Reliability of a Scoring System for Qualitative Evaluation of Lymphoscintigraphy of the Lower Extremities

LYMPHOSCORE (Lymphoscintigraphy Scoring Reliability) Reliability of a New Qualitative and Semiquantitative Lymphoscintigraphy Scoring System for Primary Lymphedema

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT

Primary lymphedema (PLE) is a rare chronic disorder. Extremity lymphoscintigraphy offers access for dynamic and functional information on peripheral lymphatics and lymph nodes. We aimed to assess intraobserver and interobserver reliability of a new lymphoscintigraphy quantitative and qualitative scoring system in a homogeneous population of adult patients followed for PLE of the lower limb(s).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a monocentric retrospective study. Clinical files of patients who underwent a lymphoscintigraphy were reviewed for inclusion. Lymphoscintigraphies were interpreted twice by 2 observers with a washout period. To assess intraobserver and interobserver reliability for both lower limbs, Cohen κ and Gwet's AC1 reliability coefficients were calculated with 95% confidence interval and P value of the zero-reliability comparison test. To interpret reliability coefficients, we used the orders of magnitude reported by Landis and Koch.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-four patients (288 limbs) with PLE were included. For intraobserver reliability, agreement range was 0.87-1 with an almost perfect agreement in all staging items of the score for both limbs with the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval ≥80%. Interobserver reliability was overall strong or almost perfect, ranging from 0.67 to 0.97.

CONCLUSIONS

This new scoring system demonstrated excellent intraobserver reliability and a very good interobserver reliability. Lymphoscintigraphy, when performed in a referral center and interpreted by trained nuclear medicine physicians, is a reliable means of investigation in patients with PLE of the lower limbs. This reproducibility advocates for further use of lymphoscintigraphy in multicentric cohorts of PLE patients.

Supermicrosurgical lymphovenous anastomosis

Lymphedema impairs patients' function and quality of life. Currently, supermicrosurgical lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) is regarded as a significant and effective treatment for lymphedema. This article aims to review recent literature on this procedure, serving as a reference for future research and surgical advancements. Evolving since the last century, LVA has emerged as a pivotal domain within modern microsurgery. It plays a crucial role in treating lymphatic disorders. Recent literature discusses clinical imaging, surgical techniques, postoperative care, and efficacy. Combining advanced tools, precise imaging, and surgical skills, LVA provides a safer and more effective treatment option for lymphedema patients, significantly enhancing their quality of life. This procedure also presents new challenges and opportunities in the realm of microsurgery.

Effectiveness of lymphaticovenular anastomosis for adult-onset primary lower limb lymphedema: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatments such as lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) are widely used in addition to conservative treatment of secondary lymphedema. However, their indications and effectiveness for primary lymphedema are unclear. This study aims to objectively demonstrate the effectiveness of LVA for adult-onset primary lymphedema from various perspectives.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined patients with primary lower limb lymphedema who underwent LVA between January 2018 and December 2021 and were 21 or older. Treatment effects were evaluated using lymphoscintigraphy, questionnaires, body mass index, extracellular fluid ratio, and lymphedema index preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The LVA was performed under general anesthesia.

RESULTS

We evaluated 11 patients (11 lower limbs). Out of seven patients with complete obstruction preoperatively, all presented partial obstruction according to the Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging classification with a significant decrease in the score. Significant improvements were observed in clinical symptoms ("hardness") and in quality of life ("appearance" and "ease of wearing compression garments") assessments. A significant change was observed in the extracellular water ratio but not in lower extremity lymphedema index (LELindex).

CONCLUSION

LVA was suggested as one of the potential treatment options for patients with adult-onset primary lymphedema in whom lymphatic flow was confirmed by lymphoscintigraphy. In addition to clinical symptoms and physical examination, the evaluation of adult-onset primary lymphedema should include the patient's quality of life.

Staging and clinical correlations of lymphoscintigraphy for unilateral gynecological cancer-related lymphedema

BACKGROUND

This study was to investigate the lymphoscintigraphy findings for the diagnosis and severity in unilateral gynecological cancer-related lymphedema (GCRL) and to correlate lymphoscintigraphy stages with the clinical findings.

METHODS

Patients with unilateral GCRL who underwent lymphoscintigraphy were staged using the presence of ileo-inguinal lymph nodes, distal-lymphatic ducts, and dermal backflow findings. Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging (TLS) was divided into three patterns and seven stages: normal drainage (L-0); partial obstruction (P-1, P-2, and P-3); and total obstruction (T4, T-5, and T-6). Correlations between clinical lymphedema severity and TLS were evaluated using analysis of variance and multivariable linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients with unilateral GCRL were divided as follows: 6 (4.3%) in normal drainage, 56 (39.7%) in partial-obstruction, and 79 (56%) in total obstruction. Cellulitis episodes, circumferential difference, and computed tomography (CT) volumetric difference were shown to be statistically different between TLS stages (P < .001 for all). Total obstruction stages were the most significant factors associated with the severity of circumferential difference (β = 19.72, 25.54, 32.42, respectively; P < .05) and CT volumetric difference (β = 36.04, 45.12, 52.78, respectively; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Total lymphatic obstruction was present in 56% of unilateral GCGL. Lymphoscintigraphy stages were statistically correlated with episodes of cellulitis, circumferential difference and CT volumetric difference in unilateral GCRL.

Validity of the Novel Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging and Correlation of Cheng Lymphedema Grading for Unilateral Extremity Lymphedema

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to validate the new Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging, correlate it with Cheng Lymphedema Grading (CLG) and evaluate the treatment outcomes of unilateral extremity lymphedema.

BACKGROUND

No consensus has been reached for diagnosis and staging for patients with lymphedema among medical specialties.

METHODS

We included 285 patients with unilateral extremity lymphedema using lymphoscintigraphy. Lymphoscintigraphy was correlated to clinical symptoms and signs, and classified into normal lymphatic drainage, partial obstruction, and total obstruction. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging, correlation between Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging and clinical findings were conducted. Patients were categorized in "surgical" (n = 154) or "nonsurgical" (n = 131) groups for outcome evaluation.

RESULTS

Lymphoscintigraphy found 11 patients (3.9%) with normal lymphatic drainage, 128 (44.9%) with partial obstruction, and 146 (51.2%) with total obstruction. Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging showed high interobserver agreement [intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.94)], and significantly correlated to computed tomography volumetric difference (r = 0.66, P < 0.001) and CLG [intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.72-0.84)]. At a mean follow-up of 31.2 ± 2.9 months, significant improvement in the circumferential difference (from 23.9% ± 17.6% to 14.6% ± 11.1%; P = 0.03) with a mean circumferential reduction rate of 40.4% ± 4.5% was found in surgical group. At a mean follow-up of 26.6 ± 8.7 months, the nonsurgical group had increase of mean circumferential difference from 24.0% ± 17.2% to 25.3% ± 19.0% (P = 0.09), with a mean circumferential reduction rate was -1.9% ± 13.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging is a reliable diagnostic tool, correlated with clinical findings and CLG, aiding in the selection of the appropriate treatment to achieve favorable long-term outcomes in unilateral extremity lymphedema.

Lymphoscintigraphy for the diagnosis of extremity lymphedema: Current controversies regarding protocol, interpretation, and clinical application

Appropriate diagnosis, staging and a further selection of the best treatment are fundamental for the management of patients with extremity lymphedema. Several clinical and imaging tools have been described for these purposes. Lymphoscintigraphy is still considered the gold standard imaging modality for diagnosing lymphedema. However, protocol variability and poor image resolution can make the interpretation challenging. Here, we reviewed technical aspects of lymphoscintigraphy, interpretation of the lymphoscintigraphy findings, staging, and its clinical application.

Lymphoscintigraphy for the evaluation of limb lymphatic flow disorders: Report of technical procedural standards from an Italian Nuclear Medicine expert panel

Lymphoscintigraphy represents the "gold standard" for diagnosis of lymphedema, but an important limitation is the lack of procedural standardization. The aim of this Italian expert panel was to provide a procedural standard for lymphoscintigraphy in the evaluation of lymphatic system disorders. Topic anaesthetic gels containing lidocaine should be avoided. Patients should remove compressive dressings. Total recommended activity for ^99mTc-nanocolloid administration in adults is 74MBq, or 37MBq per limb and per investigated compartment, in single or multiple aliquots. 2-3 subcutaneous injections should be performed (II-III±I interdigital space of each hand/foot), avoiding intravascular injection. Deep lymphatic system of lower limbs should be evaluated in presence of dermal back-flow or lymphatic stasis (1-2 subfascial administrations in retro-malleolar or plantar region). Planar images should be acquired from injection site to liver with whole-body or serial static acquisitions 20' and 90' after subcutaneous administration. Additional information on lymphatic pathways is obtained after a quick and/or prolonged exercise protocol. SPECT/CT is recommended to study the thoracic, abdominal and pelvic territories. When required, deep lymphatic system of lower limbs should be evaluated with static acquisition 90' after subfascial administration. The report should describe administration and imaging procedure, exercise protocol, qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis (wash-out rate, transport index), potential sources of error. Due to the essential role fulfilled by lymphoscintigraphy in clinical management of primary and secondary lymphedema, an effort for the standardization of this technique should be made to provide the clinicians with a homogeneous and reliable technical methodology.