1
|
Berghof TVL, Bedere N, Peeters K, Poppe M, Visscher J, Mulder HA. The genetics of resilience and its relationships with egg production traits and antibody traits in chickens. Genet Sel Evol 2024; 56:20. [PMID: 38504219 PMCID: PMC10953135 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-024-00888-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resilience is the capacity of an animal to be minimally affected by disturbances or to rapidly return to its initial state before exposure to a disturbance. Resilient livestock are desired because of their improved health and increased economic profit. Genetic improvement of resilience may also lead to trade-offs with production traits. Recently, resilience indicators based on longitudinal data have been suggested, but they need further evaluation to determine whether they are indeed predictive of improved resilience, such as disease resilience. This study investigated different resilience indicators based on deviations between expected and observed egg production (EP) by exploring their genetic parameters, their possible trade-offs with production traits, and their relationships with antibody traits in chickens. METHODS Egg production in a nucleus breeding herd environment based on 1-week-, 2-week-, or 3-week-intervals of two purebred chicken lines, a white egg-laying (33,825 chickens) and a brown egg-laying line (34,397 chickens), were used to determine deviations between observed EP and expected average batch EP, and between observed EP and expected individual EP. These deviations were used to calculate three types of resilience indicators for two life periods of each individual: natural logarithm-transformed variance (ln(variance)), skewness, and lag-one autocorrelation (autocorrelation) of deviations from 25 to 83 weeks of age and from 83 weeks of age to end of life. Then, we estimated their genetic correlations with EP traits and with two antibody traits. RESULTS The most promising resilience indicators were those based on 1-week-intervals, as they had the highest heritability estimates (0.02-0.12) and high genetic correlations (above 0.60) with the same resilience indicators based on longer intervals. The three types of resilience indicators differed genetically from each other, which indicates that they possibly capture different aspects of resilience. Genetic correlations of the resilience indicator traits based on 1-week-intervals with EP traits were favorable or zero, which means that trade-off effects were marginal. The resilience indicator traits based on 1-week-intervals also showed no genetic correlations with the antibody traits, which suggests that they are not informative for improved immunity or vice versa in the nucleus environment. CONCLUSIONS This paper gives direction towards the evaluation and implementation of resilience indicators, i.e. to further investigate resilience indicator traits based on 1-week-intervals, in breeding programs for selecting genetically more resilient layer chickens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom V L Berghof
- Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, PO Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
- Reproductive Biotechnology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Strasse 1, 85354, Freising, Germany.
| | - Nicolas Bedere
- PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590, Saint Gilles, France
| | - Katrijn Peeters
- Hendrix Genetics B.V., P.O. Box 114, 5830 AC, Boxmeer, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Poppe
- Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, PO Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- CRV B.V., Wassenaarweg 20, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Visscher
- Hendrix Genetics B.V., P.O. Box 114, 5830 AC, Boxmeer, The Netherlands
| | - Han A Mulder
- Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, PO Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Madsen MD, van der Werf JHJ, Clark S. Macro- and micro-genetic environmental sensitivity of yearling weight in Angus beef cattle. Animal 2024; 18:101068. [PMID: 38237477 DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.101068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Australian beef cattle experience variable conditions, which may give rise to genotype-by-environment interactions depending on the genotypes' macro- and/or micro-genetic environmental sensitivity (GES). Macro-GES gives rise to genotype-by-environment interactions across definable and shared environments, while micro-GES causes heritable variation of phenotypes, e.g., the performance of progeny from one sire may be more variable than other sires. Yearling weight (YW) is a key trait in Australian Angus cattle that may be impacted by both macro- and micro-GES. Current models for genetic evaluation of YW attempt to account for macro-GES by fitting sire-by-herd interactions (S × H). Variation in micro-GES had not yet been estimated for YW in Australian Angus. The aim of this study was to estimate genetic variation due to macro- and micro-GES in YW of Australian Angus cattle. A reaction norm with contemporary group effects as the environmental covariate was fitted either as an alternative to or in combination with a random S × H effect to account for macro-GES. Double hierarchical generalised linear models (DHGLM), fitted as sire models, were used to estimate the genetic variance of the dispersion as a measure of micro-GES. Variation due to both macro- and micro-GES were found in YW. The variance of the slope of the reaction norm was 0.02-0.03 (SEs 0.00), while the S × H variance accounted for 7% of the phenotypic variance in all models. Results showed that both a random S × H effect and a reaction norm should be included to account for both macro-GES and the additional variation captured by an S × H effect. The heritability of the dispersion on the measurement scale ranged from 0.06 to 0.10 (SEs 0.00) depending on which model was used. It should therefore be possible to alter both macro- and micro-GES of YW in Australian Angus through selection. However, care should be taken to ensure an appropriate data structure when including sire-by-herd interactions in the mean part of a DHGLM; otherwise, it can cause biased estimates of micro-GES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D Madsen
- School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
| | - J H J van der Werf
- School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
| | - S Clark
- School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Madsen MD, Duijvesteijn N, van der Werf J, Clark S. Micro-genetic environmental sensitivity across macro-environments of chickens reared in Burkina Faso and France. Genet Sel Evol 2023; 55:85. [PMID: 38036958 PMCID: PMC10688495 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-023-00854-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Commercial poultry production systems follow a pyramidal structure with a nucleus of purebred animals under controlled conditions at the top and crossbred animals under commercial production conditions at the bottom. Genetic correlations between the same phenotypes on nucleus and production animals can therefore be influenced by differences both in purebred-crossbred genotypes and in genotype-by-environment interactions across the two environments, known as macro-genetic environmental sensitivity (GES). Within each environment, genotype-by-environment interactions can also occur due to so-called micro-GES. Micro-GES causes heritable variation in phenotypes and decreases uniformity. In this study, genetic variances of body weight (BW) and of micro-GES of BW and the impacts of purebred-crossbred differences and macro-environmental differences on micro-GES of BW were estimated. The dataset contained three subpopulations of slow-growing broiler chickens: purebred chickens (PB) reared in France, and crossbred chickens reared in France (FR) under the same conditions as PB or reared in Burkina Faso (BF) under local conditions. The crossbred chickens were offspring of the same dam line and had PB as their sire line. RESULTS Estimates of heritability of BW and micro-GES of BW were 0.54 (SE of 0.02) and 0.06 (0.01), 0.67 (0.03) and 0.03 (0.01), and 0.68 (0.04) and 0.02 (0.01) for the BF, FR, and PB subpopulations, respectively. Estimates of the genetic correlations for BW between the three subpopulations were moderately positive (0.37 to 0.53) and those for micro-GES were weakly to moderately positive (0.01 to 0.44). CONCLUSIONS The results show that the heritability of the micro-GES of BW varies with macro-environment, which indicates that responses to selection are expected to differ between macro-environments. The weak to moderate positive genetic correlations between subpopulations indicate that both macro-environmental differences and purebred-crossbred differences can cause re-ranking of sires based on their estimated breeding values for micro-GES of BW. Thus, the sire that produces the most variable progeny in one macro-environment may not be the one that produces the most variable offspring in another. Similarly, the sire that produces the most variable purebred progeny may not produce the most variable crossbred progeny. The results highlight the need for investigating micro-GES for all subpopulations included in the selection scheme, to ensure optimal genetic gain in all subpopulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Dam Madsen
- School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.
| | | | - Julius van der Werf
- School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia
| | - Sam Clark
- School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raffo MA, Cuyabano BCD, Rincent R, Sarup P, Moreau L, Mary-Huard T, Jensen J. Genomic prediction for grain yield and micro-environmental sensitivity in winter wheat. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2023; 13:1075077. [PMID: 36816478 PMCID: PMC9929036 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1075077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Individuals within a common environment experience variations due to unique and non-identifiable micro-environmental factors. Genetic sensitivity to micro-environmental variation (i.e. micro-environmental sensitivity) can be identified in residuals, and genotypes with lower micro-environmental sensitivity can show greater resilience towards environmental perturbations. Micro-environmental sensitivity has been studied in animals; however, research on this topic is limited in plants and lacking in wheat. In this article, we aimed to (i) quantify the influence of genetic variation on residual dispersion and the genetic correlation between genetic effects on (expressed) phenotypes and residual dispersion for wheat grain yield using a double hierarchical generalized linear model (DHGLM); and (ii) evaluate the predictive performance of the proposed DHGLM for prediction of additive genetic effects on (expressed) phenotypes and its residual dispersion. Analyses were based on 2,456 advanced breeding lines tested in replicated trials within and across different environments in Denmark and genotyped with a 15K SNP-Illumina-BeadChip. We found that micro-environmental sensitivity for grain yield is heritable, and there is potential for its reduction. The genetic correlation between additive effects on (expressed) phenotypes and dispersion was investigated, and we observed an intermediate correlation. From these results, we concluded that breeding for reduced micro-environmental sensitivity is possible and can be included within breeding objectives without compromising selection for increased yield. The predictive ability and variance inflation for predictions of the DHGLM and a linear mixed model allowing heteroscedasticity of residual variance in different environments (LMM-HET) were evaluated using leave-one-line-out cross-validation. The LMM-HET and DHGLM showed good and similar performance for predicting additive effects on (expressed) phenotypes. In addition, the accuracy of predicting genetic effects on residual dispersion was sufficient to allow genetic selection for resilience. Such findings suggests that DHGLM may be a good choice to increase grain yield and reduce its micro-environmental sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel A. Raffo
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Beatriz C. D. Cuyabano
- Université Paris Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Renaud Rincent
- Génétique Quantitative et Evolution − Le Moulon, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif−sur−Yvette, France
| | | | - Laurence Moreau
- Génétique Quantitative et Evolution − Le Moulon, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif−sur−Yvette, France
| | - Tristan Mary-Huard
- Génétique Quantitative et Evolution − Le Moulon, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif−sur−Yvette, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, INRAE, UMR MIA-Paris Saclay, Palaiseau, France
| | - Just Jensen
- Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bedere N, Berghof TVL, Peeters K, Pinard-van der Laan MH, Visscher J, David I, Mulder HA. Using egg production longitudinal recording to study the genetic background of resilience in purebred and crossbred laying hens. Genet Sel Evol 2022; 54:26. [PMID: 35439920 PMCID: PMC9020098 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-022-00716-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is growing interest in using genetic selection to obtain more resilient farm animals (i.e. that are minimally affected by disturbances or rapidly recover from them). The aims of this study were to: (i) estimate the genetic parameters of resilience indicator traits based on egg production data, (ii) assess whether these traits are genetically correlated in purebreds and crossbreds, and (iii) assess the genetic correlations of these traits with egg production (EP) as total number of eggs between 25 and 83 weeks. Purebred hens (33,825 from a White Leghorn (WA) line and 34,397 from a Rhode Island (BD) line were housed in individual cages, while crossbred hens were housed in collective cages of 6 to 8 paternal half-sibs (12,852 WA and 3898 BD crossbred groups, where the name of the group refers to the line used as the sire). Deviations of a hen’s weekly egg production from the average of the corresponding batch were calculated. Resilience indicator traits investigated were the natural logarithm of the variance (LNVAR), the skewness (SKEW), and the lag-one autocorrelation (AUTO-R) of these deviations. Results In both purebred lines, EP was estimated to be lowly heritable (WA: 0.11 and BD: 0.12). Resilience indicators were also estimated to be lowly heritable in both lines (LNVAR: 0.10 and 0.12, SKEW: 0.04 and 0.02, AUTO-R: 0.06 and 0.08 in WA and BD, respectively). In both crossbred groups, EP, AUTO-R, and SKEW were estimated to be less heritable than in purebreds (EP: \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$h^{2}$$\end{document}h2 ≤ 0.07; and resilience indicator traits: \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$h^{2}$$\end{document}h2 ≤ 0.03), while LNVAR had an \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$h^{2}$$\end{document}h2 estimate that was similar to or higher in crossbreds (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$h^{2}$$\end{document}h2 ranged from 0.13 to 0.21) than in purebreds. In both purebreds and crossbreds, resilience indicator traits were estimated to have favorable genetic correlations with EP and between each other. For all traits and in both lines, estimates of genetic correlations between purebreds and crossbreds (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$r_{pc}$$\end{document}rpc) differed from 1 and ranged from 0.16 to 0.63. Conclusions These results show that selection for resilience based on EP data can be considered in breeding programs for layers. Genetic improvement of resilience in crossbreds can be achieved by using information on purebreds, but would be greatly enhanced by the integration of information on crossbreds in breeding programs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12711-022-00716-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Bedere
- PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590, Saint Gilles, France.
| | - Tom V L Berghof
- Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding & Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.,Reproductive Biotechnology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Liesel‑Beckmann‑Strasse 1, 85354, Freising, Germany
| | - Katrijn Peeters
- Hendrix Genetics B.V., P.O. Box 114, 5830 AC, Boxmeer, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen Visscher
- Hendrix Genetics B.V., P.O. Box 114, 5830 AC, Boxmeer, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid David
- GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31320, Castanet Tolosan, France
| | - Han A Mulder
- Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding & Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sell-Kubiak E, Knol EF, Lopes M. Evaluation of the phenotypic and genomic background of variability based on litter size of Large White pigs. Genet Sel Evol 2022; 54:1. [PMID: 34979897 PMCID: PMC8722267 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-021-00692-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The genetic background of trait variability has captured the interest of ecologists and animal breeders because the genes that control it could be involved in buffering various environmental effects. Phenotypic variability of a given trait can be assessed by studying the heterogeneity of the residual variance, and the quantitative trait loci (QTL) that are involved in the control of this variability are described as variance QTL (vQTL). This study focuses on litter size (total number born, TNB) and its variability in a Large White pig population. The variability of TNB was evaluated either using a simple method, i.e. analysis of the log-transformed variance of residuals (LnVar), or the more complex double hierarchical generalized linear model (DHGLM). We also performed a single-SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) genome-wide association study (GWAS). To our knowledge, this is only the second study that reports vQTL for litter size in pigs and the first one that shows GWAS results when using two methods to evaluate variability of TNB: LnVar and DHGLM. RESULTS Based on LnVar, three candidate vQTL regions were detected, on Sus scrofa chromosomes (SSC) 1, 7, and 18, which comprised 18 SNPs. Based on the DHGLM, three candidate vQTL regions were detected, i.e. two on SSC7 and one on SSC11, which comprised 32 SNPs. Only one candidate vQTL region overlapped between the two methods, on SSC7, which also contained the most significant SNP. Within this vQTL region, two candidate genes were identified, ADGRF1, which is involved in neurodevelopment of the brain, and ADGRF5, which is involved in the function of the respiratory system and in vascularization. The correlation between estimated breeding values based on the two methods was 0.86. Three-fold cross-validation indicated that DHGLM yielded EBV that were much more accurate and had better prediction of missing observations than LnVar. CONCLUSIONS The results indicated that the LnVar and DHGLM methods resulted in genetically different traits. Based on their validation, we recommend the use of DHGLM over the simpler method of log-transformed variance of residuals. These conclusions can be useful for future studies on the evaluation of the variability of any trait in any species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewa Sell-Kubiak
- Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
| | - Egbert F Knol
- Topigs Norsvin Research Centre, Beuningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcos Lopes
- Topigs Norsvin Research Centre, Beuningen, The Netherlands.,Topigs Norsvin, Curitiba, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Berghof TVL, Bovenhuis H, Mulder HA. Body Weight Deviations as Indicator for Resilience in Layer Chickens. Front Genet 2019; 10:1216. [PMID: 31921285 PMCID: PMC6923720 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Resilience is the capacity of an animal to be minimally affected by disturbances or to rapidly return to the state pertained before exposure to a disturbance. Less resilient animals are expected to be more susceptible to environmental perturbations, such as diseases, and will consequently show more and/or greater fluctuations in production than more resilient animals. Natural antibodies (NAb) are antibodies recognizing antigens without previous exposure to these, and are hypothesized to be an indication of general disease resistance. The objective of this research was to investigate genetic parameters of resilience indicators based on standardized body weight (BW) deviations and to investigate its relation with immunity (i.e. NAb) and disease resistance. Keyhole limpet hemocyanin-binding NAb were measured in layer chickens, which were selectively bred for high and low keyhole limpet hemocyanin-binding NAb levels during six generations. In addition, BW data of these layers were collected on a four-weekly interval from 4 weeks of age until 32 weeks of age. Standardized deviations of BW from an individual were compared to lines’ average BW (i.e. across individuals), and these were used to calculate resilience indicators: natural logarithm-transformed variance [ln(variance)], skewness, and lag-one autocorrelation of deviations (i.e. all within an individual). Heritabilities of resilience indicators were between 0.09 and 0.11. Genetic correlations between the three resilience indicators were between -0.20 and 0.40 (with high SE), which might suggest that the resilience indicators capture different aspects of resilience. Genetic correlations between resilience indicators and NAb were close to zero, which suggests that the resilience indicators and NAb capture different aspects of immunity. This might indicate that, in this dataset, environmental perturbations are only to a small extent affected by disease incidence, possibly due to a lack of disease occurrence. However, a lower estimated breeding value for ln(variance) was predictive for lower lesion scores after an avian pathogenic Escherichia coli inoculation and vice versa. In conclusion, this study shows that there is genetic variation in resilience indicators based on BW deviations in layer chickens, which opens up possibilities to improve resilience by means of selective breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom V L Berghof
- Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Henk Bovenhuis
- Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Han A Mulder
- Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Iung LHDS, Carvalheiro R, Neves HHDR, Mulder HA. Genetics and genomics of uniformity and resilience in livestock and aquaculture species: A review. J Anim Breed Genet 2019; 137:263-280. [PMID: 31709657 DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Genetic control of residual variance offers opportunities to increase uniformity and resilience of livestock and aquaculture species. Improving uniformity and resilience of animals will improve health and welfare of animals and lead to more homogenous products. Our aims in this review were to summarize the current models and methods to study genetic control of residual variance, genetic parameters and genomic results for residual variance and discuss future research directions. Typically, the genetic coefficient of variation is high (median = 0.27; range 0-0.86) and the heritability of residual variance is low (median = 0.01; range 0-0.10). Higher heritabilities can be achieved when increasing the number of records per animal. Divergent selection experiments have supported the feasibility of selecting for high or low residual variance. Genomic studies have revealed associations in regions related to stress, including those from the heat shock protein family. Although the number of studies is growing, genetic control of residual variance is still poorly understood, but big data and genomics offer great opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laiza Helena de Souza Iung
- School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, Brazil.,CRV Lagoa, Sertãozinho, Brazil
| | - Roberto Carvalheiro
- School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, Brazil.,National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brasília, Brazil
| | | | - Herman Arend Mulder
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Estimation of genetic variation for macro- and micro-environmental sensitivities of milk yield and composition in Holstein cows using double hierarchical generalized linear models. J DAIRY RES 2019; 86:145-153. [DOI: 10.1017/s0022029919000293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this study was to estimate genetic parameters for environmental sensitivities in milk yield and composition of Iranian Holstein cows using the double hierarchical generalized linear model (DHGLM) method. Data set included test-day productive records of cows which were provided by the Animal Breeding Center and Promotion of Animal Products of Iran during 1983 to 2014. In the DHGLM method, a random regression model was fitted which included two parts of mean and residual variance. A random regression model (mean model) and a residual variance model were used to study the genetic variation of micro-environmental sensitivities. In order to consider macro-environmental sensitivities, DHGLM was extended using a reaction norm model, and a sire model was applied. Based on the mean model, additive genetic variances for the mean were 38.25 for milk yield, 0.23 for fat yield and 0.03 for protein yield in the first lactation, respectively. Based on the residual variance model, additive genetic variances for residual variance were 0.039 for milk yield, 0.030 for fat yield and 0.020 for protein yield in the first lactation, respectively. Estimates of genetic correlation between milk yield and macro- and micro-environmental sensitivities were 0.660 and 0.597 in the first lactation, respectively. The results of this study indicated that macro- and micro-environmental sensitivities were present for milk production traits of Iranian Holsteins. High genetic coefficient of variation for micro-environmental sensitivities indicated the possibility of reducing environmental variation and increase in uniformity via selection.
Collapse
|
10
|
Berghof TVL, Poppe M, Mulder HA. Opportunities to Improve Resilience in Animal Breeding Programs. Front Genet 2019; 9:692. [PMID: 30693014 PMCID: PMC6339870 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Resilience is the capacity of an animal to be minimally affected by disturbances or to rapidly return to the state pertained before exposure to a disturbance. However, indicators for general resilience to environmental disturbances have not yet been defined, and perhaps therefore resilience is not yet included in breeding goals. The current developments on big data collection give opportunities to determine new resilience indicators based on longitudinal data, which can aid to incorporate resilience in animal breeding goals. The objectives of this paper were: (1) to define resilience indicator traits based on big data, (2) to define economic values for resilience, and (3) to show the potential to improve resilience of livestock through inclusion of resilience in breeding goals. Resilience might be measured based on deviations from expected production levels over a period of time. Suitable resilience indicators could be the variance of deviations, the autocorrelation of deviations, the skewness of deviations, and the slope of a reaction norm. These (new) resilience indicators provide opportunity to include resilience in breeding programs. Economic values of resilience indicators in the selection index can be calculated based on reduced costs due to labor and treatments. For example, when labor time is restricted, the economic value of resilience increases with an increasing number of animals per farm, and can become as large as the economic value of production. This shows the importance of including resilience in breeding goals. Two scenarios were described to show the additional benefit of including resilience in breeding programs. These examples showed that it is hard to improve resilience with only production traits in the selection index, but that it is possible to greatly improve resilience by including resilience indicators in the selection index. However, when health-related traits are already present in the selection index, the effect is smaller. Nevertheless, inclusion of resilience indicators in the selection index increases the response in the breeding goal and resilience, which results in less labor-demanding, and thus easier-to-manage livestock. Current developments on massive collection of data, and new phenotypes based on these data, offer exciting opportunities to breed for improved resilience of livestock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom V. L. Berghof
- Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Iung LHDS, Mulder HA, Neves HHDR, Carvalheiro R. Genomic regions underlying uniformity of yearling weight in Nellore cattle evaluated under different response variables. BMC Genomics 2018; 19:619. [PMID: 30115034 PMCID: PMC6097312 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5003-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In livestock, residual variance has been studied because of the interest to improve uniformity of production. Several studies have provided evidence that residual variance is partially under genetic control; however, few investigations have elucidated genes that control it. The aim of this study was to identify genomic regions associated with within-family residual variance of yearling weight (YW; N = 423) in Nellore bulls with high density SNP data, using different response variables. For this, solutions from double hierarchical generalized linear models (DHGLM) were used to provide the response variables, as follows: a DGHLM assuming non-null genetic correlation between mean and residual variance (rmv ≠ 0) to obtain deregressed EBV for mean (dEBVm) and residual variance (dEBVv); and a DHGLM assuming rmv = 0 to obtain two alternative response variables for residual variance, dEBVv_r0 and log-transformed variance of estimated residuals (ln_[Formula: see text]). RESULTS The dEBVm and dEBVv were highly correlated, resulting in common regions associated with mean and residual variance of YW. However, higher effects on variance than the mean showed that these regions had effects on the variance beyond scale effects. More independent association results between mean and residual variance were obtained when null rmv was assumed. While 13 and 4 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) showed a strong association (Bayes Factor > 20) with dEBVv and ln_[Formula: see text], respectively, only suggestive signals were found for dEBVv_r0. All overlapping 1-Mb windows among top 20 between dEBVm and dEBVv were previously associated with growth traits. The potential candidate genes for uniformity are involved in metabolism, stress, inflammatory and immune responses, mineralization, neuronal activity and bone formation. CONCLUSIONS It is necessary to use a strategy like assuming null rmv to obtain genomic regions associated with uniformity that are not associated with the mean. Genes involved not only in metabolism, but also stress, inflammatory and immune responses, mineralization, neuronal activity and bone formation were the most promising biological candidates for uniformity of YW. Although no clear evidence of using a specific response variable was found, we recommend consider different response variables to study uniformity to increase evidence on candidate regions and biological mechanisms behind it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laiza Helena de Souza Iung
- School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castelane, S/N, Vila Industrial, FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, 14884-900 Brazil
| | - Herman Arend Mulder
- Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Roberto Carvalheiro
- School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castelane, S/N, Vila Industrial, FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, 14884-900 Brazil
| |
Collapse
|