The predicted benefits of genomic selection on pig breeding objectives

The premise was tested that the additional genetic gain was achieved in the overall breeding objective in a pig breeding program using genomic selection (GS) compared to a conventional breeding program, however, some traits achieved larger gain than other traits. GS scenarios based on different reference population sizes were evaluated. The scenarios were compared using a deterministic simulation model to predict genetic gain in scenarios with and without using genomic information as an additional information source. All scenarios were compared based on selection accuracy and predicted genetic gain per round of selection for objective traits in both sire and dam lines. The results showed that GS scenarios increased overall response in the breeding objectives by 9% to 56% and 3.5% to 27% in the dam and sire lines, respectively. The difference in response resulted from differences in the size of the reference population. Although all traits achieved higher selection accuracy in GS, traits with limited phenotypic information at the time of selection or with low heritability, such as sow longevity, number of piglets born alive, pre- and post-weaning survival, as well as meat and carcass quality traits achieved the largest additional response. This additional response came at the expense of smaller responses for traits that are easy to measure, such as back fat and average daily gain in GS compared to the conventional breeding program. Sow longevity and drip loss percentage did not change in a favourable direction in GS with a reference population of 500 pigs. With a reference population of 1000 pigs or onwards, sow longevity and drip loss percentage began to change in a favourable direction. Despite the smaller responses for average daily gain and back fat thickness in GS, the overall breeding objective achieved additional gain in GS.

Genomic Prediction Using LD-Based Haplotypes in Combined Pig Populations

The size of reference population is an important factor affecting genomic prediction. Thus, combining different populations in genomic prediction is an attractive way to improve prediction ability. However, combining multireference population roughly cannot increase the prediction accuracy as well as expected in pig. This may be due to different linkage disequilibrium (LD) pattern differences between population. In this study, we used the imputed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data to construct LD-based haplotypes for genomic prediction in combined population to explore the impact of different single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) densities, variant representation (SNPs or haplotype alleles), and reference population size on the prediction accuracy for reproduction traits. Our results showed that genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) using the WGS data can improve prediction accuracy in multi-population but not within-population. Not only the genomic prediction accuracy of the haplotype method using 80 K chip data in multi-population but also GBLUP for the multi-population (3.4–5.9%) was higher than that within-population (1.2–4.3%). More importantly, we have found that using the haplotype method based on the WGS data in multi-population has better genomic prediction performance, and our results showed that building haploblock in this scenario based on low LD threshold (r² = 0.2–0.3) produced an optimal set of variables for reproduction traits in Yorkshire pig population. Our results suggested that whether the use of the haplotype method based on the chip data or GBLUP (individual SNP method) based on the WGS data were beneficial for genomic prediction in multi-population, while simultaneously combining the haplotype method and WGS data was a better strategy for multi-population genomic evaluation.

Optimizing the Construction and Update Strategies for the Genomic Selection of Pig Reference and Candidate Populations in China

Optimizing the construction and update strategies for reference and candidate populations is the basis of the application of genomic selection (GS). In this study, we first simulated1200-purebred-pigs population that have been popular in China for 20 generations to study the effects of different population sizes and the relationship between individuals of the reference and candidate populations. The results showed that the accuracy was positively correlated with the size of the reference population within the same generation (r = 0.9366, p < 0.05), while was negatively correlated with the number of generation intervals between the reference and candidate populations (r = −0.9267, p < 0.01). When the reference population accumulated more than seven generations, the accuracy began to decline. We then simulated the population structure of 1200 purebred pigs for five generations and studied the effects of different heritabilities (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5), genotyping proportions (20, 30, and 50%), and sex ratios on the accuracy of the genomic estimate breeding value (GEBV) and genetic progress. The results showed that if the proportion of genotyping individuals accounts for 20% of the candidate population, the traits with different heritabilities can be genotyped according to the sex ratio of 1:1male to female. If the proportion is 30% and the traits are of low heritability (0.1), the sex ratio of 1:1 male to female is the best. If the traits are of medium or high heritability, the male-to-female ratio is 1:1, 1:2, or 2:1, which may achieve higher genetic progress. If the genotyping proportion is up to 50%, for low heritability traits (0.1), the proportion of sows from all genotyping individuals should not be less than 25%, and for the medium and high heritability traits, the optimal choice for the male-to-female ratio is 1:1, which may obtain the greatest genetic progress. This study provides a reference for determining a construction and update plan for the reference population of breeding pigs.

Identification of Genomic Regions and Candidate Genes for Litter Traits in French Large White Pigs Using Genome-Wide Association Studies

The reproductive traits of sows are one of the important economic traits in pig production, and their performance directly affects the economic benefits of the entire pig industry. In this study, a total of 895 French Large White pigs were genotyped by GeneSeek Porcine 50K SNP Beadchip and four phenotypic traits of 1407 pigs were recorded, including total number born (TNB), number born alive (NBA), number healthy piglets (NHP) and litter weight born alive (LWB). To identify genomic regions and genes for these traits, we used two approaches: a single-locus genome-wide association study (GWAS) and a single-step GWAS (ssGWAS). Overall, a total of five SNPs and 36 genomic regions were identified by single-locus GWAS and ssGWAS, respectively. Notably, fourof all five significant SNPs were located in 10.72–11.06 Mb on chromosome 7, were also identified by ssGWAS. These regions explained the highest or second highest genetic variance in the TNB, NBA and NHP traits and harbor the protein coding gene ENSSSCG00000042180. In addition, several candidate genes associated with litter traits were identified, including JARID2, PDIA6, FLRT2 and DICER1. Overall, these novel results reflect the polygenic genetic architecture of the litter traits and provide a theoretical reference for the following implementation of molecular breeding.

Genomic Prediction of Average Daily Gain, Back-Fat Thickness, and Loin Muscle Depth Using Different Genomic Tools in Canadian Swine Populations

Improvement of prediction accuracy of estimated breeding values (EBVs) can lead to increased profitability for swine breeding companies. This study was performed to compare the accuracy of different popular genomic prediction methods and traditional best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for future performance of back-fat thickness (BFT), average daily gain (ADG), and loin muscle depth (LMD) in Canadian Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire swine breeds. In this study, 17,019 pigs were genotyped using Illumina 60K and Affymetrix 50K panels. After quality control and imputation steps, a total of 41,304, 48,580, and 49,102 single-nucleotide polymorphisms remained for Duroc (n = 6,649), Landrace (n = 5,362), and Yorkshire (n = 5,008) breeds, respectively. The breeding values of animals in the validation groups (n = 392–774) were predicted before performance test using BLUP, BayesC, BayesCπ, genomic BLUP (GBLUP), and single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) methods. The prediction accuracies were obtained using the correlation between the predicted breeding values and their deregressed EBVs (dEBVs) after performance test. The genomic prediction methods showed higher prediction accuracies than traditional BLUP for all scenarios. Although the accuracies of genomic prediction methods were not significantly (P > 0.05) different, ssGBLUP was the most accurate method for Duroc-ADG, Duroc-LMD, Landrace-BFT, Landrace-ADG, and Yorkshire-BFT scenarios, and BayesCπ was the most accurate method for Duroc-BFT, Landrace-LMD, and Yorkshire-ADG scenarios. Furthermore, BayesCπ method was the least biased method for Duroc-LMD, Landrace-BFT, Landrace-ADG, Yorkshire-BFT, and Yorkshire-ADG scenarios. Our findings can be beneficial for accelerating the genetic progress of BFT, ADG, and LMD in Canadian swine populations by selecting more accurate and unbiased genomic prediction methods.

Application of Genomic Data for Reliability Improvement of Pig Breeding Value Estimates

Replacement pigs' genomic prediction for reproduction (total number and born alive piglets in the first parity), meat, fatness and growth traits (muscle depth, days to 100 kg and backfat thickness over 6-7 rib) was tested using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction ssGBLUP methodology. These traits were selected as the most economically significant and different in terms of heritability. The heritability for meat, fatness and growth traits varied from 0.17 to 0.39 and for reproduction traits from 0.12 to 0.14. We confirm from our data that ssGBLUP is the most appropriate method of genomic evaluation. The validation of genomic predictions was performed by calculating the correlation between preliminary GEBV (based on pedigree and genomic data only) with high reliable conventional estimates (EBV) (based on pedigree, own phenotype and offspring records) of validating animals. Validation datasets include 151 and 110 individuals for reproduction, meat and fattening traits, respectively. The level of correlation (r) between EBV and GEBV scores varied from +0.44 to +0.55 for meat and fatness traits, and from +0.75 to +0.77 for reproduction traits. Average breeding value (EBV) of group selected on genomic evaluation basis exceeded the group selected on parental average estimates by 22, 24 and 66% for muscle depth, days to 100 kg and backfat thickness over 6-7 rib, respectively. Prediction based on SNP markers data and parental estimates showed a significant increase in the reliability of low heritable reproduction traits (about 40%), which is equivalent to including information about 10 additional descendants for sows and 20 additional descendants for boars in the evaluation dataset.

Using Different Single-Step Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Genomic Prediction on Body Measurement Traits in Pig

In genomic prediction, single-step method has been demonstrated to outperform multi-step methods. This study investigated the efficiency of genomic prediction for seven body measurement traits in Yorkshire population and simulated data using single-step method. For Yorkshire population, in total, 592 individuals were genotyped with Illumina PorcineSNP80 marker panel. We compared the prediction accuracy obtained from a traditional pedigree-based method (BLUP), a genomic BLUP (GBLUP) and a single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) through 20 replicates of 5-fold cross-validation (CV). In addition, we also compared the performance of two-trait ssGBLUP and single-trait ssGBLUP for the traits with different gradients of genetic correlation. Our results indicated the GBLUP method generally provided lower accuracies of prediction than BLUP and ssGBLUP methods, and the average standard deviation of unbiasedness was as large as 0.278. For single-step methods, the accuracies of ssGBLUP for seven body measurement traits ranged from 0.543 to 0.785, and the unbiasedness of ssGBLUP ranged from 0.834 to 1.026, respectively. ssGBLUP generally generated 1% on average higher prediction accuracy than traditional BLUP, the improvement of ssGBLUP and the performance of GBLUP was lower than expected mainly due to the small number of genotyped animals, it was further demonstrated by our simulation study. We simulated two traits with heritabilities 0.1, 0.3, and with high genetic correlation 0.7, our results also showed that the prediction accuracies were low for GBLUP compared with other three methods with different genotyped reference population sizes and the accuracies were improved with increasing the genotyped reference population size. However, the increase was small for ssGBLUP compared with BLUP when the genotyped reference population size was <500. Our results also demonstrated that the accuracies of genomic prediction can be further improved by implementing two-trait ssGBLUP model, the maximum gain on accuracy was 2 and 2.6% for trait of chest width compared to single-trait ssGBLUP and traditional BLUP, while the gain was decreased with the weakness of genetic correlation. Two-trait ssGBLUP even performed worse than single trait analysis in the scenario of low genetic correlation.