Compilation of a database, specific for the pesticide active substance and their metabolites, comprising the main genotoxicity endpoints

MetSim: Integrated Programmatic Access and Pathway Management for Xenobiotic Metabolism Simulators

Xenobiotic metabolism is a key consideration in evaluating the hazards and risks posed by environmental chemicals. A number of software tools exist that are capable of simulating metabolites, but each reports its predictions in a different format and with varying levels of detail. This makes comparing the performance and coverage of the tools a practical challenge. To address this shortcoming, we developed a metabolic simulation framework called MetSim, which comprises three main components. A graph-based schema was developed to allow metabolism information to be harmonized. The schema was implemented in MongoDB to store and retrieve metabolic graphs for subsequent analysis. MetSim currently includes an application programming interface for four metabolic simulators: BioTransformer, the OECD Toolbox, EPA's chemical transformation simulator (CTS), and tissue metabolism simulator (TIMES). Lastly, MetSim provides functions to help evaluate simulator performance for specific data sets. In this study, a set of 112 drugs with 432 reported metabolites were compiled, and predictions were made using the 4 simulators. Fifty-nine of the 112 drugs were taken from the Small Molecule Pathway Database, with the remainder sourced from the literature. The human models within BioTransformer and CTS (Phase I only) and the rat models within TIMES and the OECD Toolbox (Phase I only) were used to make predictions for the chemicals in the data set. The recall and precision (recall, precision) ranked in order of highest recall for each individual tool were CTS (0.54, 0.017), BioTransformer (0.50, 0.008), Toolbox in vitro (0.40, 0.144), TIMES in vivo (0.40, 0.133), Toolbox in vivo (0.40, 0.118), and TIMES in vitro (0.39, 0.128). Combining all of the model predictions together increased the overall recall (0.73, 0.008). MetSim enabled insights into the performance and coverage of in silico metabolic simulators to be more efficiently derived, which in turn should aid future efforts to evaluate other data sets.

Evaluation of QSAR models for predicting mutagenicity: outcome of the Second Ames/QSAR international challenge project

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models are powerful in silico tools for predicting the mutagenicity of unstable compounds, impurities and metabolites that are difficult to examine using the Ames test. Ideally, Ames/QSAR models for regulatory use should demonstrate high sensitivity, low false-negative rate and wide coverage of chemical space. To promote superior model development, the Division of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Japan (DGM/NIHS), conducted the Second Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project (2020-2022) as a successor to the First Project (2014-2017), with 21 teams from 11 countries participating. The DGM/NIHS provided a curated training dataset of approximately 12,000 chemicals and a trial dataset of approximately 1,600 chemicals, and each participating team predicted the Ames mutagenicity of each trial chemical using various Ames/QSAR models. The DGM/NIHS then provided the Ames test results for trial chemicals to assist in model improvement. Although overall model performance on the Second Project was not superior to that on the First, models from the eight teams participating in both projects achieved higher sensitivity than models from teams participating in only the Second Project. Thus, these evaluations have facilitated the development of QSAR models.

Sub-structure-based category formation for the prioritisation of genotoxicity hazard assessment for pesticide residues (part 2): Triazoles

In dietary risk assessment, residues of pesticidal ingredients or their metabolites need to be evaluated for their genotoxic potential. The European Food Safety Authority recommend a tiered approach focussing assessment and testing on classes of similar chemicals. To characterise similarity and to identify structural alerts associated with genotoxic concern, a set of chemical sub-structures was derived for an example dataset of 66 triazole agrochemicals for which either Ames, chromosomal aberration or micronucleus test results are publicly available. This analysis resulted in a set of ten structural alerts that define the chemical space, in terms of the common parent and metabolic scaffolds, associated with the triazole chemical class. An analysis of the available profiling schemes for DNA and protein reactivity shows the importance of investigating the predictivity of such schemes within a well-defined area of structural space. Structural space alerts, covalent chemistry profiling and physico-chemistry properties were combined to develop chemical categories suitable for chemical prioritisation. The method is a robust and reproducible approach to such read-across predictions, with the potential to reduce unnecessary testing. The key challenge in the approach was identified as being the need for pesticide-class specific metabolism data as the basis for structural space alert development.

Toward regulatory acceptance and improving the prediction confidence of in silico approaches: a case study of genotoxicity

Introduction: Genotoxicity is an imperative component of the human health safety assessment of chemicals. Its secure forecast is of the utmost importance for all health prevention strategies and regulations.Areas covered: We surveyed several types of alternative, animal-free approaches ((quantitative) structure-activity relationship (Q)SAR, read-across, Adverse Outcome Pathway, Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment) for genotoxicity prediction within the needs of regulatory frameworks, putting special emphasis on data quality and uncertainties issues.Expert opinion: (Q)SAR models and read-across approaches for in vitro bacterial mutagenicity have sufficient reliability for use in prioritization processes, and as support in regulatory decisions in combination with other types of evidence. (Q)SARs and read-across methodologies for other genotoxicity endpoints need further improvements and should be applied with caution. It appears that there is still large room for improvement of genotoxicity prediction methods. Availability of well-curated high-quality databases, covering a broader chemical space, is one of the most important needs. Integration of in silico predictions with expert knowledge, weight-of-evidence-based assessment, and mechanistic understanding of genotoxicity pathways are other key points to be addressed for the generation of more accurate and trustable results.

Evaluation of non-commercial models for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity in the assessment of EFSA's databases

Over the past years, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) released to the public domain several databases, with the main objectives of collecting and storing hazard data on the substances considered in EFSA's risk assessment and secondly to serve as a basis for further development of in silico tools such as quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. In this work, we evaluated the ability of freely available QSAR models to estimate genotoxicity and carcinogenicity properties and their possible use for screening purposes on three different EFSA's databases. With an accuracy close to 90%, the results showed good capabilities of QSAR models to predict genotoxicity in terms of bacterial reverse mutation test, while statistics for in vivo micronucleus test are not satisfactory (accuracy in the predictions close to 50%). Interestingly, results on the carcinogenicity assessment showed an accuracy in prediction close to 70% for the best models. In addition, an example of the potential application of in silico models is presented in order to provide a preliminary screening of genotoxicity properties of botanicals intended for use as food supplements.

QSAR/QSPR models based on quantum chemistry for risk assessment of pesticides according to current European legislation

In Europe, agencies and official organizations involved in the pesticide control such as the EFSA, ECHA, JRC and ECETOC or even the OECD are pointing out that the software tools based on quantitative structure relationship models, i.e. QSAR and QSPR, have a huge potential to improve the pesticide risk assessment process. In this sense, these non-animal test methods can promote the competitiveness of agriculture in this region: the consumer safety is increased with them due to the possibility of perform an overall better risk assessment of the degradation products and metabolites from pesticides. However, the use of theses computational-based (in silico) tools must be much more systematised and harmonised, improving their validation and including case studies to test them. To open databases, incorporating critical data in an orderly manner for building the models, becomes also necessary. Moreover, quantum chemistry through the Density Functional Theory should be promoted as tool for calculation of quantum descriptors, especially for the study of similar compounds with the same carbon skeleton but differing substitution patterns, e.g. isomers.