The influence of the irrigant QMix on the push-out bond strength of a bioceramic endodontic sealer

The effect of different acidic irrigation solutions on the pushout bond strength of root canal filling

Background

This study investigated the effects of different acidic solutions used as the final irrigation on the push-out bond strength (PBS) of resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers.

Methods

100 single root and canal human incisors were selected and decorated. Root canal shaping was done with ProTaper Next rotary files up to X4 and rinsed with 5 mL of 5.25% NaOCl between each file. Then, teeth were divided into five main groups according to the final irrigation (n=20). Group 1: glycolic acid; Group 2: phosphoric acid; Group 3: citric acid; Group 4: EDTA and group 5: saline. Then, each group was divided into two subgroups according to the canal sealer used (n=10). The groups filled with bioceramic-based sealer (bioserra) were named A, and the groups filled with resin-based sealer (AH Plus) were called B. PBS test was applied to one of the two samples obtained from the coronal third of each root. The data were statistically analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's HSD test (α=0.05).

Results

Statistically, the highest PBS value was obtained in group 2A (4.81±0.03 MPa), which was irrigated with phosphoric acid and filled with bioserra, and the lowest PBS value was obtained in group 5B (1.10±0,03), which was irrigated with saline and filled with AH Plus (P<0.05). There was a statistical difference between all groups except group 1A and group 3A (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The bioceramic-based root canal sealer (bioserra) bond strength is superior to resin-based (AH Plus). Phosphoric acid, glycolic acid, and citric acid can be an alternative to EDTA.

Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of QMix and AgNP Solutions in Root Canals of Primary Molars: An In-Vitro Study

Purpose

The study aimed to evaluate QMix²ⁱⁿ¹ and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) solution in eliminating Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) bacteria within root canals of primary molars.

Materials and methods

The study sample consisted of 45 extracted primary molars, which were divided into three groups: Group 1 (control) NaOCl 5.25%, Group 2 (experimental) QMix^{2 in 1}, and Group 3 (experimental) AgNPs 4000 ppm. The root canals were sterilized within an autoclave and then contaminated with E. faecalis bacteria. The root canals were irrigated for five minutes in a quantity of 3 ml using a 31-gauge irrigation needle, and then bacterial smears were taken.

Results

Sodium hypochlorite, AgNPs, and QMix²ⁱⁿ¹ effectively reduced the bacterial count of Enterococcus within root canals of primary molars. There were statistical differences between all groups. QMix²ⁱⁿ¹ solution showed the greatest antibacterial efficacy, then NaOCl solution and AgNPs solution. 

Conclusion

All irrigation solutions used are effective in eliminating E. faecalis. QMix²ⁱⁿ¹ can be considered a good alternative to sodium hypochlorite in irrigation root canals of primary teeth.