Modern Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Should Include Robust Biodistribution Reporting

Dosimetry of [18F]TRACK, the first PET tracer for imaging of TrkB/C receptors in humans

BACKGROUND

Reduced expression or impaired signalling of tropomyosin receptor kinases (Trk receptors) are found in a vast spectrum of CNS disorders. [18F]TRACK is the first PET radioligand for TrkB/C with proven in vivo brain penetration and on-target specific signal. Here we report dosimetry data for [18F]TRACK in healthy humans. 6 healthy participants (age 22-61 y, 3 female) were scanned on a General Electric Discovery PET/CT 690 scanner. [18F]TRACK was synthesized with high molar activities (Am = 250 ± 75 GBq/µmol), and a dynamic series of 12 whole-body scans were acquired after injection of 129 to 147 MBq of the tracer. Images were reconstructed with standard corrections using the manufacturer's OSEM algorithm. Tracer concentration time-activity curves (TACs) were obtained using CT-derived volumes-of-interest. Organ-specific doses and the total effective dose were estimated using the Committee on Medical Internal Radiation Dose equation for adults and tabulated Source tissue values (S values).

RESULTS

Average organ absorbed dose was highest for liver and gall bladder with 6.1E-2 (± 1.06E-2) mGy/MBq and 4.6 (± 1.18E-2) mGy/MBq, respectively. Total detriment weighted effective dose EDW was 1.63E-2 ± 1.68E-3 mSv/MBq. Organ-specific TACs indicated predominantly hepatic tracer elimination.

CONCLUSION

Total and organ-specific effective doses for [18F]TRACK are low and the dosimetry profile is similar to other 18F-labelled radio tracers currently used in clinical settings.

Personalized dosimetry of177Lu-DOTATATE: a comparison of organ- and voxel-level approaches using open-access images

¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera^®) enables targeted radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors expressing somatostatin receptor type 2. Though patient-specific dosimetry estimates may be clinically important for predicting absorbed dose-effect relationships, there are multiple relevant dosimetry paradigms which are distinct in terms of clinical effort, numerical output and added-value. This work compares three different approaches for¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE dosimetry, including 1) an organ-level approach based on reference phantom MIRD S-values scaled to patient-specific organ masses (MIRDcalc), 2) an organ-level approach based on Monte Carlo simulation in a patient-specific mesh phantoms (PARaDIM), and 3) a 3D approach based on Monte Carlo simulation in patient-specific voxel phantoms.Method. Serial quantitative SPECT/CT images for two patients receiving¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE therapy were obtained from archive in theDeep Bluedatabase. For each patient, the serial CT images were co-registered to the first time point CT using a deformable registration technique aided by virtual landmarks placed in the kidney pelves and the lesion foci. The co-registered SPECT images were integrated voxel-wise to generate time-integrated activity maps. Lesions, kidneys, liver, spleen, lungs, compact bone, spongiosa, and rest of body were segmented at the first imaging time point and overlaid on co-registered integrated activity maps. The resultant segmentation was used for three purposes: 1) to generate patient-specific phantoms, 2) to determine organ-level time-integrated activities, and 3) to generate dose volume histograms from 3D voxel-based calculations.Results. Mean absorbed doses were computed for lesions and 48 tissues with MIRDcalc software. Mean organ absorbed doses and dose volume histograms were obtained for lesions and 6 tissues with the voxel Monte Carlo approach. Lesion- and organ-level absorbed dose estimates agreed within ±26% for the lesions and ±13% for the critical organs, among the different methods tested. Overall good agreement was observed with the dosimetry estimates from the NETTER-1 trial.Conclusions. For personalized¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE dosimetry, a combined approach was determined to be valuable, which utilized two dose calculation methods supported by a single image processing workflow. In the absence of quantitative imaging limitations, the voxel Monte Carlo method likely provides valuable information to guide treatment by considering absorbed dose non-uniformity in lesions and organs at risk. The patient-scaled reference phantom method also provides valuable information, including absorbed dose estimates for non-segmented organs, and more accurate dose estimates for complex radiosensitive organs including the active marrow.

Auger electrons for cancer therapy - a review

Background

Auger electrons (AEs) are very low energy electrons that are emitted by radionuclides that decay by electron capture (e.g. ¹¹¹In, ⁶⁷Ga, ^99mTc, ^195mPt, ¹²⁵I and ¹²³I). This energy is deposited over nanometre-micrometre distances, resulting in high linear energy transfer (LET) that is potent for causing lethal damage in cancer cells. Thus, AE-emitting radiotherapeutic agents have great potential for treatment of cancer. In this review, we describe the radiobiological properties of AEs, their radiation dosimetry, radiolabelling methods, and preclinical and clinical studies that have been performed to investigate AEs for cancer treatment.

Results

AEs are most lethal to cancer cells when emitted near the cell nucleus and especially when incorporated into DNA (e.g. ¹²⁵I-IUdR). AEs cause DNA damage both directly and indirectly via water radiolysis. AEs can also kill targeted cancer cells by damaging the cell membrane, and kill non-targeted cells through a cross-dose or bystander effect. The radiation dosimetry of AEs considers both organ doses and cellular doses. The Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) schema may be applied. Radiolabelling methods for complexing AE-emitters to biomolecules (antibodies and peptides) and nanoparticles include radioiodination (¹²⁵I and ¹²³I) or radiometal chelation (¹¹¹In, ⁶⁷Ga, ^99mTc). Cancer cells exposed in vitro to AE-emitting radiotherapeutic agents exhibit decreased clonogenic survival correlated at least in part with unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) detected by immunofluorescence for γH2AX, and chromosomal aberrations. Preclinical studies of AE-emitting radiotherapeutic agents have shown strong tumour growth inhibition in vivo in tumour xenograft mouse models. Minimal normal tissue toxicity was found due to the restricted toxicity of AEs mostly on tumour cells targeted by the radiotherapeutic agents. Clinical studies of AEs for cancer treatment have been limited but some encouraging results were obtained in early studies using ¹¹¹In-DTPA-octreotide and ¹²⁵I-IUdR, in which tumour remissions were achieved in several patients at administered amounts that caused low normal tissue toxicity, as well as promising improvements in the survival of glioblastoma patients with ¹²⁵I-mAb 425, with minimal normal tissue toxicity.

Conclusions

Proof-of-principle for AE radiotherapy of cancer has been shown preclinically, and clinically in a limited number of studies. The recent introduction of many biologically-targeted therapies for cancer creates new opportunities to design novel AE-emitting agents for cancer treatment. Pierre Auger did not conceive of the application of AEs for targeted cancer treatment, but this is a tremendously exciting future that we and many other scientists in this field envision.