Progress in the Diagnostic and Predictive Evaluation of Crush Syndrome

Crush syndrome (CS), also known as traumatic rhabdomyolysis, is a syndrome with a wide clinical spectrum; it is caused by external compression, which often occurs in earthquakes, wars, and traffic accidents, especially in large-scale disasters. Crush syndrome is the second leading cause of death after direct trauma in earthquakes. A series of clinical complications caused by crush syndrome, including hyperkalemia, myoglobinuria, and, in particular, acute kidney injury (AKI), is the main cause of death in crush syndrome. The early diagnosis of crush syndrome, the correct evaluation of its severity, and accurate predictions of a poor prognosis can provide personalized suggestions for rescuers to carry out early treatments and reduce mortality. This review summarizes various methods for the diagnostic and predictive evaluation of crush syndrome, including urine dipstick tests for a large number of victims, traditional and emerging biomarkers, imaging-assisted diagnostic methods, and developed evaluation models, with the aim of providing materials for scholars in this research field.

Clinico-Etiological Spectrum and Functional Outcomes of Children with Pre-Status Dystonicus and Status Dystonicus (SD): A Descriptive Study

Background

Status dystonicus (SD) is a life-threatening movement disorder emergency characterized by increasingly frequent and severe episodes of generalized dystonia, requiring urgent hospital admission. The diverse clinico-etiological spectrum, high risk of recurrence, and residual disabilities complicate functional outcomes.

Aim

We aim to describe the clinico-etiological spectrum, radiology, therapeutic options, and follow-up of patients with pre-status dystonicus (pre-SD) and SD.

Methodology

A cross-sectional retrospective study was carried out in a tertiary care referral center. The clinical, laboratory, and radiology data of all patients aged less than 18 years with pre-SD and SD from January 2010 to December 2020 were collected. The Dystonia Severity Assessment Plan (DSAP) scale for grading severity and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) for assessing outcome were used at the last follow-up visit.

Results

Twenty-eight patients (male:female: 2.1:1) experiencing 33 episodes of acute dystonia exacerbation were identified. The median age at the onset of dystonia and SD presentation was 8.71 (range: 0.25-15.75) and 9.12 (range: 1-16.75) years, respectively. Four patients experienced more than one episode of SD. The etiological spectrum of SD includes metabolic (Wilson's disease-13, L-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase deficiency-one, and Gaucher's disease-one), genetic (neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation-three and KMT2B and THAP 1 gene-related-one each), structural-three, post-encephalitic sequelae (PES)-four, and immune-mediated (anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis-one). Five patients had pre-SD (DSAP grade 3), and 23 patients had established SD (DSAP grade 4-17 and DSAP grade 5-six). The Rapid escalation of chelation therapy precipitated SD in 11 patients with Wilson's disease. Febrile illness or pneumonia precipitated SD in nine patients. Twenty-three episodes of SD required midazolam infusion in addition to anti-dystonic medications. The median duration of hospital stay was 10 days (range: 3-29). Twenty-three patients had resolution of SD but residual dystonia persisted, while two patients had no residual dystonia at follow-up. Three patients succumbed owing to refractory SD and its complications.

Conclusion

Early identification of triggers, etiology, and appropriate management are essential to calm the dystonic storm.

A Systematic Review of Iranian Experiences in Seismo-Nephrology

Context

Crush syndrome and its potentially life-threatening complications, such as acute kidney injury (AKI), are one of the most important medical problems of disaster victims. However, today, many unanswered questions abound about the potential risk factors of crush syndrome, predictive factors of AKI, proper amount of prophylactic hydration therapy, type of fluid, time of continuing fluid, intravenous versus oral hydration, etc. Therefore, this study was designed to review the findings on Iranian nephrologist experiences in diagnosis and management of traumatic rhabdomyolysis following the last two strong earthquakes of Bam (2003) and Manjil-Rudbar (1990).

Evidence Acquisition

The study was conducted according to the MOOSE reporting guideline. A literature review was conducted on the nephrologic aspects of earthquakes in Iran. Relevant articles were identified through a comprehensive search of online databases until 2014. The search was limited to articles studying the Iranian population published in English and Persian languages. The validated combination of MeSH terms and key words was used. In addition, a manual search was run among the references of all articles that met the entrance criteria and previous reviews. Only cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies were enrolled. Two reviewers independently reviewed the eligible studies, and another reviewer contributed in case of a disagreement. Basic information from each study was evaluated from the aspects of purpose and design, year of publication, methodology, main population, and source of data. The quality of the included studies was assessed using methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. Two reviewers independently rated each paper as “good”, “fair”, or “poor”.

Results

A total of 1256 non-duplicate articles were identified, but only 35 potentially relevant papers were screened. Finally, 21 articles were found eligible and studied in details. In addition, one unpublished report was included. In the quality assessment, two articles had poor quality, and thus only 20 were finally included in the systematic review. No publication bias (coefficient = −2.28; 95% Confidence interval: −6.17 - 1.78; P = 0.26) was observed among the included studies.

Conclusions

A few eligible articles on seismo-nephrology were found in Iran, and a limited number of current articles had poor or fair quality. As expected, the chaotic situation after mass disasters and the lack of documentation led to the loss of much important data on the diagnosis and management of victims. Lessons learned from the current researches can be used as a valuable guide for future studies.

Urinalysis is an inadequate screen for rhabdomyolysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Hematuria by urine dipstick with absent red blood cells (RBCs) on microscopy is indicative of rhabdomyolysis. We determined the sensitivity of this classic urinalysis (UA) finding in the diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective electronic medical record review of patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis with a creatine phosphokinase (CPK) greater than 1000 IU/L and a UA within the first 24 hours. Data were collected using a standardized data form, and a blinded panel of 3 emergency medicine physicians reviewed selected cases. Sensitivity and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for detection of rhabdomyolysis by UA.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1796 patients were diagnosed with rhabdomyolysis, of whom 228 met inclusion criteria. The mean peak CPK was 27509 IU/L. One hundred ninety-five (86%) had a urine dip-positive for blood. However, only 94 patients (41%) had a positive urine dip and negative microscopic hematuria, resulting in a sensitivity of 41% (95% CI, 35%-47%). In a subset of 66 patients (29%) with more severe rhabdomyolysis (initial CPK, ≥10000 IU/L; mean CPK, 53365 IU/L), UA had a sensitivity of 55% (95% CI, 43%-67%). Broadening the definition of negative microscopy from 0 to 3 RBCs to less than 10 RBCs only increased the sensitivity to 79% (95% CI, 73%-83%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of a positive urine dip for blood and negative microscopy is an insensitive test for rhabdomyolysis, and the absence of this finding should not be used to exclude the diagnosis.