1
|
Ogawa S, Taniguchi Y, Watanabe T, Iwaisaki H. Fitting Genomic Prediction Models with Different Marker Effects among Prefectures to Carcass Traits in Japanese Black Cattle. Genes (Basel) 2022; 14:24. [PMID: 36672767 PMCID: PMC9859149 DOI: 10.3390/genes14010024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
We fitted statistical models, which assumed single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker effects differing across the fattened steers marketed into different prefectures, to the records for cold carcass weight (CW) and marbling score (MS) of 1036, 733, and 279 Japanese Black fattened steers marketed into Tottori, Hiroshima, and Hyogo prefectures in Japan, respectively. Genotype data on 33,059 SNPs was used. Five models that assume only common SNP effects to all the steers (model 1), common effects plus SNP effects differing between the steers marketed into Hyogo prefecture and others (model 2), only the SNP effects differing between Hyogo steers and others (model 3), common effects plus SNP effects specific to each prefecture (model 4), and only the effects specific to each prefecture (model 5) were exploited. For both traits, slightly lower values of residual variance than that of model 1 were estimated when fitting all other models. Estimated genetic correlation among the prefectures in models 2 and 4 ranged to 0.53 to 0.71, all <0.8. These results might support that the SNP effects differ among the prefectures to some degree, although we discussed the necessity of careful consideration to interpret the current results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichiro Ogawa
- Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
- Division of Meat Animal and Poultry Research, Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, Tsukuba 305-0901, Japan
| | - Yukio Taniguchi
- Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
| | - Toshio Watanabe
- National Livestock Breeding Center, Fukushima 961-8511, Japan
- Maebashi Institute of Animal Science, Livestock Improvement Association of Japan, Inc., Maebashi 371-0121, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Iwaisaki
- Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
- Sado Island Center for Ecological Sustainability, Niigata University, Niigata 952-0103, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bolormaa S, MacLeod IM, Khansefid M, Marett LC, Wales WJ, Miglior F, Baes CF, Schenkel FS, Connor EE, Manzanilla-Pech CIV, Stothard P, Herman E, Nieuwhof GJ, Goddard ME, Pryce JE. Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency. Genet Sel Evol 2022; 54:60. [PMID: 36068488 PMCID: PMC9450441 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-022-00749-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sharing individual phenotype and genotype data between countries is complex and fraught with potential errors, while sharing summary statistics of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is relatively straightforward, and thus would be especially useful for traits that are expensive or difficult-to-measure, such as feed efficiency. Here we examined: (1) the sharing of individual cow data from international partners; and (2) the use of sequence variants selected from GWAS of international cow data to evaluate the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) for residual feed intake (RFI) in Australian cows. RESULTS GEBV for RFI were estimated using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) with 50k or high-density single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), from a training population of 3797 individuals in univariate to trivariate analyses where the three traits were RFI phenotypes calculated using 584 Australian lactating cows (AUSc), 824 growing heifers (AUSh), and 2526 international lactating cows (OVE). Accuracies of GEBV in AUSc were evaluated by either cohort-by-birth-year or fourfold random cross-validations. GEBV of AUSc were also predicted using only the AUS training population with a weighted genomic relationship matrix constructed with SNPs from the 50k array and sequence variants selected from a meta-GWAS that included only international datasets. The genomic heritabilities estimated using the AUSc, OVE and AUSh datasets were moderate, ranging from 0.20 to 0.36. The genetic correlations (rg) of traits between heifers and cows ranged from 0.30 to 0.95 but were associated with large standard errors. The mean accuracies of GEBV in Australian cows were up to 0.32 and almost doubled when either overseas cows, or both overseas cows and AUS heifers were included in the training population. They also increased when selected sequence variants were combined with 50k SNPs, but with a smaller relative increase. CONCLUSIONS The accuracy of RFI GEBV increased when international data were used or when selected sequence variants were combined with 50k SNP array data. This suggests that if direct sharing of data is not feasible, a meta-analysis of summary GWAS statistics could provide selected SNPs for custom panels to use in genomic selection programs. However, since this finding is based on a small cross-validation study, confirmation through a larger study is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Iona M. MacLeod
- Agriculture Victoria Research, Agribio, Bundoora, VIC 3083 Australia
| | - Majid Khansefid
- Agriculture Victoria Research, Agribio, Bundoora, VIC 3083 Australia
| | - Leah C. Marett
- Agriculture Victoria Research, Ellinbank Centre, Ellinbank, Gippsland, VIC 3821 Australia
- School of Agriculture and Food, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
| | - William J. Wales
- Agriculture Victoria Research, Ellinbank Centre, Ellinbank, Gippsland, VIC 3821 Australia
- School of Agriculture and Food, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
| | - Filippo Miglior
- LACTANET, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3R4 Canada
- CGIL, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Canada
| | - Christine F. Baes
- CGIL, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Canada
- Institute of Genetics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, 3002 Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Erin E. Connor
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
- Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA
| | | | - Paul Stothard
- Faculty of Agricultural, Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3 Canada
| | - Emily Herman
- Faculty of Agricultural, Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3 Canada
| | - Gert J. Nieuwhof
- Agriculture Victoria Research, Agribio, Bundoora, VIC 3083 Australia
- DataGene Ltd, Agribio, Bundoora, VIC 3083 Australia
| | - Michael E. Goddard
- Agriculture Victoria Research, Agribio, Bundoora, VIC 3083 Australia
- School of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052 Australia
| | - Jennie E. Pryce
- Agriculture Victoria Research, Agribio, Bundoora, VIC 3083 Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao H, Pandey BR, Khansefid M, Khahrood HV, Sudheesh S, Joshi S, Kant S, Kaur S, Rosewarne GM. Combining NDVI and Bacterial Blight Score to Predict Grain Yield in Field Pea. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2022; 13:923381. [PMID: 35837454 PMCID: PMC9274273 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.923381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Field pea is the most commonly grown temperate pulse crop, with close to 15 million tons produced globally in 2020. Varieties improved through breeding are important to ensure ongoing improvements in yield and disease resistance. Genomic selection (GS) is a modern breeding approach that could substantially improve the rate of genetic gain for grain yield, and its deployment depends on the prediction accuracy (PA) that can be achieved. In our study, four yield trials representing breeding lines' advancement stages of the breeding program (S0, S1, S2, and S3) were assessed with grain yield, aerial high-throughput phenotyping (normalized difference vegetation index, NDVI), and bacterial blight disease scores (BBSC). Low-to-moderate broad-sense heritability (0.31-0.71) and narrow-sense heritability (0.13-0.71) were observed, as the estimated additive and non-additive genetic components for the three traits varied with the different models fitted. The genetic correlations among the three traits were high, particularly in the S0-S2 stages. NDVI and BBSC were combined to investigate the PA for grain yield by univariate and multivariate GS models, and multivariate models showed higher PA than univariate models in both cross-validation and forward prediction methods. A 6-50% improvement in PA was achieved when multivariate models were deployed. The highest PA was indicated in the forward prediction scenario when the training population consisted of early generation breeding stages with the multivariate models. Both NDVI and BBSC are commonly used traits that could be measured in the early growth stage; however, our study suggested that NDVI is a more useful trait to predict grain yield with high accuracy in the field pea breeding program, especially in diseased trials, through its incorporation into multivariate models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanhuan Zhao
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for Agri Bioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Babu R. Pandey
- Agriculture Victoria, Grains Innovation Park, Horsham, VIC, Australia
| | - Majid Khansefid
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for Agri Bioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Hossein V. Khahrood
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for Agri Bioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Shimna Sudheesh
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for Agri Bioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Sameer Joshi
- Agriculture Victoria, Grains Innovation Park, Horsham, VIC, Australia
| | - Surya Kant
- Agriculture Victoria, Grains Innovation Park, Horsham, VIC, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Sukhjiwan Kaur
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for Agri Bioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Garry M. Rosewarne
- Agriculture Victoria, Grains Innovation Park, Horsham, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Agricultural Innovation, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Misztal I, Steyn Y, Lourenco D. Genomic evaluation with multibreed and crossbred data. JDS COMMUNICATIONS 2022; 3:156-159. [PMID: 36339739 PMCID: PMC9623721 DOI: 10.3168/jdsc.2021-0177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
We found low accuracy of genomic evaluation of crossbreds based on purebred data. We found higher accuracy for crossbreds based on crossbred data. Use of putative sequence variants had a small impact on genomic accuracy.
Several types of multibreed genomic evaluation are in use. These include evaluation of crossbreds based on purebred SNP effects, joint evaluation of all purebreds and crossbreds with a single additive effect, and treating each purebred and crossbred group as a separate trait. Additionally, putative quantitative trait nucleotides can be exploited to increase the accuracy of prediction. Existing studies indicate that the prediction of crossbreds based on purebred data has low accuracy, that a joint evaluation can potentially provide accurate evaluations for crossbreds but could lower accuracy for purebreds compared with single-breed evaluations, and that the use of putative quantitative trait nucleotides only marginally increases the accuracy. One hypothesis is that genomic selection is based on estimation of clusters of independent chromosome segments. Subsequently, predicting a particular group type would require a reference population of the same type, and crosses with same breed percentage but different type (F1 vs. F2) would, at best, use separate reference populations. The genomic selection of multibreed population is still an active research topic.
Collapse
|
5
|
Manzanilla-Pech CIV, Difford GF, Sahana G, Romé H, Løvendahl P, Lassen J. Genome-wide association study for methane emission traits in Danish Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 2021; 105:1357-1368. [PMID: 34799107 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-20410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Selecting for lower methane emitting cows requires insight into the most biologically relevant phenotypes for methane emission, which are close to the breeding goal. Several methane phenotypes have been suggested over the last decade. However, the (dis)similarity of their underlying genetic architecture and correlation structures are poorly understood. Therefore, the objective of this study was to test association of SNP and genomic regions through GWAS on 8 CH4 emission traits in Danish Holstein cattle. The traits studied were methane concentration (MeC; ppm), methane production (MeP ; g/d), 2 definitions of residual methane (RMETc and RMETp: MeC and MeP regressed on metabolic body weight and energy-corrected milk, respectively), 2 definitions of methane intensity (MeI; MeIc = MeC/ECM and MeIp = MeP/ECM); 2 definitions of methane yield per kilogram of dry matter intake (MeY; MeYc = MeC/dry matter intake and MeYp = MeP/dry matter intake). A total of 1,962 cows with genotypes (Illumina BovineSNP50 Chip or Eurogenomic custom SNP chip) and repeated records of the above-mentioned 8 methane traits were analyzed. Strong associations were found with 3 traits (MeC, MeP, and MeYc) on chromosome 13 and with 5 traits (MeC, MeP, MeIp, MeYp, and MeYc) on chromosome 26. For MeIc, MeIp, RMETc, MeYc, and MeYp, some suggestive association signals were identified on chromosome 1. Genomic segments of 1 Mbp (n = 2,525) were tested for their association with these traits, which identified between 33 to 54 significantly associated regions. In a pairwise comparison, MeC and MeP were the traits that shared the highest number of significant segments (17). The same trend was observed when comparing SNP significantly associated with the traits MeC and MeP shared from 23 to 25 SNP (most of which were located in chromosomes 11, 13, and 26). Based on our results on GWAS and genetic correlations, we conclude that MeC is (genetically) more closely linked to MeP than any of the other methane traits analyzed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C I V Manzanilla-Pech
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Blichers Alle 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
| | - G F Difford
- Department of Breeding and Genetics, Nofima AS, PO Box 210, N-1431 Ås, Norway
| | - G Sahana
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Blichers Alle 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
| | - H Romé
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Blichers Alle 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
| | - P Løvendahl
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Blichers Alle 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
| | - J Lassen
- Viking Genetics, Ebeltoftvej 16, Assentoft, 8960 Randers, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Atanda SA, Olsen M, Burgueño J, Crossa J, Dzidzienyo D, Beyene Y, Gowda M, Dreher K, Zhang X, Prasanna BM, Tongoona P, Danquah EY, Olaoye G, Robbins KR. Maximizing efficiency of genomic selection in CIMMYT's tropical maize breeding program. TAG. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS. THEORETISCHE UND ANGEWANDTE GENETIK 2021; 134:279-294. [PMID: 33037897 PMCID: PMC7813723 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-020-03696-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Historical data from breeding programs can be efficiently used to improve genomic selection accuracy, especially when the training set is optimized to subset individuals most informative of the target testing set. The current strategy for large-scale implementation of genomic selection (GS) at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) global maize breeding program has been to train models using information from full-sibs in a "test-half-predict-half approach." Although effective, this approach has limitations, as it requires large full-sib populations and limits the ability to shorten variety testing and breeding cycle times. The primary objective of this study was to identify optimal experimental and training set designs to maximize prediction accuracy of GS in CIMMYT's maize breeding programs. Training set (TS) design strategies were evaluated to determine the most efficient use of phenotypic data collected on relatives for genomic prediction (GP) using datasets containing 849 (DS1) and 1389 (DS2) DH-lines evaluated as testcrosses in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Our results show there is merit in the use of multiple bi-parental populations as TS when selected using algorithms to maximize relatedness between the training and prediction sets. In a breeding program where relevant past breeding information is not readily available, the phenotyping expenditure can be spread across connected bi-parental populations by phenotyping only a small number of lines from each population. This significantly improves prediction accuracy compared to within-population prediction, especially when the TS for within full-sib prediction is small. Finally, we demonstrate that prediction accuracy in either sparse testing or "test-half-predict-half" can further be improved by optimizing which lines are planted for phenotyping and which lines are to be only genotyped for advancement based on GP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sikiru Adeniyi Atanda
- West Africa Center for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
- Section of Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Michael Olsen
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya.
| | - Juan Burgueño
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Jose Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Daniel Dzidzienyo
- West Africa Center for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Yoseph Beyene
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Manje Gowda
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Kate Dreher
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Xuecai Zhang
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | | | - Pangirayi Tongoona
- West Africa Center for Crop Improvement (WACCI), University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | | | - Gbadebo Olaoye
- Agronomy Department, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria
| | - Kelly R Robbins
- Section of Plant Breeding and Genetics, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Khansefid M, Goddard ME, Haile-Mariam M, Konstantinov KV, Schrooten C, de Jong G, Jewell EG, O’Connor E, Pryce JE, Daetwyler HD, MacLeod IM. Improving Genomic Prediction of Crossbred and Purebred Dairy Cattle. Front Genet 2020; 11:598580. [PMID: 33381150 PMCID: PMC7767986 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.598580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This study assessed the accuracy and bias of genomic prediction (GP) in purebred Holstein (H) and Jersey (J) as well as crossbred (H and J) validation cows using different reference sets and prediction strategies. The reference sets were made up of different combinations of 36,695 H and J purebreds and crossbreds. Additionally, the effect of using different sets of marker genotypes on GP was studied (conventional panel: 50k, custom panel enriched with, or close to, causal mutations: XT_50k, and conventional high-density with a limited custom set: pruned HDnGBS). We also compared the use of genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and Bayesian (emBayesR) models, and the traits tested were milk, fat, and protein yields. On average, by including crossbred cows in the reference population, the prediction accuracies increased by 0.01-0.08 and were less biased (regression coefficient closer to 1 by 0.02-0.16), and the benefit was greater for crossbreds compared to purebreds. The accuracy of prediction increased by 0.02 using XT_50k compared to 50k genotypes without affecting the bias. Although using pruned HDnGBS instead of 50k also increased the prediction accuracy by about 0.02, it increased the bias for purebred predictions in emBayesR models. Generally, emBayesR outperformed GBLUP for prediction accuracy when using 50k or pruned HDnGBS genotypes, but the benefits diminished with XT_50k genotypes. Crossbred predictions derived from a joint pure H and J reference were similar in accuracy to crossbred predictions derived from the two separate purebred reference sets and combined proportional to breed composition. However, the latter approach was less biased by 0.13. Most interestingly, using an equalized breed reference instead of an H-dominated reference, on average, reduced the bias of prediction by 0.16-0.19 and increased the accuracy by 0.04 for crossbred and J cows, with a little change in the H accuracy. In conclusion, we observed improved genomic predictions for both crossbreds and purebreds by equalizing breed contributions in a mixed breed reference that included crossbred cows. Furthermore, we demonstrate, that compared to the conventional 50k or high-density panels, our customized set of 50k sequence markers improved or matched the prediction accuracy and reduced bias with both GBLUP and Bayesian models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid Khansefid
- AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria Services, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael E. Goddard
- AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria Services, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
- Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Mekonnen Haile-Mariam
- AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria Services, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jennie E. Pryce
- AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria Services, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Hans D. Daetwyler
- AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria Services, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Iona M. MacLeod
- AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Agriculture Victoria Services, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brito LF, Oliveira HR, Houlahan K, Fonseca PA, Lam S, Butty AM, Seymour DJ, Vargas G, Chud TC, Silva FF, Baes CF, Cánovas A, Miglior F, Schenkel FS. Genetic mechanisms underlying feed utilization and implementation of genomic selection for improved feed efficiency in dairy cattle. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE 2020. [DOI: 10.1139/cjas-2019-0193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The economic importance of genetically improving feed efficiency has been recognized by cattle producers worldwide. It has the potential to considerably reduce costs, minimize environmental impact, optimize land and resource use efficiency, and improve the overall cattle industry’s profitability. Feed efficiency is a genetically complex trait that can be described as units of product output (e.g., milk yield) per unit of feed input. The main objective of this review paper is to present an overview of the main genetic and physiological mechanisms underlying feed utilization in ruminants and the process towards implementation of genomic selection for feed efficiency in dairy cattle. In summary, feed efficiency can be improved via numerous metabolic pathways and biological mechanisms through genetic selection. Various studies have indicated that feed efficiency is heritable, and genomic selection can be successfully implemented in dairy cattle with a large enough training population. In this context, some organizations have worked collaboratively to do research and develop training populations for successful implementation of joint international genomic evaluations. The integration of “-omics” technologies, further investments in high-throughput phenotyping, and identification of novel indicator traits will also be paramount in maximizing the rates of genetic progress for feed efficiency in dairy cattle worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiz F. Brito
- Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Hinayah R. Oliveira
- Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Kerry Houlahan
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Pablo A.S. Fonseca
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Stephanie Lam
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Adrien M. Butty
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Dave J. Seymour
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
- Centre for Nutrition Modelling, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Giovana Vargas
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Tatiane C.S. Chud
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Fabyano F. Silva
- Department of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais 36570-000, Brazil
| | - Christine F. Baes
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
- Vetsuisse Faculty, Institute of Genetics, University of Bern, Bern 3001, Switzerland
| | - Angela Cánovas
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Filippo Miglior
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Flavio S. Schenkel
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Richardson CM, Nguyen TTT, Abdelsayed M, Moate PJ, Williams SRO, Chud TCS, Schenkel FS, Goddard ME, van den Berg I, Cocks BG, Marett LC, Wales WJ, Pryce JE. Genetic parameters for methane emission traits in Australian dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2020; 104:539-549. [PMID: 33131823 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-18565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Methane is a greenhouse gas of high interest to the dairy industry, with 57% of Australia's dairy emissions attributed to enteric methane. Enteric methane emissions also constitute a loss of approximately 6.5% of ingested energy. Genetic selection offers a unique mitigation strategy to decrease the methane emissions of dairy cattle, while simultaneously improving their energy efficiency. Breeding objectives should focus on improving the overall sustainability of dairy cattle by reducing methane emissions without negatively affecting important economic traits. Common definitions for methane production, methane yield, and methane intensity are widely accepted, but there is not yet consensus for the most appropriate method to calculate residual methane production, as the different methods have not been compared. In this study, we examined 9 definitions of residual methane production. Records of individual cow methane, dry matter intake (DMI), and energy corrected milk (ECM) were obtained from 379 animals and measured over a 5-d period from 12 batches across 5 yr using the SF6 tracer method and an electronic feed recording system, respectively. The 9 methods of calculating residual methane involved genetic and phenotypic regression of methane production on a combination of DMI and ECM corrected for days in milk, parity, and experimental batch using phenotypes or direct genomic values. As direct genomic values (DGV) for DMI are not routinely evaluated in Australia at this time, DGV for FeedSaved, which is derived from DGV for residual feed intake and estimated breeding value for bodyweight, were used. Heritability estimates were calculated using univariate models, and correlations were estimated using bivariate models corrected for the fixed effects of year-batch, days in milk, and lactation number, and fitted using a genomic relationship matrix. Residual methane production candidate traits had low to moderate heritability (0.10 ± 0.09 to 0.21 ± 0.10), with residual methane production corrected for ECM being the highest. All definitions of residual methane were highly correlated phenotypically (>0.87) and genetically (>0.79) with one another and moderately to highly with other methane candidate traits (>0.59), with high standard errors. The results suggest that direct selection for a residual methane production trait would result in indirect, favorable improvement in all other methane traits. The high standard errors highlight the importance of expanding data sets by measuring more animals for their methane emissions and DMI, or through exploration of proxy traits and combining data via international collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Richardson
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia; School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
| | - T T T Nguyen
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| | - M Abdelsayed
- DataGene Ltd., AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| | - P J Moate
- Agriculture Victoria Research, Ellinbank, Victoria 3820, Australia; Centre for Agricultural Innovation, School of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
| | - S R O Williams
- Agriculture Victoria Research, Ellinbank, Victoria 3820, Australia
| | - T C S Chud
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
| | - F S Schenkel
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
| | - M E Goddard
- Centre for Agricultural Innovation, School of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
| | - I van den Berg
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| | - B G Cocks
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia; School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| | - L C Marett
- Agriculture Victoria Research, Ellinbank, Victoria 3820, Australia
| | - W J Wales
- Agriculture Victoria Research, Ellinbank, Victoria 3820, Australia
| | - J E Pryce
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia; School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pryce JE, Haile-Mariam M. Symposium review: Genomic selection for reducing environmental impact and adapting to climate change. J Dairy Sci 2020; 103:5366-5375. [PMID: 32331869 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-17732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The world has been warming as greenhouse gases accumulate. Worldwide from 1880 to 2012, the average surface temperature has increased by about 0.85°C and by 0.12°C per decade since 1951. The world's cattle population is a contributor to atmospheric methane, a potent greenhouse gas, in addition to suffering from high temperatures combined with humidity. This makes research into reducing the global footprint of dairy cows of importance on a long-term horizon, while improving tolerance to heat could alleviate the effects of rising temperatures. In December 2017, genomic estimated breeding values for heat tolerance in dairy cattle were released for the first time in Australia. Currently, heat tolerance is not included in the Balanced Performance Index (Australia's national selection index), and the correlation between heat tolerance breeding values and Balanced Performance Index is -0.20, so over time, heat tolerance has worsened due to lack of selection pressure. However, in contrast, sizable reductions in greenhouse gas emissions have been achieved as a favorable response to selecting for increased productivity, longevity, and efficiency, with opportunities for even greater gains through selecting for cow emissions directly. Internationally considerable research effort has been made to develop breeding values focused on reducing methane emissions using individual cow phenotypes. This requires (1) definition of breeding objectives and selection criteria and (2) assembling a sufficiently large data set for genomic prediction. Selecting for heat tolerance and reduced emissions directly may improve resilience to changing environments while reducing environmental impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie E Pryce
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia; School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
| | - Mekonnen Haile-Mariam
- Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Steyn Y, Lourenco DAL, Misztal I. Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1. J Anim Sci 2020; 97:4418-4427. [PMID: 31539424 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Combining breeds in a multibreed evaluation can have a negative impact on prediction accuracy, especially if single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects differ among breeds. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a multibreed genomic relationship matrix (G), where SNP effects are considered to be unique to each breed, that is, nonshared. This multibreed G was created by treating SNP of different breeds as if they were on nonoverlapping positions on the chromosome, although, in reality, they were not. This simple setup may avoid spurious Identity by state (IBS) relationships between breeds and automatically considers breed-specific allele frequencies. This scenario was contrasted to a regular multibreed evaluation where all SNPs were shared, that is, the same position, and to single-breed evaluations. Different SNP densities (9k and 45k) and different effective population sizes (Ne) were tested. Five breeds mimicking recent beef cattle populations that diverged from the same historical population were simulated using different selection criteria. It was assumed that quantitative trait locus (QTL) effects were the same over all breeds. For the recent population, generations 1-9 had approximately half of the animals genotyped, whereas all animals in generation 10 were genotyped. Generation 10 animals were set for validation; therefore, each breed had a validation group. Analyses were performed using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction. Prediction accuracy was calculated as the correlation between true (T) and genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). Accuracies of GEBV were lower for the larger Ne and low SNP density. All three evaluation scenarios using 45k resulted in similar accuracies, suggesting that the marker density is high enough to account for relationships and linkage disequilibrium with QTL. A shared multibreed evaluation using 9k resulted in a decrease of accuracy of 0.08 for a smaller Ne and 0.12 for a larger Ne. This loss was mostly avoided when markers were treated as nonshared within the same G matrix. A G matrix with nonshared SNP enables multibreed evaluations without considerably changing accuracy, especially with limited information per breed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvette Steyn
- Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
| | | | - Ignacy Misztal
- Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang F, Wang Y, Mukiibi R, Chen L, Vinsky M, Plastow G, Basarab J, Stothard P, Li C. Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in beef cattle revealed by genome wide association studies of imputed whole genome sequence variants: I: feed efficiency and component traits. BMC Genomics 2020; 21:36. [PMID: 31931702 PMCID: PMC6956504 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6362-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genome wide association studies (GWAS) on residual feed intake (RFI) and its component traits including daily dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), and metabolic body weight (MWT) were conducted in a population of 7573 animals from multiple beef cattle breeds based on 7,853,211 imputed whole genome sequence variants. The GWAS results were used to elucidate genetic architectures of the feed efficiency related traits in beef cattle. RESULTS The DNA variant allele substitution effects approximated a bell-shaped distribution for all the traits while the distribution of additive genetic variances explained by single DNA variants followed a scaled inverse chi-squared distribution to a greater extent. With a threshold of P-value < 1.00E-05, 16, 72, 88, and 116 lead DNA variants on multiple chromosomes were significantly associated with RFI, DMI, ADG, and MWT, respectively. In addition, lead DNA variants with potentially large pleiotropic effects on DMI, ADG, and MWT were found on chromosomes 6, 14 and 20. On average, missense, 3'UTR, 5'UTR, and other regulatory region variants exhibited larger allele substitution effects in comparison to other functional classes. Intergenic and intron variants captured smaller proportions of additive genetic variance per DNA variant. Instead 3'UTR and synonymous variants explained a greater amount of genetic variance per DNA variant for all the traits examined while missense, 5'UTR and other regulatory region variants accounted for relatively more additive genetic variance per sequence variant for RFI and ADG, respectively. In total, 25 to 27 enriched cellular and molecular functions were identified with lipid metabolism and carbohydrate metabolism being the most significant for the feed efficiency traits. CONCLUSIONS RFI is controlled by many DNA variants with relatively small effects whereas DMI, ADG, and MWT are influenced by a few DNA variants with large effects and many DNA variants with small effects. Nucleotide polymorphisms in regulatory region and synonymous functional classes play a more important role per sequence variant in determining variation of the feed efficiency traits. The genetic architecture as revealed by the GWAS of the imputed 7,853,211 DNA variants will improve our understanding on the genetic control of feed efficiency traits in beef cattle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Zhang
- Lacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada.,Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.,State Key Laboratory for Swine Genetics, Breeding and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.,Present Address: Institute of Translational Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yining Wang
- Lacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada.,Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Robert Mukiibi
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Liuhong Chen
- Lacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada.,Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Michael Vinsky
- Lacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada
| | - Graham Plastow
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - John Basarab
- Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Lacombe Research and Development Centre, 6000 C&E Trail, Lacombe, AB, Canada
| | - Paul Stothard
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Changxi Li
- Lacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada. .,Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
de las Heras-Saldana S, Clark SA, Duijvesteijn N, Gondro C, van der Werf JHJ, Chen Y. Combining information from genome-wide association and multi-tissue gene expression studies to elucidate factors underlying genetic variation for residual feed intake in Australian Angus cattle. BMC Genomics 2019; 20:939. [PMID: 31810463 PMCID: PMC6898931 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6270-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are extensively used to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) underlying the genetic variation of complex traits. However, much uncertainly often still exists about the causal variants and genes at quantitative trait loci (QTL). The aim of this study was to identify QTL associated with residual feed intake (RFI) and genes in these regions whose expression is also associated with this trait. Angus cattle (2190 steers) with RFI records were genotyped and imputed to high density arrays (770 K) and used for a GWAS approach to identify QTL associated with RFI. RNA sequences from 126 Angus divergently selected for RFI were analyzed to identify the genes whose expression was significantly associated this trait with special attention to those genes residing in the QTL regions. RESULTS The heritability for RFI estimated for this Angus population was 0.3. In a GWAS, we identified 78 SNPs associated with RFI on six QTL (on BTA1, BTA6, BTA14, BTA17, BTA20 and BTA26). The most significant SNP was found on chromosome BTA20 (rs42662073) and explained 4% of the genetic variance. The minor allele frequencies of significant SNPs ranged from 0.05 to 0.49. All regions, except on BTA17, showed a significant dominance effect. In 1 Mb windows surrounding the six significant QTL, we found 149 genes from which OAS2, STC2, SHOX, XKR4, and SGMS1 were the closest to the most significant QTL on BTA17, BTA20, BTA1, BTA14, and BTA26, respectively. In a 2 Mb windows around the six significant QTL, we identified 15 genes whose expression was significantly associated with RFI: BTA20) NEURL1B and CPEB4; BTA17) RITA1, CCDC42B, OAS2, RPL6, and ERP29; BTA26) A1CF, SGMS1, PAPSS2, and PTEN; BTA1) MFSD1 and RARRES1; BTA14) ATP6V1H and MRPL15. CONCLUSIONS Our results showed six QTL regions associated with RFI in a beef Angus population where five of these QTL contained genes that have expression associated with this trait. Therefore, here we show that integrating information from gene expression and GWAS studies can help to better understand the genetic mechanisms that determine variation in complex traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samuel A. Clark
- School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW Australia
| | - Naomi Duijvesteijn
- School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW Australia
| | - Cedric Gondro
- School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW Australia
- Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI USA
| | | | - Yizhou Chen
- Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Menangle, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Xiang R, Berg IVD, MacLeod IM, Hayes BJ, Prowse-Wilkins CP, Wang M, Bolormaa S, Liu Z, Rochfort SJ, Reich CM, Mason BA, Vander Jagt CJ, Daetwyler HD, Lund MS, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME. Quantifying the contribution of sequence variants with regulatory and evolutionary significance to 34 bovine complex traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116:19398-19408. [PMID: 31501319 PMCID: PMC6765237 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1904159116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Many genome variants shaping mammalian phenotype are hypothesized to regulate gene transcription and/or to be under selection. However, most of the evidence to support this hypothesis comes from human studies. Systematic evidence for regulatory and evolutionary signals contributing to complex traits in a different mammalian model is needed. Sequence variants associated with gene expression (expression quantitative trait loci [eQTLs]) and concentration of metabolites (metabolic quantitative trait loci [mQTLs]) and under histone-modification marks in several tissues were discovered from multiomics data of over 400 cattle. Variants under selection and evolutionary constraint were identified using genome databases of multiple species. These analyses defined 30 sets of variants, and for each set, we estimated the genetic variance the set explained across 34 complex traits in 11,923 bulls and 32,347 cows with 17,669,372 imputed variants. The per-variant trait heritability of these sets across traits was highly consistent (r > 0.94) between bulls and cows. Based on the per-variant heritability, conserved sites across 100 vertebrate species and mQTLs ranked the highest, followed by eQTLs, young variants, those under histone-modification marks, and selection signatures. From these results, we defined a Functional-And-Evolutionary Trait Heritability (FAETH) score indicating the functionality and predicted heritability of each variant. In additional 7,551 cattle, the high FAETH-ranking variants had significantly increased genetic variances and genomic prediction accuracies in 3 production traits compared to the low FAETH-ranking variants. The FAETH framework combines the information of gene regulation, evolution, and trait heritability to rank variants, and the publicly available FAETH data provide a set of biological priors for cattle genomic selection worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruidong Xiang
- Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Irene van den Berg
- Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Iona M MacLeod
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Benjamin J Hayes
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
- Centre for Animal Science, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia
| | - Claire P Prowse-Wilkins
- Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Min Wang
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Sunduimijid Bolormaa
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Zhiqian Liu
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Simone J Rochfort
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Coralie M Reich
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Brett A Mason
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Christy J Vander Jagt
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Hans D Daetwyler
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Mogens S Lund
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
| | - Amanda J Chamberlain
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Michael E Goddard
- Faculty of Veterinary & Agricultural Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fang ZH, Pausch H. Multi-trait meta-analyses reveal 25 quantitative trait loci for economically important traits in Brown Swiss cattle. BMC Genomics 2019; 20:695. [PMID: 31481029 PMCID: PMC6724290 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6066-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known about the genetic architecture of economically important traits in Brown Swiss cattle because only few genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been carried out in this breed. Moreover, most GWAS have been performed for single traits, thus not providing detailed insights into potentially existing pleiotropic effects of trait-associated loci. Results To compile a comprehensive catalogue of large-effect quantitative trait loci (QTL) segregating in Brown Swiss cattle, we carried out association tests between partially imputed genotypes at 598,016 SNPs and daughter-derived phenotypes for more than 50 economically important traits, including milk production, growth and carcass quality, body conformation, reproduction and calving traits in 4578 artificial insemination bulls from two cohorts of Brown Swiss cattle (Austrian-German and Swiss populations). Across-cohort multi-trait meta-analyses of the results from the single-trait GWAS revealed 25 quantitative trait loci (QTL; P < 8.36 × 10− 8) for economically relevant traits on 17 Bos taurus autosomes (BTA). Evidence of pleiotropy was detected at five QTL located on BTA5, 6, 17, 21 and 25. Of these, two QTL at BTA6:90,486,780 and BTA25:1,455,150 affect a diverse range of economically important traits, including traits related to body conformation, calving, longevity and milking speed. Furthermore, the QTL at BTA6:90,486,780 seems to be a target of ongoing selection as evidenced by an integrated haplotype score of 2.49 and significant changes in allele frequency over the past 25 years, whereas either no or only weak evidence of selection was detected at all other QTL. Conclusions Our findings provide a comprehensive overview of QTL segregating in Brown Swiss cattle. Detected QTL explain between 2 and 10% of the variation in the estimated breeding values and thus may be considered as the most important QTL segregating in the Brown Swiss cattle breed. Multi-trait association testing boosts the power to detect pleiotropic QTL and assesses the full spectrum of phenotypes that are affected by trait-associated variants. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-6066-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zih-Hua Fang
- Animal Genomics, Institute of Agricultural Science, ETH Zürich, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Hubert Pausch
- Animal Genomics, Institute of Agricultural Science, ETH Zürich, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Khansefid M, Pryce JE, Bolormaa S, Chen Y, Millen CA, Chamberlain AJ, Vander Jagt CJ, Goddard ME. Comparing allele specific expression and local expression quantitative trait loci and the influence of gene expression on complex trait variation in cattle. BMC Genomics 2018; 19:793. [PMID: 30390624 PMCID: PMC6215656 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5181-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The mutations changing the expression level of a gene, or expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL), can be identified by testing the association between genetic variants and gene expression in multiple individuals (eQTL mapping), or by comparing the expression of the alleles in a heterozygous individual (allele specific expression or ASE analysis). The aims of the study were to find and compare ASE and local eQTL in 4 bovine RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) datasets, validate them in an independent ASE study and investigate if they are associated with complex trait variation. RESULTS We present a novel method for distinguishing between ASE driven by polymorphisms in cis and parent of origin effects. We found that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) driving ASE are also often local eQTL and therefore presumably cis eQTL. These SNPs often, but not always, affect gene expression in multiple tissues and, when they do, the allele increasing expression is usually the same. However, there were systematic differences between ASE and local eQTL and between tissues and breeds. We also found that SNPs significantly associated with gene expression (p < 0.001) were likely to influence some complex traits (p < 0.001), which means that some mutations influence variation in complex traits by changing the expression level of genes. CONCLUSION We conclude that ASE detects phenomenon that overlap with local eQTL, but there are also systematic differences between the SNPs discovered by the two methods. Some mutations influencing complex traits are actually eQTL and can be discovered using RNA-Seq including eQTL in the genes CAST, CAPN1, LCORL and LEPROTL1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid Khansefid
- Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia. .,Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
| | - Jennie E Pryce
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.,La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Sunduimijid Bolormaa
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Yizhou Chen
- Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Menangle, NSW, Australia
| | - Catriona A Millen
- Agricultural Business Research Institute, The University of New England, Armidale, Australia
| | - Amanda J Chamberlain
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Michael E Goddard
- Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Khansefid M, Millen CA, Chen Y, Pryce JE, Chamberlain AJ, Vander Jagt CJ, Gondro C, Goddard ME. Gene expression analysis of blood, liver, and muscle in cattle divergently selected for high and low residual feed intake. J Anim Sci 2018; 95:4764-4775. [PMID: 29293712 DOI: 10.2527/jas2016.1320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Improving feed efficiency in cattle is important because it increases profitability by reducing costs, and it also shrinks the environmental footprint of cattle production by decreasing manure and greenhouse gas emissions. Residual feed intake (RFI) is 1 measurement of feed efficiency and is the difference between actual and predicted feed intake. Residual feed intake is a complex trait with moderate heritability, but the genes and biological processes associated with its variation still need to be found. We explored the variation in expression of genes using RNA sequencing to find genes whose expression was associated with RFI and then investigated the pathways that are enriched for these genes. In this study, we used samples from growing Angus bulls (muscle and liver tissues) and lactating Holstein cows (liver tissue and white blood cells) divergently selected for low and high RFI. Within each breed-tissue combination, the correlation between the expression of genes and RFI phenotypes, as well as GEBV, was calculated to determine the genes whose expression was correlated with RFI. There were 16,039 genes expressed in more than 25% of samples in 1 or more tissues. The expression of 6,143 genes was significantly associated with RFI phenotypes, and expression of 2,343 genes was significantly associated with GEBV for RFI ( < 0.05) in at least 1 tissue. The genes whose expression was correlated with RFI phenotype (or GEBV) within each breed-tissue combination were enriched for 158 (78) biological processes (Fisher Exact Statistics for gene-enrichment analysis, EASE score < 0.1) and associated with 13 (13) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways ( < 0.05 and fold enrichment > 2). These biological processes were related to regulation of transcription, translation, energy generation, cell cycling, apoptosis, and proteolysis. However, the direction of the correlation between RFI and gene expression in some cases reversed between tissues. For instance, low levels of proteolysis in muscle were associated with high efficiency in growing bulls, but high levels of proteolysis in white blood cells were associated with efficiency of milk production in lactating cows.
Collapse
|
18
|
Calus MPL, Goddard ME, Wientjes YCJ, Bowman PJ, Hayes BJ. Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection. J Dairy Sci 2018; 101:4279-4294. [PMID: 29550121 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Genomic prediction is applicable to individuals of different breeds. Empirical results to date, however, show limited benefits in using information on multiple breeds in the context of genomic prediction. We investigated a multitask Bayesian model, presented previously by others, implemented in a Bayesian stochastic search variable selection (BSSVS) model. This model allowed for evidence of quantitative trait loci (QTL) to be accumulated across breeds or for both QTL that segregate across breeds and breed-specific QTL. In both cases, single nucleotide polymorphism effects were estimated with information from a single breed. Other models considered were a single-trait and multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood (GREML) model, with breeds considered as different traits, and a single-trait BSSVS model. All single-trait models were applied to each of the 2 breeds separately and to the pooled data of both breeds. The data used included a training data set of 6,278 Holstein and 722 Jersey bulls, as well as 374 Jersey validation bulls. All animals had genotypes for 474,773 single nucleotide polymorphisms after editing and phenotypes for milk, fat, and protein yields. Using the same training data, BSSVS consistently outperformed GREML. The multitask BSSVS, however, did not outperform single-trait BSSVS, which used pooled Holstein and Jersey data for training. Thus, the rigorous assumption that the traits are the same in both breeds yielded a slightly better prediction than a model that had to estimate the correlation between the breeds from the data. Adding the Holstein data significantly increased the accuracy of the single-trait GREML and BSSVS in predicting the Jerseys for milk and protein, in line with estimated correlations between the breeds of 0.66 and 0.47 for milk and protein yields, whereas only the BSSVS model significantly improved the accuracy for fat yield with an estimated correlation between breeds of only 0.05. The relatively high genetic correlations for milk and protein yields, and the superiority of the pooling strategy, is likely the result of the observed admixture between both breeds in our data. The Bayesian model was able to detect several QTL in Holsteins, which likely enabled it to outperform GREML. The inability of the multitask Bayesian models to outperform a simple pooling strategy may be explained by the fact that the pooling strategy assumes equal effects in both breeds; furthermore, this assumption may be valid for moderate- to large-sized QTL, which are important for multibreed genomic prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P L Calus
- Wageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
| | - M E Goddard
- Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia; Agriculture Research, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Melbourne, Victoria 3083, Australia
| | - Y C J Wientjes
- Wageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - P J Bowman
- Agriculture Research, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Melbourne, Victoria 3083, Australia; School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| | - B J Hayes
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia; Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Centre for Animal Science, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pryce JE, Nguyen TTT, Axford M, Nieuwhof G, Shaffer M. Symposium review: Building a better cow-The Australian experience and future perspectives. J Dairy Sci 2018; 101:3702-3713. [PMID: 29454697 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Genomic selection has led to opportunities for developing new breeding values that rely on phenotypes in dedicated reference populations of genotyped cows. In Australia, it has been applied to 2 novel traits: feed efficiency, which was released in 2015 as feed saved breeding values, and heat tolerance genomic breeding values, released for the first time in 2017. Feed saved is already included in the national breeding objective, which is focused on profitability and designed to be in line with farmer preferences. Our future focus is on traits associated with animal health, either directly or in combination with predictor traits, such as mid-infrared spectral data and, into the future, automated data capture. Although it is common for many evaluated traits to have genomic reliabilities ranging between 60 and 75%, many new, genomic information-only traits are likely to have reliabilities of less than 50%. Pooling of phenotype data internationally and investing in maintenance of reference populations is one option to increase the reliability of these traits; the other is to apply improved genomic prediction methods. For example, advances in the use of sequence data, in addition to gene expression studies, can lead to improved persistence of genomic breeding values across breeds and generations and potentially lead to greater reliabilities. Lower genomic reliabilities of novel traits could reduce the overall index reliability. However, provided these traits contribute to the overall breeding objective (e.g., profit), they are worth including. Bull selection tools and personalized genetic trends are already available, but increased access to economic and automatic capture farm data may see even better use of data to improve farm management and selection decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Pryce
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia; School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
| | - T T T Nguyen
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| | - M Axford
- DataGene Ltd., Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| | - G Nieuwhof
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia; DataGene Ltd., Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| | - M Shaffer
- DataGene Ltd., Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Statistical properties of proportional residual energy intake as a new measure of energetic efficiency. J DAIRY RES 2017; 84:248-253. [PMID: 28831969 DOI: 10.1017/s0022029917000395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Traditional ratio measures of efficiency, including feed conversion ratio (FCR), gross milk efficiency (GME), gross energy efficiency (GEE) and net energy efficiency (NEE) may have some statistical problems including high correlations with milk yield. Residual energy intake (REI) or residual feed intake (RFI) is another criterion, proposed to overcome the problems attributed to the traditional ratio criteria, but it does not account for production or intake levels. For example, the same REI value could be considerable for low producing and negligible for high producing cows. The aim of this study was to propose a new measure of efficiency to overcome the problems attributed to the previous criteria. A total of 1478 monthly records of 268 lactating Holstein cows were used for this study. In addition to FCR, GME, GEE, NEE and REI, a new criterion called proportional residual energy intake (PREI) was calculated as REI to net energy intake ratio and defined as proportion of net energy intake lost as REI. The PREI had an average of -0·02 and range of -0·36 to 0·27, meaning that the least efficient cow lost 0·27 of her net energy intake as REI, while the most efficient animal saved 0·36 of her net energy intake as less REI. Traditional ratio criteria (FCR, GME, GEE and NEE) had high correlations with milk and fat corrected milk yields (absolute values from 0·469 to 0·816), while the REI and PREI had low correlations (0·000 to 0·069) with milk production. The results showed that the traditional ratio criteria (FCR, GME, GEE and NEE) are highly influenced by production traits, while the REI and PREI are independent of production level. Moreover, the PREI adjusts the REI magnitude for intake level. It seems that the PREI could be considered as a worthwhile measure of efficiency for future studies.
Collapse
|
21
|
Mehrban H, Lee DH, Moradi MH, IlCho C, Naserkheil M, Ibáñez-Escriche N. Predictive performance of genomic selection methods for carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle: impacts of the genetic architecture. Genet Sel Evol 2017; 49:1. [PMID: 28093066 PMCID: PMC5240470 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-016-0283-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2015] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hanwoo beef is known for its marbled fat, tenderness, juiciness and characteristic flavor, as well as for its low cholesterol and high omega 3 fatty acid contents. As yet, there has been no comprehensive investigation to estimate genomic selection accuracy for carcass traits in Hanwoo cattle using dense markers. This study aimed at evaluating the accuracy of alternative statistical methods that differed in assumptions about the underlying genetic model for various carcass traits: backfat thickness (BT), carcass weight (CW), eye muscle area (EMA), and marbling score (MS). Methods Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values (DGV) for carcass traits were estimated by applying fivefold cross-validation to a dataset including 1183 animals and approximately 34,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Results Accuracies of BayesC, Bayesian LASSO (BayesL) and genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) methods were similar for BT, EMA and MS. However, for CW, DGV accuracy was 7% higher with BayesC than with BayesL and GBLUP. The increased accuracy of BayesC, compared to GBLUP and BayesL, was maintained for CW, regardless of the training sample size, but not for BT, EMA, and MS. Genome-wide association studies detected consistent large effects for SNPs on chromosomes 6 and 14 for CW. Conclusions The predictive performance of the models depended on the trait analyzed. For CW, the results showed a clear superiority of BayesC compared to GBLUP and BayesL. These findings indicate the importance of using a proper variable selection method for genomic selection of traits and also suggest that the genetic architecture that underlies CW differs from that of the other carcass traits analyzed. Thus, our study provides significant new insights into the carcass traits of Hanwoo cattle. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-016-0283-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Mehrban
- Department of Animal Science, Shahrekord University, P.O. Box 115, Shahrekord, 88186-34141, Iran
| | - Deuk Hwan Lee
- Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University, Jungang-ro 327, Anseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, 456-749, Korea.
| | - Mohammad Hossein Moradi
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Arak University, Arāk, 38156-8-8349, Iran
| | - Chung IlCho
- Hanwoo Improvement Center, National Agricultural Cooperative Federation, Haeun-ro 691, Unsan-myeon, Seosan-si, Chungnam-do, 356-831, Korea
| | - Masoumeh Naserkheil
- Department of Animal Science, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 4111, Karaj, 31587-11167, Iran
| | - Noelia Ibáñez-Escriche
- The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
van den Berg I, Boichard D, Lund MS. Sequence variants selected from a multi-breed GWAS can improve the reliability of genomic predictions in dairy cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2016; 48:83. [PMID: 27809758 PMCID: PMC5095991 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-016-0259-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2015] [Accepted: 10/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Sequence data can potentially increase the reliability of genomic predictions, because such data include causative mutations instead of relying on linkage disequilibrium (LD) between causative mutations and prediction variants. However, the location of the causative mutations is not known, and the presence of many variants that are in low LD with the causative mutations may reduce prediction reliability. Our objective was to investigate whether the use of variants at quantitative trait loci (QTL) that are identified in a multi-breed genome-wide association study (GWAS) for milk, fat and protein yield would increase the reliability of within- and multi-breed genomic predictions in Holstein, Jersey and Danish Red cattle. A wide range of scenarios that test different strategies to select prediction markers, for both within-breed and multi-breed prediction, were compared. Results For all breeds and traits, the use of variants selected from a multi-breed GWAS resulted in substantial increases in prediction reliabilities compared to within-breed prediction using a 50 K SNP array. Reliabilities depended highly on the choice of the prediction markers, and the scenario that led to the highest reliability varied between breeds and traits. While genomic correlations across breeds were low for genome-wide sequence variants, the effects of the QTL variants that yielded the highest reliabilities were highly correlated across breeds. Conclusions Our results show that the use of sequence variants, which are located near peaks of QTL that are detected in a multi-breed GWAS, can increase reliability of genomic predictions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-016-0259-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene van den Berg
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark. .,GABI, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
| | - Didier Boichard
- GABI, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Mogens S Lund
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Manzanilla-Pech CIV, De Haas Y, Hayes BJ, Veerkamp RF, Khansefid M, Donoghue KA, Arthur PF, Pryce JE. Genomewide association study of methane emissions in Angus beef cattle with validation in dairy cattle1. J Anim Sci 2016; 94:4151-4166. [DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016-0431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C. I. V. Manzanilla-Pech
- Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands
- Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands
- Mococha Research Station, National Institute of Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock Research, 97454 Mococha, Yucatan, Mexico
| | - Y. De Haas
- Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - B. J. Hayes
- Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
| | - R. F. Veerkamp
- Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands
- Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - M. Khansefid
- Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
- Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- La Trobe University, AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
| | - K. A. Donoghue
- Department of Primary Industries, Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, NSW 2823, Australia
| | - P. F. Arthur
- Department of Primary Industries, Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, NSW 2823, Australia
| | - J. E. Pryce
- Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
- La Trobe University, AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lu D, Akanno EC, Crowley JJ, Schenkel F, Li H, De Pauw M, Moore SS, Wang Z, Li C, Stothard P, Plastow G, Miller SP, Basarab JA. Accuracy of genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits of beef cattle using 50K and imputed HD genotypes1. J Anim Sci 2016; 94:1342-53. [DOI: 10.2527/jas.2015-0126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- D. Lu
- Livestock Gentec, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Post Box 50034, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand
| | - E. C. Akanno
- Livestock Gentec, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - J. J. Crowley
- Livestock Gentec, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Canadian Beef Breeds Council, Calgary, AB T2E 7H7, Canada
| | - F. Schenkel
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, University of Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - H. Li
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, University of Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - M. De Pauw
- Livestock Gentec, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - S. S. Moore
- Livestock Gentec, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Z. Wang
- Livestock Gentec, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - C. Li
- Livestock Gentec, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, University of Guelph, ON, Canada
- Lacombe Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 6000 C & E Trail, Lacombe, AB, Canada
| | - P. Stothard
- Livestock Gentec, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - G. Plastow
- Livestock Gentec, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - S. P. Miller
- Livestock Gentec, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Post Box 50034, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, University of Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - J. A. Basarab
- Livestock Gentec, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Lacombe Research Centre, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, 6000 C & E Trail, Lacombe, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hayes BJ, Donoghue KA, Reich CM, Mason BA, Bird-Gardiner T, Herd RM, Arthur PF. Genomic heritabilities and genomic estimated breeding values for methane traits in Angus cattle1. J Anim Sci 2016; 94:902-8. [DOI: 10.2527/jas.2015-0078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
26
|
Aliloo H, Pryce JE, González-Recio O, Cocks BG, Hayes BJ. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits. Genet Sel Evol 2016; 48:8. [PMID: 26830030 PMCID: PMC4736671 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-016-0186-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2015] [Accepted: 01/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Dominance effects may contribute to genetic variation of complex traits in dairy cattle, especially for traits closely related to fitness such as fertility. However, traditional genetic evaluations generally ignore dominance effects and consider additive genetic effects only. Availability of dense single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) panels provides the opportunity to investigate the role of dominance in quantitative variation of complex traits at both the SNP and animal levels. Including dominance effects in the genomic evaluation of animals could also help to increase the accuracy of prediction of future phenotypes. In this study, we estimated additive and dominance variance components for fertility and milk production traits of genotyped Holstein and Jersey cows in Australia. The predictive abilities of a model that accounts for additive effects only (additive), and a model that accounts for both additive and dominance effects (additive + dominance) were compared in a fivefold cross-validation. Results Estimates of the proportion of dominance variation relative to phenotypic variation that is captured by SNPs, for production traits, were up to 3.8 and 7.1 % in Holstein and Jersey cows, respectively, whereas, for fertility, they were equal to 1.2 % in Holstein and very close to zero in Jersey cows. We found that including dominance in the model was not consistently advantageous. Based on maximum likelihood ratio tests, the additive + dominance model fitted the data better than the additive model, for milk, fat and protein yields in both breeds. However, regarding the prediction of phenotypes assessed with fivefold cross-validation, including dominance effects in the model improved accuracy only for fat yield in Holstein cows. Regression coefficients of phenotypes on genetic values and mean squared errors of predictions showed that the predictive ability of the additive + dominance model was superior to that of the additive model for some of the traits. Conclusions In both breeds, dominance effects were significant (P < 0.01) for all milk production traits but not for fertility. Accuracy of prediction of phenotypes was slightly increased by including dominance effects in the genomic evaluation model. Thus, it can help to better identify highly performing individuals and be useful for culling decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Aliloo
- Biosciences Research Division, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia. .,School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia. .,Dairy Futures Cooperative Research Centre (CRC), AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.
| | - Jennie E Pryce
- Biosciences Research Division, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia. .,School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia. .,Dairy Futures Cooperative Research Centre (CRC), AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.
| | - Oscar González-Recio
- Dairy Futures Cooperative Research Centre (CRC), AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia. .,Department of Animal Breeding, INIA, Ctra La Coruña, km 7.5, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Benjamin G Cocks
- Biosciences Research Division, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia. .,School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia. .,Dairy Futures Cooperative Research Centre (CRC), AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.
| | - Ben J Hayes
- Biosciences Research Division, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia. .,School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia. .,Dairy Futures Cooperative Research Centre (CRC), AgriBio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Meuwissen T, Hayes B, Goddard M. Genomic selection: A paradigm shift in animal breeding. Anim Front 2016. [DOI: 10.2527/af.2016-0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 223] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ben Hayes
- Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources and Dairy Futures Cooperative Research Centre, Agribio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia; School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Mike Goddard
- Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources and Dairy Futures Cooperative Research Centre, Agribio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia; Faculty of veterinary and agricultural sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Two-Variance-Component Model Improves Genetic Prediction in Family Datasets. Am J Hum Genet 2015; 97:677-90. [PMID: 26544803 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2015] [Accepted: 10/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic prediction based on either identity by state (IBS) sharing or pedigree information has been investigated extensively with best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) methods. Such methods were pioneered in plant and animal-breeding literature and have since been applied to predict human traits, with the aim of eventual clinical utility. However, methods to combine IBS sharing and pedigree information for genetic prediction in humans have not been explored. We introduce a two-variance-component model for genetic prediction: one component for IBS sharing and one for approximate pedigree structure, both estimated with genetic markers. In simulations using real genotypes from the Candidate-gene Association Resource (CARe) and Framingham Heart Study (FHS) family cohorts, we demonstrate that the two-variance-component model achieves gains in prediction r(2) over standard BLUP at current sample sizes, and we project, based on simulations, that these gains will continue to hold at larger sample sizes. Accordingly, in analyses of four quantitative phenotypes from CARe and two quantitative phenotypes from FHS, the two-variance-component model significantly improves prediction r(2) in each case, with up to a 20% relative improvement. We also find that standard mixed-model association tests can produce inflated test statistics in datasets with related individuals, whereas the two-variance-component model corrects for inflation.
Collapse
|
29
|
Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection. Genet Sel Evol 2015; 47:84. [PMID: 26525050 PMCID: PMC4630892 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-015-0162-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 10/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The success of genomic selection in animal breeding hinges on the availability of a large reference population on which genomic-based predictions of additive genetic or breeding values are built. Here, we explore the benefit of combining two unrelated populations into a single reference population. METHODS The datasets consisted of 1829 Brahman and 1973 Tropical Composite cattle with measurements on five phenotypes relevant to tropical adaptation and genotypes for 71,726 genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The underlying genomic correlation for the same phenotype across the two breeds was explored on the basis of consistent linkage disequilibrium (LD) phase and marker effects in both breeds. RESULTS The proportion of genetic variance explained by the entire set of SNPs ranged from 37.5 to 57.6 %. Estimated genomic correlations were drastically affected by the process used to select SNPs and went from near 0 to more than 0.80 for most traits when using the set of SNPs with significant effects and the same LD phase in the two breeds. We found that, by carefully selecting the subset of SNPs, the missing heritability can be largely recovered and accuracies in genomic predictions can be improved six-fold. However, the increases in accuracy might come at the expense of large biases. CONCLUSIONS Our results offer hope for the effective implementation of genomic selection schemes in situations where the number of breeds is large, the sample size within any single breed is small and the breeding objective includes many phenotypes.
Collapse
|
30
|
Wientjes YCJ, Calus MPL, Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction. Genet Sel Evol 2015; 47:42. [PMID: 25951906 PMCID: PMC4424523 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-015-0124-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 04/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although simulation studies show that combining multiple breeds in one reference population increases accuracy of genomic prediction, this is not always confirmed in empirical studies. This discrepancy might be due to the assumptions on quantitative trait loci (QTL) properties applied in simulation studies, including number of QTL, spectrum of QTL allele frequencies across breeds, and distribution of allele substitution effects. We investigated the effects of QTL properties and of including a random across- and within-breed animal effect in a genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model on accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction using genotypes of Holstein-Friesian and Jersey cows. Methods Genotypes of three classes of variants obtained from whole-genome sequence data, with moderately low, very low or extremely low average minor allele frequencies (MAF), were imputed in 3000 Holstein-Friesian and 3000 Jersey cows that had real high-density genotypes. Phenotypes of traits controlled by QTL with different properties were simulated by sampling 100 or 1000 QTL from one class of variants and their allele substitution effects either randomly from a gamma distribution, or computed such that each QTL explained the same variance, i.e. rare alleles had a large effect. Genomic breeding values for 1000 selection candidates per breed were estimated using GBLUP modelsincluding a random across- and a within-breed animal effect. Results For all three classes of QTL allele frequency spectra, accuracies of genomic prediction were not affected by the addition of 2000 individuals of the other breed to a reference population of the same breed as the selection candidates. Accuracies of both single- and multi-breed genomic prediction decreased as MAF of QTL decreased, especially when rare alleles had a large effect. Accuracies of genomic prediction were similar for the models with and without a random within-breed animal effect, probably because of insufficient power to separate across- and within-breed animal effects. Conclusions Accuracy of both single- and multi-breed genomic prediction depends on the properties of the QTL that underlie the trait. As QTL MAF decreased, accuracy decreased, especially when rare alleles had a large effect. This demonstrates that QTL properties are key parameters that determine the accuracy of genomic prediction. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-015-0124-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne C J Wientjes
- Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. .,Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Mario P L Calus
- Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Michael E Goddard
- Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Agribio, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia. .,Faculty of Land and Environment, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia. .,Dairy Futures Cooperative Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia.
| | - Ben J Hayes
- Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Agribio, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia. .,Dairy Futures Cooperative Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia. .,La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kemper K, Hayes B, Daetwyler H, Goddard M. How old are quantitative trait loci and how widely do they segregate? J Anim Breed Genet 2015; 132:121-34. [DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2014] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- K.E. Kemper
- Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; University of Melbourne; Parkville Vic. Australia
| | - B.J. Hayes
- Department of Environment and Primary Industries; AgriBio; Bundoora Vic. Australia
- La Trobe University; Bundoora Vic. Australia
- Dairy Futures Co-operative Research Centre; Bundoora Vic. Australia
| | - H.D. Daetwyler
- Department of Environment and Primary Industries; AgriBio; Bundoora Vic. Australia
- La Trobe University; Bundoora Vic. Australia
| | - M.E. Goddard
- Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences; University of Melbourne; Parkville Vic. Australia
- Department of Environment and Primary Industries; AgriBio; Bundoora Vic. Australia
| |
Collapse
|