18F-FDG PET/CT: Therapy Response Assessment Interpretation (Hopkins Criteria) and Survival Outcomes in Lung Cancer Patients

The Role of CT and MR Imaging in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of the Spine: From Patient Selection and Treatment Planning to Post-Treatment Monitoring

Spine metastases (SMs) are common, arising in 70% of the cases of the most prevalent malignancies in males (prostate cancer) and females (breast cancer). Stereotactic body radiotherapy, or SBRT, has been incorporated into clinical treatment algorithms over the past decade. SBRT has shown promising rates of local control for oligometastatic spinal lesions with low radiation dose to adjacent critical tissues, particularly the spinal cord. Imaging is critically important in SBRT planning, guidance, and response monitoring. This paper reviews the roles of imaging in spine SBRT, including conventional and advanced imaging approaches for SM detection, treatment planning, and post-SBRT follow-up.

PET/CT in treatment response assessment in lung cancer. When should it be recommended?

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer. Different treatment options are now possible both for surgical candidates and for those NSCLC patients deemed not suitable for surgery. Despite the treatments available, only a limited number of less advanced stages are potentially curable, with many patients suffering local recurrence or distant metastases. FDG-PET/CT is commonly used in many centers for post-treatment evaluation, follow-up, or surveillance; Nonetheless, there is no clear consensus regarding the indications in these cases. Based upon the results of a literature review and local expertise from a large lung cancer unit, we built clinical evidence-based recommendations for the use of FDG-PET/CT in response assessment. We found that in general this is not recommended earlier than 3 months from treatment; however, as described in detail the correct timing will also depend upon the type of treatment used. We also present a structured approach to assessing treatment changes when reporting FDG-PET/CT, using visual or quantitative approaches.

Evaluation of treatment response by Hopkins criteria on 18 F FDG PET-CT in patients of non-small cell lung cancer and its comparison with PERCIST response criteria

AIM

To assess treatment response on FDG PET-CT in NSCLC patients by visual Hopkins score compared to PERCIST criteria and its potential for prognostication (or its correlation with survival).

METHODS

Forty-four NSCLC patients with baseline and post-treatment FDG PET-CT scans were included, and interpreted using Hopkins and PERCIST criteria classifying patients into responders and non-responders. PERCIST-based CMR and PMR, and Hopkins Scores 1,2,3 were classified responders. PERCIST-based SD and PD and Hopkins scores 4,5 were classified as non-responders. Patients were followed upto 24 months after treatment completion. Cohen kappa for inter-criteria agreement and Kaplan Meir curve for overall survival (OS) analysis done.

RESULTS

Out of 44 patients, PERCIST classified 27 (61.3%) as responders and 17 (38.6%) as non-responders, whereas Hopkins classified 12 patients (27.3%) as responders and 32 (72.7%) as non-responders. Inter-criteria agreement was low (kappa=0.19) with discordance in 45.5% of patients. Eighteen of 20 discordant cases were non-responders on Hopkins and responders on PERCIST, of which 88.8% were non-responders on follow-up as predicted by Hopkins. PERCIST responders had OS of 96.4% and 64.3% at 9 and 24 months, respectively, while non-responders OS was 93.5% and 40.2% at 9 and 24 months, respectively ( P -value = 0.049). However, responders on Hopkins had OS of 100% at 24 months, whereas non-responders had OS of 93.5% and 51.5% at 9 and 24 months, respectively ( P -value = 0.232).

CONCLUSION

Semi-quantitative PERCIST and visual Hopkins criteria show low inter-criteria agreement, with visual criteria better-predicting survival in patients of NSCLC.

Imaging Follow-Up of Nonsurgical Therapies for Lung Cancer: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Lung cancer continues to be the most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. In the past decade, with the implementation of lung cancer screening programs and advances in surgical and nonsurgical therapies, the survival of patients with lung cancer has increased, as has the number of imaging studies that these patients undergo. However, most patients with lung cancer do not undergo surgical re-section, because they have comorbid disease or lung cancer in an advanced stage at diagnosis. Nonsurgical therapies have continued to evolve with a growing range of systemic and targeted therapies, and there has been an associated evolution in the imaging findings encountered at follow-up examinations after such therapies (e.g., with respect to posttreatment changes, treatment complications, and recurrent tumor). This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review describes the current status of nonsurgical therapies for lung cancer and their expected and unexpected imaging manifestations. The goal is to provide guidance to radiologists regarding imaging assessment after such therapies, focusing mainly on non-small cell lung cancer. Covered therapies include systemic therapy (conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy), radiotherapy, and thermal ablation.

PET/CT reading for relapse in non-small cell lung cancer after chemoradiotherapy in the PET-Plan trial cohort

BACKGROUND

Current studies indicate that fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography ([¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT) is the most accurate imaging modality for the detection of relapsed locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after curatively intended chemoradiotherapy. To this day, there is no objective and reproducible definition for the diagnosis of disease recurrence in PET/CT, the reading of which is relevantly influenced by post radiation inflammatory processes. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare visual and threshold-based semi-automated evaluation criteria for the assessment of suspected tumor recurrence in a well-defined study population investigated during the randomized clinical PET-Plan trial.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis comprises 114 PET/CT data sets of 82 patients from the PET-Plan multi-center study cohort who underwent [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT imaging at different timepoints for relapse, as suspected by CT. Scans were first analyzed visually by four blinded readers using a binary scoring system for each possible localization and the associated reader certainty of the evaluation. Visual evaluations were conducted repeatedly without and with additional knowledge of the initial staging PET and radiotherapy delineation volumes. In a second step, uptake was measured quantitatively using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), peak standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak), and a liver threshold-based quantitative assessment model. Resulting sensitivity and specificity for relapse detection were compared to the findings in the visual assessment. The gold standard of recurrence was independently defined by prospective study routine including external reviewers using CT, PET, biopsies and clinical course of the disease.

RESULTS

Overall interobserver agreement (IOA) of the visual assessment was moderate with a high difference between secure (ĸ = 0.66) and insecure (ĸ = 0.24) evaluations. Additional knowledge of the initial staging PET and radiotherapy delineation volumes improved the sensitivity (0.85 vs 0.92) but did not show significant impact on the specificity (0.86 vs 0.89). PET parameters SUVmax and SULpeak showed lower accuracy compared to the visual assessment, whereas threshold-based reading showed similar sensitivity (0.86) and higher specificity (0.97).

CONCLUSION

Visual assessment especially if associated with high reader certainty shows very high interobserver agreement and high accuracy that can be further increased by baseline PET/CT information. The implementation of a patient individual liver threshold value definition, similar to the threshold definition in PERCIST, offers a more standardized method matching the accuracy of experienced readers albeit not providing further improvement of accuracy.

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Interpretation Criteria for the Assessment of Therapeutic Response in Patients with Advanced Stage of Lung Cancer: Inter-Reader Reliability, Accuracy, and Survival Outcomes

Aim

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) is useful in the evaluation of lung cancer (LC), both for staging and therapy assessment. However, for the evaluation of treatment response, shared criteria are not available. We proposed a 3-point score, similar to Deauville-score and compared its diagnostic accuracy with Hopkins criteria for the evaluation of treatment response in LC to validate a qualitative and simpler interpretation system.

Methods

We retrospectively included 93 patients with advanced stage (III-IV) LC who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT after first-line treatment. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans were interpreted according to a 3-point scale-like Deauville score criteria (score 1 = uptake lower than blood-pool activity; score 2 = uptake higher than blood-pool but lower than liver activity; score 3 = uptake higher than liver). Inter-reader variability was assessed using percent agreement and kappa statistics. Kaplan-Meier plots with a Mantel-Cox log-rank test were performed, considering death as the endpoint.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of like Deauville-like score criteria were 82,76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70.5%-91.4%), 80% (95% CI 28.3%-99%), 97.9% (95% CI 89.2%-99.6%), 28.6%(95% CI 16.38%-44.9%), and 82.5% (95% CI 70.9-90.9%), respectively. Applying Hopkins criteria score we obtained sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 81% [95% CI 68.6%-90.1%), 100% (95% CI 47.2-100%), 100% (95% CI %), 31.3% (95% CI 21.0%-43%), and 82.5%(95% CI 70.9%-90.9%), respectively. There was a high agreement between the two readers both using Hopkins criteria (k = 0.912) and like-Deauville-score criteria (k = 0.956). Applying 3-point-scale criteria, patients with positive PET/CT after therapy had significantly shorter lower survival (P = 0.0021).

Conclusion

The application of 3-point scale criteria for posttherapy assessment in patients with advanced stage of LC represents an easy and reproducible method with optimal inter-observer agreement and great PPV and accuracy.

Artificial intelligence-based prediction of clinical outcome in immunotherapy and targeted therapy of lung cancer

Lung cancer accounts for the main proportion of malignancy-related deaths and most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy have great advances in application in clinics to treat lung cancer patients, yet the efficacy is unstable. The response rate of these therapies varies among patients. Some biomarkers have been proposed to predict the outcomes of immunotherapy and targeted therapy, including programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and oncogene mutations. Nevertheless, the detection tests are invasive, time-consuming, and have high demands on tumor tissue. The predictive performance of conventional biomarkers is also unsatisfactory. Therefore, novel biomarkers are needed to effectively predict the outcomes of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) can be a possible solution, as it has several advantages. AI can help identify features that are unable to be used by humans and perform repetitive tasks. By combining AI methods with radiomics, pathology, genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and clinical data, the integrated model has shown predictive value in immunotherapy and targeted therapy, which significantly improves the precision treatment of lung cancer patients. Herein, we reviewed the application of AI in predicting the outcomes of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in lung cancer patients, and discussed the challenges and future directions in this field.

Role of Consolidative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Oligoresistant/Oligoprogressive Pulmonary Parenchymal Metastases

Aim

To extend the survival of patients by providing local control of metastases in oligoresistance/oligoprogressive disease.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) applied to 30 lesions in the lungs of 19 patients who were considered inoperable by the tumor board upon the development of oligoresistance/oligoprogressive lung metastasis while undergoing chemotherapy between January 2016 and December 2017. Each patient had one to five metastases in their lungs. The median SBRT biologic effective dose at α/β of 10 (BED₁₀) was 180.0 (IQR: 115.5–180.0) Gy.

Results

We obtained effective, low-toxicity results. The rates of local control were 89.4%, 84.2%, and 78.9% for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years, respectively. The median local control time was 4 (IQR: 3–6) months. The median overall survival (OS) was 36.3 (IQR: 29.7–42.9) months. The rates of OS for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years were 89.5%, 73.7%, and 61.4%, respectively. Despite the nonoccurrence of grade 4–5 toxicity in the lungs, six (31.6%) patients had grade 1–3 pulmonary pneumonia, one patient had a grade 4 skin ulceration, and two patients had increased chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the follow-up period.

Discussion

In patients with oligometastatic lung tumors, SBRT is very effective in terms of progression-free survival and OS.

Joint EANM/SNMMI/ESTRO practice recommendations for the use of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT external beam radiation treatment planning in lung cancer V1.0

PURPOSE

2-[18F]FDG PET/CT is of utmost importance for radiation treatment (RT) planning and response monitoring in lung cancer patients, in both non-small and small cell lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC). This topic has been addressed in guidelines composed by experts within the field of radiation oncology. However, up to present, there is no procedural guideline on this subject, with involvement of the nuclear medicine societies.

METHODS

A literature review was performed, followed by a discussion between a multidisciplinary team of experts in the different fields involved in the RT planning of lung cancer, in order to guide clinical management. The project was led by experts of the two nuclear medicine societies (EANM and SNMMI) and radiation oncology (ESTRO).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

This guideline results from a joint and dynamic collaboration between the relevant disciplines for this topic. It provides a worldwide, state of the art, and multidisciplinary guide to 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT RT planning in NSCLC and SCLC. These practical recommendations describe applicable updates for existing clinical practices, highlight potential flaws, and provide solutions to overcome these as well. Finally, the recent developments considered for future application are also reviewed.

Visual Assessment of 18F-FDG Uptake on PET to Predict Survival Benefit to PD-1 Blockade in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockade is a standard treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Approximately 20% patients receiving PD-1 blockade monotherapy can survive for more than 5 years. However, there are limited data on the optimal biomarkers for predicting long-term outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of 18F-FDG uptake in patients with NSCLC responding to PD-1 blockade.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent 18F-FDG PET after confirmation of clinical response to PD-1 blockade monotherapy were retrospectively included in this study. Visual assessment using a 5-point scale score according to 18F-FDG uptake was performed, and the 18F-FDG uptake cutoff score for prolonged response to PD-1 blockade was defined as 3 (low score: 1, 2, or 3 and high score: 4 or 5).

RESULTS

A significantly greater number of patients with low scores had a performance status of 0 or 1 than patients with high scores. Among the 38 patients, 20 (53%) had a low score and 18 (47%) had a high score. Progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly longer in patients with low scores than in patients with high scores. Low 18F-FDG uptake was an independent prognostic factor for predicting favorable progression-free survival and overall survival, as confirmed by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumors with lower 18F-FDG uptake on PET than normal hepatic lesions exhibit the possibility of prolonged response to PD-1 blockade. Visual assessment on PET is easy for every clinician and is understandable to confirm aggressive tumor activity.

Impact of Follow-up 18F-FDG PET on the Management in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The incidence of lung cancer has increased steadily. We meta-analyzed to assess the impact of 18F-FDG PET on the management of lung cancer to detect recurrence/metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed systematic searches of Medline and Embase databases for English-language publications. All published studies regarding the impact of PET on the management of patients with lung cancer in detection of recurrence/metastasis were searched. The proportion of management change (%) defined as the percentage of patients who changed management after FDG PET to patients who had FDG PET was calculated. The data from each study were analyzed using MedCalc Statistical Software version 14.12.0 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium).

RESULTS

Eight studies including 523 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. The impact of 18F-FDG PET for the purpose of detecting recurrence/metastasis in patients with lung cancer was evaluated using management change rates, which were ranged from 28.6% to 79.2% with a pooled effect of 61.4% (95% confidence interval, 49.5%-72.7%; I2 = 85.7%). In a subgroup analysis, impact of 18F-FDG PET was evaluated in studies of patients with non-small cell lung cancer with indication of abnormal findings of conventional imaging, elevated tumor markers, and clinical symptoms with the pooled rate of management change of 62.2% (95% confidence interval, 44.2%-78.5%; I2 = 88.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

We have highlighted that 18F-FDG PET has a major impact on the management of patients with recurrent lung cancer. These findings suggest that 18F-FDG PET should be performed in patients with lung cancer, especially in cases involving equivocal or suspicious recurrence/metastasis on conventional imaging, elevated tumor markers, or clinical symptoms during follow-up.

[Effects of CT-based Attenuation Correction on PET Images Using Data-driven Respiratory Gating]

PURPOSE

We applied deviceless, positron emission tomography/computed tomography(PET/CT) data-driven respiratory gating (DDG) to validate the effects of misalignment between PET and CT at various respiratory phases.

METHODS

A lung lesion was simulated using an NEMA IEC body phantom in which the background comprised hot spheres containing polystyrene foam beads. We acquired PET images as the phantom moved downwards and then stopped. Attenuation on computed tomography images acquired at the inspiratory, stationary, and expiratory phases was corrected after the phantom stopped moving. Normalized mean square error (NMSE), recovery coefficients (RC_max and RC_mean) and volume were analyzed on DDG-PET images using CT-based attenuation correction.

RESULTS

The NMSE was closest to 0 in PET images corrected using the expiratory CT image. The RC_max was<1.0, and the RC_mean was closest to 1.0 only in PET images corrected using the expiratory CT image. Volume was either underestimated or overestimated more according to the size of the spheres when the alignment of CT and PET images was greater.

CONCLUSION

We recommend using the expiratory but not the inspiratory phase when using DDG for PET/CT correction.

A physics-guided modular deep-learning based automated framework for tumor segmentation in PET

An important need exists for reliable positron emission tomography (PET) tumor-segmentation methods for tasks such as PET-based radiation-therapy planning and reliable quantification of volumetric and radiomic features. To address this need, we propose an automated physics-guided deep-learning-based three-module framework to segment PET images on a per-slice basis. The framework is designed to help address the challenges of limited spatial resolution and lack of clinical training data with known ground-truth tumor boundaries in PET. The first module generates PET images containing highly realistic tumors with known ground-truth using a new stochastic and physics-based approach, addressing lack of training data. The second module trains a modified U-net using these images, helping it learn the tumor-segmentation task. The third module fine-tunes this network using a small-sized clinical dataset with radiologist-defined delineations as surrogate ground-truth, helping the framework learn features potentially missed in simulated tumors. The framework was evaluated in the context of segmenting primary tumors in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET images of patients with lung cancer. The framework's accuracy, generalizability to different scanners, sensitivity to partial volume effects (PVEs) and efficacy in reducing the number of training images were quantitatively evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and several other metrics. The framework yielded reliable performance in both simulated (DSC: 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86, 0.88)) and patient images (DSC: 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.76)), outperformed several widely used semi-automated approaches, accurately segmented relatively small tumors (smallest segmented cross-section was 1.83 cm2), generalized across five PET scanners (DSC: 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.76)), was relatively unaffected by PVEs, and required low training data (training with data from even 30 patients yielded DSC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.71)). In conclusion, the proposed automated physics-guided deep-learning-based PET-segmentation framework yielded reliable performance in delineating tumors in FDG-PET images of patients with lung cancer.

It's About Quality, Not Quantity: Qualitative FDG PET/CT Criteria for Therapy Response Assessment in Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE. FDG PET/CT has emerged as an effective tool for the timely accurate assessment of how tumors respond to therapy. To standardize interpretation and reporting, numerous response criteria have been developed. This article will review the evolution of these criteria along with their strengths and weaknesses. CONCLUSION. Several qualitative assessments applicable to common malignancies have been developed in recent years that solve many of the challenges faced by their quantitative predecessors. These are reviewed, and information is provided regarding individual treatment efficacy and prognosis.

18F-FDG PET/CT in Restaging and Evaluation of Response to Therapy in Lung Cancer: State of the Art

BACKGROUND

Metabolic information provided by 18F-FDG PET/CT are useful for initial staging, therapy planning, response evaluation, and to a lesser extent for the follow-up of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To date, there are no established clinical guidelines in treatment response and early detection of recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of 18F-FDG PET/CT in NSCLC and in particular, to discuss its utility in treatment response evaluation and restaging of lung cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was used based on PubMed results. From all studies published in English those that explored the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the treatment response scenario were selected.

RESULTS

Several studies have demonstrated that modifications in metabolic activity, expressed by changes in SUV both in the primary tumor as well as in regional lymph nodes, are associated with tumor response and survival. Beside SUV, other metabolic parameters (i.e. MTV, TLG, and percentage changes) are emerging to be helpful for predicting clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG parameters appear to be promising factors for evaluating treatment response and for detecting recurrences, although larger prospective trials are needed to confirm these evidences and to determine optimal cut-off values.

Revalidation of PET/computed tomography criteria (Hopkins criteria) for the assessment of therapeutic response in lung cancer patients: inter-reader reliability, accuracy and survival outcomes

BACKGROUND/AIM

Systematic reporting using qualitative evaluation of PET/computed tomography (CT) results has been demonstrated to be very accurate and reproducible in posttherapy assessment of lung cancer (so-called Hopkins criteria). Our aim was to test, in a different cohort of patients, the Hopkins criteria for assessment of therapeutic response in lung cancer and to compare the results with those obtained using a semi-quantitative evaluation of uptake.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. A total of 85 patients with known lung cancer who underwent fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT assessment within 24 weeks (mean 7.9 weeks) of completion of treatment were included. Treatments included surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy or combinations thereof. PET/CT interpretation was done by two nuclear medicine physicians, and discrepancies were resolved by a third interpreter. Studies were scored both according to the Hopkins criteria using qualitative assessment of tracer uptake for the primary tumour, locoregional disease in the mediastinum and distant metastatic sites and by applying the same five-point score using a semi-quantitative measure, maximum standardized uptake value. Overall scores of 1, 2 and 3 were considered negative for residual disease, while scores of 4 and 5 were considered positive. Patients were followed up for a median of 18.5 months (range 2-139 months). Kaplan-Meier plots with a Mantel-Cox log-rank test were performed, considering death as the endpoint. Inter-reader variability was assessed using percent agreement and kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The Cohen κ coefficient analysis showed substantial agreement between the two interpreters on the five-point Hopkins criteria scoring, with a κ of 0.73. There was almost perfect agreement between the interpreters with respect to classification as positive or negative according to the Hopkins criteria, with a κ of 0.89. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of the Hopkins criteria were 88.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 80.6-96.5%), 79.2% (95% CI 63.2-95.1%), 91.5% (95% CI 84.4-98.6%), 73.1% (95% CI 61.8-84.4%) and 85.9% (95% CI 78.5-93.3%), respectively. There was almost perfect agreement between the qualitative and semi-quantitative scoring with a κ of 0.87, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of the semi-quantitative Hopkin's criteria of 86.9% (95% CI 78.4-95.4%), 79.2% (95% CI 62.9-95.4%), 91.4% (95% CI 84.2-98.6%), 70.4% (95% CI 58.6-82.1%) and 84.7% (95% CI 80.8-92.4%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of Hopkins criteria for posttherapy assessment in patients with lung cancer represents an easy and reproducible method with substantial to almost perfect interobserver agreement and high positive predictive value and accuracy; moreover, it is easily understood by referring physicians. Additionally, there was no significant difference when applying a semi-quantitative measure to the same five-point score.

RESISTing the Need to Quantify: Putting Qualitative FDG-PET/CT Tumor Response Assessment Criteria into Daily Practice

Tumor response assessments are essential to evaluate cancer treatment efficacy and prognosticate survival in patients with cancer. Response criteria have evolved over multiple decades, including many imaging modalities and measurement schema. Advances in FDG-PET/CT have led to tumor response criteria that harness the power of metabolic imaging. Qualitative PET/CT assessment schema are easy to apply clinically, are reproducible, and yield good prognostic results. We present 3 such criteria, namely, the Lugano classification for lymphoma, the Hopkins criteria, and the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data Systems criteria for head and neck cancers. When comparing baseline PET/CTs with interim or end-of-treatment PET/CTs, radiologists can classify the tumor response as complete metabolic response, partial metabolic response, no metabolic response, or progressive disease, which has important implications in directing further cancer management and long-term patient prognosis. The purpose of this article is to review the progression of tumor response assessments from CT- and PET/CT-based quantitative and semi-quantitative systems to PET/CT-based qualitative systems; introduce the classification schema for these systems; and describe how to use these rapid, powerful, and qualitative PET/CT-based systems in daily practice through illustrative cases.

Prognostic value of dual-point fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging, partial volume correction and glucose transporter-1 expression in resected nonsmall cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between the prognosis and glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1) expression or fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake using partial volume correction and dual-point imaging in surgically resected nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

Our patient population consisted of 108 NSCLC cases. The early maximum standardized uptake value (ESUVmax), delayed SUVmax (DSUVmax), partial volume correction SUVmax (cSUVmax) and retention index of primary lesions were calculated. Cox proportional hazard model was applied to evaluate the effects of PET parameters and Glut-1 expression. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methods, and the difference in survival between subgroups was analyzed by log-rank test.

RESULTS

On the Cox regression analysis, ESUVmax, DSUVmax, cSUVmax and Glut-1 were significantly related to DFS [ESUVmax, hazard ratio = 2.301, 95% confidential interval (CI) = 1.146-4.618, P = 0.019; DSUVmax, hazard ratio = 2.483, 95% CI = 1.257-4.905, P = 0.009; cSUVmax, hazard ratio = 2.205, 95% CI = 1.038-4.686, P = 0.04; Glut-1, hazard ratio = 2.095, 95% CI = 1.086-4.041, P = 0.001] and OS (ESUVmax, hazard ratio = 3.197, 95% CI = 1.339-7.633, P = 0.009; DSUVmax, hazard ratio = 3.599, 95% CI = 1.521-8.516, P = 0.004; cSUVmax, hazard ratio = 8.655, 95% CI = 2.048-36.658, P = 0.003; Glut-1, hazard ratio = 2.427, 95% CI = 5.140, P = 0.021). Retention index had no significant association with DFS or OS. On the Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the patients with high ESUVmax, DSUVmax, cSUVmax and Glut-1 showed significantly worse prognosis than those with low values (ESUVmax: DFS, P = 0.001, OS, P = 0.003; DSUVmax: DFS, P = 0.002, OS, P = 0.004; cSUVmax: DFS, P < 0.001, OS, P = 0.013; Glut-1: DFS, P = 0.012, OS, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

cSUVmax, ESUVmax, DSUVmax and Glut-1 may be more useful biomarkers than retention index for predicting outcomes in NSCLC patients.

Lung Cancer Recurrence: 18F-FDG PET/CT in Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to summarize the clinical utility of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of lung cancer recurrence with an emphasis on typical anatomic and metabolic patterns of recurrence, expected posttherapeutic changes, and common pitfalls of FDG PET/CT. FDG PET/CT is useful in assessing therapeutic response and in determining the extent of recurrent disease and provides a guide for targeted biopsy.

CONCLUSION

FDG PET/CT plays a crucial role in the evaluation of therapeutic response in lung cancer and guides management.

Local control and vertebral compression fractures following stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases

•

SBRT provides a satisfying local control rate of 88% in patients with spMets.

•

Post-SBRT vertebral compression rate of 4% corresponds to the current literature.

•

>6 months of bisphosphonates use is associated with lower fracture-free survival.

Purpose

We aimed to retrospectively assess the incidence of vertebral compression fractures (VCF), examine clinicopathologic factors potentially associated with VCF, and evaluate treatment response in patients who received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine metastases (spMets).

Methods and Materials

We identified 78 patients with 125 spMets at baseline and subsequent assessments. Patients received SBRT doses of 16 or 18 Gy. Patients with pre-existing VCF and co-existing local progression were excluded. Spine instability neoplastic score (SINS) was used for spMets categorization. Response to SBRT and VCF were assessed according to the Positron Emission tomography Response Criteria In Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and Genant scores, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analyses were used to assess local control of disease and vertebral compression fracture-free survival (FFS).

Results

We treated 103 cases with single spMets and 11 cases involving double spMets with SBRT. Progressive disease was reported in 3.2% and 8.2% of the cases in the first and last PET/CT reports, respectively. The distribution of treatment response in the remaining patients was: complete response in 30.6% of patients, partial response in 47.1% of patients, and stable disease in 22.3% of patients in the first PET/CT; complete response in 62.3% of patients, partial response in 16.7% of patients, and stable disease in 21% of patients at the last monitoring. Local failures were observed in 15 (12%) of cases. Median SINS was 5 (range: 1−13); majority of patients in our cohort (70.4%) were categorized as stable according to SINS, five (4%) patients had Grade 3 VCF at a median time of 16 months after SBRT (range: 2−22 months), and 60% of VCF occurred after an interval of at least 12 months after SBRT. No bisphosphonate usage was significantly associated with VCF (r = −0.204; p = 0.022). Median FFS was 21 months. Univariate analyses indicated that female gender (p < 0.001), bisphosphonate use (p = 0.005), >6 months of bisphosphonates use (p = 0.002), and the lowest vertebral body collapse score (p = 0.023) were associated with higher FFS. Female gender (p = 0.007), >6 months of bisphosphonates usage (p = 0.018), and the lowest vertebral body collapse score (p = 0.044) retained independent significance.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that spine SBRT with doses of 16–18 Gy promises good local control of disease with acceptable VCF rates. Lowest vertebral body collapse score, female gender, and >6 months of bisphosphonate use were significantly associated with longer FFS.

Post-chemoradiotherapy FDG PET with qualitative interpretation criteria for outcome stratification in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Objectives

Post-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) FDG PET is a useful prognosticator of esophageal cancer. However, debate on the diverse criteria of previous publications preclude worldwide multicenter comparisons, and even a universal practice guide. We aimed to validate a simple qualitative interpretation criterion of post-CRT FDG PET for outcome stratification and compare it with other criteria.

Methods

The post-CRT FDG PET of 114 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were independently interpreted using a qualitative 4-point scale (Qual_4PS) that identified focal esophageal FDG uptake greater than liver uptake as residual tumor. Cohen’s κ coefficient (κ) was used to measure interobserver agreement of Qual_4PS. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used for survival analysis. Other criteria included a different qualitative approach (Qual_BK), maximal standardized uptake values (SUV_max3.4, SUV_max2.5), relative change of SUV_max between pre- and post-CRT FDG PET (ΔSUV_max), mean standardized uptake values (SUV_mean), metabolic volume (MV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG).

Results

Overall interobserver agreement on the Qual_4PS criterion was excellent (κ: 0.95). Except the Qual_BK, SUV_max2.5, and TLG, all the other criteria were significant predictors for overall survival (OS). Multivariable analysis showed only Qual_4PS (HR: 15.41; P = 0.005) and AJCC stage (HR: 2.47; P = 0.007) were significant independent variables. The 2-year OS rates of Qual_4PS(‒) patients undergoing CRT alone (68.4%) and patients undergoing trimodality therapy (62.5%) were not significant different, but the 2-year OS rates of Qual_4PS(+) patients undergoing CRT alone (10.0%) were significantly lower than in patients undergoing trimodality therapy (42.1%).

Conclusions

The Qual_4PS criterion is reproducible for assessing the response of ESCC to CRT, and valuable for predicting survival. It may add value to response-adapted treatment for ESCC patients, and help to decide whether surgery is warranted after CRT.

What 18F-FDG PET Response-Assessment Method Best Predicts Survival After Curative-Intent Chemoradiation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: EORTC, PERCIST, Peter Mac Criteria, or Deauville Criteria?

The optimal methodology for defining response with ¹⁸F-FDG PET after curative-intent chemoradiation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unknown. We compared survival outcomes according to the criteria of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), PERCIST 1.0, the Peter Mac metabolic visual criteria, and the Deauville criteria, respectively. Methods: Three prospective trials of chemoradiation for NSCLC, involving baseline and posttreatment ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging, were conducted between 2004 and 2016. Responses were categorized as complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response, stable metabolic disease, or progressive metabolic disease. Cox proportional-hazards models and log-rank tests assessed the impact of each response on overall survival (OS). Results: Eighty-seven patients underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT before and after radical chemoradiation for NSCLC. Follow-up ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed at a median of 89 d (interquartile range, 79-93 d) after radiotherapy. Median follow-up and OS after PET response imaging were 49 and 28 mo, respectively. Interobserver agreements for EORTC, PERCIST, Peter Mac, and Deauville had κ values of 0.76, 0.76, 0.87, and 0.84, respectively. All 4 response criteria were significantly associated with OS. Peter Mac and Deauville showed better fit than EORTC and PERCIST and distinguished better between CMR and non-CMR. Conclusion: All 4 response criteria were highly predictive of OS, but visual criteria showed greater interobserver agreement and stronger discrimination between CMR and non-CMR, highlighting the importance of visual assessment to recognize radiation pneumonitis, changes in lung configuration, and patterns of response.

Measurement uncertainty of lesion and reference mediastinum standardized uptake value in lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess standardized uptake value (SUV) measurement uncertainty (MU) of lung cancer lesions with uptake greater than mediastinum but less than or equal to the liver and that of the mediastinum blood pool, and to compare lesion SUV with mediastinum SUV by assessing MU of their ratio.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Dynamic PET data involving 10 frames were retrospectively analyzed in 10 patients, yielding maximal SUV of 25 lesions (Lesion-SUVmax), 10 mediastinum SUV, either maximal or mean (Med-SUVmax, Med-SUVmean), 25 Rmax ratios (=Lesion-SUVmax/Med-SUVmax), and 25 Rmean ratios (=Lesion-SUVmax/Med-SUVmean). A mean coefficient of variation was calculated for each parameter, leading to relative measurement uncertainty (MUr), respectively.

RESULTS

MU of Rmax was found to involve both Lesion-SUVmax and Med-SUVmax MU: MUr=33.3-23.3-21.9%, respectively (95% confidence level). No significant difference in MUr was found between Med-SUVmax and Med-SUVmean and between Rmax and Rmean.

CONCLUSION

Comparison between target lesion SUV and reference mediastinum SUV must take into account SUV MU of both. Therefore, no MU reduction can be expected from using the lesion/mediastinum SUVmax ratio instead of Lesion-SUVmax. Moreover, no MU reduction can be expected from using the mean mediastinum SUV instead of the maximal one.

MicroRNA-125a-5p plays a role as a tumor suppressor in lung carcinoma cells by directly targeting STAT3

Increasing evidence supports that the dysregulation of microRNA expression plays an important role in the process of tumor occurrence and development. Studies have found that mir-125a-5p expression was downregulated in a variety of tumors, but the effects and mechanism of mir-125a-5p in lung cancer are still unclear. The aim of this study is to detect the expression of mir-125a-5p in lung cancer tissues and lung cancer cell lines and to explore the effects of mir-125a-5p on the biological characteristics of lung cancer cells; thus, this study aims to provide new methods and new strategies for the treatment of lung cancer. The result from quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction showed that the expression of miR-125a-5p was significantly lower in lung cancer tissues and lung cancer cell lines (95-D, A549, HCC827, and NCI-H1299) than that in normal tissue adjacent to lung cancer or normal human bronchial epithelial cells. In order to explore the function and mechanism of mir-125a-5p in lung cancer cells, miR-125a-5p mimic or mir-125a-5p inhibitor was transfected into A549 cells. Mir-125a-5p displayed an obvious upregulation in A549 cells transfected with miR-125a-5p and an obvious downregulation in A549 cells transfected with mir-125a-5p inhibitor compared to that in A549 cells transfected with control miRNA. 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide, BrdU staining, flow cytometry, and Transwell assay showed that the upregulation of miR-125a-5p could significantly decrease the cell viability, proliferation, and invasion of lung cancer cells and increase apoptosis of lung cancer cells. The downregulation of miR-125a-5p provided very contrasting results. Computational algorithms predicted that the STAT3 is a target of miR-125a-5p. Here, we validated that miR-125a-5p could directly bind to the 3'-untranslated region of STAT3, and miR-125a-5p overexpression could significantly inhibit the protein expression of STAT3. These results suggested that mir-125a-5p can regulate the expression of STAT3 in lung cancer cells. To further verify whether mir-125a-5p can play a biological role through regulating STAT3, 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide, flow cytometry, and Transwell analysis demonstrated that overexpression of STAT3 can reverse the cells' biological effects induced by mir-125a-5p overexpression. Mir-125a-5p downregulated in lung cancer tissue and cell lines can negatively regulate STAT3 protein expression. Taken together, mir-125a-5p inhibited the proliferation and invasion of lung cancer cells and facilitated lung cancer cell apoptosis through suppressing STAT3. Enhancing the expression of miR-125a-5p is expected to benefit the therapy for the patients with lung cancer.

The Value of FDG PET/CT in Treatment Response Assessment, Follow-Up, and Surveillance of Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to summarize the evidence regarding the role of FDG PET/CT in treatment response assessment and surveillance of lung cancer and to provide suggested best practices.

CONCLUSION

FDG PET/CT is a valuable imaging tool for assessing treatment response for patients with lung cancer, though evidence for its comparative effectiveness with chest CT is still evolving. FDG PET/CT is most useful when there is clinical suspicion or other evidence for disease recurrence or metastases. The sequencing, cost analysis, and comparative effectiveness of FDG PET/CT and conventional imaging modalities in the follow-up setting need to be investigated.

Post-treatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparative effectiveness study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of same-day therapy-assessment PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) and conventional contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

METHODS

A total of 110 (95 men and 15 women; mean age 59 years) patients with biopsy-proven OPSCC were evaluated with same-day PET/CT and CECT pair scans as part of follow-up therapy assessment. Scans were performed within 6 months after the completion of primary treatment (median time: 3.1 months; range: 0.5-6 months). PET/CT and CECT scans were reviewed retrospectively for residual primary site disease, and right and left cervical lymph node involvement. Histopathology or 6 month clinical/imaging follow-up were used as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for the primary site and cervical nodal disease.

RESULTS

Of 110 OPSCC patients, 90.9% were human papilloma virus positive, 80.8% were stage 4, and 76.4% received chemoradiation as the primary treatment. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of PET/CT and CECT were similar in the evaluation of the primary cancer site (PET/CT: 75.0, 91.5, 25.0, 99.0, and 90.9, respectively, versus CECT: 75.0, 90.6, 23.1, 99.0, and 90.0, respectively). In evaluating cervical lymph node involvement, PET/CT appeared to have higher accuracy (96.8 vs. 81.7%), specificity (97.7 vs. 81.7%), and PPV (45.8 vs. 16.5%), comparable NPV (99.4% for both), and lower sensitivity (65 vs. 75%) compared with same-day CECT.

CONCLUSION

Same-day PET/CT and CECT scans had comparable accuracy in the evaluation of primary tumor sites after completion of therapy in patients with OPSCC. PET/CT showed higher accuracy in the evaluation of cervical lymph node involvement.

Clinical Indications and Impact on Management: Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans in Oncology Patients

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services coverage includes 3 posttherapy ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans per patient and per tumor type. Any additional follow-up ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans will be reimbursed at the discretion of a local Medicare administrator, if deemed medically necessary. This study aimed to investigate common clinical indications for performing a fourth or additional follow-up ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans that could affect the management of patients. Methods: This was a retrospective institutional review of 433 oncology patients (203 men; mean age, 55 y), including a total of 1,659 fourth or subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans after completion of primary treatment. Twelve indications for performing a fourth or subsequent follow-up PET/CT scan were determined, and the impact of each of the 12 indications on patients' management was evaluated. Results: The primary tumors were breast cancer (92 patients, 426 scans), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (77 patients, 208 scans), Hodgkin disease (41 patients, 182 scans), colorectal cancer (70 patients, 286 scans), melanoma (69 patients, 271 scans), and lung cancer (84 patients, 286 scans). The indications were categorized in 4 groups: PET/CT for diagnosis of tumor recurrence (303/1,659, 18.3%), PET/CT before starting therapy for tumor recurrence (64/1,659, 3.9%), PET/CT to assess therapy response for tumor recurrence (507/1,659, 30.6%), and follow-up PET/CT after completion of treatment for tumor recurrence (785/1,659, 47.3%). Overall, fourth and subsequent follow-up ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans resulted in change in management in 31.6% of the scans (356 of 1,128) when the scans were obtained for medical necessities (indications 1-11), and in 5.6% of the scans (30/531) when the scans were obtained without any medical necessity (indication 12). Conclusion: The fourth and subsequent PET/CT scans obtained after completion of primary treatment led to a change in management in 31.6% of the scans when acquired for appropriate clinical reasons. Performing follow-up PET/CT without appropriate medical reason had a low impact on patients' management and should be avoided.

Efficacy of qualitative response assessment interpretation criteria at 18F-FDG PET-CT for predicting outcome in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy

Objectives

To evaluate the utility of a standardized qualitative scoring system for treatment response assessment at 18F-FDG PET-CT in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma and correlate this with subsequent patient outcome.

Methods

Ninety-six consecutive patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with radical chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in a single centre between 2011 and 2014 underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT approximately 3 months post-treatment. Tumour metabolic response was assessed qualitatively using a 5-point scale ranging from background level activity only through to progressive metabolic disease. Clinical and radiological (MRI pelvis) follow-up was performed in all patients. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method (Mantel-Cox log-rank) and correlated with qualitative score using Chi-squared test.

Results

Forty patients (41.7 %) demonstrated complete metabolic response (CMR) on post-treatment PET-CT (Score 1/2) with 38 patients (95.0 %) remaining disease free after a minimum follow-up period of 18 months. Twenty-four patients (25.0 %) had indeterminate residual uptake (ID, Score 3) at primary or nodal sites after treatment, of these eight patients (33.3 %) relapsed on follow-up, including all patients with residual nodal uptake (n = 4Eleven11 of 17 patients (64.7 %) with significant residual uptake (partial metabolic response, PMR, Score 4) subsequently relapsed. In 15 patients (15.6 %) PET-CT demonstrated progressive disease (PD, Score 5) following treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a highly statistically significant difference in PFS and OS between patients with CMR, indeterminate uptake, PMR and PD (Log-rank, P < 0.0001). Chi-squared test demonstrated a highly statistically significant association between increasing qualitative score and risk of recurrence or death (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Use of a 5-point qualitative scoring system to assess metabolic response to CRT in locally advanced cervical carcinoma predicts survival outcome and this prognostic information may help guide further patient management.

Molecular Imaging and Precision Medicine: PET/Computed Tomography and Therapy Response Assessment in Oncology

A variety of methods have been developed to assess tumor response to therapy. Standardized qualitative criteria based on 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography have been proposed to evaluate the treatment effectiveness in specific cancers and these allow more accurate therapy response assessment and survival prognostication. Multiple studies have addressed the utility of the volumetric PET biomarkers as prognostic indicators but there is no consensus about the preferred segmentation methodology for these metrics. Heterogeneous intratumoral uptake was proposed as a novel PET metric for therapy response assessment. PET imaging techniques will be used to study the biological behavior of cancers during therapy.

Precision Medicine and PET/Computed Tomography: Challenges and Implementation

Precision Medicine is about selecting the right therapy for the right patient, at the right time, specific to the molecular targets expressed by disease or tumors, in the context of patient's environment and lifestyle. Some of the challenges for delivery of precision medicine in oncology include biomarkers for patient selection for enrichment-precision diagnostics, mapping out tumor heterogeneity that contributes to therapy failures, and early therapy assessment to identify resistance to therapies. PET/computed tomography offers solutions in these important areas of challenges and facilitates implementation of precision medicine.