Hip Abduction Strength: Relationship to Trunk and Lower Extremity Motion During A Single-Leg Step-Down Task in Professional Baseball Players

The Clinician's Guide to Baseball Pitching Biomechanics

CONTEXT

Improper baseball pitching biomechanics are associated with increased stresses on the throwing elbow and shoulder as well as an increased risk of injury.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Previous studies quantifying pitching kinematics and kinetics were reviewed.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 5.

RESULTS

At the instant of lead foot contact, the elbow should be flexed approximately 90° with the shoulder at about 90° abduction, 20° horizontal abduction, and 45° external rotation. The stride length should be about 85% of the pitcher's height with the lead foot in a slightly closed position. The pelvis should be rotated slightly open toward home plate with the upper torso in line with the pitching direction. Improper shoulder external rotation at foot contact is associated with increased elbow and shoulder torques and forces and may be corrected by changing the stride length and/or arm path. From foot contact to maximum shoulder external rotation to ball release, the pitcher should demonstrate a kinematic chain of lead knee extension, pelvis rotation, upper trunk rotation, elbow extension, and shoulder internal rotation. The lead knee should be flexed about 45° at foot contact and 30° at ball release. Corrective strategies for insufficient knee extension may involve technical issues (stride length, lead foot position, lead foot orientation) and/or strength and conditioning of the lower body. Improper pelvis and upper trunk rotation often indicate the need for core strength and flexibility. Maximum shoulder external rotation should be about 170°. Insufficient external rotation leads to low shoulder internal rotation velocity and low ball velocity. Deviation from 90° abduction decreases the ability to achieve maximum external rotation, increases elbow torque, and decreases the dynamic stability in the glenohumeral joint.

CONCLUSION

Improved pitching biomechanics can increase performance and reduce risk of injury.

SORT

Level C.

Drive-Leg Kinematics During the Windup and Pushoff Is Associated With Pitching Kinetics at Later Phases of the Pitch

BACKGROUND

Inconsistent findings exist between drive-leg ground-reaction forces (GRFs) and pitching mechanics. Previous literature has largely reported drive-leg mechanics and GRFs at the start of the pushoff phase for their role in initiating force development. Little research has assessed drive-leg kinematics that includes a pitcher's windup motion to determine its effects on subsequent phases in the pitching motion.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The primary aim was to analyze the relationship between drive-leg knee valgus angle during the windup and subsequent pitching mechanics. We hypothesized that the drive-leg knee valgus angle during the early portion of the pitching motion would alter later phases' pitching mechanics. A secondary aim was to assess GRFs to determine if the drive-leg knee valgus angle was associated with changes in force. We hypothesized that an increased drive-leg knee valgus angle would increase GRFs during the pitching motion.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 17 high school baseball pitchers (mean age, 16.1 ± 0.9 years; mean height, 180.0 ± 4.8 cm; mean weight, 75.5 ± 7.5 kg) volunteered for the study. Kinematic data and GRFs were collected using an electromagnetic tracking system and force plates. Pitchers threw maximal-effort fastballs from a mound at regulation distance. The drive-leg knee valgus angle was analyzed during the windup and pushoff phases of the pitch to determine its effects on other biomechanical variables throughout the pitching motion.

RESULTS

There was a significant relationship between drive-leg knee valgus angle during the windup (Fchange 1,12) = 16.13; P = .002; R² = 0.695) and lateral GRF in the arm-cocking phase. Additionally, there was a significant relationship between drive-leg knee valgus angle during pushoff (Fchange(2,11) = 10.21; P = .003; R² = 0.716) and lateral GRF in the arm-cocking phase and pitching-elbow valgus moment in the acceleration phase.

CONCLUSION

Drive-leg knee valgus angle during the windup and pushoff had a significant relationship with drive-leg GRF and pitching-elbow valgus moment at later stages of the pitching cycle.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Assessments of drive-leg kinematics during the windup and pushoff may be useful in identifying inefficient movement patterns that can have an effect on the direction of a pitcher's drive-leg force contribution, which can lead to increased forces on the throwing elbow.

Relationship between ground reaction force and throwing arm kinetics in high school and collegiate pitchers

BACKGROUND

Throwing a baseball requires the transmission of forces generated in the lower extremity, through the trunk, to the upper extremity, and ultimately translates to the ball. A disruption in the functioning of the lower extremities could lead to altered upper extremity kinematics and increased load exerted on the shoulder and elbow. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of ground reaction forces (GRF) on the drive and stride sides and kinetics of the throwing arm in high school and collegiate baseball pitchers.

METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, data that were previously collected during a pitching evaluation were analyzed. Fifty high school pitchers and twenty six collegiate pitchers had received a pitching evaluation. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between variables.

RESULTS

Only the drive leg medial force was determined to be a significant predictor of maximum shoulder external rotation torque. Maximum elbow valgus torque was not correlated with any GRF variables and ball speed was only weakly correlated with stride leg medial force. There were no significant differences in GRFs between the high school and college pitchers.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the limited relationships present, other factors such as muscle strength, coordination, kinematics, or stride technique may overshadow the effects of GRF in highly skilled pitchers and warrant further investigation. Understanding this relationship will be important to both enhancing performance and avoiding injury.