Evaluation of Serum Calprotectin Levels in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Development of Luminescent Biosensors for Calprotectin

Calprotectin, a metal ion-binding protein complex, plays a crucial role in the innate immune system and has gained prominence as a biomarker for various intestinal and systemic inflammatory and infectious diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and tuberculosis (TB). Current clinical testing methods rely on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), limiting accessibility and convenience. In this study, we introduce the Fab-Enabled Split-luciferase Calprotectin Assay (FESCA), a novel quantitative method for calprotectin measurement. FESCA utilizes two new fragment antigen binding proteins (Fabs), CP16 and CP17, that bind to different epitopes of the calprotectin complex. These Fabs are fused with split NanoLuc luciferase fragments, enabling the reconstitution of active luciferase upon binding to calprotectin either in solution or in varied immobilized assay formats. FESCA's output luminescence can be measured with standard laboratory equipment as well as consumer-grade cell phone cameras. FESCA can detect physiologically relevant calprotectin levels across various sample types, including serum, plasma, and whole blood. Notably, FESCA can detect abnormally elevated native calprotectin from TB patients. In summary, FESCA presents a convenient, low-cost, and quantitative method for assessing calprotectin levels in various biological samples, with the potential to improve the diagnosis and monitoring of inflammatory diseases, especially in at-home or point-of-care settings.

Serum Calprotectin in the Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Diseases: An Ace up Your Sleeve?

Background: Calprotectin (CP) is a calcium- and zinc-binding protein that plays a key role in innate immunity and in the recruitment of inflammatory cells. CP can be detected both in serum and in fecal samples. Serum CP (sCP) is more specific for autoimmune diseases, while fecal CP (fCP) has been well investigated for gastrointestinal diseases. Few studies have shown the clinical effectiveness of sCP as an acute-phase biomarker for gastrointestinal diseases. Aim: The aim of this narrative review is to discuss the role of sCP as a useful alternative biomarker of the acute-phase activity of gastrointestinal diseases and as a possible tool for screening and monitoring these diseases. Material and Methods: We searched original articles, abstracts, reviews, case reports, and clinical trials on PubMed®, Up-to-Date®, and Medscape® in the last ten years. Conclusion: We found that sCP could represent a useful biomarker in the evaluation of the inflammatory stage in patients with immune-mediated gastrointestinal diseases, but more studies are needed to promote its routine use in clinical practice as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker as a replacement for fCP.

Establishing a pediatric reference interval for plasma calprotectin

Plasma calprotectin is a promising new biomarker of inflammatory activity and has been found to correlate well with clinical and endoscopic activity in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. A pediatric reference interval for plasma calprotectin has not been established for the Phadia 250 EliA™ Calprotectin fluoroenzyme immunoassay. In studies regarding pre-analytical properties, excellent precision and stability was found. However, sensitivity to hemolysis was demonstrated. We identified pediatric blood samples from apparently healthy children who were referred by their general practitioner for blood sampling including measurement of hemoglobin (Hb) and C-reactive protein (CRP). We excluded samples from children who had undergone additional blood sampling within 2 months before or after the index sample, if Hb was outside of local reference ranges or CRP levels were above the lower limit of the measuring interval (LLM), and any samples with a hemolysis above 0.02 mmol/L. Using this algorithm, we identified 141 blood samples. No outliers were identified. We established the following reference intervals according to CLSI C28-A3 using non-parametric statistics: 1-17 years: 16-246 µg/L. Our results may prove useful for further utilization of plasma calprotectin as a marker of inflammation in children and adolescents with inflammatory disorders.

Biological, genetic and epigenetic markers in ulcerative colitis

In this review, we have summarized the existing knowledge of ulcerative colitis (UC) markers based on current literature, specifically, the roles of potential new biomarkers, such as circulating, fecal, genetic, and epigenetic alterations, in UC onset, disease activity, and in therapy response. UC is a complex multifactorial inflammatory disease. There are many invasive and non-invasive diagnostic methods in UC, including several laboratory markers which are employed in diagnosis and disease assessment; however, colonoscopy remains the most widely used method. Common laboratory abnormalities currently used in the clinical practice include inflammation-induced alterations, serum autoantibodies, and antibodies against bacterial antigens. Other new serum and fecal biomarkers are supportive in diagnosis and monitoring disease activity and therapy response; and potential salivary markers are currently being evaluated as well. Several UC-related genetic and epigenetic alterations are implied in its pathogenesis and therapeutic response. Moreover, the use of artificial intelligence in the integration of laboratory biomarkers and big data could potentially be useful in clinical translation and precision medicine in UC management.

Serum Calprotectin and B-cell activating factor are potential biomarkers for Helicobacter pylori infection

Humans always mount a robust immune response to the bacterial infection caused by Helicobacter pylori, which causes various gastrointestinal tract infections. Calprotectin (CALP) and B-Cell Activating Factor (BAFF) are inflammatory biomarkers having a role in the gastrointestinal neutrophilic response to bacterial infection. The study was designed to assess serum CALP and BAFF as inflammatory biomarkers in H. pylori infection and peptic ulcer patients. The current study comprised 112 people, including 62 H. pylori-infected patients (34 men and 28 women) who were clinically diagnosed with H. pylori infection via testing positive for the H. pylori stool antigen test; they were compared to a control group of 50 healthy people (34 men and 16 women) who were age and gender-matched to H. pylori-infected patients. The serum level of CALP and BAFF were assayed using the ELISA technique. The biochemical parameters were statistically compared between patients and controls by unpaired Man-Whitney U t-test and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. There was a significant elevation of serum CALP in H. pylori-infected patients [116.4(120.7), p=0.0132] in comparison to healthy controls [99.50(115.8)]. Similarly, there was a significant elevation of serum BAFF concentration in H. pylori-infected patients [485.7(367.1), p=0.0014] in comparison to healthy controls [444.5(513.0)]. The ROC curve analysis suggests serum CALP and BAFF as reasonable inflammatory biomarkers for H. pylori infection with statistically significant (p=0.0135, p=0.0015) area under the ROC curve of (0.6361, 0.6748), respectively. CALP and BAFF are potent inflammatory biomarkers involved in the development and etiology of H. pylori infection. Serum CALP and BAFF levels could be used as biomarkers for chronic inflammation induced by H. pylori. CALP and BAFF biomarkers can be combined to diagnose and predict the prognosis of H. pylori infection.

Circulating Calprotectin (cCLP) in autoimmune diseases

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Calprotectin (CLP) is a heterodimeric complex formed by two S100 proteins (S100A8/A9), which plays a pivotal role in innate immunity. Due to its intrinsic cytotoxic and proinflammatory properties, CLP controls cell differentiation, proliferation and NETosis and has been associated with a wide range of rheumatic diseases. Our review summarizes the widespread interest in circulating CLP (cCLP) as a biomarker of neutrophil-related inflammation, in autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARD) and non-ARD.

METHODS

A thorough literature review was performed using PubMed and EMBASE databases searching for circulating calprotectin and synonyms S100A8/A9, myeloid-related protein 8/14 (MRP8/MRP14), calgranulin A/B and L1 protein in addition to specific ARDs and autoimmune non-rheumatic diseases. We selected only English-language articles and excluded abstracts without the main text.

RESULTS

High cCLP serum levels are associated with worse structural outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis and to a lesser extent, in spondyloarthritis. In addition, cCLP can predict disease relapse in some autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-associated vasculitis (AAV) and some severe manifestations of connective tissue diseases, such as glomerulonephritis in SLE, AAV, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, adult-onset Still's disease and lung fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Therefore, cCLP levels enable the identification of patients who need an accurate and tight follow-up. The clinical usefulness of cCLP as an inflammatory marker has been suggested for inflammatory/autoimmune non-rheumatic diseases, and especially for the monitoring of the inflammatory bowel diseases patients. Currently, there are only a few studies that evaluated the cCLP efficacy as a clinical biomarker in inflammatory/autoimmune non-rheumatic diseases with controversial results. Future studies are warranted to better clarify the role of cCLP in relation to the disease severity in myasthenia gravis, multiple sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, Graves' orbitopathy, autoimmune bullous diseases and uveitis.

CONCLUSION

Our literature review supports a relevant role of cCLP as potential prognostic biomarker mirroring local or systemic inflammation, especially in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Pursuing neutrophils: systematic scoping review on blood-based biomarkers as predictors of treatment outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease

Background

Long-term management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is challenging and the identification of reliable predictors for treatment outcomes is an unmet need. Neutrophil-related biomarkers have been mainly studied in the feces, but blood analyses have inherent advantages.

Objective

To review the recent learnings on the ability of blood-based neutrophil-expressed biomarkers to predict treatment outcomes in IBD.

Design

Systematic scoping review.

Data sources and methods

We performed a literature search in Pubmed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until May 2022 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All human studies associating blood-based neutrophil-related compounds with the prediction of disease progression, complication onset, or treatment outcomes were included.

Results

From 1032 retrieved entries, 34 studies were selected, 32 published in 2013 or later. In all, 17 biomarkers from granules, cytoplasm, plasmatic membrane, and plasma were explored. In total, 1850 Crohn's disease (CD) and 1122 ulcerative colitis non-duplicated patients were included. The most mentioned biomarkers were nCD64, serum calprotectin (SC), oncostatin M (OSM), neutrophil elastase-generated calprotectin fragment (CPa9-HNE), and triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM1). Six biomarkers showed promising results: OSM, SC, eNAMPT, nCD64, TREM1, and CPa9-HNE. Variable positive signals were found for human neutrophil peptide 1-3, LL-37, S100A12, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin. No predictive ability was found for the remaining markers. Sharing a neutrophil compartment did not indicate similar behavior.

Conclusion

Advances in the last decade began to unveil the untapped potential of the readily accessible blood neutrophil-expressed biomarkers, especially nCD64, TREM1, and CPa9-HNE. Current evidence suggests that future research should focus on well-defined subpopulations instead of a one-size-fits-all biomarker.

Registration

https://osf.io/kes9a.

Is canine calprotectin in serum stabile after storage at low temperature?

BACKGROUND

In human and veterinary medicine calprotectin is most widely used in diagnosing different gastro-intestinal diseases. The aim of this study was to assess the stability of canine calprotectin (cCP) in serum after storage at low temperatures and imprecision of the method.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from dogs with different clinical diagnoses. Twenty-two dogs were included in this study. Calprotectin concentration was measured 4 hours after serum separation (T0), and after being frozen at - 80 °C for 8 (T1) and 16 weeks (T2). The maximum permissible difference (MPD) was derived from the equation for calculating total error (TE) TE = %Bias + (1.96 x %CV), where bias and coefficient of variation (CV) were defined by the manufacturer. The dogs enrolled in this study were patients admitted during the morning (9-12 a.m.), on the day the first measurement was performed. All sample analysis for determination of stability were done in duplicates. For determination of within-run precision, the two patients' serum samples were analyzed in 20 replicates. Imprecision was assessed by analyzing 20 replicates on one plate on two samples where high and low concentrations were anticipated.

RESULTS

The calculated value of MPD was 32.52%. Median calprotectin concentrations were higher at T1 114.08 μg/L (IQR = 55.05-254.56) and T2 133.6 μg/L (IQR = 100.57-332.98) than at T0 83.60 μg/L (IQR = 50.38-176.07). Relative and absolute bias at T1 (49.3%; 45.98 μg/L) and T2 (109.93%; 94.09 μg /L) have shown that calprotectin concentrations increase after long term storage at - 80 °C.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study indicate that c-CP was not stable for 16 weeks at low storage temperature (- 80 °C). Considering the observed change in the concentration of c-CP at T1, a storage time of 8 weeks should be safely applied. The method imprecision was not satisfactory, especially in the lower concentration range.

Linkage of calprotectin with inflammation, activity and treatment response of rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis

Aim: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the clinical value of calprotectin in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Methods: The data regarding blood calprotectin levels in RA patients were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases. Results: Thirty-one eligible articles were included. Calprotectin was increased in RA patients compared with healthy controls (mean difference [MD] = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.16-1.79). Calprotectin was positively associated with C-reactive protein (correlation coefficient [CC] = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.53-0.63) and disease activity score (CC = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.38-0.58) in RA patients. Interestingly, calprotectin showed an increased trend in RA responders compared with nonresponders, but without statistical significance (MD = 0.38, 95% CI: -0.09-0.85). Conclusion: Blood calprotectin relates to disease risk, inflammation and activity in RA patients.

Diagnostic performance of serum calprotectin in discriminating active from inactive ulcerative colitis in an outpatient setting

BACKGROUND

There are limited and conflicting data on the value of serum calprotectin (sCp) in discriminating active from inactive disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

Faecal calprotectin (fCp), sCp, serum C-reactive protein (sCRP) and platelets were compared in patients with UC who had clinically active (n=29) and clinically inactive (n=42) disease. sCp was measured with Bühlmann® (BMN sCp) and ImmunodiagnostikTM (IDK sCp) assays.

RESULTS

Median (interquartile range) fCp was higher in active than inactive disease [1004 (466 - 1922) vs 151 (55 - 280) µg/g; p < 0.0001). BMN sCp [4534 (3387 - 6416) vs 4031 (2401 - 5414) ng/mL; p = 0.1825], IDK sCp [4531 (2920 - 6433) vs 3307 (2104 - 4789) ng/mL; p = 0.1065], sCRP [ 4 (2 - 8) vs 2 (1 - 4) mg/L; p = 0.0638) and platelets [269 (233 - 331) vs 280 (227 - 325) x10-9/L; p = 0.8055] were similar in active and inactive disease respectively. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curves with 95% confidence limits were 0.85 (0.76 - 0.94) for fCp, 0.61 (0.47 - 0.74) for BMN sCp, 0.61 (0.48 - 0.75) for IDK sCp, 0.69 (0.56 - 0.81) for sCRP, and 0.52 (0.38 - 0.66) for blood platelets.

CONCLUSIONS

FCp is the optimum biomarker for discriminating between active and inactive UC. The diagnostic performance of sCp, irrespective of assay, and systemic biomarkers was poor; of these sCRP performed best.