Cell-blocks and other ancillary studies (including molecular genetic tests and proteomics)

Rapid on-site evaluation and cell blocks: getting the most from the least invasive method in cytopathology

INTRODUCTION

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) sampling is a minimally invasive procedure done to identify the pathology behind superficial and deep-seated lesions. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) can be an adjunct to the FNACs. Our study aimed to identify the role of ROSE in diagnostic adequacy and to check the benefit of cell block (CB)/cell buttons prepared from the ROSE samples.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted where all patients referred for FNAC were included. ROSE using 1% aqueous toluidine blue stain and CB/cell button preparations were done for the identification of various cytological lesions.

RESULTS

Among 600 cases included in the study most common age group was third and fourth decades with a mean age of 41.6 years and M: F ratio of 1:1.7. Ultrasound-guided procedures were done in 20% of cases. CB preparation was available in 14% of cases. Most CBs were from the cases wherein ROSE was performed 81% (77 out of 86), with CB helping in making an accurate diagnosis in 17% of cases. Lymph nodes 26%, and thyroid 23% were the most common sites for sampling with the highest number of repeat procedures from non-ROSE cases (14%). The non-diagnostic rate for non-ROSE cases was 7.7% (23/300) even after the repeat procedures as compared to 1.3% (4/300) for ROSE. Three slides on average were consumed in ROSE-performed procedures, as compared to an average of 5 slides in non-ROSE. The average turnaround time was 1.7 days for non-ROSE cases and 1.05 for ROSE cases respectively. Cyto-histopathological correlation was available in 40% of cases with a sensitivity of 98.1%, specificity of 96.7%, positive predictive value of 90%, negative predictive value of 99.4%, and diagnostic accuracy of 97%. The correlation of CB, number of slides consumed, and turnaround time among the 2 groups were statistically significant (P value < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ROSE is a method used to assess material aspirated at the time of FNAC procedures to determine the adequacy and to an extent to identify whether the lesion is neoplastic or non-neoplastic. CBs have helped in increasing diagnostic accuracy apart from the fact that the paraffin-embedded tissue material can be used for further studies.

Proteomic analysis of small extracellular vesicles unique to cervical cancer

Background

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common cancer in females worldwide. Existing biomarkers for CC, such as squamous cell carcinoma antigens, show low specificity. Hence, a novel biomarker for the diagnosis of CC is required. Through proteomic analysis, this study aimed to distinguish between the small extracellular vesicle (sEV) protein profiles of healthy controls (HC) and CC sera and to identify potential sEV proteins that can serve as biomarkers for CC diagnosis.

Methods

The number and size distribution of sEVs in HC and CC sera were measured using nanoparticle tracking analysis. Differential ultracentrifugation combined with size-exclusion chromatography was used to isolate and purify sEVs. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to identify and compare the protein profiles between patients with CC and HC. Differentially expressed extracellular vesicle (EV) proteins were validated using The Cancer Genome Atlas database.

Results

The EV particle concentration in patients with CC was marginally higher than that in HC. Proteomic and functional protein analyses revealed a difference in the EV protein profiles between HC and CC and identified proteins that can serve as biomarkers for CC.

Conclusions

This study provides insights into the potential of sEVs as less invasive biomarkers for CC diagnosis. Validation with a well-designed cohort should be performed to determine the clinical diagnostic value of specific protein markers for CC.

Cell block preparation as an adjunctive tool after fine-needle aspiration cytology for screening oral and maxillofacial diseases

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of cell block (CB) preparation from fine-needle aspiration cytology for diagnosing oral and maxillofacial diseases.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective analysis of 568 samples collected by our laboratory for CB preparation from fine-needle aspiration cytology of the oral and maxillofacial region between January 2001 and October 2021. We performed cytologic diagnoses and compared them with the available histopathologic diagnoses to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of CB preparation for identifying malignant lesions.

RESULTS

The most frequent diagnosis was pleomorphic adenoma (n = 44, 7.7%), followed by metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma (n = 28, 4.9%) and odontogenic keratocyst (n = 26, 4.6%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of CB preparation, which revealed detailed morphologic and architectural patterns, were 70.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 62.5%, and 80.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cell block preparation from fine-needle aspiration cytology of the oral and maxillofacial region may be a useful adjunctive diagnostic tool for diagnosing oral and maxillofacial diseases because it reveals morphologic and architectural patterns similar to those shown on histopathologic slides, leading to the better categorization of diseases.

Utilization of cytologic cell blocks for targeted sequencing of solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Targeted sequencing of cytologic samples has significantly increased in recent years. With increasing numbers of clinical trials for variant specific therapeutics, validating a comprehensive assay for cytologic samples has become clinically important.

AIM

For this study, a retrospective review of cytologic cell blocks from fine needle aspirations and fluid specimens was performed.

METHODS

Two hundred twenty six total cases of solid tumor malignancies were identified, of which 120 cases and 20 lymph node negative controls were sequenced for the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay. Cytology and surgical specimen correlation was performed in a subset of cases. Statistical analysis to determine variant concordance was performed.

RESULTS

Within the 117 cases sequenced, a total of 347 pathogenic variants were detected. Of the 117 cases, 32 cases (27.4%) would qualify for FDA approved targeted therapy according to the current guidelines, and an additional 23 cases (19.7%) would qualify for clinical trial based on pathogenic variants detected.

DISCUSSION

With over 27% of cases in our cohort qualifying for some form of targeted therapy, our study shows the importance of providing comprehensive molecular diagnostic options. Despite only half of the cytology cases in the review period having enough material to be sequenced, overall approximately 27% of patients in this cohort would have benefitted from this service.

Role of immunocytochemistry in cervical cancer screening

The cervical cancer screening has been based conventionally on cytologic analysis. With advances in understanding the role of human papillomavirus, cotesting has been applied. But most of the patients subjected to colposcopy did not benefit, except in cases with HSIL [high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion] cytology. Because of this, a step to increase the sensitivity to detect cancers and pre-cancers but with higher specificity with minimal overdiagnosis leading to prevention of unindicated cervical biopsies is highly desired. Such triaging step in cases with abnormal screening results is expected to minimize invasive interventions because of low false positivity. With availability of methodologies leading to quantitatively and qualitatively enhanced cell-blocks from residual liquid based cytology specimens, immunostaining can be performed for multiple immunomarkers with potential objectivity to triage initial screening test results. This is enhanced further with inclusion of AV marker in the cell-blocks and application of SCIP (subtractive coordinate immunoreactivity pattern) approach. The cell-blocks are also resource for performing other ancillary studies including molecular pathology and proteomics/metabolomics as potential tests in future. This review explores application of residual liquid based cytology specimen for cell-blocking with application of ancillary studies in algorithmic manner as adjunct to ASCCP management guidelines for improved patient care.

Immunocytochemistry of effusion fluids: Introduction to SCIP approach

Due to the remarkably wide morphologic spectrum of reactive mesothelial cells, some of the effusion fluids may be difficult to interpret with objective certainty by cytomorphology alone. Cytomorphology of well to moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas (responsible for the bulk of malignant effusions) may overlap with floridly reactive mesothelial cells. Even mesotheliomas including diffuse malignant epithelioid mesothelioma, are usually cytomorphologically bland without unequivocal features of malignancy. The intensity of challenge depends on the interpreter's training or experience level, institutional demographics of patients (such as type of prevalent diseases, predominant sex and age group), technical support, and quality of cytopreparatory processing. In general immunocytochemistry is valuable adjunct to facilitate objective interpretation with or without other ancillary techniques as indicated. An increasing number of immunomarkers is further refining the contribution of immunohistochemistry to this field. However, application of immunohistochemistry to effusion fluids is relatively challenging because of many variables. Multiple factors such as delay after specimen collection, specimen processing related factors including fixation and storage; ambient conditions under which paraffin blocks are archived (for retrospective testing); antigen retrieval method; duration of antigen retrieval step; antibody clone and dilution; and antibody application time are identical to application of immunohistochemistry in other areas. The significant challenge related to the potential compromization of the immunoreactivity pattern due to exposure to non-formalin fixatives / reagents is also applicable to effusion fluid specimens. The immunoreactivity results would be compared and corelated with cumulative metadata based on the reported studies performed and validated on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Deviating from such protocols may lead to suboptimal results, which is not uncommon in clinical practice with potential compromization of patient care and related liability. Because of this, it is critical to perform immunocytochemistry on formalin-fixed cell-block sections only. In addition, unless the interpretation criteria for immunohistochemical evaluation of effusion fluids are not modified specifically, it may not be productive in resolving some challenging cases. However, this aspect is not well elaborated in the literature. A basic and critical challenge is finding and locating the cells of interest in cell-block sections of effusion fluids. A unique approach is to choose a fundamental immunopanel which highlight the mesothelial and inflammatory cells in reactive effusion fluids to create the basic map. This allows detection of a 'second-foreign' population which can be immunocharacterized further with the help of subtractive coordinate immunoreactivity pattern (SCIP) approach elaborated here.

Serous fluid: Metastatic sarcomas, melanoma, and other non-epithelial neoplasms

While most tumors metastatic to the serous membranes are of epithelial origin, cytologists should be aware that non-epithelial neoplasms can also cause malignant effusions including sarcomas, melanomas, germ cell tumors, and, more rarely, brain tumors. The differential diagnosis of a malignant effusion is accordingly broad, especially for the small round blue cell tumors that includes not only mesenchymal tumors, but also non-mesenchymal tumors, such as neuroblastoma and Wilms tumor. Diagnosing non-epithelial malignancies in effusion specimens based entirely upon their cytomorphologic features is difficult because these neoplasms often exhibit considerable morphological overlap and their cytomorphology can differ from the original tumor. As malignant cells have a tendency to round up in body fluids these non-epithelial neoplasms can therefore mimic reactive mesothelial cells and metastatic adenocarcinoma. The use of ancillary studies including immunostaining, FISH, and molecular studies is thus often critical to reach a definitive diagnosis. This review article will be incorporated finally as one of the chapters in CMAS (CytoJournal Monograph/Atlas Series) #2. It is modified slightly from the chapter by the initial authors in the first edition of Diagnostic Cytopathology of Serous Fluids.

Flow cytometry, molecular analysis, and other special techniques (in Serous Fluid Cytopathology)

Morphological and architectural pattern evaluations play a major role in the rpretation of hematopoietic neoplasms. However, confirmation of diagnosis, classification, prognosis, and risk stratification are highly dependent on the utilization of multiple ancillary studies. The importance of these ancillary studies increases in evaluating serous fluid samples, as these samples lack architecture and patterns. Likewise, the morphology can be disturbed by sample preparation. The most common ancillary studies utilized are flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry for immunophenotyping, Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH), cytogenetics for structural and gene rearrangements, and molecular studies for mutational analysis. Among them, flow cytometry analysis is the handiest test to perform with high diagnostic yield on serous fluid specimens. In this article we will discuss the use, caveat, and role of the most common ancillary studies on serous fluid specimen evaluation. This review article will be incorporated finally as one of the chapters in CMAS (CytoJournal Monograph/Atlas Series) #2. It is modified slightly from the chapter by the initial authors (Choladda Vejabhuti, MD and Chung-Che (Jeff) Chang, MD, PhD) in the first edition of Diagnostic Cytopathology of Serous Fluids.

Serous fluids and hematolymphoid disorders

Diagnosing hematolymphoid neoplasm by evaluating fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology sample is controversial and requires experience and clinical skills. This concept becomes more challenging when evaluating hematolymphoid neoplasm in body fluid. Differentiating between low-grade lymphoma and reactive lymphocytes is often difficult by morphology alone as reactive lymphoid cells may acquire activation morphology from being exposed to different cytokines within the body fluid. However, in most cases there are specific features that may aid in differentiating small reactive from non-reactive lymphocytes including the round shape of the nucleus, the absence of visible nucleoli and the presence of fine clumped chromatin. In large cell lymphoma and leukemia cells involvement of body fluid this concept becomes less challenging. Large cell lymphoma and leukemia cells tend to have large size nuclei, less mature chromatin, and visible nucleoli with and without cytoplasmic vacuoles. However, to reach accurate diagnosis and subclassification, the utilizing of flow cytometry, to confirm monoclonality, and other ancillary studies such immunocytochemistry, cytogenetics and molecular studies is needed. This review article will be incorporated finally as one of the chapters in CMAS (CytoJournal Monograph/Atlas Series) #2. It is modified slightly from the chapter by the initial authors in the first edition of Diagnostic Cytopathology of Serous Fluids.

Serous cavity metastasis: Evaluation of unknown primary

Malignant effusions can occur in patients with neoplasia. Once a metastatic diagnosis is confirmed, the primary site of origin of malignancy needs to be ascertained. This task can be challenging without a prior history of malignancy. In some patients their effusion may be the initial presentation of an underlying malignancy. Metastases usually present with a dual population of mesothelial and malignant cells. Combining cytomorphologic examination with ancillary testing such as immunocytochemistry can help identify the origin of the foreign malignant cell population. Helpful architectural clues include a single cell pattern, solid cell ball pattern, single file arrangement, papillary formation, psammoma bodies and background mucin. Useful cellular features include the presence of signet ring cells, small cells, pleomorphic and multinucleated giant cells, squamous cells, spindle cells and pigmentation. Rarely, despite an extensive work-up the primary site of origin for a malignant effusion may remain unresolved. This review article will be incorporated finally as one of the chapters in CMAS (CytoJournal Monograph/Atlas Series) #2. It is modified slightly from the chapter by the initial authors in the first edition of Cytopathologic Diagnosis of Serous Fluids.

CelLock TM: an innovative standardized cell-block preparation procedure

The CelLock™ procedure kit is used to collect and prepare cellular specimens such as fine needle aspirates (FNA), cytology specimens, cultured cells, small tissue biopsies, and samples with scant tissue fragments or cells into a paraffin cell-block. This cell-block can be used for subsequent microtomy and staining using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), special stains, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and applicable molecular techniques such as in situ hybridization (ISH). CelLock is a standardized method that provides optimal receipt, preservation, preparation, and processing of cell-blocks which, contain virtually all of the submitted specimens and are able to be embedded and sectioned in a reproducible fashion. The specimen contained within the cell-block is preserved such that all the cellular protein and genetic information is available for histological and ancillary testing.

Introduction to the second edition of 'Diagnostic Cytopathology of Serous Fluids' as CytoJournal Monograph (CMAS) in Open Access

Serous fluids are excessive accumulation of fluids in a serous cavity as effusion. However, traditionally this area also covers cytopathologic evaluation of washings of these cavities including pelvic/peritoneal washing. This is the introductory review article in series on this topic with the application of simplified algorithmic approaches. The series would be compiled finally as a book after minor modifications of individual review articles to accommodate the book layout on the topic as second edition of 'Diagnostic Cytopathology of Serous Fluids' book. The approach is primarily directed towards detection of neoplastic cells based on morphology alone or with the help of various ancillary tests, including commonly applied immunocytochemistry to be interpreted as second foreign population with application of SCIP (subtractive coordinate immunoreactivity pattern) approach in effusion fluid tapings. As the role of molecular pathology tests is increasing, this component as ancillary testing will also be covered as applicable. Because a picture and sketches are worth a thousand words, illustrations and figures are included generously even at the risk of moderate repetition. The clinically important serous cavities include peritoneal cavity, pericardial cavity, and two pleural cavities. The primary topic of this series is specimens from these cavities as effusion fluids and washings including cytopathologic evaluation of peritoneal/pelvic washing. It is expected that some readers may not read the entire series or the final book from beginning to end, but refer to the individual review articles and chapters sporadically during their clinical practice. Considering this practical limitation, some brief repetition may be observed throughout the book. Some of the important themes will be highlighted as italicized and bolded text for quick reference. Dedicated articles/chapters are assigned for technical and other reference material as appendices. Tables, algorithms, sketches, and combination of pictures are included generously for quick reference. Most of the illustrations are attempted to be labeled appropriately with arrows and other indicators to avoid equivocation, especially for beginners in the field. This introductory review article describes general details under the following three broad headings: Histology and general cytology of serous cavity lining Effusion (general considerations) Ancillary techniques in brief.

Adequacy of pleural fluid cytology for comprehensive molecular analysis of lung adenocarcinoma: Experience of a large health-care system

Objectives:

Pleural fluid evaluation is an effective modality for identifying actionable genetic mutations to guide therapy in lung carcinoma. Clinicians requesting molecular studies often send large volumes of fluid to be processed that is not possible or cost effective and is hence not standard of practice in most cytopathology laboratories. We wanted to establish the characteristics of an adequate specimen that would yield reliable results with current molecular testing platforms.

Material and Methods:

A review of 500 malignant pleural effusions, from pulmonary and non-pulmonary sources, was undertaken over a 4-year period. Of these 44 cases (from 42 patients) that were positive for primary lung adenocarcinoma were included in the study. Molecular analysis was performed on 42 specimens. A complete next generation sequencing (NGS) panel was performed on 36 specimens. Individual testing for estimated glomerular filtration rate, KRAS, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, and ROS1 was performed on six specimens. The number of malignant cells and proportion of tumor to non-tumor nucleated cells (T: NT) on cell blocks was recorded as <20%, 20–50% and >50%.

Results:

The minimum volume on which a complete NGS panel could be performed was 20 ml with cell count of 1000 and T: NT proportion of 20–50%. The minimum number of tumor cells required for successful molecular analysis for T: NT proportion of <20%, 20–50%, and >50% was 300, 250, and 170 cells, respectively.

Conclusion:

We concluded that tumor cell proportion, rather than specimen volume, is of prime importance for determining the efficacy of pleural fluid for molecular studies. Evaluation of both absolute and relative numbers of tumor cells is critical for assessing the adequacy and predicting successful yield for molecular analysis.

Peritoneal malignant mesothelioma: Slippery like an eel to diagnose on cytology-case series of 3 cases

INTRODUCTION

Peritoneal malignant mesothelioma is an extremely rare tumor and is a difficult diagnosis to be made on cytology alone. We report 3 cases where the cytologic features were misdiagnosed as carcinoma/lymphoma but histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) established the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.

CLINICAL DETAILS

Case 1 was a 60-year-old man with multiloculated ascites and omental caking. Peritoneal fluid was reported as malignant on cytology but was misclassified as adenocarcinoma. Case 2, a 45-year-old man with ascites and peritoneal nodularity, radiologically mimicking peritoneal carcinomatosis, was also reported positive for malignancy on ascitic fluid cytology. Fine-needle aspiration (FNAC) from omental fat revealed signet ring cells, thus misleading to cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Case 3 was a 63-year-old man with perisplenic mass with extensive omental caking and peritoneal nodularity that was also suspected to be peritoneal carcinomatosis on radiology. FNAC smears from perisplenic mass showed sheets of plasmacytoid cells. On cytology, the differential diagnoses offered were neuroendocrine tumor or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma was established only after IHC on histopathologic sections in all these cases. None of our patients had history of prior asbestos exposure.

CONCLUSION

In such clinical scenarios, with radiology suggesting peritoneal carcinomatosis, the cytologic features need corroboration by IHC/fluorescence in situ hybridization on cell block or biopsy to correctly identify malignant mesothelioma and differentiate it from metastatic carcinomatous deposits and benign mesothelial proliferation.

Cell-blocks and hematolymphoid lesions

Cell-blocks are an important component for evaluation for hematolymphoid lesions. They are especially critical for immunocharacterization of the lymphoid population especially when flow cytometry is not available or cannot be performed. In addition, cell-blocks allow various molecular pathology tests including gene rearrangement studies and FISH, proteomics analysis, and microbiology/histochemical special stains. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for mass lesions, lymphadenopathy, and effusion fluids are common cytopathology specimens which are frequently cell-blocked. The differential diagnosis of enlarged lymph nodes (LNs) and mass lesions is broad and includes reactive processes, granulomatous lesions and malignancies including solid tumor metastases and various types of hematological malignancies, of which lymphoma would be most common. Depending on the patient population, most lymphomas may be diagnosed with immunocharacterization on cell-block or/and flow cytometry in concert with excellent cytomorphology in Diff-Quik stained FNA aspirate smears. However, a proportion of lymphoma cases (up to 12-30%) may still require an excisional LN biopsy to evaluate architectural parameters. Similarly, various effusion fluids suspicious for lymphoma can be immunocharacterized by immunostaining of cell-block sections (or/and by flow cytometry). Availability of quantitatively and qualitatively optimum cell-blocks of specimens to be evaluated for hematolymphoid processes is critical for immunohistochemistry, polymerase chain reaction, in situ hybridization (FISH), and gene expression profiling studies.