Reduced rate of postoperative infections in emergency cesarean section after two doses of cefuroxim perioperatively. A placebo-controlled study

Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section

BACKGROUND

The single most important risk factor for postpartum maternal infection is cesarean section. Although guidelines endorse the use of prophylactic antibiotics for women undergoing cesarean section, there is not uniform implementation of this recommendation. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1995 and last updated in 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of prophylactic antibiotics compared with no prophylactic antibiotics on infectious complications in women undergoing cesarean section.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 July 2014) and reference lists of retrieved papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing the effects of prophylactic antibiotics versus no treatment in women undergoing cesarean section.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and carried out data extraction. The clinically important primary outcomes were wound infection, endometritis, serious maternal infectious complications and adverse effects on the infant. We presented dichotomous data as risk ratios (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and combined trials in meta-analyses. We assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 95 studies enrolling over 15,000 women. Compared with placebo or no treatment, the use of prophylactic antibiotics in women undergoing cesarean section reduced the incidence of wound infection (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.46, 82 studies, 14,407 women), endometritis (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.42, 83 studies, 13,548 women) and maternal serious infectious complications (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.49, 32 studies, 6159 women). When only studies that included women undergoing an elective cesarean section were analyzed, there was also a reduction in the incidence of wound infections (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.82, 17 studies, 3537 women) and endometritis (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.61, 15 studies, 2502 women) with prophylactic antibiotics. Similar estimates of effect were seen whether the antibiotics were administered before the cord was clamped or after. The effect of different antibiotic regimens was studied and similar reductions in the incidence of infections were seen for most of the antibiotics and combinations.There were no data on which to estimate the effect of maternal administration of antibiotics on infant outcomes. No studies systematically collected and reported on adverse infant outcomes nor the effect of antibiotics on the developing infant immune system. No studies reported on the incidence of oral candidiasis (thrush) in babies. Maternal adverse effects were also rarely described.We judged the evidence for antibiotic treatment compared with no treatment to be of moderate quality; most studies lacked an adequate description of methods and were assessed as being at unclear risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The conclusions of this review support the recommendation that prophylactic antibiotics should be routinely administered to all women undergoing cesarean section to prevent infection. Compared with placebo or no treatment, the use of prophylactic antibiotics in women undergoing cesarean section reduced the incidence of wound infection, endometritis and serious infectious complications by 60% to 70%. There were few data on adverse effects and no information on the effect of antibiotics on the baby, making the assessment of overall benefits and harms difficult. Prophylactic antibiotics given to all women undergoing elective or non-elective cesarean section is beneficial for women but there is uncertainty about the consequences for the baby.

Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section

BACKGROUND

The single most important risk factor for postpartum maternal infection is cesarean section. Routine prophylaxis with antibiotics may reduce this risk and should be assessed in terms of benefits and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of prophylactic antibiotics compared with no prophylactic antibiotics on infectious complications in women undergoing cesarean section.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (May 2009).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing the effects of prophylactic antibiotics versus no treatment in women undergoing cesarean section.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and carried out data extraction.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 86 studies involving over 13,000 women. Prophylactic antibiotics in women undergoing cesarean section substantially reduced the incidence of febrile morbidity (average risk ratio (RR) 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39 to 0.51, 50 studies, 8141 women), wound infection (average RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.48, 77 studies, 11,961 women), endometritis (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.42, 79 studies, 12,142 women) and serious maternal infectious complications (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.48, 31 studies, 5047 women). No conclusions can be made about other maternal adverse effects from these studies (RR 2.43; 95% CI 1.00 to 5.90, 13 studies, 2131 women). None of the 86 studies reported infant adverse outcomes and in particular there was no assessment of infant oral thrush. There was no systematic collection of data on bacterial drug resistance. The findings were similar whether the cesarean section was elective or non elective, and whether the antibiotic was given before or after umbilical cord clamping. Overall, the methodological quality of the trials was unclear and in only a few studies was it obvious that potential other sources of bias had been adequately addressed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Endometritis was reduced by two thirds to three quarters and a decrease in wound infection was also identified. However, there was incomplete information collected about potential adverse effects, including the effect of antibiotics on the baby, making the assessment of overall benefits and harms complicated. Prophylactic antibiotics given to all women undergoing elective or non-elective cesarean section is clearly beneficial for women but there is uncertainty about the consequences for the baby.

WITHDRAWAN. Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section

BACKGROUND

The single most important risk factor for postpartum maternal infection is cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of prophylactic antibiotic treatment on infectious complications in women undergoing cesarean delivery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (January 2002) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials comparing antibiotic prophylaxis or no treatment for both elective and non-elective cesarean section.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-one trials were included. Use of prophylactic antibiotics in women undergoing cesarean section substantially reduced the incidence of episodes of fever, endometritis, wound infection, urinary tract infection and serious infection after cesarean section. The reduction in the risk of endometritis with antibiotics was similar across different patient groups: the relative risk (RR) for endometritis for elective cesarean section (number of women = 2037) was 0.38 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22 to 0.64); the RR for non-elective cesarean section (n = 2132) was 0.39 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.46); and the RR for all patients (n = 11,937) was 0.39 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.43). Wound infections were also reduced: for elective cesarean section (n = 2015) RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.99); for non-elective cesarean section (n = 2780) RR 0.36 95% CI 0.26 to 0.51]; and for all patients (n = 11,142) RR 0.41 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.43).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The reduction of endometritis by two thirds to three quarters and a decrease in wound infections justifies a policy of recommending prophylactic antibiotics to women undergoing elective or non-elective cesarean section.

Revisões sistemáticas de antibioticoprofilaxia em cesarianas

O objetivo do trabalho foi analisar a evidência científica disponível sobre os efeitos da antibioticoprofilaxia em cesarianas. As presentes revisões sistemáticas compreenderam um exame detalhado da qualidade do desenho e da execução assim como da heterogeneidade clínica entre os ensaios. A meta-análise dos ensaios placebo-controlados (27 estudos) apontou eficácia aproximada de 65% para ambos os desfechos estudados, endometrite e infecção da ferida cirúrgica (IFC), correspondendo a uma queda da incidência de 11% e 5%, respectivamente. As análises de sensibilidade mostraram efeitos sumários semelhantes aos observados para o conjunto dos ensaios. O subgrupo dos 12 ensaios de cesáreas não eletivas indicou benefício importante da antibioticoprofilaxia para ambos os desfechos, correspondente a uma queda de 14% (endometrite) e 5% (IFC). Para cesáreas eletivas (dois ensaios), não foi mostrado benefício relevante. A evidência obtida dos ensaios comparativos de doses foi limitada devido a falhas metodológicas importantes e ao pequeno número de pacientes envolvidas (três ensaios). Os ensaios comparativos de antimicrobianos (sete estudos) não evidenciaram diferença de eficácia entre os dois esquemas analisados, cefalosporinas de 1ª e de 2ª geração.

Reduction of surgical site infections after Caesarean delivery using surveillance

Since 1997, the Krankenhaus Infektions Surveillance System (KISS) has collected data on surgical site infections (SSIs) following Caesarean delivery (CD). The aim of this study was to determine whether surveillance and feedback of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) could reduce the infection rate after CD. Only departments that had participated in KISS for at least three years were included in the analysis. The CD infection rates of the first, second and third years of KISS participation were compared for significant differences. The relative risk was calculated for the first and the third year of KISS participation. Multi-variate logistic regression analysis was performed to detect significant risk factors for SSI after CD using the third year of participation as one parameter. Twenty-six of 52 obstetric and gynaecology departments met the study's inclusion criteria. In those 26 departments, 17,405 CD procedures were performed and 331 SSIs were recorded (1.9%). The SSI rate after CD procedures was significantly reduced in the third year of KISS participation (1.6%) compared with the first year of KISS participation (2.4%), with a relative risk of 0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.82]. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that KISS participation over three years was an independent factor for the reduction of SSI rate (odds ratio 0.64; 95% CI 0.49-0.83). As shown previously for other types of HAI, this study demonstrated that continuous surveillance and comparison with stratified reference data could reduce SSI infection rates after CD.

Introduction of the Misgav Ladach caesarean section at an African tertiary centre: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the Misgav Ladach caesarean section technique can offer benefits compared with conventional caesarean section technique in the prevailing conditions of a busy African tertiary centre.

DESIGN

A randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

A tertiary African obstetric unit with 18,000 deliveries annually.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred and thirty-nine women undergoing caesarean section.

METHODS

Eight residents and registrars were instructed in the Misgav Ladach technique for caesarean section during one week, after which the study commenced. The course participants instructed their colleagues; in total, 16 doctors participated. Women requiring caesarean section were randomised to Misgav Ladach or to the conventional lower midline incision procedure, excluding those with a previous scar.

RESULTS

During 11 weeks 339 randomised procedures (328 of which were emergency procedures) were carried out. Mean operating time was 25 x 3 minutes for Misgav Ladach and 32 x 6 minutes for the lower midline incision procedure (95% CI -8 x 3; -6 x 3). Mean blood loss was 354 mL and 447 mL (-133; -53), and the number of sutures 3 x 1 and 6 x 1 (-3 x 1; -2 x 9), respectively. No significant difference was found in Apgar scores. Mobilisation was earlier with the Misgav Ladach procedure. No difference was found in overall post-operative infection rates i.e. wound infection or febrile illness, but the combination of wound infection and fever was more common in the Misgav Ladach group.

CONCLUSION

The Misgav Ladach caesarean section confers benefits such as reduced blood loss, conservation of time and suture material, and rapid mobilisation, but more studies are needed to explore modifications aimed at reducing post-operative infections in settings with limited resources.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section

BACKGROUND

The single most important risk factor for postpartum maternal infection is Cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of prophylactic antibiotic treatment on infectious complications in women undergoing Cesarean delivery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing antibiotic prophylaxis or no treatment for both elective and non-elective Cesarean section.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-six trials were included. Use of prophylactic antibiotics in women undergoing Cesarean section substantially reduced the incidence of episodes of fever, endometritis, wound infection, urinary tract infection and serious infection after Cesarean section. The reduction in the risk of endometritis with antibiotics was similar across different patient groups. The relative risk for elective Cesarean section was 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.48. The relative risk for non-elective Cesarean section was 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.35. The relative risk for undefined or all patients together was 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.33. Despite the large number of trials, different populations and different antibiotic regimens, there was no statistically significant heterogeneity.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The reduction of endometritis by two thirds to three quarters justifies a policy of administering prophylactic antibiotics to women undergoing elective or non-elective Cesarean section.

Incidence of hospital-acquired infections associated with caesarean section

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine the incidence of post-caesarean infections in a Canadian community teaching hospital using computer algorithms designed for the diagnosis of nosocomial infections. Inferential chart review was done on 1335 women delivered by lower-segment caesarean section (793 primary and 542 secondary) at the Calgary General Hospital between January 1985 and April 1988. The overall infection rates were 42.1 and 46.1% for women delivered by primary and secondary caesarean section, respectively. Incisional surgical wound infection accounted for the largest proportion of post-caesarean infections found. Women delivered by primary caesarean section had significantly higher rates of endometritis, deep surgical wound infection and bacteraemia than those delivered by secondary section. All types of post-caesarean infection, except asymptomatic bacteriuria, caused the duration of the post-partum hospital stay to be significantly increased.