1
|
Sell TC, Zerega R, King V, Reiter CR, Wrona H, Bullock GS, Mills N, Räisänen A, Ledbetter L, Collins GS, Kvist J, Filbay SR, Losciale JM. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) Scores over Time After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. SPORTS MEDICINE - OPEN 2024; 10:49. [PMID: 38689130 PMCID: PMC11061071 DOI: 10.1186/s40798-024-00712-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychological readiness is an important consideration for athletes and clinicians when making return to sport decisions following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). To improve our understanding of the extent of deficits in psychological readiness, a systematic review is necessary. OBJECTIVE To investigate psychological readiness (measured via the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI)) over time after ACL tear and understand if time between injury and surgery, age, and sex are associated with ACL-RSI scores. METHODS Seven databases were searched from the earliest date available to March 22, 2022. Articles reporting ACL-RSI scores after ACL tear were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I, RoB-2, and RoBANS tools based on the study design. Evidence certainty was assessed for each analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled ACL-RSI scores, stratified by time post-injury and based on treatment approach (i.e., early ACLR, delayed ACLR, and unclear approach). RESULTS A total of 83 studies were included in this review (78% high risk of bias). Evidence certainty was 'weak' or 'limited' for all analyses. Overall, ACL-RSI scores were higher at 3 to 6 months post-ACLR (mean = 61.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 58.6, 64.4], I2 = 94%) compared to pre-ACLR (mean = 44.4 [95% CI 38.2, 50.7], I2 = 98%), remained relatively stable, until they reached the highest point 2 to 5 years after ACLR (mean = 70.7 [95% CI 63.0, 78.5], I2 = 98%). Meta-regression suggests shorter time from injury to surgery, male sex, and older age were associated with higher ACL-RSI scores only 3 to 6 months post-ACLR (heterogeneity explained R2 = 47.6%), and this reduced 1-2 years after ACLR (heterogeneity explained R2 = 27.0%). CONCLUSION Psychological readiness to return to sport appears to improve early after ACL injury, with little subsequent improvement until ≥ 2-years after ACLR. Longer time from injury to surgery, female sex and older age might be negatively related to ACL-RSI scores 12-24 months after ACLR. Due to the weak evidence quality rating and the considerable importance of psychological readiness for long-term outcomes after ACL injury, there is an urgent need for well-designed studies that maximize internal validity and identify additional prognostic factors for psychological readiness at times critical for return to sport decisions. REGISTRATION Open Science Framework (OSF), https://osf.io/2tezs/ .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy C Sell
- Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Ryan Zerega
- Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Victoria King
- Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | | - Hailey Wrona
- Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Garrett S Bullock
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
- Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nilani Mills
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anu Räisänen
- Department of Physical Therapy Education-Oregon, College of Health Sciences-Northwest, Western University of Health Sciences, Oregon, USA
- Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Joanna Kvist
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Medicine, University of Linkoping, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephanie R Filbay
- Department of Physiotherapy, Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Justin M Losciale
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Urhausen AP, Grindem H, Engebretsen L, Silbernagel KG, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Risberg MA. The Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort treatment algorithm yields superior outcomes to usual care 9-12 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2024; 32:214-222. [PMID: 38226690 PMCID: PMC11291834 DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcomes were compared between participants who followed the treatment algorithm of the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort, consisting of progressive preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, patient education, clinical testing and shared decision-making about treatment choice, and those who followed usual care 9-12 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS Participants with primary ACLR were included from the Norwegian arm of the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort and the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry (usual care). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale scores and the International Knee Documentation Committee-Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) scores were compared. KOOS scores for the usual care group were converted to IKDC-SKF scores with recently published validated crosswalk. The percentages of participants with scores above predefined thresholds for patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were also calculated. RESULTS Eighty of 100 (80%) participants from the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort and 1588 of 3248 (49%) from the usual care group participated in the follow-up. Participants from the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort had higher KOOS subscale (p < 0.001) and IKDC-SKF scores (p < 0.001), and a higher percentage reached PASS (84%-96% vs. 62%-76%, p ≤ 0.002) for KOOS Pain, symptoms, activities of daily living and sports compared to the usual care group. No significant differences were found for KOOS quality of life scores (not significant [n.s.]) or PASS percentages (80% vs. 74%, n.s.). CONCLUSION Participants with ACLR who followed the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort treatment algorithm had reduced knee symptoms, superior function and higher percentages of satisfactory outcomes than participants who followed usual care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk P. Urhausen
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege Grindem
- Oslo Sport Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lars Engebretsen
- Oslo Sport Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Michael J. Axe
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
- First State Orthopaedics, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Lynn Snyder-Mackler
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - May Arna Risberg
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|