Imaging in Pulsatile Tinnitus: Case Based Review

Non-invasive imaging modalities for diagnosing pulsatile tinnitus: a comprehensive review and recommended imaging algorithm

Pulsatile tinnitus (PT) is a challenging diagnostic condition arising from various vascular, neoplastic, and systemic disorders. Non-invasive imaging is essential for identifying underlying causes while minimizing risks of invasive diagnostic angiography. Although no consensus exists on the primary imaging modality for PT and currently CT, ultrasound, and MRI are used in the diagnostic pathway, MRI is increasingly preferred as the first-line screening test for its diagnostic efficacy and safety. MRI protocols such as time-of-flight, magnetic resonance angiography, diffusion-weighted imaging, and arterial spin labeling can identify serious causes, including vascular shunting lesions, venous sinus stenosis, and tumors. In this narrative review of the current literature we discuss the benefits and limitations of various non-invasive imaging modalities in identifying the characteristic imaging findings of the most common causes of PT and also provide an algorithm that clinicians can use to guide the imaging evaluation.

Imaging of Pulsatile Tinnitus

Tinnitus is a common complaint that approximately three-fourths of adults will experience at some point in their life. While for many it is a mild nuisance, for some it can be debilitating, affecting cognition and quality of life, increasing stress, and leading to anxiety, depression, and in severe circumstances even suicide. Pulsatile tinnitus refers to the perception of a heartbeat-like sound without external stimulus. Although less common than nonpulsatile tinnitus, pulsatile tinnitus raises concern for underlying disease that can have a high risk of causing the patient harm if undiagnosed, and most of these patients will have positive findings at imaging. While these findings are often subtle, identifying them can have a meaningful impact on the patient's quality of life. The literature on pulsatile tinnitus is changing rapidly with improved imaging techniques and novel minimally invasive treatment options. A careful history and physical examination together with appropriate imaging are therefore critical in identifying the underlying cause. With emerging surgical, endovascular, and supportive technologies, the vast majority of patients with bothersome pulsatile tinnitus can be cured or have their symptoms ameliorated. The objective of this narrative review is to present a comprehensive analysis of the currently available literature on pulsatile tinnitus, with a focus on understanding its pathophysiologic mechanisms, diagnostic pathways, imaging findings, and the spectrum of available management strategies and ultimately to propose a structured framework that aids radiologists as well as clinicians in identifying an underlying diagnosis and guiding management of these patients. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Severe bilateral papilledema after sigmoid sinus constriction surgery: a case report

BACKGROUND

Papilledema is a common sign of various diseases in the eye. It could result from any conditions of increased intracranial pressure (ICP). Underlying the etiology of papilledema and appropriate treatment in time is essential.

CASE REPORT

We present a case of severe bilateral papilledema after sigmoid sinus constriction surgery. A 25-year-old female presented with a 1-month history of bilateral blurred vision, headache, and vomiting. The patient had a history of right-side sigmoid sinus constriction surgery for pulsatile tinnitus (PT) one month before in another hospital. Fundus examination showed severe bilateral papilledema. Lumbar puncture showed an elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure of 29 cm H2O. Neuroimaging examination demonstrated the right sigmoid sinus filling defect as changes after surgery. We referred the patient to the initial surgeon, who repaired the sigmoid sinus on the right side by removing the implanted gelatin sponge, as diuretic treatment could not be effective. Intracranial hypertension symptoms and signs improved soon after eliminating sigmoid sinus stenosis. Neuroimaging showed resolved right sigmoid sinus stenosis after the second surgery. CSF opening pressure was 14.5 cm H2O at the 1-month follow-up. Fundus examination showed entirely resolved papilledema. Three years of follow-up showed no recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first clinical report of intracranial hypertension associated with sigmoid sinus constriction surgery. Although rare, rapid detection and adequate etiology management could lead to a good prognosis. It highlights the need for ophthalmologists to be aware of the diagnostic approach to papilledema and enhance cooperation with multidisciplinary departments. The most likely cause of the intracranial hypertension was dominant sinus surgical constriction by mechanical external compression, as confirmed by the complete clinical remission following the second operation to remove the implanted gelatin sponge. Thus, this case also highlights the importance of selecting the appropriate therapeutic option for PT. Surgical sinus constriction should no longer be considered a viable option for PT treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Tinnitus: 2023 Update

Tinnitus is abnormal perception of sound and has many subtypes. Clinical evaluation, audiometry, and otoscopy should be performed before ordering any imaging, as the choice of imaging will depend on various factors. Type of tinnitus (pulsatile or nonpulsatile) and otoscopy findings of a vascular retrotympanic lesion are key determinants to guide the choice of imaging studies. High-resolution CT temporal bone is an excellent tool to detect glomus tumors, abnormal course of vessels, and some other abnormalities when a vascular retrotympanic lesion is seen on otoscopy. CTA or a combination of MR and MRA/MRV are used to evaluate arterial or venous abnormalities like dural arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous malformation, carotid stenosis, dural sinus stenosis, and bony abnormalities like sigmoid sinus wall abnormalities in cases of pulsatile tinnitus without a vascular retrotympanic lesion. MR of the brain is excellent in detecting mass lesions such as vestibular schwannomas in cases of unilateral nonpulsatile tinnitus. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Blood Flow Velocity: a Decision Tool for Stenting Indication in Venous Pulsatile Tinnitus

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Lateral sinus stenosis is the most common cause of venous pulsatile tinnitus (VPT). Stenting is an effective treatment after demonstration of a trans-stenotic pressure gradient; however, pressure measurement has many technical limitations. In 2018, a study showed that a combined approach with intravascular velocity measurement could be effective in identifying most appropriate candidates for stenting. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a new strategy using this biomarker for the indication of stenting even without a significant pressure gradient.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with disabling VPT were included from 2016 to 2019 and analyzed retrospectively. Intrasinusal pressures were measured and blood flow velocities (with a dual-sensor guidewire) were used for the indication of stenting independent of the pressure gradient. We evaluated the clinical outcome after stenting based on this new biomarker.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients were treated according to this strategy. At last follow-up (mean = 30.2 months), 32/33 patients (97%) treated by stenting showed complete resolution or a significant decrease in VPT intensity. The use of velocity as the threshold for indicating stenting identified 8 patients (24%) missed by the pressure gradient. Their clinical outcome after stenting was excellent and no complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of sinus blood flow velocity provides a hemodynamic explanation of disease and may be a better tool than pressure gradient for the indication of stenting in VPT.