Review/Perspective On the Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Spinal Arachnoid Cysts

Spinal extradural arachnoid cysts: a rare entity and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Spinal extradural arachnoid cysts (SEDC) are rare primary spinal lesions, accounting for less than 1% of all spinal epidural lesions. The literature contains only case reports of this pathology, and treatment remains controversial due to its rarity. Major reported SEDC cases are caused by leaking out of cerebrospinal fluid through a dural defect in the thecal sac forming an extradural cyst. Other reports describe non-communicating SEDC cases where the dural defect was not identified. We report a literature review on SEDC and the case of a 53 year‑old female who presented with type IA extradural cyst with subarachnoid space communication.

METHODS

Literature review, preoperative imaging and surgical technique.

RESULTS

The extradural cyst was excised completely and the dural defect was repaired. After surgical decompression, neurological symptoms gradually recovered.

CONCLUSIONS

The extradural arachnoid cyst is an uncommon entity. Preoperative imaging is one of the determining elements in orienting the therapeutic management of the SEDCs. The choice of the surgical technique must be the least invasive in order to avoid postoperative complications. Subtotal or complete excision of the cyst, followed by obliteration of the communication stalk and repair of the dural defect is the gold standard treatment.

Neuraxial pathology and regional anesthesia: an education guide to decision-making

In current clinical practice, spinal anesthesia and analgesia techniques-including epidural and subarachnoid procedures-are frequently executed without imaging like X-ray or epidurography. Unrecognized spinal pathology has resulted in serious morbidity in the context of performing neuraxial anesthesia. Typically, preoperative consultations incorporate a patient's medical history but lack a detailed spinal examination or consideration of recent MRI or CT scans. In contrast, within the domain of pain clinics, a multidisciplinary approach involving anesthesiologists and neuroradiologists is common. Such collaborative settings rely on exhaustive clinical history and scrutinization of recent imaging studies, which may influence the decision to proceed with invasive spinal interventions. There are no epidemiological data concerning rates of the different baseline pathologies that would potentially pose morbidity risks from neuraxial procedures, but the most common among these is canal stenosis, which significantly affects almost 20% of people over 60 years of age. This paper aims to elucidate these critical findings and advocate for incorporating meticulous preoperative assessments for individuals slated for spinal anesthesia or analgesia procedures, thereby attempting to mitigate potential risks.