Prevalence, Severity, and Correlates of Pain Flares in Response to a Repeated Sit-to-Stand Activity: A Cross-sectional Study of 14 902 Patients With Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis in Primary Care

Telehealth mindful exercise for people with knee osteoarthritis: A decentralized feasibility randomized controlled trial

Objective

Negative psychological beliefs like fear avoidance and catastrophizing can interfere with exercise engagement in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Mindfulness, when integrated with exercise, could potentially address both psychological and physical impairments. Our objectives were to optimize and assess the feasibility of a novel telehealth, group-based mindful exercise intervention for people with knee OA.

Methods

We conducted a decentralized randomized controlled trial where participants (n ​= ​40) with symptomatic knee OA were randomized into mindful exercise (n ​= ​21) or exercise-only (n ​= ​19) groups. Both groups received supervised group-based interventions weekly for 8-weeks via Zoom. Primary outcomes were safety, fidelity, and feasibility of the mindful exercise intervention. Participants completed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for pain, function, and psychological measures at baseline, week-8, and week-14.

Results

Participants were from 21 US states; >90% identified as having White race, 16% were from rural areas, and approximately 40% had an annual income < $50,000. At 8-weeks, mindful exercise and exercise groups had retention rates of 86% (18/21) and 100% (19/19), and attendance was 54% (11.4/21) and 68% (13/19) respectively. There were no adverse events in the mindful exercise group and four in the exercise group related to exacerbation of knee pain. Preliminary findings showed numerically larger improvements in several PROs for the mindful exercise group.

Conclusion

An 8-week telehealth, group-based, mindful exercise intervention was safe for people with knee OA. Our decentralized approach was feasible in terms of recruitment and retention. Further refinement is needed to improve intervention attendance and participant diversity.

Osteoarthritis and hypertension: observational and Mendelian randomization analyses

BACKGROUND

The association between osteoarthritis (OA) and hypertension is a subject of ongoing debate in observational research, and the underlying causal relationship between them remains elusive.

METHODS

This study retrospectively included 24,871 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2013 to 2020. Weighted logistic regression was performed to investigate the connection between OA and hypertension. Additionally, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted to explore the potential causal relationship between OA and hypertension.

RESULTS

In the NHANES data, after adjusting for multiple confounding factors, there was no significant relationship between OA and hypertension (OR 1.30, 95% CI, 0.97-1.73, P = 0.089). However, among males, OA appeared to be associated with a higher risk of hypertension (OR 2.25, 95% CI, 1.17-4.32, P = 0.019). Furthermore, MR results indicate no relationship between multiple OA phenotypes and hypertension: knee OA (IVW, OR 1.024, 95% CI: 0.931-1.126, P = 0.626), hip OA (IVW, OR 0.990, 95% CI: 0.941-1.042, P = 0.704), knee or hip OA (IVW, OR 1.005, 95% CI: 0.915-1.105, P = 0.911), and OA from UK Biobank (IVW, OR 0.796, 95% CI: 0.233-2.714, P = 0.715). Importantly, these findings remained consistent across different genders and in reverse MR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that OA patients had a higher risk of hypertension only among males in the observational study. However, MR analysis did not uncover any causal relationship between OA and hypertension.

Recommendations for the delivery of therapeutic exercise for people with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis. An international consensus study from the OARSI Rehabilitation Discussion Group

OBJECTIVE

To develop evidence-informed recommendations to support the delivery of best practice therapeutic exercise for people with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis (OA).

DESIGN

A multi-stage, evidence-informed, international multi-disciplinary consensus process that included: 1) a narrative literature review to synthesise existing evidence; 2) generation of evidence-informed proposition statements about delivery of exercise for people with knee and/or hip OA by an international multi-disciplinary expert panel, with statements refined and analysed thematically; 3) an e-Delphi survey with the expert panel to gain consensus on the most important statements; 4) a final round of statement refinement and thematic analysis to group remaining statements into domains.

RESULTS

The expert panel included 318 members (academics, health care professionals and exercise providers, patient representatives) from 43 countries. Final recommendations comprised 54 specific proposition statements across 11 broad domains: 1) use an evidence-based approach; 2) consider exercise in the context of living with OA and pain; 3) undertake a comprehensive baseline assessment with follow-up; 4) set goals; 5) consider the type of exercise; 6) consider the dose of exercise; 7) modify and progress exercise; 8) individualise exercise; 9) optimise the delivery of exercise; 10) focus on exercise adherence; and 11) provide education about OA and the role of exercise.

CONCLUSION

The breadth of issues identified as important by the international diverse expert panel highlights that delivering therapeutic exercise for OA is multi-dimensional and complex.

Course of pain and fluctuations in pain related to suspected early hip osteoarthritis: the CHECK study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevalence during a 10-year follow-up of clinically relevant fluctuations in pain and the course of hip pain in participants with hip complaints suspected to be early stage hip osteoarthritis (OA). To distinguish between participants with relevant fluctuations in pain and those without based on baseline characteristics.

METHODS

Data were collected at baseline and after 2, 5, 8, and 10 years on 495 participants from the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee Study (CHECK) with hip pain at baseline. Baseline demographic, anamnestic, and physical-examination characteristics were assessed. The primary outcome was levels of pain in the past week (scored using 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale) at follow-up assessments. Relevant fluctuation was defined as average absolute residuals greater than 1 after fitting a straight line to the participant's pain scores over time.

RESULTS

The majority of the participants (76%) had stable or decreasing pain. Relevant fluctuations were found in 37% of the participants. The following baseline variables were positively associated with the presence of relevant fluctuations: higher levels of pain in the past week, use of pain transformation as a coping style, higher number of comorbidities, use of pain medication, and higher levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. No associations were found for baseline radiographic hip OA or clinical hip OA.

CONCLUSION

During a 10-year follow-up, the majority of participants had stable or decreasing pain levels. In those participants with relevant fluctuation (37%), a limited number of baseline variables were associated with increased odds of having relevant fluctuations in pain.

Osteoarthritis Flares

The phenomenon of flares is a common feature in the daily life of people with osteoarthritis (OA). Characterized by episodes of sudden-onset increases in signs and symptoms, their impact can often be distressing and disabling. Despite their potential to have both short-term and long-term consequences for patients across the whole course of the condition, their occurrence and optimal management are not fully understood. This article provides a contemporary perspective on defining OA flares and their potential triggers, and offers suggestions for how health professionals might explore flare patterns with patients in clinical practice and frame timely best-practice treatment approaches.

Recent Injury, Severe Radiographic Change, and Lower Quadriceps Strength Increase Risk of Knee Pain Exacerbation During Walking: A Within-Person Knee-Matched Study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the associations of knee injury, radiographic osteoarthritis severity, and quadriceps strength with knee pain exacerbation during walking.

DESIGN

Within-person knee-matched case-control study.

METHODS

Participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative who completed a 20-m walking test at the 24-month visit were included. Pain exacerbation was defined as an increase in pain intensity of 1 or more on a numeric rating scale (0 as no pain and 10 as the worst imaginable pain) while completing the 20-m walking test. We used conditional logistic regression to assess the relation of recent knee injury, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade, and quadriceps strength to unilateral knee pain exacerbation during walking.

RESULTS

We included 277 people who experienced unilateral knee pain exacerbation during the walking test. Recent knee injury was associated with pain exacerbation during walking, with an odds ratio of 3.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3, 9.2). Compared with knees with a KL grade of 0, the odds ratios of pain exacerbation during walking were 1.3 (95% CI: 0.7, 2.7), 3.3 (95% CI: 1.5, 7.1), and 8.1 (95% CI: 3.1, 21.1) for knees with KL grades of 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Painful knees with a deficit in quadriceps strength of greater than or equal to 4% had a 1.4-fold (95% CI: 1.0, 1.9) higher risk of pain exacerbation during walking than their pain-free counterparts.

CONCLUSION

Recent knee injury, more severe radiographic osteoarthritis, and lower quadriceps strength were associated with an increased risk of knee pain exacerbation during walking. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(6):298-304. Epub 10 May 2021. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.9735.

Best-practice clinical management of flares in people with osteoarthritis: A scoping review of behavioral, lifestyle and adjunctive treatments

INTRODUCTION

Transient episodes of increased pain, stiffness or swelling are common in people with osteoarthritis (OA). Yet, evidence-based management strategies for lessening the impact of OA flares are rarely covered in clinical guidelines and have been identified as a gap by clinicians delivering OA care. We aimed to identify evidence on behavioral, lifestyle or other adjunctive flare management strategies that could be used by clinicians or consumers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search between 1990-2020 was performed in three databases using a scoping methodology. We included qualitative or quantitative studies, and reviews that examined OA flare management, or that reported OA flare outcomes at timepoints ≤2 weeks post-intervention. Outcomes included any physical or psychological OA outcome treatable with a therapeutic intervention.

RESULTS

We included 9 studies, all of which examined the relationship between therapeutic exercise/ physical activity and OA flares. All studies reported pain outcomes at the knee. Two also included the hip. Only two studies examined specific management strategies for OA flares. Both favorably reported the benefits of undertaking an exercise program modified accordingly during an episode, but the quality of the evidence was low.

DISCUSSION

This scoping review highlights the paucity of evidence available on non-pharmacological treatments of OA flare management that could influence clinical practice. At present, there is no robust evidence to support or reject any specific therapies for OA flare management in clinical practice. Future work is needed, particularly around outcomes beyond pain, trajectories of symptom improvement, and for joints other than the knee.

Preoperative meloxicam versus postoperative meloxicam for pain control, patients' satisfaction and function recovery in hip osteoarthritis patients who receive total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study

This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect, patients’ satisfaction, tolerance and hip-joint function recovery by preoperative meloxicam versus postoperative meloxicam in treating hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA). 132 hip OA patients who underwent THA surgery were allocated into postoperative analgesia (POST) and preoperative analgesia (PRE) groups at a 1:1 ratio. In the PRE group, patients took meloxicam 15 mg at 24 h pre-operation, 7.5 mg at 4 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post-operation; in the POST group, patients received meloxicam 15 mg at 4 h post-operation, then 7.5 mg at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post-operation. Furthermore, postoperative pain, consumption of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), overall satisfaction and adverse events were evaluated within 96 h post-operation; meanwhile, Harris hip score was assessed within 6 months post-operation. Pain VAS at rest at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and pain VAS at passive movement at 6 h, 12 h were decreased in PRE group compared to POST group. In addition, additional consumption of PCA and the total consumption of PCA were both reduced in PRE group compared to POST group. Additionally, overall satisfaction in PRE group was higher at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h compared to POST group. While Harris hip score was of no difference between POST group and PRE group at M3 or M6. Besides, no difference in adverse events incidence was found between the two groups. In conclusion, preoperative meloxicam achieves better efficacy and similar tolerance compared to postoperative meloxicam in hip OA patients post THA.