Systems biology is an efficient tool for investigation of low-dose chronic irradiation influence on plants in the Chernobyl zone

Biological impact of Chornobyl radiation: a review of recent progress

The incident of Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (CNPP) explosion has pioneered a plethora of studies unfolding various biological effects of radiation stress on several living systems. Determining radiation dose rates at which both acute and chronic biological effects occur in different biological systems will aid in the ex-situ generation of radiation-tolerant organisms. So far, the accumulation of data on different radiation doses from Chernobyl area demonstrating various biological impacts has not been documented altogether vastly. Therefore, this review aims to document the recorded doses in CNPP over the years at which different biological changes have been observed in plants, soil, aquatic organisms, birds, and animals. A total of 72 peer-reviewed papers obtained from PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Research4life were included in this review. A few factors have come under attention in this review. Firstly, plant and soil systems combinedly showed the most published studies after the catastrophe where plants showed a higher frequency of DNA methylation in their genome to resist radiation stress. Secondly, reduced species abundance, chromosomal aberrations, increased sterility, and mortality were mostly observed in the aftermath of Chernobyl catastrophe among plants, soil, aquatic organisms, birds, and small mammals. Furthermore, major scares of data after 2018 were prominently observed. Very few studies on radiation dose levels after 2018 are available. Hence, a major research area has emerged for radiation biologists to study present radiation levels and any genetic changes in the recent generation of the original victim species. This will help provide a standard dataset that can act as a reference resource for radiation biologists and future research on the impact of both acute and chronic radiation on the different biological systems.

Implications of ionizing radiation on pollen performance in comparison with diverse models of polar cell growth

Research concerning the effects of ionizing radiation (IR) on plant systems is essential for numerous aspects of human society, as for instance, in terms of agriculture and plant breeding, but additionally for elucidating consequences of radioactive contamination of the ecosphere. This comprehensive survey analyses effects of x- and γ-irradiation on male gametophytes comprising primarily in vitro but also in vivo data of diverse plant species. The IR-dose range for pollen performance was compiled and 50% inhibition doses (ID₅₀ ) for germination and tube growth were comparatively related to physiological characteristics of the microgametophyte. Factors influencing IR-susceptibility of mature pollen and polarized tube growth were evaluated, such as dose-rate, environmental conditions, or species-related variations. In addition, all available reports suggesting bio-positive IR-effects particularly on pollen performance were examined. Most importantly, for the first time influences of IR specifically on diverse phylogenetic models of polar cell growth were comparatively analysed, and thus demonstrated that the gametophytic system of pollen is extremely resistant to IR, more than plant sporophytes and especially much more than comparable animal cells. Beyond that, this study develops hypotheses regarding a molecular basis for the extreme IR-resistance of the plant microgametophyte and highlights its unique rank among organismal systems.

Differential expression of flowering genes in Arabidopsis thaliana under chronic and acute ionizing radiation

PURPOSE

Chronic and acute irradiations have drastic effects on flowering stage that plays an important role in further seed development and can determine seed yield. The expression of the key flowering genes, AP1, CO, GI, FT, FLC, and LFY, sensitive to irradiation repair gene RAD51 and the proliferation gene PCNA2 were studied in the wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana (Columbia ecotype) under chronic and acute irradiations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chronic irradiation was performed using the radioactive isotope ¹³⁷СsCl in two total doses of 3 cGy and 17 cGy, with the dose rate of 10^-7 cGy/s and 6.8 10^-6 cGy/s, respectively. The plants were grown under chronic irradiation during 6 weeks, from seeds till the 6.3 stage of flowering. For acute exposure, the plants were X-ray irradiated one time at the 5.0 development stage (20 days old) by a total dose of 15 Gy with the dose rate of 89 cGy/s.

RESULTS

After chronic irradiation with the 3 cGy dose the irradiated plants demonstrated 8 ± 2.8 days earlier flowering than in the control group. However, at the 17 cGy chronic and at the 15 Gy acute doses plants showed 14 ± 3.7 and 2 ± 1.4 days later flowering, respectively. The 3 cGy chronic exposure significantly increased the expression of the CO gene by a factor of 1.152 (1.087-1.217 95% C.I.) and decreased the expression of the FT gene by a factor of 0.128 (0.021-0.396 95% C.I.). The 17 cGy chronic exposure decreased expression of the AP1 gene by a factor of 0.872 (0.803-0.940 95% C.I.) and the LFY gene by a factor of 0.471 (0.306-0.687 95% C.I.). The 15 Gy acute exposure decreased the expression of the AP1 gene by a factor of 0.104 (0.074-0.144 95% C.I.) and the PCNA2 gene by a factor of 0.346 (0.238-0.488 95% C.I.).

CONCLUSIONS

The increased expression of the CO gene and decreased expression of the AP1 and FT genes under the lower dose of chronic exposure were associated with earlier flowering. The acute exposure increased the expression of the PCNA2 gene and decreased the expression of the flowering genes, except AP1. The flowering was delayed under both the higher dose of chronic exposure and under acute exposure, but it was less affected by the latter. Presumably, it was related to the activation of DNA repair under the 3 cGy chronic and 15 Gy acute irradiations.

Ionizing Radiation, Higher Plants, and Radioprotection: From Acute High Doses to Chronic Low Doses

Understanding the effects of ionizing radiation (IR) on plants is important for environmental protection, for agriculture and horticulture, and for space science but plants have significant biological differences to the animals from which much relevant knowledge is derived. The effects of IR on plants are understood best at acute high doses because there have been; (a) controlled experiments in the field using point sources, (b) field studies in the immediate aftermath of nuclear accidents, and (c) controlled laboratory experiments. A compilation of studies of the effects of IR on plants reveals that although there are numerous field studies of the effects of chronic low doses on plants, there are few controlled experiments that used chronic low doses. Using the Bradford-Hill criteria widely used in epidemiological studies we suggest that a new phase of chronic low-level radiation research on plants is desirable if its effects are to be properly elucidated. We emphasize the plant biological contexts that should direct such research. We review previously reported effects from the molecular to community level and, using a plant stress biology context, discuss a variety of acute high- and chronic low-dose data against Derived Consideration Reference Levels (DCRLs) used for environmental protection. We suggest that chronic low-level IR can sometimes have effects at the molecular and cytogenetic level at DCRL dose rates (and perhaps below) but that there are unlikely to be environmentally significant effects at higher levels of biological organization. We conclude that, although current data meets only some of the Bradford-Hill criteria, current DCRLs for plants are very likely to be appropriate at biological scales relevant to environmental protection (and for which they were intended) but that research designed with an appropriate biological context and with more of the Bradford-Hill criteria in mind would strengthen this assertion. We note that the effects of IR have been investigated on only a small proportion of plant species and that research with a wider range of species might improve not only the understanding of the biological effects of radiation but also that of the response of plants to environmental stress.