[Comparison of clinical-metabolic efficacy of pre- and probiotics in the conducted optimized protocols of eradication therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection]

Postbiotics in inflammatory bowel disease: efficacy, mechanism, and therapeutic implications

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is one of the most challenging diseases in the 21st century, and more than 10 million people around the world suffer from IBD. Because of the limitations and adverse effects associated with conventional IBD therapies, there has been increased scientific interest in microbial-derived biomolecules, known as postbiotics. Postbiotics are defined as the preparation of inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confer a health benefit on the host, comprising inactivated microbial cells, cell fractions, metabolites, etc. Postbiotics have shown potential in enhancing IBD treatment by reducing inflammation, modulating the immune system, stabilizing intestinal flora and maintaining the integrity of intestinal barriers. Consequently, they are considered promising adjunctive therapies for IBD. Recent studies indicate that postbiotics offer distinctive advantages, including spanning clinical (safe origin), technological (easy for storage and transportation) and economic (reduced production costs) dimensions, rendering them suitable for widespread applications in functional food/pharmaceutical. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the definition, classification and applications of postbiotics, with an emphasis on their biological activity in both the prevention and treatment of IBD. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.

Detection and Treatment of Helicobacter pylori: Problems and Advances

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is chronic and etiologically linked to gastric cancer (GC) derived from gastric epithelium. The potential mechanism is complex, covering chronic inflammation, epithelial senescence, NF-κB activation, the cytotoxin-associated gene A protein translocation, and related abnormal signaling pathways. In clinical practice, the test-and-treat strategy, endoscopy-based strategy, and (family-based) screen-and-treat strategy are recommended to detect H. pylori and prevent GC. It has been demonstrated that the decreasing annual incidence of GC is largely attributable to the management of H. pylori. This study reviews the current clinical practice of H. pylori on the detection and eradication, alternative treatment strategies, and related problems and advances, and hopes to contribute to the better clinical management of H. pylori.

Gastrointestinal microbiome and Helicobacter pylori: Eradicate, leave it as it is, or take a personalized benefit–risk approach?

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is generally regarded as a human pathogen and a class 1 carcinogen, etiologically related to gastric and duodenal ulcers, gastric cancer, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. However, H. pylori can also be regarded as a commensal symbiont. Unlike other pathogenic/ opportunistic bacteria, H. pylori colonization in infancy is facilitated by T helper type 2 immunity and leads to the development of immune tolerance. Fucosylated gastric mucin glycans, which are an important part of the innate and adaptive immune system, mediate the adhesion of H. pylori to the surface of the gastric epithelium, contributing to successful colonization. H. pylori may have beneficial effects on the host by regulating gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota and protecting against some allergic and autoimmune disorders and inflammatory bowel disease. The potential protective role against inflammatory bowel disease may be related to both modulation of the gut microbiota and the immunomodulatory properties of H. pylori. The inverse association between H. pylori and some potentially proinflammatory and/or procarcinogenic bacteria may suggest it regulates the GI microbiota. Eradication of H. pylori can cause various adverse effects and alter the GI microbiota, leading to short-term or long-term dysbiosis. Overall, studies have shown that gastric Actinobacteria decrease after H. pylori eradication, Proteobacteria increase during short-term follow-up and then return to baseline levels, and Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus increase in the short-term and interim follow-up. Various gastric mucosal bacteria (Actinomyces, Granulicatella, Parvimonas, Peptostreptococcus, Prevotella, Rothia, Streptococcus, Rhodococcus, and Lactobacillus) may contribute to precancerous gastric lesions and cancer itself after H. pylori eradication. H. pylori eradication can also lead to dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, with increased Proteobacteria and decreased Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria. The increase in gut Proteobacteria may contribute to adverse effects during and after eradication. The decrease in Actinobacteria, which are pivotal in the maintenance of gut homeostasis, can persist for > 6 mo after H. pylori eradication. Furthermore, H. pylori eradication can alter the metabolism of gastric and intestinal bacteria. Given the available data, eradication cannot be an unconditional recommendation in every case of H. pylori infection, and the decision to eradicate H. pylori should be based on an assessment of the benefit–risk ratio for the individual patient. Thus, the current guidelines based on the unconditional “test-and-treat” strategy should be revised. The most cautious and careful approach should be taken in elderly patients with multiple eradication failures since repeated eradication can cause antibiotic-associated diarrhea, including severe Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis and antibiotic-associated hemorrhagic colitis due to Klebsiella oxytoca. Furthermore, since eradication therapy with antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors can lead to serious adverse effects and/or dysbiosis of the GI microbiota, supplementation of probiotics, prebiotics, and microbial metabolites (e.g., butyrate + inulin) should be considered to decrease the negative effects of eradication.

[Efficacy of butyric acid inclusion in eradication regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis of controlled trials]

AIM

Systematization of data on the efficacy and safety of butyric acid inclusion in eradication therapy (ET) regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

Research searches were carried out in the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) until November 2020. All controlled studies comparing the efficacy and/or safety of including butyric acid in ET regimens for H. pylori infection were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 6 controlled studies (1 Italy, 5 Russia) involving 736 patients (381 in the ET groups with butyric acid; 355 in the comparison groups). The pooled eradication efficiency in the butyric acid groups was 90.23% (95% confidence interval CI 86.73493.069), while in the comparison groups it was 65.69% (95% CI 60.44170.669). Meta-analysis showed that the addition of butyric acid to ET regimens significantly increased the eradication efficiency (odds ratio OR 5.355, 95% CI 3.5048.184; p0.001). There was no significant heterogeneity between results (p=0.1408; I2=42.1%). The addition of butyric acid to ET regimens significantly reduces the risk of diarrhea (OR 0.225, 95% CI 0.09230.549; p=0.001; I2=34.21%) and abdominal distention (OR 0.357, 95% CI 0.1550.818; p=0.015; I2=80.13%) by the end of the 1st week of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis demonstrated that the inclusion of butyric acid in ET regimens for H. pylori infection significantly increases the effectiveness of treatment and reduce the incidence of side effects. Apparently, the increase in the effectiveness of eradication is due to an increase in patient compliance with treatment due to an improvement in the safety profile of therapy.