Experience with Esophagogastrointestinal Transit Scintigraphy in the Initial 229 Patients: Multiple Regions of Dysmotility Are Common

Additional criteria on scintigraphic testing for diagnosis of rapid colonic transit in patients with chronic diarrhea

BACKGROUND

Colonic transit (CT) measured by validated scintigraphy using 111In-labeled activated charcoal particles is summarized using geometric center (GC) of isotopic distribution in four colonic regions and stool at 24 and 48 h. Diagnosis of rapid CT is currently based on GC24 ≥4.4 in females and >4.7 in males, which lack sensitivity. Our aim was to evaluate, in patients with chronic diarrhea with normal CT by GC24 and GC48, the diagnostic utility of CT change (∆GC) relative to sex-matched normal values.

METHODS

We evaluated two adult patient cohorts: 701 clinical patients (1994-2023) with chronic diarrhea and 76 research participants with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (N = 63) or bile acid diarrhea (BAD, N = 13). Results of ∆GC were compared to 220 healthy controls' 95th percentiles (%ile) (≥2.0 females and ≥2.2 males). In the research cohort, we also analyzed (Spearman correlation) colonic ∆GC with ascending colon emptying T1/2 (AC T1/2), average stool frequency and consistency based on a daily diary, total fecal bile acid (BA) concentration, and % primary BA in a single stool sample.

KEY RESULTS

Among 701 clinical patients with normal GC24, 160 (22.3%) had rapid CT based on ∆GC 95th %ile in health. Among 76 research participants, an additional 20.6% IBS-D and 23% BAD had rapid CT ∆GC. Younger age and absence of diabetes mellitus were predictive of rapid ∆GC. ∆GC significantly correlated with AC T1/2 and with fecal BA.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

∆GC identified an additional 21%-23% patients with rapid colonic transit among patients with diarrhea and normal GC24.

Whole Gut Transit Scintigraphy for the Assessment of Patients with Symptoms of Chronic Constipation

INTRODUCTION

Whole gut transit scintigraphy (WGTS) can detect delayed colonic transit (CT), different types of CT delays, and assess upper GI tract transit.

AIM

To delineate the frequency of different types of CT patterns in patients with chronic constipation (CC), determine the relationship between these CT patterns and upper GI tract transit abnormalities, and assess how symptoms relate to different colonic transit patterns.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients who had WGTS for CC. Patients completed a modified PAGI-SYM questionnaire to assess symptoms. Patients ingested a standard solid (Tc-99m egg sandwich)-liquid (In-111 water) meal to assess solid meal gastric emptying (GE), liquid GE, small bowel transit (SBT), and geometric center of colonic activity at 24, 48, and 72h.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty six patients underwent WGTS. Main symptoms were constipation (41%), nausea (24%), and bloating (22%). CT assessment showed 32% of patients had normal transit, 31% colonic inertia (CI), 28% functional rectosigmoid obstruction (FRS0), and 9% generalized slow colonic transit (GSCT). GE was delayed in 36%; more commonly in CI and FRSO. SBT was delayed in 19%; more commonly in GSCT and CI. Patients with CI had less bowel movements per week whereas patients with normal CT had more bm/week.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of patients with symptomatic constipation, WGTS assessment showed delayed colonic transit in 68% of patients, with 31% having colonic inertia, 28% a functional rectosigmoid obstruction pattern, and 9% generalized delay in colonic transit. Abnormalities in GE and SBT were present in 36 and 19%. WGTS is helpful to document delayed colonic transit (CT), assess the pattern of the delay in CT, and determine if there are upper GI transit abnormalities.

Randomized, crossover trial: comparing the effects of standardized egg-white meal and Vital® on global gastric emptying parameters and intragastric meal distribution in healthy Asian participants

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Measurements of gastric emptying and accommodation for alternative test-meal protocol during gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), such as high-calorie nutrient drinks, are not fully established. We aimed to compare the effects of standardized egg-white meal (EWM) versus high-calorie nutrient drink (Vital®; Abbott Laboratories) on global GES parameters and intragastric meal distribution at immediate scan (IMD0h).

METHODS

Of 84 screened participants, 60 asymptomatic healthy Asian population (38 females; 24.0 ± 1.5 years; 23.8 ± 2.6 kg/m2) were recruited in this 2 × 2 (AB/BA) crossover trial. Participants were randomized to a 4-h GES with 99mTc-radiolabeled EWM (~255.8 kcal), followed by a 200 mL Vital® (300 kcal), or vice versa, separated by a 2-week washout period. Global meal retention (GMR), power-exponential model emptying parameters (half-emptying [T1/2], lag phases [Tlag2%, Tlag5%, Tlag10%]), and IMD0h were determined and compared.

RESULTS

GMRs for both test meals were within the international standard references for solid GES. Compared to EWM, Vital® exhibited significantly lower GMRs (faster emptying) from 0.5 to 3 h (all P < 0.001) but comparable at 4 h (P = 0.153). Similar observations were found for the model-based T1/2 and the different Tlag thresholds (all P < 0.001). Furthermore, IMD0h was found to be lower with Vital®, indicating lower gastric accommodation (faster antral filling) immediately post-ingestion (P < 0.001). Both test meals showed significant moderate-to-strong positive associations at the late-phase GE (GMR 2-4 h, T1/2) (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, Vital® is an acceptable alternative test meal to the EWM for GES; however, exercise caution when interpreting early-phase GE. The normative values for global GES parameters and IMD0h are also established.

Systemic sclerosis gastrointestinal dysmotility: risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management

Nearly all patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) are negatively affected by dysfunction in the gastrointestinal tract, and the severity of gastrointestinal disease in SSc correlates with high mortality. The clinical complications of this dysfunction are heterogeneous and include gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, gastroparesis, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, intestinal pseudo-obstruction, malabsorption and the requirement for total parenteral nutrition. The abnormal gastrointestinal physiology that promotes the clinical manifestations of SSc gastrointestinal disease throughout the gastrointestinal tract are diverse and present a range of therapeutic targets. Furthermore, the armamentarium of medications and non-pharmacological interventions that can benefit affected patients has substantially expanded in the past 10 years, and research is increasingly focused in this area. Here, we review the details of the gastrointestinal complications in SSc, tie physiological abnormalities to clinical manifestations, detail the roles of standard and novel therapies and lay a foundation for future investigative work.

Gastroparesis in systemic sclerosis: a detailed analysis using whole-gut scintigraphy

OBJECTIVES

Gastroparesis is a common complication of SSc. We sought to determine the degree of overlap between gastroparesis and dysmotility in other areas of the gut, correlate our findings with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, and examine associations between gastroparesis and SSc features.

METHODS

Whole-gut scintigraphy was performed on SSc patients who were enrolled in the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Cohort, for whom detailed longitudinal clinical and serologic data are collected. A subset of patients completed the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument 2.0 (UCLA GIT 2.0) to quantify their GI symptoms. We examined associations between the presence and severity of gastroparesis, GI symptoms, and SSc clinical features.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven SSc patients with and without GI symptoms underwent whole-gut scintigraphy and completed the gastric emptying study. Of the 97, 34 (35%) met criteria for gastroparesis. Of the measures assessed, delayed liquid emptying captured more patients with delayed gastric transit than delayed solid emptying (74% vs 55%), and percentage liquid emptying correlated best with GIT Reflux (ρ = -0.33, P = 0.01) and Distension (ρ = -0.30, P = 0.03) scores. Of 33 patients with gastroparesis, 30 (91%) had abnormal transit in other areas of the GI tract. Higher anti-centromere protein B (CENP-B) titres correlated with slower gastric emptying (ρ = -0.26, P = 0.03), but no specific clinical features of SSc were associated with gastroparesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric emptying of liquids when given alongside solids may be more sensitive and provide a more clinically relevant measure of gastroparesis in SSc than solid gastric emptying or liquid gastric emptying alone. SSc patients with gastroparesis frequently have dysmotility in other areas of the GI tract, underscoring the need for whole-gut scintigraphy to evaluate the entire gut.