Significance of endoscopic hematoma evacuation in elderly patients with spontaneous putaminal hemorrhage

Purely Endoscopic Evacuation of Intracranial Hematomas

Cerebral hemorrhage is a frequent disease and one of the main causes of disabilities. Even in the case of cerebral hemorrhage, if there were a treatment that would improve the functional prognosis, the benefits would be immeasurable. Although there are limited reports with a high level of evidence in past studies, it has been found that surgery can be effective if a large amount of hematoma can be removed in a minimally invasive manner. Also, it has become clear that the control of bleeding becomes a problem when surgery is performed within 2 days after the onset of stroke and that the therapeutic time window might be longer. In Japan, since the introduction of the transparent sheath by Nishihara et al., endoscopic hematoma removal has been widely performed and has become the standard surgical procedure. The three basic equipment needed for this surgery are a rigid scope, a suction coagulator, and a transparent sheath. The key point of the surgery is to search for hematomas and bleeding points through a transparent sheath and coagulate the bleeding vessels. In this chapter, we will introduce surgical techniques using these devices, but it is important to carefully decide on surgical options by considering your own technique, the condition of each patient, and the devices available in the area.

Clinical Significance of Stiffness during Endoscopic Surgery for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study

Studies regarding hematoma stiffness and removal difficulty are scarce. This study explored the association between hematoma stiffness and surgical results of endoscopic hematoma removal for intracerebral hemorrhage. It also aimed to clarify factors associated with hematoma stiffness. We classified intracerebral hematoma as either soft or firm stiffness by retrospectively evaluating operative videos by two neurosurgeons. The interobserver reliability of the classification was assessed by calculating the κ values. We investigated the relationship between hematoma stiffness and surgical results. Favorable hematoma removal (FHR) was defined as a residual hematoma volume of ≤15 mL or removal rate of ≥70%. Furthermore, we compared the background characteristics, imaging findings, and laboratory data between the two groups. Forty patients were included in this study. The mean baseline hematoma volume was 69.9 mL (range, 41.3-97.6 mL). FHR was accomplished in 35 cases (87.5%). Thirty-four patients (85%) were in the soft hematoma group (group S). Six patients (15%) were in the firm hematoma group (group F). Classification of hematoma stiffness demonstrated an excellent degree of interobserver agreement (κ score = 0.91). Patients in group S had a high FHR rate (p = 0.018) and short endoscopic procedure times (p = 0.00034). The island sign was present in group S (p = 0.030). Patients in group F had significantly high fibrinogen levels (p = 0.049) and low serum total calcium (p = 0.032), hemoglobin (p = 0.041), and hematocrit (p = 0.011) levels. Hematoma stiffness during endoscopic surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage correlates with surgical results, including the endoscopic procedure time and accomplishing rate of FHR.

Endoscopic surgery versus craniotomy for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in the late elderly patients

OBJECTIVES

To compare the prognosis of late elderly patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) treated by endoscopic evacuation and craniotomy MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we identified patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent surgery for spontaneous ICH within 48 hours after admission between April 2014 and March 2018. Eligible patients were classified into two groups according to the type of surgery (endoscopic surgery and craniotomy). Propensity-score matching weight analysis was conducted to compare the good neurological outcome modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (0-4) at discharge as the primary endpoint between the two groups. Secondary endpoints were postoperative meningitis, tracheostomy, reoperation within 3 days and total hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

Among the 5,396 eligible patients, endoscopic surgery and craniotomy were performed in 895 and 4,501 patients, respectively. In the propensity-score matching weight analysis, all covariates were well balanced. The proportions of patients with a good prognosis (mRS score at discharge: 0-4) did not significantly differ between the surgical procedures (42.1% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.828). The proportions of meningitis, tracheostomy and reoperation were not significantly different between the two groups. Hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the craniotomy group than in the endoscopic surgery group (25,536 vs. 29,603 US dollars, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Inhospital outcomes did not differ between endoscopic and open surgeries for spontaneous ICH in the late-stage elderly patients aged ≥75 years. Hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the craniotomy group, suggesting that endoscopic surgery may be more acceptable.