1
|
Abikhzer G, Treglia G, Pelletier-Galarneau M, Buscombe J, Chiti A, Dibble EH, Glaudemans AWJM, Palestro CJ, Sathekge M, Signore A, Jamar F, Israel O, Gheysens O. EANM/SNMMI guideline/procedure standard for [ 18F]FDG hybrid PET use in infection and inflammation in adults v2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06915-3. [PMID: 39387894 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06915-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hybrid [18F]FDG PET imaging is currently the method of choice for a wide variety of infectious and inflammatory disorders and was recently adopted in several clinical guidelines. A large amount of evidence-based articles, guidelines and appropriate use criteria have been published since the first version of this guideline in 2013. PURPOSE To provide updated evidence-based information to assist physicians in recommending, performing and interpreting hybrid [18F]FDG PET examinations for infectious and inflammatory disorders in the adult population. METHODS A systematic literature search of evidence-based articles using whole-body [18F]FDG hybrid imaging on the indications covered within this guideline was performed. All systematic reviews and meta-analyses published within the last 10 years until January 2023 were identified in PubMed/Medline or Cochrane. For each indication covered in this manuscript, diagnostic performance was provided based on meta-analyses or systematic reviews. If not available, results from prospective or retrospective studies were considered based on predefined selection criteria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid [18F]FDG PET is extremely useful in the work-up and management of adults with infectious and inflammatory diseases, as supported by extensive and rapidly growing evidence-based literature and adoption in clinical guidelines. Practical recommendations are provided describing evidence-based indications as well as interpretation criteria and pitfalls. Monitoring treatment response is the most challenging but insufficiently studied potential application in infection and inflammation imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gad Abikhzer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Giorgio Treglia
- Nuclear Medicine, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland
| | | | - John Buscombe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
| | - Elizabeth H Dibble
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Andor W J M Glaudemans
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Mike Sathekge
- Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), University of Pretoria, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Alberto Signore
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, University Hospital S. Andrea, "Sapienza" University, Roma, Italy
| | - Francois Jamar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Institute of Clinical and Experimental Research (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ora Israel
- Rappaport School of Medicine, Technion- Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Olivier Gheysens
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Institute of Clinical and Experimental Research (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hess S, Noriega-Álvarez E, Leccisotti L, Treglia G, Albano D, Roivainen A, Glaudemans AWJM, Gheysens O. EANM consensus document on the use of [ 18F]FDG PET/CT in fever and inflammation of unknown origin. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:2597-2613. [PMID: 38676736 PMCID: PMC11224117 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06732-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with fever and inflammation of unknown origin (FUO/IUO) are clinically challenging due to variable clinical presentations with nonspecific symptoms and many differential diagnoses. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) is increasingly used in FUO and IUO, but the optimal diagnostic strategy remains controversial. This consensus document aims to assist clinicians and nuclear medicine specialists in the appropriate use of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in FUO and IUO based on current evidence. METHODS A working group created by the EANM infection and inflammation committee performed a systematic literature search based on PICOs with "patients with FUO/IUO" as population, "[18F]FDG-PET/CT" as intervention, and several outcomes including pre-scan characteristics, scan protocol, diagnostic yield, impact on management, prognosis, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS We included 68 articles published from 2001 to 2023: 9 systematic reviews, 49 original papers on general adult populations, and 10 original papers on specific populations. All papers were analysed and included in the evidence-based recommendations. CONCLUSION FUO and IUO remains a clinical challenge and [18F]FDG PET/CT has a definite role in the diagnostic pathway with an overall diagnostic yield or helpfulness in 50-60% of patients. A positive scan is often contributory by directly guiding treatment or subsequent diagnostic procedure. However, a negative scan may be equally important by excluding focal disease and predicting a favorable prognosis. Similar results are obtained in specific populations such as ICU-patients, children and HIV-patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Søren Hess
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Edel Noriega-Álvarez
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain
| | - Lucia Leccisotti
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio Treglia
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Domenico Albano
- Nuclear Medicine, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Anne Roivainen
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- InFLAMES Research Flagship, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Andor W J M Glaudemans
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9700 RB, The Netherlands.
| | - Olivier Gheysens
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Institute of Clinical and Experimental Research (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kumar A, Kumar B, Kumar Upadhyay A, Muthu GS, Mitra S. Gallium68-Labeled Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (68Ga-FAPI) PET/CT as an Alternative to Fluoro18-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT: Discussion in a Case of Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of Pancreas. Cureus 2023; 15:e50183. [PMID: 38186547 PMCID: PMC10771818 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) is an integral part of the imaging of solid tumors in today's oncology practice. The most commonly used PET radiotracer is 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). FDG PET has imaging characteristics of a high tumor-to-background uptake ratio and is used in the detection of primary as well as metastatic sites. However, a significant pitfall is its inability to differentiate between neoplastic and infective lesions. To address this concern, many PET radiotracers have been developed and tried over time, a promising one being radiolabelled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI). Fibroblast-activated protein (FAP) is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs); it forms a significant component of the tumor stroma. Since there is over-expression of CAF in the majority of malignancies, it is a potential target for molecular imaging using PET. Several radiolabeled FAP inhibitors have been developed for PET imaging of malignancies and have also been used in theranostic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bhola Kumar
- Nuclear Medicine, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND
| | | | - G S Muthu
- Nuclear Medicine, Meherbai Tata Memorial Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND
| | - Sujata Mitra
- Nuclear Medicine, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND
| |
Collapse
|