Heat conductive properties of set root canal sealers

In vitro evaluation of temperature change on the root surface after the removal of root canal filling

This study aimed to compare the temperature changes occurring on the root surfaces after the removal of root canal filling with two different root canal sealers by two different reciprocating files. Sixty extracted teeth with a single root and canal were used in this study. After chemomechanical preparation, the root canals in the experimental groups were filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus or CeraSeal, while those of the control groups were filled with gutta-percha only. Resiproc or WaveOne Gold were used for the removal of the root canal filling. Temperature changes in the middle and apical third of the root surface were recorded by a thermal camera at different time intervals. Among the groups using the same sealer, the temperature rise observed on the root surface at the end of 90 s in the Resiproc groups was found to be significantly higher than that of the WaveOne Gold groups.

Temperature and time variations during apical resection

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate temperature and time variations during root-end resection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty human premolars were selected. The root canals were enlarged up to ProTaper X3 rotary instrument. A thermocouple was placed into the root canal 1 mm behind the resection line. The teeth were randomly divided into six groups according to the apical resection method: steel bur, tungsten carbide bur, Lindeman bur, diamond bur, laser and ultrasonic surgical piezo with a diamond tip. The root ends were resected 3 mm away from the root apex. The temperature of the root dentine during resection was recorded as maximum temperature, mean temperature and temperature change. The time required for apicectomy was recorded for each group. The Kruskal-Wallis method was used to analyse the differences between temperature changes during apical resections. The significance level was set at 5%.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between bur groups in terms of temperature increase. The maximum temperature in piezo surgery was significantly higher than the Lindeman, tungsten and steel burs (p < .001). In addition, the maximum temperature in laser surgery was higher than the Lindeman bur (p < .05). An increase in the temperature was mostly seen in piezo surgery and the least temperature change occurred in the Lindeman bur. Mean time stayed under 1 min in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although piezo caused the highest temperature increase, the measured temperature increase was within physiological limits in all tested techniques.