Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT and 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer Who Are Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Single-Center, Phase II Study

Gastrin Releasing Peptide Receptors-targeted PET Diagnostics and Radionuclide Therapy for Prostate Cancer Management: Preclinical and Clinical Developments of the Past 5 Years

Each tumor has its own distinctive molecular identity. Treatment, therefore, should be tailored to this unique cancer phenotype. Theragnostics uses the same compound for targeted imaging and treatment, radiolabeled to an appropriate radionuclide, respectively. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPRs) are overexpressed in prostate cancer, and radiolabeled GRPR antagonists have shown high diagnostic performance at staging and biochemical recurrence. Several GRPR-targeting theragnostic compounds have been developed preclinically. Their translation into clinics is underway with 4 clinical trials recruiting participants with GRPR-expressing tumors.

Evaluation of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor, prostate-specific membrane antigen, and neurotensin receptor 1 as potential biomarkers for accurate prostate cancer stratified diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Studies on single-target PET imaging of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), or neurotensin receptor 1(NTR1) have been reported. However, the performance of these three targets in the progression of PCa remains unclear. Our study aims to compare the expression of GRPR, PSMA, and NTR1 in patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), prostate cancer (PCa), and lymph node metastasis. We synthesized molecular probes targeting the markers to achieve a non-invasive precise detection of PCa patients with PET/CT imaging.

METHODS

In this study, the expression of GRPR, PSMA, and NTR1 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 34 PIN, 171 PCa, and 22 lymph node metastasis tissues of patients. The correlation between their expression and the clinicopathological parameters of PCa patients was assessed. Sixteen PCa patients with different Gleason scores (GS) underwent dual-tracer (68Ga-NOTA-RM26 and 68Ga-NOTA-PSMA617) PET/CT.

RESULTS

In the PIN stage, the expression of GRPR was significantly higher than that of PSMA and NTR1 (P < 0.001), while NTR1 expression was significantly higher than PSMA and GRPR expression in primary PCa (P = 0.001). High PSMA expression in PCa patients was associated with shorter progression-free survival (P = 0.037) and overall survival (P = 0.035). PCa patients with high GS had higher tumor uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-PSMA617 than those with low GS (P = 0.001), while PCa patients with low GS had higher tumor uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-RM26 than those with high GS (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents three novel biomarkers (PSMA, GRPR, and NTR1) as imaging agents for PET/CT, and may offer a promising approach for non-invasive precise detection and Gleason grade prediction of PCa patients.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted surgery in prostate cancer: Accurate identification, real-time diagnosis, and precise resection

Radical prostatectomy (RP) combined with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the first step in multimodal treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) without distant metastases. For a long time, the surgical resection range has been highly dependent on the surgeon's visualization and experience with preoperative imaging. With the rapid development of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography (PSMA-PET and PSMA-SPECT), PSMA-targeted surgery has been introduced for a more accurate pathological diagnosis and complete resection of positive surgical margins (PSMs) and micro-lymph node metastases (LNMs). We reviewed PSMA-targeted surgeries, including PSMA-PET-guided prostatic biopsy (PSMA-TB), PSMA-targeted radio-guided surgery (PSMA-RGS), PSMA-targeted fluorescence-guided surgery (PSMA-FGS), and multi-modality/multi-targeted PSMA-targeted surgery. We also discuss the strengths and challenges of PSMA-targeted surgery, and propose that PSMA-targeted surgery could be a great addition to existing surgery protocols, thereby improving the accuracy and convenience of surgery for primary and recurrent PCa in the near future.

Advances of radiolabeled GRPR ligands for PET/CT imaging of cancers

GRPR is a type of seven-transmembrane G-protein coupled receptor that belongs to the bombesin protein receptor family. It is highly expressed in various cancers, including prostate cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, and so on. As a result, molecular imaging studies have been conducted using radiolabeled GRPR ligands for tumor diagnosis, as well as monitoring of recurrence and metastasis. In this paper, we provided a comprehensive overview of relevant literature from the past two decades, with a specific focus on the advancements made in radiolabeled GRPR ligands for imaging prostate cancer and breast cancer.

GRPR versus PSMA: expression profiles during prostate cancer progression demonstrate the added value of GRPR-targeting theranostic approaches

Introduction

Central to targeted radionuclide imaging and therapy of prostate cancer (PCa) are prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting radiopharmaceuticals. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) targeting has been proposed as a potential additional approach for PCa theranostics. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent and at what stage of the disease GRPR-targeting applications can complement PSMA-targeting theranostics in the management of PCa.

Methods

Binding of the GRPR- and PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceuticals [177Lu]Lu-NeoB and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, respectively, was evaluated and compared on tissue sections of 20 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 16 primary PCa and 17 progressive castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) fresh frozen tissue specimens. Hematoxylin-eosin and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase stains were performed to identify regions of prostatic adenocarcinoma and potentially high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. For a subset of primary PCa samples, RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) was used to identify target mRNA expression in defined tumor regions.

Results

The highest median [177Lu]Lu-NeoB binding was observed in primary PCa samples, while median and overall [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 binding was highest in CRPC samples. The highest [177Lu]Lu-NeoB binding was observed in 3/17 CRPC samples of which one sample showed no [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 binding. RNA ISH analyses showed a trend between mRNA expression and radiopharmaceutical binding, and confirmed the distinct GRPR and PSMA expression patterns in primary PCa observed with radiopharmaceutical binding.

Conclusion

Our study emphasizes that GRPR-targeting approaches can contribute to improved PCa management and complement currently applied PSMA-targeting strategies in both early and late stage PCa.

The Impact of PSMA PET/CT on Modern Prostate Cancer Management and Decision Making-The Urological Perspective

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET use in prostate cancer treatment has recently become a routinely used imaging modality by urologists. New, established data regarding its performance in different stages of prostate cancer, as well as gaining clinical knowledge with new tracers, drives the need for urologists and other clinicians to improve the utilization of this tool. While the use of PSMA PET/CT is more common in metastatic disease, in which it outperforms classical imaging modalities and drives treatment decisions and adjustments, recently, it gained ground in localized prostate cancer as well, especially in high-risk disease. Still, PSMA PET/CT might reveal lesions within the prostate or possibly locoregional or metastatic disease, not always representing true cancer when utilized in earlier stages of the disease, potentially adding diagnostic burden and changing treatment decisions. As urological treatment options advance toward focal treatments in localized organ-confined prostate cancer, recent reports suggest the utilization of PSMA PET/CT in treatment planning and follow-up and even when choosing active surveillance. This review aims to reveal the current perspective of urologists regarding its daily use.

A prospective comparative study of [68Ga]Ga-RM26 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT imaging in suspicious prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based PET/CT imaging has limitations in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). We recruited 207 participants with suspicious PCa to perform PET/CT imaging with radiolabeled gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) antagonist, [68Ga]Ga-RM26, and compare with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and histopathology.

METHODS

Every participant with suspicious PCa was scanned with both [68Ga]Ga-RM26 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT. PET/CT imaging was compared using pathologic specimens as a reference standard.

RESULTS

Of the 207 participants analyzed, 125 had cancer, and 82 were diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The sensitivity and specificity of [68Ga]Ga-RM26 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT imaging differed significantly for detecting clinically significant PCa. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.54 for [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT and 0.91 for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT in detecting PCa. For clinically significant PCa imaging, the AUCs were 0.51 vs. 0.93, respectively. [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT imaging had higher sensitivity for PCa with Gleason score (GS) = 6 (p = 0.03) than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT but poor specificity (20.73%). In the group with PSA < 10 ng/mL, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT were lower than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT (60.00% vs. 80.30%, p = 0.12, 23.26% vs. 88.37%, p = 0.000, and 0.524 vs. 0.822, p = 0.000, respectively). [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT exhibited significantly higher SUVmax in specimens with GS = 6 (p = 0.04) and in the low-risk group (p = 0.01), and its uptake did not increase with PSA level, GS, or clinical stage.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study provided evidence for the superior accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT over [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT in detecting more clinically significant PCa. [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT showed an advantage for imaging low-risk PCa.

Modular One-Pot Strategy for the Synthesis of Heterobivalent Tracers

Bivalent ligands, i.e., molecules having two ligands covalently connected by a linker, have been gathering attention since the first description of their pharmacological potential in the early 80s. However, their synthesis, particularly of labeled heterobivalent ligands, can still be cumbersome and time-consuming. We herein report a straightforward procedure for the modular synthesis of labeled heterobivalent ligands (HBLs) using dual reactive 3,6-dichloro-1,2,4,5-tetrazine as a starting material and suitable partners for sequential S_NAr and inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder (IEDDA) reactions. This assembly method conducted in a stepwise or in a sequential one-pot manner provides quick access to multiple HBLs. A conjugate combining ligands toward the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) was radiolabeled, and its biological activity was assessed in vitro and in vivo (receptor binding affinity, biodistribution, imaging) as an illustration that the assembly methodology preserves the tumor targeting properties of the ligands.

Theranostics of Primary Prostate Cancer: Beyond PSMA and GRP-R

The imaging of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) is now widely used at the initial staging of prostate cancers in patients with a high metastatic risk. However, its ability to detect low-grade tumor lesions is not optimal.

METHODS

First, we prospectively performed neurotensin receptor-1 (NTS₁) IHC in a series of patients receiving both [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 before prostatectomy. In this series, PSMA and GRP-R IHC were also available (n = 16). Next, we aimed at confirming the PSMA/GRP-R/NTS₁ expression profile by retrospective autoradiography (n = 46) using a specific radiopharmaceuticals study and also aimed to decipher the expression of less-investigated targets such as NTS₂, SST₂ and CXCR4.

RESULTS

In the IHC study, all samples with negative PSMA staining (two patients with ISUP 2 and one with ISUP 3) were strongly positive for NTS₁ staining. No samples were negative for all three stains-for PSMA, GRP-R or NTS₁. In the autoradiography study, binding of [¹¹¹In]In-PSMA-617 was high in all ISUP groups. However, some samples did not bind or bound weakly to [¹¹¹In]In-PSMA-617 (9%). In these cases, binding of [¹¹¹n]In-JMV 6659 and [¹¹¹In]In-JMV 7488 towards NTS₁ and NTS₂ was high.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting PSMA and NTS₁/NTS₂ could allow for the detection of all intraprostatic lesions.