after injury. As an analysis technique, quantile regression is useful to assess complex associations in many orthopaedic settings in which a certain outcome is expected to occur in most patients leading to non-normally distributed data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

Implementation of a novel stratified PAthway of CarE for common musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions in primary care: protocol for a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial (the PACE MSK trial)

Introduction

Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions constitute the highest burden of disease globally, with healthcare services often utilised inappropriately and overburdened. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel clinical PAthway of CarE programme (PACE programme), where care is provided based on people’s risk of poor outcome.

Methods and analysis

Multicentre randomised controlled trial. 716 people with MSK conditions (low back pain, neck pain or knee osteoarthritis) will be recruited in primary care. They will be stratified for risk of a poor outcome (low risk/high risk) using the Short Form Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (SF-ÖMSPQ) then randomised to usual care (n=358) or the PACE programme (n=358). Participants at low risk in the PACE programme will receive up to 3 sessions of guideline based care from their primary healthcare professional (HCP) supported by a custom designed website (mypainhub.com). Those at high risk will be referred to an allied health MSK specialist who will conduct a comprehensive patient-centred assessment then liaise with the primary HCP to determine further care. Primary outcome (SF 12-item PCS) and secondary outcomes (eg, pain self-efficacy, psychological health) will be collected at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Cost-effectiveness will be measured as cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Health economic analysis will include direct and indirect costs. Analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Primary and secondary outcomes will be analysed independently, using generalised linear models. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies embedded within the trial will evaluate patient experience, health professional practice and interprofessional collaboration.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethics approval has been received from the following Human Research Ethics Committees: The University of Sydney (2018/926), The University of Queensland (2019000700/2018/926), University of Melbourne (1954239), Curtin University (HRE2019-0263) and Northern Sydney Local Health District (2019/ETH03632). Dissemination of findings will occur via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and social media.

Trial registration number

ACTRN12619000871145.

Effects of childhood trauma on pain-related distress in adults

BACKGROUND

Much of the work in post-musculoskeletal (MSK) trauma and distress has been conducted through frameworks that start from the injury and go forward to better understand the trajectories and predictors of recovery. However, stress-diatheses models suggest that reactions to trauma are shaped by pre-existing experiences of the person more than the parameters of the event itself. In this study, we explore the effects of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on traumatic threat appraisal, distress and pain-related functional interference in adulthood.

METHODS

Adult participants with acute, non-catastrophic musculoskeletal trauma completed a battery of questionnaires that included the Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire (ACEQ), the Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (BIPQ), the Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). An a priori model was evaluated through path analysis to determine the variance in BPI Interference scores explained through direct or indirect pathways between these variables (ACEQ->BIPQ, BIPQ->TIDS, TIDS->BPI). The analysis was repeated for the sample when disaggregated by sex.

RESULTS

In n = 114, the base model was saturated. After removing non-significant pathways, the ACEQ->BIPQ->TIDS->BPI paths were significant and in the expected direction, explaining 57.1% of variance in acute BPI Interference score. When disaggregated by sex, the effect of ACEs on threat appraisal was only significant in men and not women, although this analysis was exploratory.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute pain-related interference could be predicted by post-traumatic distress and threat appraisal. Threat appraisal could be further predicted through ACEs, more childhood adversities were associated with more threatening appraisal of trauma in adulthood. The disaggregated finding that the effects of childhood adversities were only significant in males requires further exploration.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study explores the potential pathways of the stress-diathesis model while focusing on adverse childhood experiences as a novel contribution to the field of acute post-trauma pain. The findings may inform future research design and interpretation of acute-to-chronic pain risk stratification tools.

Prognostic factors for pain chronicity in low back pain: a systematic review

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Several prognostic factors are related to low back pain chronicity, and these should be taken into account when planning more comprehensive models in its prevention.

Low back pain is the leading cause for years lived in disability. Most people with acute low back pain improve rapidly, but 4% to 25% of patients become chronic. Since the previous systematic reviews on the subject, a large number of new studies have been conducted. The objective of this article was to review the evidence of the prognostic factors behind nonspecific chronic low back pain. A systematic literature search was performed without date limitation from the MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and Medic databases. Specific inclusion criteria were used, and risk factors before the onset of chronic symptoms were searched. Study quality was assessed by 2 independent reviewers. One hundred eleven full articles were read for potential inclusion, and 25 articles met all the inclusion criteria. One study was rated as good quality, 19 studies were rated as fair quality, and 5 articles were rated as poor quality. Higher pain intensity, higher body weight, carrying heavy loads at work, difficult working positions, and depression were the most frequently observed risk factors for chronic low back pain. Maladaptive behavior strategies, general anxiety, functional limitation during the episode, smoking, and particularly physical work were also explicitly predictive of chronicity. According to this systematic review, several prognostic factors from the biomechanical, psychological and psychosocial point of view are significant for chronicity in low back pain.

Identification of clinically-useful cut scores of the Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS) for predicting rate of recovery following musculoskeletal trauma

Objective

The Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS) is a 12-item self-report tool intended for prognostic risk phenotyping in people with acute musculoskeletal (MSK) trauma. The initial validation study showed good associations with outcomes 12 weeks later in a cohort of 72 acutely injured patients from one region in Canada. This study aims to provide further clinical utility through identification of meaningful cut scores in a larger, mixed geography sample, and expands the prediction window from 12 to 52 weeks.

Methods

Data were drawn from databanks in London, Canada and Chicago, United States. Participants were recruited within 3 weeks of non-catastrophic MSK trauma and followed for 12 months. Using outcomes trajectories, the TIDS underwent linear regression-based analysis to predict 52-week outcomes, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves to identify discriminative accuracy and meaningful cut scores.

Results

N = 224 participants with acute trauma were followed and both %Interference and Pain Severity were captured at intake and 3 follow-ups to establish curvilinear recovery trajectories. The TIDS explained significant variance in both the interference and severity outcomes after controlling for sex, region of injury, and baseline scores. ROC analysis revealed significant discriminative accuracy for predicting both the trajectories and the distal outcomes over 52 weeks. The TIDS was more accurate for identifying the low-risk than high-risk patients.

Conclusion

The TIDS is a useful tool for ‘ruling out’ high risk of poor outcome in a mixed sample of participants from two different countries.

Impact statement

The TIDS will be a useful tool for clinicians to predict the rate of recovery by displaying meaningful cut-scores for their patients after an acute musculoskeletal injury. This could lead to reduced burden of care for low risk patients and more informed treatment options for higher risk patients.

Brain Network Disruption in Whiplash

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Whiplash-associated disorders frequently develop following motor vehicle collisions and often involve a range of cognitive and affective symptoms, though the neural correlates of the disorder are largely unknown. In this study, a sample of participants with chronic whiplash injuries were scanned by using resting-state fMRI to assess brain network changes associated with long-term outcome metrics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Resting-state fMRI was collected for 23 participants and used to calculate network modularity, a quantitative measure of the functional segregation of brain region communities. This was analyzed for associations with whiplash-associated disorder outcome metrics, including scales of neck disability, traumatic distress, depression, and pain. In addition to these clinical scales, cervical muscle fat infiltration was quantified by using Dixon fat-water imaging, which has shown promise as a biomarker for assessing disorder severity and predicting recovery in chronic whiplash.

RESULTS

An association was found between brain network structure and muscle fat infiltration, wherein lower network modularity was associated with larger amounts of cervical muscle fat infiltration after controlling for age, sex, body mass index, and scan motion (t = -4.02, partial R ²  = 0.49, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This work contributes to the existing whiplash literature by examining a sample of participants with whiplash-associated disorder by using resting-state fMRI. Less modular brain networks were found to be associated with greater amounts of cervical muscle fat infiltration suggesting a connection between disorder severity and neurologic changes, and a potential role for neuroimaging in understanding the pathophysiology of chronic whiplash-associated disorders.

Concussion in Combination With Whiplash-Associated Disorder May Be Missed in Primary Care: Key Recommendations for Assessment and Management

Whiplash and concussion may have similar presenting symptoms, biomechanical mechanisms, and neurophysiological sequelae, but neither enjoys a gold standard diagnostic test. Guidelines for whiplash and concussion are developed and implemented separately. This disparate process may contribute to misdiagnosis, delay appropriate primary care management, and impair patient outcomes. In our clinical commentary, we present 3 cases where signs and symptoms consistent with whiplash were identified in primary care. Symptoms in all cases included neck pain, headache, dizziness, and concentration deficits, raising suspicion of coexisting postconcussion syndrome. All cases were referred for specialist physical therapy. Characteristics consistent with poor recovery in both whiplash and postconcussion syndrome were confirmed, and multidisciplinary management, drawing from both whiplash and concussion guidelines, was implemented. All patients reported improvement in activities of daily living after tailored management addressing both neck and head injury-related factors, suggesting that these conditions were not mutually exclusive. Self-reported outcomes included reductions in neck disability and postconcussion symptoms of between 20% and 40%. It may be appropriate for whiplash and concussion guidelines to be amalgamated, enhanced, and mutually recognized on a patient-by-patient basis. Primary health care professionals might consider minimum screening to identify postconcussion syndrome in patients following motor vehicle collision by administering questionnaires and assessing cranial nerve function, balance, and cognition. Management should then incorporate principles from both whiplash and concussion guidelines and harmonize with available imaging guidelines for suspected spine and head trauma. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(11):819-828. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8946.

Multidimensional screening for predicting pain problems in adults: a systematic review of screening tools and validation studies

Screening tools allowing to predict poor pain outcomes are widely used. Often these screening tools contain psychosocial risk factors. This review (1) identifies multidimensional screening tools that include psychosocial risk factors for the development or maintenance of pain, pain-related distress, and pain-related disability across pain problems in adults, (2) evaluates the quality of the validation studies using Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST), and (3) synthesizes methodological concerns. We identified 32 articles, across 42 study samples, validating 7 screening tools. All tools were developed in the context of musculoskeletal pain, most often back pain, and aimed to predict the maintenance of pain or pain-related disability, not pain-related distress. Although more recent studies design, conduct, analyze, and report according to best practices in prognosis research, risk of bias was most often moderate. Common methodological concerns were identified, related to participant selection (eg, mixed populations), predictors (eg, predictors were administered differently to predictors in the development study), outcomes (eg, overlap between predictors and outcomes), sample size and participant flow (eg, unknown or inappropriate handling of missing data), and analysis (eg, wide variety of performance measures). Recommendations for future research are provided.

Whiplash-Associated Dysphagia: Considerations of Potential Incidence and Mechanisms

Non-specific self-reports of dysphagia have been described in people with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) following motor vehicle collision (MVC); however, incidence and mechanistic drivers remain poorly understood. Alterations in oropharyngeal dimensions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), along with heightened levels of stress, pain, and changes in stress-dependent microRNA expression (e.g., miR-320a) have been also associated with WAD, suggesting multi-factorial issues may underpin any potential swallowing changes. In this exploratory paper, we examine key biopsychosocial parameters in three patients with persistent WAD reporting swallowing change and three nominating full recovery after whiplash with no reported swallowing change. Parameters included (1) oropharyngeal volume with 3D MRI, (2) peritraumatic miR-320a expression, and (3) psychological distress. These factors were explored to highlight the complexity of patient presentation and propose future considerations in relation to a potential deglutition disorder following WAD. The three participants reporting changes in swallowing all had smaller oropharyngeal volumes at < 1 week and at 3 months post injury and lower levels of peritraumatic miR-320a. At 3 months post MVC, oropharyngeal volumes between groups indicated a large effect size (Hedge's g = 0.96). Higher levels of distress were reported at both time points for those with persistent symptomatology, including self-reported dysphagia, however, this was not featured in those nominating recovery. This paper considers current evidence for dysphagia as a potentially under-recognized feature of WAD and highlights the need for future, larger-scaled, multidimensional investigation into the incidence and mechanisms of whiplash-associated dysphagia.

The Nature of Whiplash in a Compensable Environment: Injury, Disability, Rehabilitation, and Compensation Systems

Synopsis Whiplash is a compensable injury in many jurisdictions, but there is considerable heterogeneity in the compensation arrangements that apply across jurisdictions, even within some countries. These compensation schemes have, however, been subject to a common set of interrelated concerns, chiefly concerning the incentives, behaviors, and outcomes that may arise when financial compensation for injuries is available to injured parties. This article provides a nontechnical overview of some of those concerns through the lens of economics: principally, insurance economics and health economics, including related subsets such as information economics and agency theory, as well as economics and the law. It notes that because it is generally infeasible to randomize the treatment (ie, compensation) via trials, analyses of observational data are necessary to discover more about the relationship between compensation and health outcomes. This poses the analytical challenge of discovering causal connections between phenomena from nonrandomized data sets. The present article calls for further research that would enable convincing causal interpretations of such relationships via the careful analysis of rich observational data sets using modern econometric methods. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(7):503-508. Epub 16 Jun 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7533.

How Do We Meet the Challenge of Whiplash?

A previous special issue of JOSPT (October 2016) discussed whiplash in terms of the clinical problems and current research surrounding prevention, biomechanics of injury, emergent care, imaging advancements, recovery pathways and prognosis, pathogenesis of posttrauma pain, acute and chronic management, and new predictive clinical tools. While great strides have been made in the field of whiplash and are continuing in earnest, a key group of clinicians and academics have recognized that inconsistent outcomes in published literature hamper our ability to meaningfully synthesize research findings, leading to results of systematic reviews that provide very few concrete clinical recommendations. We are optimistic that improved outcomes for people with whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) are attainable in the near future, as interdisciplinary research efforts continue to align internationally, new mechanisms are identified and explored, and advanced statistical techniques allow complex questions to be answered in clinically meaningful ways. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(7):444-446. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.0106.

Whiplash Continues Its Challenge

There have been many advances in the management of neck pain disorders, but a personal frustration as a clinician and researcher in the field is that the incidence of full recovery following a whiplash injury as a result of a motor vehicle crash has not increased and, subsequently, the rate of transition to chronic neck pain has not lessened. The commentaries in this special issue reflect the multifaceted nature of whiplash-associated disorders and the wide-ranging research in the field. While management of whiplash, especially the challenge of lessening the rate of transition to chronicity, has yet to be achieved, the picture is becoming clearer. This should give great confidence and some hope to individuals with whiplash-associated disorders who have long-term pain and functional disability that after the next decade of research and clinical development, the outcomes following whiplash are likely to be vastly improved. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(10):815-817. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.0112.