Does laparoscopy still has a role in modern fertility practice?

Hysterolaparoscopy: A Gold Standard for Diagnosing and Treating Infertility and Benign Uterine Pathology

Background: Combined hysteroscopy and laparoscopy is a valuable method for diagnosing and treating infertility and benign uterine pathology. Both procedures are minimally invasive, reliable, and safe, with a low complication rate. Aim: In this review, we expose the efficiency and safety of hysterolaparoscopy in the management of infertility and other benign uterine pathologies. Method: We performed a systematic literature review on several databases: PubMed^®/MEDLINE, PMC, Crossref.org, and Web of Science in the last 10 years. Inclusion criteria: Women of reproductive age with primary or secondary infertility and/or benign uterine pathology. Exclusion criteria: pre-puberty, menopause, couple with male infertility. Conclusion: Hysterolaparoscopy is a useful tool to assess infertility and simultaneously diagnose and treat pelvic and uterine lesions.

Fertiloscopy in women with unexplained infertility: Long-term cumulative pregnancy rate

OBJECTIVE

Fertiloscopy is as safe as laparoscopy in literature, but we don't know its relevance in women with unexplained infertility (UI). Our objective was to assess the effects of fertiloscopy procedures on the outcomes of subsequent pregnancy occurrences in patients with UI.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center study of all patients followed up after fertiloscopy procedures between 2002 and 2007. The occurrence and outcome of pregnancies were studied in the five years following the procedure.

RESULTS

124 fertiloscopies were performed. Pelvic exploration was considered as sufficient in 83.8% of cases, of which no abnormalities were found in 78.2%. Laparoconversions occurred for 19 patients (16.5%). The pregnancy rate at five years was 76.9%. The mean delay for pregnancy occurrence was 10.7 months (±17).

CONCLUSION

The pregnancy rate in our study is similar to that after laparoscopy. Fertiloscopy, a less intrusive procedure, should be considered as a reliable option for the management of patients with UI.

Predictive value of a modified classification of fallopian tube status on prognosis of tubal factor infertility after laparoscopic surgery

Built on 2 existing classification systems, this study was to develop a new classification system to better predict the pregnancy prognosis after laparoscopic surgery in patients with tubal factor infertility and accordingly propose a management strategy.We followed up 423 patients suffering from tubal factor infertility who had undergone hysteroscopic-laparoscopic surgery for 2 years without in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET). Based on the operative reports, a new, modified classification of fallopian tube status (hereafter referred to as the modified classification) was developed with reference to the 2 existing classification systems (the r-AFS classification of pelvic adhesions and the scoring system of distal tubal obstruction). A score of 0 to 3 was assigned to each of the 4 factors (tubal wall consistency, hydrosalpinx, pelvic adhesions, and tubal patency) for each of the tubes with a total bilateral score of 0 to 24. The patients were classified for the abnormalities of the fallopian tubes into 3 groups: mild (<8), moderate (8-15) and severe (>15). By utilizing SPSS 20.0 Statistic Analysis Software, the data were analyzed with t test, Chi-Square test, ANOVA or ROC as appropriate.Each of the 4 factors of the modified classification was independently and closely associated with post-surgical prognosis (P < .05). There was a statistically significant difference in postoperative pregnancy prognosis among the 3 groups of patients (P < .05). Patients with a score of <8 (mild) had the highest intrauterine pregnancy rate, reaching 60.1%. In contrast, patients with a score of 8 to 15 (moderate) had a significant increase in ectopic pregnancy (21.5%), while patients with a score of >15 (severe) had a significantly increased infertility rate of 89.5%. When the pregnancy outcomes were divided into intrauterine pregnancy and other outcomes, the modified classification had the largest area under the ROC curve (0.569) (P < .05). With the optimum cutoff of 4.5, the sensitivity was 88.6%, specificity was 74.5% and accuracy was 63.1%.The modified classification of fallopian tube status is a simple and practical scoring system which can comprehensively and effectively evaluate the function of the fallopian tube and thus is more accurate than the other 2 systems in predicting the postoperative pregnancy outcomes.