Loss of consciousness at ictus and/or poor World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade on admission reflects the impact of EBI and predicts poor outcome in patients with SAH

Comparison of efficacy between clazosentan and fasudil hydrochloride-based management of vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage focusing on older and WFNS grade V patients: a single-center experience in Japan

Subarachnoid hemorrhage often leads to poor outcomes owing to vasospasm, even after successful aneurysm treatment. Clazosentan, an endothelin receptor inhibitor, has been proven to be an effective treatment for vasospasms in a Japanese randomized controlled trial. However, its efficacy in older patients (≥ 75 years old) and those with World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade V has not been demonstrated. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of clazosentan in older patients and those with WFNS grade V, using real-world data. Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage treated before and after the introduction of clazosentan were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were categorized into two groups (clazosentan era versus pre-clazosentan era), in which vasospasm management and outcomes were compared. Vasospasms were managed with fasudil hydrochloride-based (pre-clazosentan era) or clazosentan-based treatment (clazosentan era). Seventy-eight patients were included in this study: the clazosentan era (n = 32) and pre-clazosentan era (n = 46). Overall, clazosentan significantly reduced clinical vasospasms (clazosentan era: 31.3% versus pre-clazosentan era: 60.9%, p = 0.01), delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) (9.4% versus 39.1%, p = 0.004), and vasospasm-related morbidity and mortality (M/M) (3.1% versus 19.6%, p = 0.03). In subgroup analysis of older patients or those with WFNS grade V, no significant difference was observed in clinical outcomes, although both DCI and vasospasm-related M/M were lower in the clazosentan era. Clazosentan was more effective than fasudil-based management in preventing DCI and reducing vasospasm-related M/M. Clazosentan could be used safely in older patients and those with WFNS grade V, although clinical outcomes in these patients were comparable to those of conventional treatment.

The clinical course and outcomes of non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages in a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAHs) are thought to have a benign clinical course compared to aneurysmal SAHs. The aim of this study is to report the clinical course and outcomes of non-aneurysmal SAHs in a large single-center study.

METHODS

The patients with non-aneurysmal SAHs were screened from Tampere University Hospital from 2005 to 2020. The clinical data were collected from the patient's medical records and from the imaging studies. The primary interest was the neurological outcome assessed by dichotomized GOS at 2 months. Multivariable logistic regression was used to study the factors associated with unfavorable outcome.

RESULTS

We found 216 non-aneurysmal SAHs in 214 patients (2 patients with > 1 bleed). Ninety-seven percent of patients with a typical perimesencephalic bleeding pattern SAH (PSAH) (75/77) had a favorable outcome, while 86% of patients with non-perimesencephalic SAH (NPSAH) had a favorable outcome (84/98). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, loss of consciousness (LOC) (aOR 214.67, 95% CI 17.62-2615.89) and Fisher grade 4 bleeding pattern (aOR 23.32, 95% CI 1.40-387.98) were associated with increased risk for unfavorable outcome (GOS 1-3). Vasospasm was seen in 20% of non-aneurysmal SAH patients, hydrocephalus in 17%, and 13% needed ventriculostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-aneurysmal SAH seems to have a good prognosis for majority of patients, especially for patients with a PSAH. Non-aneurysmal SAH patients are however affected by vasospasm and hydrocephalus and have similar risk factors for poor outcome as patients with aneurysmal SAH. This suggests that it is the severity of the bleed rather than the etiology that associates with poor outcome.

Edema Resolution and Clinical Assessment in Poor-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Useful Indicators to Predict Delayed Cerebral Infarctions?

Background: The level of consciousness and cerebral edema are among the indicators that best define the intensity of early brain injury following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Although these indicators are usually altered in patients with a poor neurological status, their usefulness for selecting patients at risk of cerebral infarction (CI) is not well established. Furthermore, little is known about the evolution of these indicators during the first week of post-ictal events. Our study focused on describing the association of the longitudinal course of these predictors with CI occurrence in patients with severe aSAH. Methods: Out of 265 aSAH patients admitted consecutively to the same institution, 80 patients with initial poor neurological status (WFNS 4–5) were retrospectively identified. After excluding 25 patients with early mortality, a total of 47 patients who underwent early CT (<3 days) and late CT (<7 days) acquisitions were included in the study. Early cerebral edema and delayed cerebral edema were calculated using the SEBES score, and the level of consciousness was recorded daily during the first week using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Results: There was a significant improvement in the SEBES (Early-SEBES median (IQR) = 3 (2–4) versus Delayed-SEBES = 2 (1–3); p = 0.001) and in GCS scores (B = 0.32; 95% CI 0.15–0.49; p = 0.001) during the first week. When comparing the ROC curves of Delayed-SEBES vs Early-SEBES as predictors of CI, no significant differences were found (Early-SEBES Area Under the Curve: 0.65; Delayed-SEBES: 0.62; p = 0.17). Additionally, no differences were observed in the relationship between the improvement in the GCS across the first week and the occurrence of CI (p = 0.536). Conclusions: Edema and consciousness level improvement did not seem to be associated with the occurrence of CI in a surviving cohort of patients with severe aSAH. Our results suggest that intensive monitoring should not be reduced in patients with a poor neurological status regardless of an improvement in cerebral edema and level of consciousness during the first week after bleeding.