Dadkhah M, Raja AM, Memon AR, Borchardt G, Nedungadi P, Abu-Eteen K, Raman R. A Toolkit for Detecting Fallacious Calls for Papers from Potential Predatory Journals.
Adv Pharm Bull 2023;
13:627-634. [PMID:
38022802 PMCID:
PMC10676554 DOI:
10.34172/apb.2023.068]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose
Flattering emails are crucial in tempting authors to submit papers to predatory journals. Although there is ample literature regarding the questionable practices of predatory journals, the nature and detection of spam emails need more attention. Current research provides insight into fallacious calls for papers from potential predatory journals and develops a toolkit in this regard.
Methods
In this study, we analyzed three datasets of calls for papers from potential predatory journals and legitimate journals using a text mining approach and R programming language.
Results
Overall, most potential predatory journals use similar language and templates in their calls for papers. Importantly, these journals praise themselves in glorious terms involving positive words that may be rarely seen in emails from legitimate journals. Based on these findings, we developed a lexicon for detecting unsolicited calls for papers from potential predatory journals.
Conclusion
We conclude that calls for papers from potential predatory journals and legitimate journals are different, and it can help to distinguish them. By providing an educational plan and easily usable tools, we can deal with predatory journals better than previously.
Collapse